Search

Thompson Sampling (TS) is an efficient method for decision-making under uncertainty, where an action is sampled from a carefully prescribed distribution which is updated based on the observed data. In this work, we study the problem of adaptive control of stabilizable linear-quadratic regulators (LQRs) using TS, where the system dynamics are unknown. Previous works have established that $\tilde O(\sqrt{T})$ frequentist regret is optimal for the adaptive control of LQRs. However, the existing methods either work only in restrictive settings, require a priori known stabilizing controllers, or utilize computationally intractable approaches. We propose an efficient TS algorithm for the adaptive control of LQRs, TS-based Adaptive Control, TSAC, that attains $\tilde O(\sqrt{T})$ regret, even for multidimensional systems, thereby solving the open problem posed in Abeille and Lazaric (2018). TSAC does not require a priori known stabilizing controller and achieves fast stabilization of the underlying system by effectively exploring the environment in the early stages. Our result hinges on developing a novel lower bound on the probability that the TS provides an optimistic sample. By carefully prescribing an early exploration strategy and a policy update rule, we show that TS achieves order-optimal regret in adaptive control of multidimensional stabilizable LQRs. We empirically demonstrate the performance and the efficiency of TSAC in several adaptive control tasks., Comment: Accepted for presentation at the Conference on Learning Theory (COLT) 2022

Inspired by competitive policy designs approaches in online learning, new control paradigms such as competitive-ratio and regret-optimal control have been recently proposed as alternatives to the classical $\mathcal{H}_2$ and $\mathcal{H}_\infty$ approaches. These competitive metrics compare the control cost of the designed controller against the cost of a clairvoyant controller, which has access to past, present, and future disturbances in terms of ratio and difference, respectively. While prior work provided the optimal solution for the regret-optimal control problem, in competitive-ratio control, the solution is only provided for the sub-optimal problem. In this work, we derive the optimal solution to the competitive-ratio control problem. We show that the optimal competitive ratio formula can be computed as the maximal eigenvalue of a simple matrix, and provide a state-space controller that achieves the optimal competitive ratio. We conduct an extensive numerical study to verify this analytical solution, and demonstrate that the optimal competitive-ratio controller outperforms other controllers on several large scale practical systems. The key techniques that underpin our explicit solution is a reduction of the control problem to a Nehari problem, along with a novel factorization of the clairvoyant controller's cost. We reveal an interesting relation between the explicit solutions that now exist for both competitive control paradigms by formulating a regret-optimal control framework with weight functions that can also be utilized for practical purposes.

Learning a dynamical system requires stabilizing the unknown dynamics to avoid state blow-ups. However, current reinforcement learning (RL) methods lack stabilization guarantees, which limits their applicability for the control of safety-critical systems. We propose a model-based RL framework with formal stability guarantees, Krasovskii Constrained RL (KCRL), that adopts Krasovskii's family of Lyapunov functions as a stability constraint. The proposed method learns the system dynamics up to a confidence interval using feature representation, e.g. Random Fourier Features. It then solves a constrained policy optimization problem with a stability constraint based on Krasovskii's method using a primal-dual approach to recover a stabilizing policy. We show that KCRL is guaranteed to learn a stabilizing policy in a finite number of interactions with the underlying unknown system. We also derive the sample complexity upper bound for stabilization of unknown nonlinear dynamical systems via the KCRL framework.

Despite perfectly interpolating the training data, deep neural networks (DNNs) can often generalize fairly well, in part due to the "implicit regularization" induced by the learning algorithm. Nonetheless, various forms of regularization, such as "explicit regularization" (via weight decay), are often used to avoid overfitting, especially when the data is corrupted. There are several challenges with explicit regularization, most notably unclear convergence properties. Inspired by convergence properties of stochastic mirror descent (SMD) algorithms, we propose a new method for training DNNs with regularization, called regularizer mirror descent (RMD). In highly overparameterized DNNs, SMD simultaneously interpolates the training data and minimizes a certain potential function of the weights. RMD starts with a standard cost which is the sum of the training loss and a convex regularizer of the weights. Reinterpreting this cost as the potential of an "augmented" overparameterized network and applying SMD yields RMD. As a result, RMD inherits the properties of SMD and provably converges to a point "close" to the minimizer of this cost. RMD is computationally comparable to stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and weight decay, and is parallelizable in the same manner. Our experimental results on training sets with various levels of corruption suggest that the generalization performance of RMD is remarkably robust and significantly better than both SGD and weight decay, which implicitly and explicitly regularize the $\ell_2$ norm of the weights. RMD can also be used to regularize the weights to a desired weight vector, which is particularly relevant for continual learning.

