Search

Outcomes: 1. Learn about the Massachusetts Medical Schools' Collaborative's toolbox of educational competencies and curriculum mapping in serious illness communication, with examples on using the tools to improve curricula at each school 2. Generate ideas and strategies for developing educational activities at your own institution that promote learners' acquisition of palliative care skills, regardless of their future discipline All clinicians require a sophisticated set of serious illness communication (SIC) skills to ensure high-quality, humanistic care for patients and families from diverse communities as they face life-changing medical decisions at vulnerable times in their lives. However, most clinicians are not trained in SIC and, as former students, learned these concepts "on the fly" or in electives. The Massachusetts Medical Schools' Collaborative was created to change this paradigm and ensure all students receive foundational SIC training. The collaborative includes faculty, administrators, and students from four schools (Boston University School of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Tufts University School of Medicine, and UMass Chan Medical School) and is convened by the Massachusetts Coalition for Serious Illness Care, a group of over 125 member organizations focused on equity in serious illness care. Our collaborative seeks to develop longitudinal, developmentally based curricula in SIC. We first developed and published five educational SIC competencies. We then created a standardized curriculum mapping process to understand existing educational activities across schools and opportunities to fill gaps defined by the competencies. The collaborative also conducted focus groups with 50 fourth-year medical students; among key themes, students viewed SIC as essential, yet described their exposure as based mostly on "luck" if they were included in family meetings or coached on SIC. Armed with the competencies, curricular mapping, and focus group data, leaders at each school are expanding curricula in SIC and palliative care based on local needs and resources. Presenters will use most of the session to share concrete examples of curriculum design and implementation based on the collaborative's toolbox, which will be available for participants to bring to their own institutions. As a field, we can make this critical investment in the next generation of clinicians and create educational best practices to help build more trustworthy, equitable healthcare systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medical Education 2011: : 166-175 Academic medical centres may adopt new learning technologies with little data on their effectiveness or on how they compare with traditional methodologies. We conducted a comparative study of student reflective writings produced using either an electronic (blog) format or a traditional written (essay) format to assess differences in content, depth of reflection and student preference. Students in internal medicine clerkships at two US medical schools during the 2008-2009 academic year were quasi-randomly assigned to one of two study arms according to which they were asked to either write a traditional reflective essay and subsequently join in faculty-moderated, small-group discussion ( n = 45), or post two writings to a faculty-moderated group blog and provide at least one comment on a peer's posts ( n = 50). Examples from a pilot block were used to refine coding methods and determine inter-rater reliability. Writings were coded for theme and level of reflection by two blinded authors; these coding processes reached inter-rater reliabilities of 91% and 80%, respectively. Anonymous pre- and post-clerkship surveys assessed student perceptions and preferences. Student writing addressed seven main themes: (i) being humanistic; (ii) professional behaviour; (iii) understanding caregiving relationships; (iv) being a student; (v) clinical learning; (vi) dealing with death and dying, and (vii) the health care system, quality, safety and public health. The distribution of themes was similar across institutions and study arms. The level of reflection did not differ between study arms. Post-clerkship surveys showed that student preferences for blogging or essay writing were predicted by experience, with the majority favouring the method they had used. Our study suggests there is no significant difference in themes addressed or levels of reflection achieved when students complete a similar assignment via online blogging or traditional essay writing. Given this, faculty staff should feel comfortable in utilising the blog format for reflective exercises. Faculty members could consider the option of using either format to address different learning styles of students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This journal watch is sponsored by the Alliance for Clinical Education (ACE). The purpose of this article is to summarize medical education manuscripts from specialty journals that are important and relevant to educators across specialties. Specialties included in our review were cardiology, gastroenterology, general internal medicine, pulmonology, nephrology, hematology and oncology, endocrinology, rheumatology, infectious disease, and neurology. We are grateful to Teaching and Learning in Medicine and ACE for giving us the opportunity to publish this review. The Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine Research Committee conducted this review. Included are English articles published from September 2006 through September 2007. PubMed was searched for peer-reviewed research publications reporting primary data on medical education. Medical subject heading terms included combinations of medical education, medical student, residency training, practice, undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education, internship and residency, and continuing medical education. We also reviewed the bibliographies of all articles found though our PubMed search to identify additional articles that may not have been included in PubMed's search engine. Furthermore, we discussed identified articles with content experts in each specialty to ensure that appropriate journals and articles were included from each subspecialty. The journals that we selected for review are not often read by the typical medical educator. We included articles from general and subspecialty journals of internal medicine excluding the following, which have a focus on medical education or cross-specialties: Academic Medicine, Advances in Health Science Education, Medical Education, Medical Teacher, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, and New England Journal of Medicine. Specialties included in our review were cardiology, gastroenterology, general internal medicine, pulmonology, nephrology, hematology and oncology, endocrinology, rheumatology, infectious disease, and neurology. We also reviewed the bibliographies of all articles found though our PubMed search to identify additional articles. Furthermore, we discussed identified articles with