Search

Background: Robust evidence is lacking on optimal timing of statin administration and its impact on patient outcomes.Objective: This study aims to evaluate among incident statin users the relationship between those prescribed evening vs. daily dosing instructions, medication adherence, and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c).Design: This is an observational cohort study at Sutter Health, a community-based healthcare system, 2010-2016.Participants: Patients were ≥ 35 years of age as of the first statin prescription (baseline), with 12 to 36 months of electronic health record activity before and after baseline. Incident use was defined as no statin prescription in 12 months prior to baseline.Main Measures: Differences in medication adherence (proportion of days covered ≥ 0.80) over 12 months from baseline and mean change in LDL-c between 12 and 24 months from baseline were measured using regression modeling, adjusting for baseline demographics and clinical, prescriber, and statin characteristics.Key Results: Among 31,252 patients with valid statin prescriptions between 2010 and 2016, 5099 eligible incident statin users (mean age, 63 years) were identified, of whom 53% were prescribed evening and 47% daily dosing instructions. No difference in likelihood of statin adherence over 12 months was observed for evening vs. daily dosing (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.75, 1.08). No differences were observed in mean change in LDL-c (adjusted mean difference 1.42 mg/dL; 95% CI - 1.02, 3.89) or likelihood of attaining LDL-c < 70 mg/dL (adjusted OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.67, 1.04) for evening vs. daily dosing over a mean of 19 months follow-up.Conclusions: Among incident statin users from a real-world clinical setting, those with daily and evening dosing instructions had similar adherence rates and mean changes in LDL-c. Given potential clinical equipoise for evening and daily dosing, clinicians should consider patient-tailored statin dosing instructions to reduce potentially unnecessary regimen complexity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To assess the association between multiple pharmacy use and medication adherence and potential drug-drug interactions ( DDIs) in older adults. Design Cross-sectional propensity score-weighted analysis. Setting 2009 claims data. Participants A nationally representative sample of 926,956 Medicare Part D beneficiaries aged 65 and older continuously enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare and Part D that year who filled one or more prescriptions at a community retail or mail order pharmacy. Measurements Multiple pharmacy use was defined as concurrent (overlapping time periods) or sequential use (non-overlapping time periods) of ≥2 pharmacies in the year. Medication adherence was calculated using a proportion of days covered of 0.80 or greater for eight therapeutic categories (beta-blockers, renin angiotensin system antagonists, calcium channel blockers, statins, sulfonylureas, biguanides (metformin), thiazolidinediones, and dipeptidyl peptidase- IV inhibitors). Potential DDIs arising from use of certain drugs across a broad set of classes were defined as the concurrent filling of two interacting drugs. Results Overall, 38.1% of the sample used multiple pharmacies. Those using multiple pharmacies (concurrently or sequentially) consistently had higher adjusted odds of nonadherence (ranging from 1.10 to 1.31, P < .001) across all chronic medication classes assessed after controlling for sociodemographic, health status, and access to care factors than single pharmacy users. The adjusted predicted probability of exposure to a DDI was also slightly higher for those using multiple pharmacies concurrently (3.6%) than for single pharmacy users (3.2%, adjusted odds ratio ( AOR) = 1.11, 95% confidence interval ( CI) = 1.08-1.15) but lower in individuals using multiple pharmacies sequentially (2.8%, AOR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.81-0.91). Conclusions Filling prescriptions at multiple pharmacies was associated with lower medication adherence across multiple chronic medications and a small but statistically significant greater likelihood of DDIs in concurrent pharmacy users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Numerous interventions are available to boost medication adherence, but the targeting of these interventions often relies on crude measures of poor adherence. Group-based trajectory models identify individuals with similar longitudinal prescription filling patterns. Identifying distinct adherence trajectories may be more useful for targeting interventions, although the association between adherence trajectories and clinical outcomes is unknown.Objective: To examine the association between adherence trajectories for oral hypoglycemics and subsequent hospitalizations among diabetes patients.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Patients: A total of 16,256 Pennsylvania Medicaid enrollees, non-dually eligible for Medicare, initiating oral hypoglycemics between 2007 and 2009.Main Measures: We used group-based trajectory models to identify trajectories of oral hypoglycemics in the 12 months post-treatment initiation, using monthly proportion of days covered (PDC) as the adherence measure. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between trajectories and time to first diabetes-related hospitalization/emergency department (ED) visits in the following year. We used the C-index to compare prediction performance between adherence trajectories and dichotomous cutpoints (annual PDC <80 vs. ≥80 %).Results: The mean annual PDC was 0.58 (SD 0.32). Seven trajectories were identified: perfect adherers (9 % of the cohort), nearly perfect adherers (31.4 %), moderate adherers (21.0 %), low adherers (11.0 %), late discontinuers (6.8 %), early discontinuers (9.7 %), and non-adherers with only one fill (11.1 %). Compared to perfect adherers, trajectories of moderate adherers (HR = 1.48, 95 % CI 1.25, 1.75), low adherers (HR = 1.51, 95 % CI 1.25, 1.83), and non-adherers with only one fill (HR = 1.35, 95 % CI 1.09, 1.67) had greater risk of diabetes-related hospitalizations/ED visits. Predictive accuracy was improved using trajectories compared to dichotomized cutpoints (C-index = 0.714 vs. 0.652).Conclusions: Oral hypoglycemic treatment trajectories were highly variable in this large Medicaid cohort. Low and moderate adherers and those filling only one prescription had a modestly higher risk of hospitalizations/ED visits compared to perfect adherers. Trajectory models may be valuable in identifying specific non-adherence patterns for targeting interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medication adherence to oral cancer therapy is a critical component to achieving optimal patient outcomes. As the US population ages, growing numbers of patients will be prescribed oral cancer therapy regimens, highlighting the need for innovative and scalable solutions. Clinical pharmacists offer tremendous promise to help patients improve their adherence to oral cancer therapy. Moreover, addition of oral chemotherapy to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) medication adherence quality measures has the potential to improve care and result in better therapeutic outcomes with fewer costs for patients and payers. Future research is needed to test the use of pharmacist-managed interventions to improve adherence to oral cancer therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]