Current state-of-the-art model-based reinforcement learning algorithms use trajectory sampling methods, such as the Cross-Entropy Method (CEM), for planning in continuous control settings. These zeroth-order optimizers require sampling a large number of trajectory rollouts to select an optimal action, which scales poorly for large prediction horizons or high dimensional action spaces. First-order methods that use the gradients of the rewards with respect to the actions as an update can mitigate this issue, but suffer from local optima due to the non-convex optimization landscape. To overcome these issues and achieve the best of both worlds, we propose a novel planner, Cross-Entropy Method with Gradient Descent (CEM-GD), that combines first-order methods with CEM. At the beginning of execution, CEM-GD uses CEM to sample a significant amount of trajectory rollouts to explore the optimization landscape and avoid poor local minima. It then uses the top trajectories as initialization for gradient descent and applies gradient updates to each of these trajectories to find the optimal action sequence. At each subsequent time step, however, CEM-GD samples much fewer trajectories from CEM before applying gradient updates. We show that as the dimensionality of the planning problem increases, CEM-GD maintains desirable performance with a constant small number of samples by using the gradient information, while avoiding local optima using initially well-sampled trajectories. Furthermore, CEM-GD achieves better performance than CEM on a variety of continuous control benchmarks in MuJoCo with 100x fewer samples per time step, resulting in around 25% less computation time and 10% less memory usage. The implementation of CEM-GD is available at $\href{https://github.com/KevinHuang8/CEM-GD}{\text{https://github.com/KevinHuang8/CEM-GD}}$.

Autoregressive exogenous (ARX) systems are the general class of input-output dynamical systems used for modeling stochastic linear dynamical systems (LDS) including partially observable LDS such as LQG systems. In this work, we study the problem of system identification and adaptive control of unknown ARX systems. We provide finite-time learning guarantees for the ARX systems under both open-loop and closed-loop data collection. Using these guarantees, we design adaptive control algorithms for unknown ARX systems with arbitrary strongly convex or convex quadratic regulating costs. Under strongly convex cost functions, we design an adaptive control algorithm based on online gradient descent to design and update the controllers that are constructed via a convex controller reparametrization. We show that our algorithm has $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ regret via explore and commit approach and if the model estimates are updated in epochs using closed-loop data collection, it attains the optimal regret of $\text{polylog}(T)$ after $T$ time-steps of interaction. For the case of convex quadratic cost functions, we propose an adaptive control algorithm that deploys the optimism in the face of uncertainty principle to design the controller. In this setting, we show that the explore and commit approach has a regret upper bound of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{2/3})$, and the adaptive control with continuous model estimate updates attains $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ regret after $T$ time-steps., Comment: 3rd Annual Learning for Dynamics & Control Conference (L4DC)

We consider the infinite-horizon LQR control problem. Motivated by competitive analysis in online learning, as a criterion for controller design we introduce the dynamic regret, defined as the difference between the LQR cost of a causal controller (that has only access to past disturbances) and the LQR cost of the \emph{unique} clairvoyant one (that has also access to future disturbances) that is known to dominate all other controllers. The regret itself is a function of the disturbances, and we propose to find a causal controller that minimizes the worst-case regret over all bounded energy disturbances. The resulting controller has the interpretation of guaranteeing the smallest regret compared to the best non-causal controller that can see the future. We derive explicit formulas for the optimal regret and for the regret-optimal controller for the state-space setting. These explicit solutions are obtained by showing that the regret-optimal control problem can be reduced to a Nehari extension problem that can be solved explicitly. The regret-optimal controller is shown to be linear and can be expressed as the sum of the classical $H_2$ state-feedback law and an $n$-th order controller ($n$ is the state dimension), and its construction simply requires a solution to the standard LQR Riccati equation and two Lyapunov equations. Simulations over a range of plants demonstrate that the regret-optimal controller interpolates nicely between the $H_2$ and the $H_\infty$ optimal controllers, and generally has $H_2$ and $H_\infty$ costs that are simultaneously close to their optimal values. The regret-optimal controller thus presents itself as a viable option for control systems design.

Linear time-varying (LTV) systems are widely used for modeling real-world dynamical systems due to their generality and simplicity. Providing stability guarantees for LTV systems is one of the central problems in control theory. However, existing approaches that guarantee stability typically lead to significantly sub-optimal cumulative control cost in online settings where only current or short-term system information is available. In this work, we propose an efficient online control algorithm, COvariance Constrained Online Linear Quadratic (COCO-LQ) control, that guarantees input-to-state stability for a large class of LTV systems while also minimizing the control cost. The proposed method incorporates a state covariance constraint into the semi-definite programming (SDP) formulation of the LQ optimal controller. We empirically demonstrate the performance of COCO-LQ in both synthetic experiments and a power system frequency control example., Comment: 3rd Annual Learning for Dynamics & Control Conference (L4DC)

In many computational tasks and dynamical systems, asynchrony and randomization are naturally present and have been considered as ways to increase the speed and reduce the cost of computation while compromising the accuracy and convergence rate. In this work, we show the additional benefits of randomization and asynchrony on the stability of linear dynamical systems. We introduce a natural model for random asynchronous linear time-invariant (LTI) systems which generalizes the standard (synchronous) LTI systems. In this model, each state variable is updated randomly and asynchronously with some probability according to the underlying system dynamics. We examine how the mean-square stability of random asynchronous LTI systems vary with respect to randomization and asynchrony. Surprisingly, we show that the stability of random asynchronous LTI systems does not imply or is not implied by the stability of the synchronous variant of the system and an unstable synchronous system can be stabilized via randomization and/or asynchrony. We further study a special case of the introduced model, namely randomized LTI systems, where each state element is updated randomly with some fixed but unknown probability. We consider the problem of system identification of unknown randomized LTI systems using the precise characterization of mean-square stability via extended Lyapunov equation. For unknown randomized LTI systems, we propose a systematic identification method to recover the underlying dynamics. Given a single input/output trajectory, our method estimates the model parameters that govern the system dynamics, the update probability of state variables, and the noise covariance using the correlation matrices of collected data and the extended Lyapunov equation. Finally, we empirically demonstrate that the proposed method consistently recovers the underlying system dynamics with the optimal rate.