content experts in each specialty to ensure that appropriate journals and articles were included from each subspecialty. Authors rated each article based on relevance, rigor, importance, and generalizibility of findings. We also sought to include articles from each phase in the continuum of medical education: undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education as well as qualitative and quantitative studies. Articles were ranked by each author. We then held conference calls and had e-mail discussions to establish consensus on the articles included in this review. The following is a summary of each selected article grouped by theme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent changes in healthcare system and training mandates have altered the clinical learning environment. We incorporated reflective writing into Internal Medicine clerkships (IMcs) in multiple institutions so students could consider the impact of clerkship experiences on their personal and professional development. We analyzed student reflections to inform curricula and support learning.Methods: We qualitatively analyzed the reflections of students at 3 US medical schools during IMcs (N = 292) to identify themes, tone, and reflective quality using an iterative approach. Chi-square tests assessed differences between these factors and across institutions.Findings: Students openly described powerful experiences. Major themes focused on 4 categories: personal issues (PI), professional development (PD), relational issues (RI), and medical care (MC). Each major theme was represented at each institution, although with significant variability between institutions in many of the subcategories including student role (PI), development-as-a-physician (PD), professionalism (PD) (p < 0.001). Students used positive tones to describe student role, development-as-a-physician and physician-patient relationship (PD) (p < 0.01-0.001), and negative tones for quality and safety (MC) (p < 0.05). Only 4% of writings coded as professionalism had a positive tone. Students employed a "reporting" voice in writing about clinical problem-solving, healthcare systems, and quality/safety (MC).Discussion: Reflection is considered important to professional development. Our analysis suggests that students at 3 institutions reflect on similar experiences. Theme variability across institutions implies curricula should be tailored to local culture. Reflective quality analysis suggests students are better equipped to reflect on certain experiences over others, which may impact learning. Student reflections can function as a mirror for our organizations, offer institutional feedback for support and improvement, and inform curricula for learners and faculty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The 4th-year internal medicine subinternship (subI), with its strong emphasis on experience-based learning and increased patient responsibilities, is an important component of undergraduate medical education. Discussions have begun amongst educational leaders on the importance of standardizing curriculum and evaluation tools utilized during the subinternship. Purpose: The objective of this survey was to describe the current state of educational practices regarding the subI curriculum, use of Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) curricular guidelines, evaluation methodologies, and subintern call frequency and duty hours. Methods: The survey was a part of the CDIM annual survey sent to 109 institutional members in 2005. The subinternship survey included 17 questions that addressed the prevalence of formal curricula in the subinternship, use of CDIM curricular guidelines and resources, and the evaluation tools utilized for assessment of the subinternship. Two questions examined the call frequency and duty hours of the subinterns. Results: Eighty-eight members responded (81%). Of the respondents, 37% have a formal curriculum and 35% used CDIM curricular guidelines for the subinternship. More than half of the respondents agreed that the curricular guide helped organize their subI rotations (53%), and 48% agreed that it enhanced the quality of subI education. A global rating summative evaluation form (56%) was the most commonly used evaluation tool in the subinternship. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations1-3 (1%) and Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX)4(2%) were much less utilized during the subinternship. The respondents expressed an interest in the development of a standardized exam (47%) and clinical assessment tools such as the mini-CEX (59%). The vast majority of IM subinterns participate in 3 to 9 calls per rotation and spend less than 80 hr in the hospital per week. Conclusions: A formal curriculum is offered in slightly more than one third of subIs. Clerkship directors expressed interest in developing standardized evaluation tools to assess subintern competencies. The majority of IM subinterns spend less than 80 hr in the hospital per week. Further studies are needed to assess barriers to incorporating a formal curriculum and develop standardized tools to assess subintern competencies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

CONTEXT: Trainees are exposed to medical errors throughout medical school and residency. Little is known about what facilitates and limits learning from these experiences. OBJ'ECT/VE: To identify major factors and areas of tension in trainees' learning from medical errors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Structured telephone interviews with 59 trainees (medical students and residents) from 1 academic medical center. Five authors reviewed transcripts of audiotaped interviews using content analysis. RESULTS: Trainees were aware that medical errors occur from early in medical school. Many had an intense emotional response to the idea of committing errors in patient care. Students and residents noted variation and conflict in institutional recommendations and individual actions. Many expressed role confusion regarding whether and how to initiate discussion after errors occurred. Some noted the conflict between reporting errors to seniors who were responsible for their evaluation. Learners requested more open discussion of actual errors and faculty disclosure. No students or residents felt that they learned better from near misses than from actual errors, and many believed that they learned the most when harm was caused. CONCLUSIONS: Trainees are aware of medical errors, but remaining tensions may limit learning, institutions can immediately address variability in faculty response and local culture by disseminating clear, accessible algorithms to guide behavior when errors occur. Educators should develop longitudinal curricula that integrate actual cases and faculty disclosure. Future multi-institutional work should focus on identified themes such as teaching and learning in emotionally charged situations, learning from errors and near misses and balance between individual and systems responsibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]