Search

A poset is Esakia representable when it is isomorphic to the prime spectrum of a Heyting algebra. Notably, every Esakia representable poset is also the spectrum of a commutative ring with unit. The problem of describing the Esakia representable posets was raised in 1985 and remains open to this day. We recall that a forest is a disjoint union of trees and that a root system is the order dual of a forest. It is shown that a root system is Esakia representable if and only if it satisfies a simple order theoretic condition, known as "having enough gaps", and each of its nonempty chains has an infimum. This strengthens Lewis's characterisation of the root systems which are spectra of commutative rings with unit. While a similar characterisation of arbitrary Esakia representable forests seems currently out of reach, we show that a well-ordered forest is Esakia representable if and only if it has enough gaps and each of its nonempty chains has a supremum.

A bi-Heyting algebra validates the G\"odel-Dummett axiom $(p\to q)\vee (q\to p)$ iff the poset of its prime filters is a disjoint union of co-trees (i.e., order duals of trees). Bi-Heyting algebras of this kind are called bi-G\"odel algebras and form a variety that algebraizes the extension $\operatorname{\mathsf{bi-GD}}$ of bi-intuitionistic logic axiomatized by the G\"odel-Dummett axiom. In this paper we establish the decidability of the problem of determining if a finitely axiomatizable extension of $\operatorname{\mathsf{bi-GD}}$ is locally tabular. Notably, if $L$ is an extension of $\operatorname{\mathsf{bi-GD}}$, then $L$ is locally tabular iff $L$ is not contained in $Log(FC)$, the logic of a particular family of finite co-trees, called the finite combs. We prove that $Log(FC)$ is finitely axiomatizable. Since this logic also has the finite model property, it is therefore decidable. Thus, the above characterization of local tabularity ensures the decidability of the aforementioned problem.

It is shown that the universal theory of the free pseudocomplemented distributive lattice is decidable and a recursive axiomatization is presented. This contrasts with the case of the full elementary theory of the finitely generated free algebras which is known to be undecidable. As a by-product, a description of the pseudocomplemented distributive lattices that can be embedded into the free algebra is also obtained.

A quasivariety has the weak ES property when the epimorphisms between its finitely generated members are surjective. A characterization of quasivarieties with the weak ES property is obtained and a method for detecting failures of this property in quasivarieties with a near unanimity term and in congruence permutable varieties is given. It is also shown that under reasonable assumptions the weak ES property implies arithmeticity. In particular, every filtral variety with the weak ES property is a discriminator variety.

A classic result in modal logic, known as the Blok Dichotomy Theorem, states that the degree of incompleteness of a normal extension of the basic modal logic $\sf K$ is $1$ or $2^{\aleph_0}$. It is a long-standing open problem whether Blok Dichotomy holds for normal extensions of other prominent modal logics (such as $\sf S4$ or $\sf K4$) or for extensions of the intuitionistic propositional calculus $\mathsf{IPC}$. In this paper, we introduce the notion of the degree of finite model property (fmp), which is a natural variation of the degree of incompleteness. It is a consequence of Blok Dichotomy Theorem that the degree of fmp of a normal extension of $\sf K$ remains $1$ or $2^{\aleph_0}$. In contrast, our main result establishes the following Antidichotomy Theorem for the degree of fmp for extensions of $\mathsf{IPC}$: each nonzero cardinal $\kappa$ such that $\kappa \leq \aleph_0$ or $\kappa = 2^{\aleph_0}$ is realized as the degree of fmp of some extension of $\mathsf{IPC}$. We then use the Blok-Esakia theorem to establish the same Antidichotomy Theorem for normal extensions of $\sf S4$ and $\sf K4$.

For every $n \in \mathbb{N}$, we construct a variety of Heyting algebras, whose $n$-generated free algebra is finite but whose $(n+1)$-generated free algebra is infinite.

We introduce prime products as a generalization of ultraproducts for positive logic. Prime products are shown to satisfy a version of {\L}o\'s's Theorem restricted to positive formulas, as well as the following variant of Keisler Isomorphism Theorem: under the generalized continuum hypothesis, two models have the same positive theory if and only if they have isomorphic prime powers of ultrapowers., Comment: 15 pages; Accepted to the Journal of Symbolic Logic

