Search

Objectives: To establish the relationship between the presence and titer of virus-specific serum- and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-antibodies in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and disease severity measured with different quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. Methods: We investigated an association between clinical and MRI measures of disease activity and the presence and titer of IgG antibodies against seven common viruses (measles, rubella, herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2, varicella zoster virus, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus). One hundred and forty (90 female/50 male) patients with definite MS and 131 age and sex-matched controls participated in the study. Antibody positivity and titer were ascertained by the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique and clinical assessment was performed by evaluating the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score and the lifetime relapse rate (LRR). T1- and T2-lesion loads (LL) and the brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) were calculated. Results: Multiple analyses showed that there was an association between antibody positivity against CMV and higher titer and better clinical and MRI outcomes. The cluster analyses indicated that patients positive for antibodies against CMV had significantly older age at onset (uncorr p=0.001 and corr p=0.009), lower LRR (uncorr p=0.003 and corr p=0.03) and higher BPF (uncorr p=0.004 and pcorr p=0.04). CMV-positive patients who had higher antibody titer showed lower T2-LL (uncorr p=0.003 and corr p=0.03) and higher BPF (uncorr p=0.006 and corr p=0.05). Discussion: Surprisingly, our results focused attention on the 'protective' role of a particular virus. CMV is probably capable of triggering some immunomodulating/immune evasion mechanisms which may decrease immune reactivity in MS patients. Further studies are needed to confirm and elucidate our study results on a larger sample of MS patients and in animal model studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To test the effect of serial magnetic resonance (MR) coregistration on short-term brain volume changes using different semiautomated and automated brain volume techniques in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS). Coregistration is frequently used to increase precision in serial MR imaging (MRI) analyses. However, the effect of coregistration on measurement of whole brain volume changes from serial scans in the short term has not been tested in MS patients. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with RR MS [mean disease duration: 4.9 years, mean age: 34.4 years and mean expanded disability status scale (EDSS): 1.4] were scanned at baseline and monthly for a period of 3 months with 2D spin-echo T1-weighted sequences obtained with nongapped 3 mm axial slices. Percent brain parenchymal fraction change (PBPFC) was calculated by a semiautomated (Buffalo) and, separately, by two automated (Buffalo automated and SIENAX) techniques, whereas percent brain volume change (PBVC) was calculated by the SIENA technique. For coregistration of serial images we used a robust, fully automated linear image coregistration tool. PBPFC and PBVC were calculated before and after coregistration, comparing scans from the following time periods: (1) baseline to month 3; (2) baseline to month 1; (3) month 1 to 2 and (4) month 2 to 3. Results: The highest median PBPFCs measured on non-coregistered images were detected for the baseline-to-month-3 time period and ranged from -0.11% for Buffalo semiautomated to -0.45% for Buffalo automated (p=ns). On coregistered images, the highest PBPFCs were detected for the baseline-to-month-3 time period and ranged from 0.3% for Buffalo semiautomated, -0.3% for Buffalo automated, 0.02% for SIENAX and -0.02% for SIENA (PBVC). At all time points of the study, no significant differences of median volume changes were measured on coregistered and non-coregistered images when comparing the results among the segmentation algorithms. Conclusions: Over a 3 month period we did not detect short-term changes in normalized brain volumes using different measurement techniques. A longer observation period is needed to assess whether coregistration can affect the measurement of long-term brain volume changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is still a controversy regarding the best regional brain atrophy measurements in multiple sclerosis (MS) studies. The aim of this study was to establish whether, in a cross-sectional study, the normalized measurements of regional brain atrophy correlate better with the MRI-defined regional brain lesions than the absolute measurements of regional brain atrophy. We assessed 45 patients with clinically definite relapsing–remitting (RR) MS (median disease duration 12 years), and measured T1-lesion load (LL) and T2-LL of frontal lobes and pons, using a reproducible semi-automated technique. The regional brain parenchymal volume (RBPV) of frontal lobes and pons was obtained by use of a computerized interactive program, which incorporates semi-automated and automated segmentation processes. A normalized measurement, the regional brain parenchymal fraction (RBPF), was calculated as the ratio of RBPV to the total volume of the parenchyma and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the frontal lobes and in the region of the pons. The total regional brain volume fraction (TRBVF) was obtained after we had corrected for the total volume of the parenchyma and the CSF in the frontal lobes and in the region of the pons for the total intracranial volume. The mean coefficient of variation (CV) for RBPF of the pons was 1% for intra-observer reproducibility and 1.4% for inter-observer reproducibility. Generally, the normalized measurements of regional brain atrophy correlated with regional brain volumes and disability better than did the absolute measurements. RBPF and TRBVF correlated with T2-LL of the pons (r=-0.37, P=0.011, and r= -0.40, P=0.0005 respectively) and with T1-LL of the pons (r=-0.27, P=0.046, and r=-0.31, P=0.04, respectively), whereas RBPV did not (r=-0.18, P = NS). T1-LL of the frontal lobes was related to RBPF (r=-0.32, P=0.033) and TRBVF (r=-0.29, P=0.05), but not to RBPV (R=-0.27, P= NS). There was only a trend of correlation between T2-LL of the frontal lobes and RBPF (r=-0.27, P=0.06) and TRBVF (r=-0.28, P=0.057), and no correlation with RBPV (r=-0.23, P= NS). The magnitude of correlation between the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and pontine and frontal lobe RBPF and TRBVF was more than twice as high as the correlation between EDSS and RBPV of the same regions. These data suggest that normalized regional brain atrophy measurements are preferable to absolute regional measurements in cross-sectional studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]