In this work, we study model-based reinforcement learning (RL) in unknown stabilizable linear dynamical systems. When learning a dynamical system, one needs to stabilize the unknown dynamics in order to avoid system blow-ups. We propose an algorithm that certifies fast stabilization of the underlying system by effectively exploring the environment with an improved exploration strategy. We show that the proposed algorithm attains $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ regret after $T$ time steps of agent-environment interaction. We also show that the regret of the proposed algorithm has only a polynomial dependence in the problem dimensions, which gives an exponential improvement over the prior methods. Our improved exploration method is simple, yet efficient, and it combines a sophisticated exploration policy in RL with an isotropic exploration strategy to achieve fast stabilization and improved regret. We empirically demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms other popular methods in several adaptive control tasks., Comment: 25th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) 2022

We study the problem of system identification and adaptive control in partially observable linear dynamical systems. Adaptive and closed-loop system identification is a challenging problem due to correlations introduced in data collection. In this paper, we present the first model estimation method with finite-time guarantees in both open and closed-loop system identification. Deploying this estimation method, we propose adaptive control online learning (AdaptOn), an efficient reinforcement learning algorithm that adaptively learns the system dynamics and continuously updates its controller through online learning steps. AdaptOn estimates the model dynamics by occasionally solving a linear regression problem through interactions with the environment. Using policy re-parameterization and the estimated model, AdaptOn constructs counterfactual loss functions to be used for updating the controller through online gradient descent. Over time, AdaptOn improves its model estimates and obtains more accurate gradient updates to improve the controller. We show that AdaptOn achieves a regret upper bound of $\text{polylog}\left(T\right)$, after $T$ time steps of agent-environment interaction. To the best of our knowledge, AdaptOn is the first algorithm that achieves $\text{polylog}\left(T\right)$ regret in adaptive control of unknown partially observable linear dynamical systems which includes linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control.

We study the problem of adaptive control in partially observable linear quadratic Gaussian control systems, where the model dynamics are unknown a priori. We propose LqgOpt, a novel reinforcement learning algorithm based on the principle of optimism in the face of uncertainty, to effectively minimize the overall control cost. We employ the predictor state evolution representation of the system dynamics and deploy a recently proposed closed-loop system identification method, estimation, and confidence bound construction. LqgOpt efficiently explores the system dynamics, estimates the model parameters up to their confidence interval, and deploys the controller of the most optimistic model for further exploration and exploitation. We provide stability guarantees for LqgOpt and prove the regret upper bound of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ for adaptive control of linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) systems, where $T$ is the time horizon of the problem.

We study the problem of regret minimization in partially observable linear quadratic control systems when the model dynamics are unknown a priori. We propose ExpCommit, an explore-then-commit algorithm that learns the model Markov parameters and then follows the principle of optimism in the face of uncertainty to design a controller. We propose a novel way to decompose the regret and provide an end-to-end sublinear regret upper bound for partially observable linear quadratic control. Finally, we provide stability guarantees and establish a regret upper bound of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{2/3})$ for ExpCommit, where $T$ is the time horizon of the problem.

Most modern learning problems are highly overparameterized, meaning that there are many more parameters than the number of training data points, and as a result, the training loss may have infinitely many global minima (parameter vectors that perfectly interpolate the training data). Therefore, it is important to understand which interpolating solutions we converge to, how they depend on the initialization point and the learning algorithm, and whether they lead to different generalization performances. In this paper, we study these questions for the family of stochastic mirror descent (SMD) algorithms, of which the popular stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is a special case. Our contributions are both theoretical and experimental. On the theory side, we show that in the overparameterized nonlinear setting, if the initialization is close enough to the manifold of global minima (something that comes for free in the highly overparameterized case), SMD with sufficiently small step size converges to a global minimum that is approximately the closest one in Bregman divergence. On the experimental side, our extensive experiments on standard datasets and models, using various initializations, various mirror descents, and various Bregman divergences, consistently confirms that this phenomenon happens in deep learning. Our experiments further indicate that there is a clear difference in the generalization performance of the solutions obtained by different SMD algorithms. Experimenting on a standard image dataset and network architecture with SMD with different kinds of implicit regularization, $\ell_1$ to encourage sparsity, $\ell_2$ yielding SGD, and $\ell_{10}$ to discourage large components in the parameter vector, consistently and definitively shows that $\ell_{10}$-SMD has better generalization performance than SGD, which in turn has better generalization performance than $\ell_1$-SMD.