1. <scp>VA home‐based</scp> primary care interdisciplinary team structure varies with Veterans' needs, aligns with <scp>PACE</scp> regulation
- Author
-
Orna Intrator, Darlene Davis, Bruce Kinosian, Thomas Edes, Ciaran S. Phibbs, Caitlin Chan, and Dayna Cooper
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Health Services for the Aged ,Institutionalisation ,Frail Elderly ,Pharmacist ,Risk Assessment ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Frail elders ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Veterans Affairs ,health care economics and organizations ,Aged ,Veterans ,Pace ,Aged, 80 and over ,Patient Care Team ,Health Services Needs and Demand ,Primary Health Care ,Social work ,business.industry ,030503 health policy & services ,Home Care Services ,Home based ,United States ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Family medicine ,Veterans Health Services ,Primary care.interdisciplinary ,Female ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,0305 other medical science ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND Interdisciplinary team (IDT) care is central to home-based primary care (HBPC) of frail elders. Traditionally, all HBPC disciplines managed a patient (Full IDT), a costly approach to maintain. The recent PACE (Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly) regulation provides for a flexible approach of annual assessments from a core team with involvement of additional disciplines dependent upon patient needs (Core+). Current Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) HBPC guidance specifies Full IDTs care for medically complex and functionally impaired Veterans similar to PACE participants. We evaluated whether VA HBPC has adopted the flexible structure of the PACE regulation, aligned to Veteran needs. DESIGN Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING All 139 VA HBPC programs administered across 379 sites. PARTICIPANTS About 55,173 Veterans enrolled in HBPC during fiscal year 2018. MEASUREMENTS Patients' HBPC physician, nurse, psychologist/psychiatrist, social worker, therapist, dietitian, and pharmacist visits were grouped into interdisciplinary team types. Patient frailty was classified using VA HNHR v2 (High-Need High-Risk version 2, a measure of high, medium, and low risk of long-term institutionalization). Medical complexity was measured by clusters of impairment in the JEN frailty index (JFI). JFI clusters were validated by VA's Nosos measure to project cost and Care Assessment Need (CAN) measure of hospitalization and mortality risk. RESULTS HBPC provided Full IDT care to 21%, Core+ care to 54%, and Home Health+ (HHA+) care (skilled home health services plus additional disciplines, without primary care) to 16% of Veterans. Team type was associated with medical complexity (X2 2863.5 [66 df], p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF