Search

BACKGROUNDCurrently, there is no proven effective therapy nor vaccine for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. Evidence regarding the potential benefit of early administration of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) therapy in symptomatic patients with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) is not clear.METHODSThis observational prospective cohort study took place in 238 ambulatory fever clinics in Saudi Arabia, which followed the Ministry of Health (MOH) COVID-19 treatment guideline. This guideline included multiple treatment options for COVID-19 based on the best available evidence at the time, among which was Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Patients with confirmed COVD-19 (by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test) who presented to these clinics with mild to moderate symptoms during the period from 5-26 June 2020 were included in this study. Our study looked at those who received HCQ-based therapy along with supportive care (SC) and compared them to patients who received SC alone. The primary outcome was hospital admission within 28-days of presentation. The secondary outcome was a composite of intensive care admission (ICU) and/or mortality during the follow-up period. Outcome data were assessed through a follow-up telephonic questionnaire at day 28 and were further verified with national hospitalisation and mortality registries. Multiple logistic regression model was used to control for prespecified confounders.RESULTSOf the 7,892 symptomatic PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients who visited the ambulatory fever clinics during the study period, 5,541 had verified clinical outcomes at day 28 (1,817 patients in the HCQ group vs 3,724 in the SC group). At baseline, patients who received HCQ therapy were more likely to be males who did not have hypertension or chronic lung disease compared to the SC group. No major differences were noted regarding other comorbid conditions. All patients were presenting with active complaints; however, the HCQ groups had higher rates of symptoms compared to the SC group (fever: 84% vs 66.3, headache: 49.8 vs 37.4, cough: 44.5 vs 35.6, respectively). Early HCQ-based therapy was associated with a lower hospital admission within 28-days compared to SC alone (9.4% compared to 16.6%, RRR 43%,p-valuep-value0.001). Adjusting for age, gender, and major comorbid conditions, a multivariate logistic regression model showed a decrease in the odds of hospitalisation in patients who received HCQ compared to SC alone (adjusted OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.47-0.69],p-value ). The composite outcome of ICU admission and/or mortality was also lower for the HCQ group compared to the SC group controlling for potential confounders (adjusted OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.34-0.91],p-value0.019).CONCLUSIONEarly intervention with HCQ-based therapy in patients with mild to moderate symptoms at presentation is associated with lower adverse clinical outcomes among COVID-19 patients, including hospital admissions, ICU admission, and/or death.

Summary Although several studies analyzed p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) gene expression separately in oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), no reports of combined assessment of both proteins in this cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the roles of p53 and hMSH2 proteins in oral SCC as well as in oral dysplastic lesions (DL) in Yemen. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine the pattern of expression of p53 and hmsh2 proteins in 70 oral SCC and 21 oral DL obtained from Yemeni patients. p53 Immunoexpression was detected in 24 of the 70 oral SCC (34.3%) and 3 of 21 DL (14.3%) with no significant difference between the two groups. On the other hand, reduced expression of hMSH2 was detected in 26 of the 70 oral SCC (37.1%) and 2 of 21 oral DL (9.5%) with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.03). Both proteins were significantly related to the grade of tumor differentiation (P = 0.007 and 0.02, respectively). There was an inverse correlation between the levels of p53 and hMSH2 immunoexpression in the oral SCC (r = 0.42, P = 0.01). This study suggested that p53 may play a role in the early stages of oral carcinogenesis, while hMSH2 may be altered in the late stages. More importantly, the roles of p53 and hMSH2 in oral carcinogenesis seem to be interrelated in the pathogenetic pathway of oral SCC. Such a relationship has not been published previously in this type of cancer and needs to be clarified in future studies.

