Search

mckenna hp, keeney s&hasson f (2005) Journal of Clinical Nursing14, 426–434Views on the ground: teaching and clinical assessors’ views on vocational training for healthcare assistants in IrelandThis paper reports the views of teaching staff and clinical assessors on their experience of programme delivery and assessment.In 2001, the Irish Department of Health and Children developed a vocational training programme for healthcare assistants. This programme was piloted nationally across 14 hospital and community sites. Teaching staff and clinical assessors at each site delivered the programme.One-to-one semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 16 clinical staff and 26 teaching staff. With consent, all interviews were tape-recorded, from which the transcripts were subject to content analysis.A lack of experience and preparation among teaching staff and clinical assessors was evident. The staff's commitment to their role on the programme while maintaining their normal duties caused frustration and uncertainty. Not withstanding, the value of the programme in terms of increased motivation, satisfaction and knowledge of healthcare assistants and the impact on care delivery, was recognized by respondents.This programme represents the provision of a national standard training programme for healthcare assistants. It provides an insight into the delivery of such a programme and the educational and training needs of healthcare assistants through the views of staff that taught and assessed on it.Findings suggest that the development and implementation of a national training programme for healthcare assistants is achievable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

mckenna h. p., ashton s. & keeney s. (2004) Journal of Advanced Nursing 45(2), 178–189 Barriers to evidence-based practice in primary care Evidence-based practice is one of the most important underlying principles in modern health care. In the United Kingdom, successive governments have highlighted the fact that a quality health service is built upon the use of best evidence. Health professionals are becoming more accountable within clinical governance structures for the care they provide. The need to use robust research findings effectively is a critical component of their role. However, studies show that a number of barriers prevent the effective use of best available evidence. This study aimed to identify barriers to evidence-based practice in primary care. A specially designed questionnaire was used to gather respondents’ perceptions of the barriers to evidence-based practice. Data were collected in 2000/2001. Findings show that general practitioners (GPs) ranked barriers differently to community nurses. GPs believed that the most significant barriers to using evidence in practice were: the limited relevance of research to practice, keeping up with all the current changes in primary care, and the ability to search for evidence-based information. In contrast, the most significant barriers to the identified by community nurses were poor computer facilities, poor patient compliance and difficulties in influencing changes within primary care. This suggests that these two groups may require different strategies for barrier removal. Identifying barriers is just the first step to addressing issues surrounding the use of evidence-based practice. Extra resources will be needed if these barriers are to be tackled. However, if the resultant change improves the health and wellbeing of people and communities, then the extra costs would be offset by more efficient use of services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]