Search

Random forests are popular methods for regression and classification analysis, and many different variants have been proposed in recent years. One interesting example is the Mondrian random forest, in which the underlying constituent trees are constructed via a Mondrian process. We give precise bias and variance characterizations, along with a Berry-Esseen-type central limit theorem, for the Mondrian random forest regression estimator. By combining these results with a carefully crafted debiasing approach and an accurate variance estimator, we present valid statistical inference methods for the unknown regression function. These methods come with explicitly characterized error bounds in terms of the sample size, tree complexity parameter, and number of trees in the forest, and include coverage error rates for feasible confidence interval estimators. Our novel debiasing procedure for the Mondrian random forest also allows it to achieve the minimax-optimal point estimation convergence rate in mean squared error for multivariate $\beta$-H\"older regression functions, for all $\beta > 0$, provided that the underlying tuning parameters are chosen appropriately. Efficient and implementable algorithms are devised for both batch and online learning settings, and we carefully study the computational complexity of different Mondrian random forest implementations. Finally, simulations with synthetic data validate our theory and methodology, demonstrating their excellent finite-sample properties., Comment: 64 pages, 1 figure, 6 tables

This paper addresses challenges in robust transfer learning stemming from ambiguity in Bayes classifiers and weak transferable signals between the target and source distribution. We introduce a novel quantity called the ''ambiguity level'' that measures the discrepancy between the target and source regression functions, propose a simple transfer learning procedure, and establish a general theorem that shows how this new quantity is related to the transferability of learning in terms of risk improvements. Our proposed ''Transfer Around Boundary'' (TAB) model, with a threshold balancing the performance of target and source data, is shown to be both efficient and robust, improving classification while avoiding negative transfer. Moreover, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the TAB model on non-parametric classification and logistic regression tasks, achieving upper bounds which are optimal up to logarithmic factors. Simulation studies lend further support to the effectiveness of TAB. We also provide simple approaches to bound the excess misclassification error without the need for specialized knowledge in transfer learning., Comment: 86 pages, 4 figures

Decision tree learning is increasingly being used for pointwise inference. Important applications include causal heterogenous treatment effects and dynamic policy decisions, as well as conditional quantile regression and design of experiments, where tree estimation and inference is conducted at specific values of the covariates. In this paper, we call into question the use of decision trees (trained by adaptive recursive partitioning) for such purposes by demonstrating that they can fail to achieve polynomial rates of convergence in uniform norm with non-vanishing probability, even with pruning. Instead, the convergence may be arbitrarily slow or, in some important special cases, such as honest regression trees, fail completely. We show that random forests can remedy the situation, turning poor performing trees into nearly optimal procedures, at the cost of losing interpretability and introducing two additional tuning parameters. The two hallmarks of random forests, subsampling and the random feature selection mechanism, are seen to each distinctively contribute to achieving nearly optimal performance for the model class considered.

We develop a theoretical framework for the analysis of oblique decision trees, where the splits at each decision node occur at linear combinations of the covariates (as opposed to conventional tree constructions that force axis-aligned splits involving only a single covariate). While this methodology has garnered significant attention from the computer science and optimization communities since the mid-80s, the advantages they offer over their axis-aligned counterparts remain only empirically justified, and explanations for their success are largely based on heuristics. Filling this long-standing gap between theory and practice, we show that oblique regression trees (constructed by recursively minimizing squared error) satisfy a type of oracle inequality and can adapt to a rich library of regression models consisting of linear combinations of ridge functions and their limit points. This provides a quantitative baseline to compare and contrast decision trees with other less interpretable methods, such as projection pursuit regression and neural networks, which target similar model forms. Contrary to popular belief, one need not always trade-off interpretability with accuracy. Specifically, we show that, under suitable conditions, oblique decision trees achieve similar predictive accuracy as neural networks for the same library of regression models. To address the combinatorial complexity of finding the optimal splitting hyperplane at each decision node, our proposed theoretical framework can accommodate many existing computational tools in the literature. Our results rely on (arguably surprising) connections between recursive adaptive partitioning and sequential greedy approximation algorithms for convex optimization problems (e.g., orthogonal greedy algorithms), which may be of independent theoretical interest. Using our theory and methods, we also study oblique random forests.

