1. Gender stereotypes in equity crowdfunding: the effect of gender bias on the interpretation of quality signals
- Author
-
Kazem Mochkabadi, Simon Kleinert, Organisation,Strategy & Entrepreneurship, and RS: GSBE other - not theme-related research
- Subjects
Signaling theory ,PERCEPTIONS ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Commercial law ,g23 - "Pension Funds ,Non-bank Financial Institutions ,Financial Instruments ,Institutional Investors" ,Context (language use) ,Pension Funds ,Institutional Investors ,Equity financing ,Accounting ,Gender role congruity theory ,REPUTATION ,Quality (business) ,Corporate Finance and Governance: General ,Equity crowdfunding ,Business and International Management ,Gender role ,Empirical evidence ,media_common ,INVESTMENTS ,General Engineering ,Entrepreneurship ,ATTENTION ,Gender ,PERFORMANCE ,FEMALE ,Entrepreneurial finance ,INVESTORS ,ENTREPRENEURIAL SUCCESS ,l26 - Entrepreneurship ,BUSINESS ,g30 - Corporate Finance and Governance: General ,Demographic economics ,LEADERSHIP ,Psychology ,Reputation - Abstract
Equity crowdfunding has the potential to democratize entrepreneurial finance and provide female entrepreneurs with new and equal access to early-stage financing. In this paper, we present first empirical evidence on gender stereotypes in the context of technology ventures in equity crowdfunding. Drawing on signaling and gender role congruity theory, we hypothesize that quality signals have different effects depending on whether they are sent by male or female entrepreneurs. Results taken from a sample of 263 equity crowdfunding campaigns run by technology ventures confirm our hypotheses. In line with gender stereotypes, management experience is beneficial for male entrepreneurs but detrimental for female entrepreneurs. Interestingly, media coverage as a third-party signal has the oppositive effect, being more effective for female entrepreneurs.
- Published
- 2022