Search

Abstract: An important question remains as to how the brain differentially processes first (pricking) pain mediated by Aδ-nociceptors versus second (burning) pain mediated by C-nociceptors. In the present cross-over randomized, within-subjects controlled study, brain activity patterns were examined with event-related fMRI while pricking and burning pain were selectively evoked using a diode laser. Stimuli evoking equivalent pain intensities were delivered to the dorsum of the left foot. Different laser parameters were used to elicit pricking (60ms pulse duration) and burning (2.0s pulse duration) pain. Whole brain group analysis showed that several brain areas were commonly activated by pricking and burning pain, including bilateral thalamus, bilateral anterior insula, bilateral posterior parietal lobule, contralateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ipsilateral cerebellum, and mid anterior cingulate cortex. These findings show that pricking and burning pain were associated with activity in many of the same nociceptive processing brain regions. This may be expected given that Aδ-and C-nociceptive signals converge to a great extent at the level of the dorsal horn. Other brain regions showed differential processing. Stronger activation in the pricking pain condition was found in the ipsilateral hippocampus, bilateral parahippocampal gyrus, bilateral fusiform gyrus, contralateral cerebellum and contralateral cuneus/parieto-occipital sulcus. Stronger activation in the burning pain condition was found in the ipsilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These differential activation patterns suggest preferential importance of Aδ-fiber signals versus C-fiber signals for these specific brain regions. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Sensory function of small peripheral nerve fiber was assessed by means of quantitative sensory testing ( QST) during which sensory stimulation was provided using diode laser ( DL) in patients suffering from painful neuropathy ( PN) and compared with symptom-free healthy controls ( HC). Based on previous research work using DL stimulation, parameters that demonstrated safe and specific activation of A-delta, which were distinct from stimulation parameters for the activation of C-fibers, were utilized in this study. Results of this study demonstrated that this differential activation pointed to the impaired function of A-delta fibers while C-fiber function was unaffected. Stimulation of HC reproduced previously published results, and stimulation during this study was safe also without any dermal effect in patients with PN and in HC. Parameters used in this study were demonstrated in previous preclinical rodent study identical differential effect on activation of A-delta and C-fibers, and as such, DL is an ideal tool for translational pain research where specific activation of A-delta or C-fibers, or both, is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]