This paper shows that decision trees constructed with Classification and Regression Trees (CART) and C4.5 methodology are consistent for regression and classification tasks, even when the number of predictor variables grows sub-exponentially with the sample size, under natural 0-norm and 1-norm sparsity constraints. The theory applies to a wide range of models, including (ordinary or logistic) additive regression models with component functions that are continuous, of bounded variation, or, more generally, Borel measurable. Consistency holds for arbitrary joint distributions of the predictor variables, thereby accommodating continuous, discrete, and/or dependent data. Finally, we show that these qualitative properties of individual trees are inherited by Breiman's random forests. A key step in the analysis is the establishment of an oracle inequality, which allows for a precise characterization of the goodness-of-fit and complexity tradeoff for a mis-specified model.

Decision trees with binary splits are popularly constructed using Classification and Regression Trees (CART) methodology. For regression models, this approach recursively divides the data into two near-homogenous daughter nodes according to a split point that maximizes the reduction in sum of squares error (the impurity) along a particular variable. This paper aims to study the statistical properties of regression trees constructed with CART methodology. In doing so, we find that the training error is governed by the Pearson correlation between the optimal decision stump and response data in each node, which we bound by constructing a prior distribution on the split points and solving a nonlinear optimization problem. We leverage this connection between the training error and Pearson correlation to show that CART with cost-complexity pruning achieves an optimal complexity/goodness-of-fit tradeoff when the depth scales with the logarithm of the sample size. Data dependent quantities, which adapt to the dimensionality and latent structure of the regression model, are seen to govern the rates of convergence of the prediction error.

A popular class of problem in statistics deals with estimating the support of a density from $n$ observations drawn at random from a $d$-dimensional distribution. The one-dimensional case reduces to estimating the end points of a univariate density. In practice, an experimenter may only have access to a noisy version of the original data. Therefore, a more realistic model allows for the observations to be contaminated with additive noise. In this paper, we consider estimation of convex bodies when the additive noise is distributed according to a multivariate Gaussian distribution, even though our techniques could easily be adapted to other noise distributions. Unlike standard methods in deconvolution that are implemented by thresholding a kernel density estimate, our method avoids tuning parameters and Fourier transforms altogether. We show that our estimator, computable in $(O(\ln n))^{(d-1)/2}$ time, converges at a rate of $ O_d(\log\log n/\sqrt{\log n}) $ in Hausdorff distance, in accordance with the polylogarithmic rates encountered in Gaussian deconvolution problems. Part of our analysis also involves the optimality of the proposed estimator. We provide a lower bound for the minimax rate of estimation in Hausdorff distance that is $\Omega_d(1/\log^2 n)$.

Applied researchers often construct a network from a random sample of nodes in order to infer properties of the parent network. Two of the most widely used sampling schemes are subgraph sampling, where we sample each vertex independently with probability $p$ and observe the subgraph induced by the sampled vertices, and neighborhood sampling, where we additionally observe the edges between the sampled vertices and their neighbors. In this paper, we study the problem of estimating the number of motifs as induced subgraphs under both models from a statistical perspective. We show that: for any connected $h$ on $k$ vertices, to estimate $s=\mathsf{s}(h,G)$, the number of copies of $h$ in the parent graph $G$ of maximum degree $d$, with a multiplicative error of $\epsilon$, (a) For subgraph sampling, the optimal sampling ratio $p$ is $\Theta_{k}(\max\{ (s\epsilon^2)^{-\frac{1}{k}}, \; \frac{d^{k-1}}{s\epsilon^{2}} \})$, achieved by Horvitz-Thompson type of estimators. (b) For neighborhood sampling, we propose a family of estimators, encompassing and outperforming the Horvitz-Thompson estimator and achieving the sampling ratio $O_{k}(\min\{ (\frac{d}{s\epsilon^2})^{\frac{1}{k-1}}, \; \sqrt{\frac{d^{k-2}}{s\epsilon^2}}\})$. This is shown to be optimal for all motifs with at most $4$ vertices and cliques of all sizes. The matching minimax lower bounds are established using certain algebraic properties of subgraph counts. These results quantify how much more informative neighborhood sampling is than subgraph sampling, as empirically verified by experiments on both synthetic and real-world data. We also address the issue of adaptation to the unknown maximum degree, and study specific problems for parent graphs with additional structures, e.g., trees or planar graphs.