Despite palliative treatments, tumor-induced bone disease (TIBD) remains highly debilitating for many cancer patients and progression typically results in death within two years. Therefore, more effective therapies with enhanced anti-resorptive and cytotoxic characteristics are needed. We developed bisphosphonate-chemotherapeutic conjugates designed to bind bone and hydrolyze, releasing both compounds, thereby targeting both osteoclasts and tumor cells. This study examined the effects of our lead compound, MBC-11 (the anhydride formed between arabinocytidine (AraC)-5'-phosphate and etidronate), on bone tumor burden, bone volume, femur bone mineral density (BMD), and overall survival using two distinct mouse models of TIBD, the 4T1/luc breast cancer and the KAS-6/1-MIP1alpha multiple myeloma models. In mice orthotopically inoculated with 4T1/luc mouse mammary cells, MBC-11 (0.04 microg/day; s.c.) reduced the incidence of bone metastases to 40% (4/10), compared to 90% (9/10; p=0.057) and 100% (5/5; p=0.04) of PBS- or similarly-dosed, zoledronate-treated mice, respectively. MBC-11 also significantly decreased bone tumor burden compared to PBS- or zoledronate-treated mice (p=0.021, p=0.017, respectively). MBC-11 and zoledronate (0.04 microg/day) significantly increased bone volume by two- and four-fold, respectively, compared to PBS-treated mice (p=0.005, p

Objective: To assess the inadequate glycemic control and its correlates among type 2 diabetes patients attending a private diabetes and endocrine center at Dallah Hospital - Riyadh, (KSA) and to compare our results with other previous similar studies. Material and method: An analytical study was carried out on a 594 patients with type 2 diabetes who were attending the diabetes and endocrine center at Dallah Hospital in Riyadh during the period from February to April 2011. Data were collected by the treating physicians themselves at the end of each patient visit and entered on a special standard form (Microsoft Excel) program. Results: The mean average of HbA1c in this study was 7.81%. 35% of patients achieved adequate glycemic control of HbA1c less than 7% (according to ADA recommendation). There is correlation between duration of diabetes, patient’s age, dyslipideamia and the glycemic control, but this correlation does not exist with the gender of the patient or patient’s body mass index for those who reached a good glycemic control. Conclusion: Our analysis study conclude a positive correlation between the duration of diabetes, patients’ age, dyslipidemia and the glycemic control, which is not shown with body mass index or gender of the patients. More efforts on health education should be spent to convince patients on the importance of life style modification and compliance with the treatment to achieve a satisfactory targeted level of HbA1c.

Introduction Post-marketing surveillance activities (namely pharmacovigilance) are crucial to favor the early detection of unexpected adverse events (AEs) and/or serious adverse reactions (SAEs). Indeed, spontaneous reporting of AEs has been demonstrated to underestimate the number of events in different clinical settings. Aim of the present study is to report the preliminary data of a Regional (Calabria, Italy) Pharmacovigilance Program (CBPP) aimed at improving AEs’ reporting associated with biologics use in rheumatology. Materials and methods We developed a simple, cost-effective pharmacovigilance program based on regular training sessions for physicians (stimulated reporting), periodical phone calls by a clinical pharmacologist aimed at identifying new events and stimulating self-awareness and encouraging reporting to the physician during the subsequent follow-up visit for minor AEs. To test this approach, all consecutive patients undergoing treatment with one biologic agent at eight rheumatology centers during a two-years period were invited to participate. Collected AEs were compared to the number of AEs spontaneously reported for the same molecules in the same centers before starting the protocol. Results During the study period, 399 patients (245 females; mean age: 58 ± 11 years) were started on treatment with biologics for active RA (n = 211, 52.9%), PsA (n = 119, 29.8%) or AS (n = 69, 17.3%) at eight rheumatology centers. A total of 125 AEs (31.3%) and 9 SAEs (2.3%) were reported during the two-years study period. In the control cohort (comprising 368 consecutive patients started on treatment with bDMARDs during a two-years period before CBPP study) only 42 (11.4%) AEs and no SAEs were reported (p < 0.0001). The most common AEs were injection site reactions and skin disorders. Conclusions In conclusion, our study provides further evidence of a critical role of active pharmacovigilance in detection, reporting and analysis of AEs in rheumatology.