A bi-Heyting algebra validates the G\"odel-Dummett axiom $(p\to q)\vee (q\to p)$ iff the poset of its prime filters is a disjoint union of co-trees (i.e., order duals of trees). Bi-Heyting algebras of this kind are called bi-G\"odel algebras and form a variety that algebraizes the extension $\mathsf{bi}$-$\mathsf{LC}$ of bi-intuitionistic logic axiomatized by the G\"odel-Dummett axiom. In this paper we initiate the study of the lattice $\Lambda(\mathsf{bi}$-$\mathsf{LC})$ of extensions of $\mathsf{bi}$-$\mathsf{LC}$. We develop the methods of Jankov-style formulas for bi-G\"odel algebras and use them to prove that there are exactly continuum many extensions of $\mathsf{bi}$-$\mathsf{LC}$. We also show that all these extensions can be uniformly axiomatized by canonical formulas. Our main result is a characterization of the locally tabular extensions of $\mathsf{bi}$-$\mathsf{LC}$. We introduce a sequence of co-trees, called the finite combs, and show that a logic in $\mathsf{bi}$-$\mathsf{LC}$ is locally tabular iff it contains at least one of the Jankov formulas associated with the finite combs. It follows that there exists the greatest non-locally tabular extension of $\mathsf{bi}$-$\mathsf{LC}$ and consequently, a unique pre-locally tabular extension of $\mathsf{bi}$-$\mathsf{LC}$. These results contrast with the case of the intermediate logic axiomatized by the G\"odel-Dummett axiom, which is known to have only countably many extensions, all of which are locally tabular.

Sahlqvist theory is extended to the fragments of the intuitionistic propositional calculus that include the conjunction connective. This allows us to introduce a Sahlqvist theory of intuitionistic character amenable to arbitrary protoalgebraic deductive systems. As an application, we obtain a Sahlqvist theorem for the fragments of the intuitionistic propositional calculus that include the implication connective and for the extensions of the intuitionistic linear logic., Comment: 50 pages

We develop a duality for (modal) lattices that need not be distributive, and use it to study positive (modal) logic beyond distributivity, which we call weak positive (modal) logic. This duality builds on the Hofmann, Mislove and Stralka duality for meet-semilattices. We introduce the notion of $\Pi_1$-persistence and show that every weak positive modal logic is $\Pi_1$-persistent. This approach leads to a new relational semantics for weak positive modal logic, for which we prove an analogue of Sahlqvist correspondence result.

For (finitary) deductive systems, we formulate a signature-independent abstraction of the \emph{weak excluded middle law} (WEML), which strengthens the existing general notion of an inconsistency lemma (IL). Of special interest is the case where a quasivariety $\mathsf{K}$ algebraizes a deductive system $\,\vdash$. We prove that, in this case, if $\,\vdash$ has a WEML (in the general sense) then every relatively subdirectly irreducible member of $\mathsf{K}$ has a greatest proper $\mathsf{K}$-congruence; the converse holds if $\,\vdash$ has an inconsistency lemma. The result extends, in a suitable form, to all protoalgebraic logics. A super-intuitionistic logic possesses a WEML iff it extends $\mathbf{KC}$. We characterize the IL and the WEML for normal modal logics and for relevance logics. A normal extension of $\mathbf{S4}$ has a global consequence relation with a WEML iff it extends $\mathbf{S4.2}$, while every axiomatic extension of $\mathbf{R^t}$ with an IL has a WEML.

The logics RL, RP, and RG have been obtained by expanding Lukasiewicz logic L, product logic P, and G\"odel--Dummett logic G with rational constants. We study the lattices of extensions and structural completeness of these three expansions, obtaining results that stand in contrast to the known situation in L, P, and G. Namely, RL is hereditarily structurally complete. RP is algebraized by the variety of rational product algebras that we show to be Q-universal. We provide a base of admissible rules in RP, show their decidability, and characterize passive structural completeness for extensions of RP. Furthermore, structural completeness, hereditary structural completeness, and active structural completeness coincide for extensions of RP, and this is also the case for extensions of RG, where in turn passive structural completeness is characterized by the equivalent algebraic semantics having the joint embedding property. For nontrivial axiomatic extensions of RG we provide a base of admissible rules. We leave the problem open whether the variety of rational G\"odel algebras is Q-universal.

It is proved that epimorphisms are surjective in a range of varieties of residuated structures, including all varieties of Heyting or Brouwerian algebras of finite depth, and all varieties consisting of Goedel algebras, relative Stone algebras, Sugihara monoids or positive Sugihara monoids. This establishes the infinite deductive Beth definability property for a corresponding range of substructural logics. On the other hand, it is shown that epimorphisms need not be surjective in a locally finite variety of Heyting or Brouwerian algebras of width 2. It follows that the infinite Beth property is strictly stronger than the so-called finite Beth property, confirming a conjecture of Blok and Hoogland.

A logic is said to admit an equational completeness theorem when it can be interpreted into the equational consequence relative to some class of algebras. We characterize logics admitting an equational completeness theorem that are either locally tabular or have some tautology. In particular, it is shown that a protoalgebraic logic admits an equational completeness theorem precisely when its has two distinct logically equivalent formulas. While the problem of determining whether a logic admits an equational completeness theorem is shown to be decidable both for logics presented by a finite set of finite matrices and for locally tabular logics presented by a finite Hilbert calculus, it becomes undecidable for arbitrary logics presented by finite Hilbert calculi.