Learning properties of large graphs from samples has been an important problem in statistical network analysis since the early work of Goodman \cite{Goodman1949} and Frank \cite{Frank1978}. We revisit a problem formulated by Frank \cite{Frank1978} of estimating the number of connected components in a large graph based on the subgraph sampling model, in which we randomly sample a subset of the vertices and observe the induced subgraph. The key question is whether accurate estimation is achievable in the \emph{sublinear} regime where only a vanishing fraction of the vertices are sampled. We show that it is impossible if the parent graph is allowed to contain high-degree vertices or long induced cycles. For the class of chordal graphs, where induced cycles of length four or above are forbidden, we characterize the optimal sample complexity within constant factors and construct linear-time estimators that provably achieve these bounds. This significantly expands the scope of previous results which have focused on unbiased estimators and special classes of graphs such as forests or cliques. Both the construction and the analysis of the proposed methodology rely on combinatorial properties of chordal graphs and identities of induced subgraph counts. They, in turn, also play a key role in proving minimax lower bounds based on construction of random instances of graphs with matching structures of small subgraphs.

The MDL two-part coding $ \textit{index of resolvability} $ provides a finite-sample upper bound on the statistical risk of penalized likelihood estimators over countable models. However, the bound does not apply to unpenalized maximum likelihood estimation or procedures with exceedingly small penalties. In this paper, we point out a more general inequality that holds for arbitrary penalties. In addition, this approach makes it possible to derive exact risk bounds of order $1/n$ for iid parametric models, which improves on the order $(\log n)/n$ resolvability bounds. We conclude by discussing implications for adaptive estimation., Comment: To appear in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2018

We establish $ L^{\infty} $ and $ L^2 $ error bounds for functions of many variables that are approximated by linear combinations of ReLU (rectified linear unit) and squared ReLU ridge functions with $ \ell^1 $ and $ \ell^0 $ controls on their inner and outer parameters. With the squared ReLU ridge function, we show that the $ L^2 $ approximation error is inversely proportional to the inner layer $ \ell^0 $ sparsity and it need only be sublinear in the outer layer $ \ell^0 $ sparsity. Our constructions are obtained using a variant of the Jones-Barron probabilistic method, which can be interpreted as either stratified sampling with proportionate allocation or two-stage cluster sampling. We also provide companion error lower bounds that reveal near optimality of our constructions. Despite the sparsity assumptions, we showcase the richness and flexibility of these ridge combinations by defining a large family of functions, in terms of certain spectral conditions, that are particularly well approximated by them.

Let $ f^{\star} $ be a function on $ \mathbb{R}^d $ with an assumption of a spectral norm $ v_{f^{\star}} $. For various noise settings, we show that $ \mathbb{E}\|\hat{f} - f^{\star} \|^2 \leq \left(v^4_{f^{\star}}\frac{\log d}{n}\right)^{1/3} $, where $ n $ is the sample size and $ \hat{f} $ is either a penalized least squares estimator or a greedily obtained version of such using linear combinations of sinusoidal, sigmoidal, ramp, ramp-squared or other smooth ridge functions. The candidate fits may be chosen from a continuum of functions, thus avoiding the rigidity of discretizations of the parameter space. On the other hand, if the candidate fits are chosen from a discretization, we show that $ \mathbb{E}\|\hat{f} - f^{\star} \|^2 \leq \left(v^3_{f^{\star}}\frac{\log d}{n}\right)^{2/5} $. This work bridges non-linear and non-parametric function estimation and includes single-hidden layer nets. Unlike past theory for such settings, our bound shows that the risk is small even when the input dimension $ d $ of an infinite-dimensional parameterized dictionary is much larger than the available sample size. When the dimension is larger than the cube root of the sample size, this quantity is seen to improve the more familiar risk bound of $ v_{f^{\star}}\left(\frac{d\log (n/d)}{n}\right)^{1/2} $, also investigated here., Comment: Submitted to Annals of Statistics