Search

Over the past decade systematic reviews of interprofessional education (IPE) have provided a more informed understanding of the effects of this type of education. This paper contributes to this literature by reporting an update of a Cochrane systematic review published in this journal ten years ago (Zwarenstein et al., 1999). In updating this initial review, our current work involved searches of a number of electronic databases from 1999–2006, as well as reference lists, books, conference proceedings and websites. Like the previous review, only studies which employed randomized controlled trials, controlled-before and-after-studies and interrupted time series studies of IPE, and that reported validated professional practice and health care outcomes, were included. While the first review found no studies which met its inclusion criteria, the updated review located six IPE studies. This paper aims to add to the ongoing development of evidence for IPE. Despite some useful progress being made in relation to strengthening the evidence base for IPE, the paper concludes by stressing that further rigorous mixed method studies of IPE are needed to provide a greater clarity of IPE and its effects on professional practice and patient/client care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Concern exists that the transition from student to doctor is abrupt and stressful, and that new graduates lack both clinical skills and confidence. This paper explores the effect of a preparation programme on the confidence and skills of new graduates commencing their first clinical post. Fifty-three participants in two English hospitals undertook a two-week induction combining life support, emergency and clinical skills training with administrative induction and shadowing the outgoing house officer. Questionnaires and focus groups at the beginning, end, and one month following the programme explored participants' perceptions. Respondents were initially anxious about starting work, concerned mainly about clinical skills; taking responsibility; being alone; non-technical skills; and local geography and procedures. Confidence increased following the programme, and the programme's contents directly mitigated some fears. Shadowing was most highly valued, though experiences varied; acute emergency training was also valued, but clinical skills revision was more variably received. Having commenced work, these perceptions remained. Confidence increased further, but clinical practice still represented a steep learning curve. This programme to support the transition from medical student to practising doctor was useful and effective, but could be improved. Increasing responsibility during shadowing could effect an even smoother transition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Collaborative practice is seen as a core aspect of professional practice and, therefore, a focus of professional education. Current interprofessional and quality assurance literature provides enumeration and discussion of a range of competencies required for effective collaborative practice. Case studies of education and training related to collaborative competences rarely discuss the nature of influences on development, delivery and learning. Barriers to development and delivery have been identified for interprofessional education, but we want to move beyond the mental picture of climbing over or moving around fixed hurdles. Learning opportunities are complex dynamic systems, seeking equilibrium. The creative tension of influences provides opportunities for insightful management. This paper uses the systems-form 3P (presage - process - product) model of learning and teaching ( Biggs, 1993 ) to help examine the nature of educational opportunities designed to promote collaborative working. Presage, process and product factors are identified and discussed. We argue that untangling (or at least seeing) the web of influences on learning to work together promotes critical awareness and encourages more informed and timely decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been much written about new interprofessional collaborations, rather less about established or terminated collaborations. This paper briefly rehearses well known factors that encourage and discourage interprofessional collaboration, before considering factors that may help sustain collaborations or signal that termination of the collaboration is appropriate. The Clinical Skills Initiative at St Bartholomew's in London, UK is offered as a case study of a sustained interprofessional collaboration. It will be argued that a combination of continued need to collaborate and empowerment to do so, creates favourable conditions for sustained collaboration. The composition of the interprofessional team that comprises the collaboration is also seen as key. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]