We prove that there exist profinite Heyting algebras that are not isomorphic to the profinite completion of any Heyting algebra. This resolves an open problem from 2009. More generally, we characterize those varieties of Heyting algebras in which profinite algebras are isomorphic to profinite completions. It turns out that there exists largest such. We give different characterizations of this variety and show that it is finitely axiomatizable and locally finite. From this it follows that it is decidable whether in a finitely axiomatizable variety of Heyting algebras all profinite members are profinite completions. In addition, we introduce and characterize representable varieties of Heyting algebras, thus drawing connection to the classical problem of representing posets as prime spectra.

A Leibniz class is a class of logics closed under the formation of term-equivalent logics, compatible expansions, and non-indexed products of sets of logics. We study the complete lattice of all Leibniz classes, called the Leibniz hierarchy. In particular, it is proved that the classes of truth-equational and assertional logics are meet-prime in the Leibniz hierarchy, while the classes of protoalgebraic and equivalential logics are meet-reducible. However, the last two classes are shown to be determined by Leibniz conditions consisting of meet-prime logics only.

A notion of interpretation between arbitrary logics is introduced, and the poset Log of all logics ordered under interpretability is studied. It is shown that in Log infima of arbitrarily large sets exist, but binary suprema in general do not. On the other hand, the existence of suprema of sets of equivalential logics is established. The relations between Log and the lattice of interpretability types of varieties are investigated.

We present a logical and algebraic description of right adjoint functors between generalized quasi-varieties, inspired by the work of McKenzie on category equivalence. This result is achieved by developing a correspondence between the concept of adjunction and a new notion of translation between relative equational consequences.

It was shown recently that epimorphisms need not be surjective in a variety K of Heyting algebras, but only one counter-example was exhibited in the literature until now. Here, a continuum of such examples is identified, viz. the variety generated by the Rieger-Nishimura lattice, and all of its (locally finite) subvarieties that contain the original counter-example K. It is known that, whenever a variety of Heyting algebras has finite depth, then it has surjective epimorphisms. In contrast, we show that for every integer n greater or equal than 2, the variety of all Heyting algebras of width at most n has a non-surjective epimorphism. Within the so-called Kuznetsov-Gerciu variety (i.e., the variety generated by finite linear sums of one-generated Heyting algebras), we describe exactly the subvarieties that have surjective epimorphisms. This yields new positive examples, and an alternative proof of epimorphism surjectivity for all varieties of Goedel algebras. The results settle natural questions about Beth-style definability for a range of intermediate logics.

Abstract algebraic logic is a theory that provides general tools for the algebraic study of arbitrary propositional logics. According to this theory, every logic L is associated with a matrix semantics Mod*(L). This paper is a contribution to the systematic study of the so-called "truth sets" of the matrices in Mod*(L). In particular, we show that the fact that the truth sets of Mod*(L) can be defined by means of equations with universally quantified parameters is captured by an order-theoretic property of the Leibniz operator restricted to deductive filters of L. This result was previously known for equational definability without parameters. Similarly, it was known that the truth sets of Mod*(L) are implicitly definable if and only if the Leibniz operator is injective on deductive filters of L over every algebra. However, it was an open problem whether the injectivity of the Leibniz operator transfers from the theories of L to its deductive filters over arbitrary algebras. We show that this is the case for logics expressed in a countable language, and that it need not be true in general. Finally we consider an intermediate condition on the truth sets in Mod*(L) that corresponds to the order-reflection of the Leibniz operator.

Positive modal algebras are the positive-subreducts of modal algebras. We prove that the variety of positive S4-algebras is not locally finite. On the other hand, the free one-generated positive S4-algebra is shown to be finite. Moreover, we describe the bottom part of the lattice of varieties of positive S4-algebras. Building on this, we characterize (passively, hereditarily) structurally complete varieties of positive K4-algebras.

In this paper we consider, from a computational point of view, the problem of classifying logics within the Leibniz and Frege hierarchies typical of abstract algebraic logic. The main result states that, for logics presented syntactically, this problem is in general undecidable. More precisely, we show that there is no algorithm that classifies the logic of a finite consistent Hilbert calculus in the Leibniz and in the Frege hierarchies.

We prove that the problem of determining whether a finite logical matrix determines an algebraizable logic is complete for EXPTIME. The same result holds for the classes of order algebraizable, weakly algebraizable, equivalential and protoalgebraic logics. Finally, the same problem for the class of truth-equational logic is shown to be hard for EXPTIME.

A commutative residuated lattice A is said to be subidempotent if the lower bounds of its neutral element e are idempotent (in which case they naturally constitute a Brouwerian algebra A*). It is proved here that epimorphisms are surjective in a variety K of such algebras A (with or without involution), provided that each finitely subdirectly irreducible algebra B in K has two properties: (1) B is generated by lower bounds of e, and (2) the poset of prime filters of B* has finite depth. Neither (1) nor (2) may be dropped. The proof adapts to the presence of bounds. The result generalizes some recent findings of G. Bezhanishvili and the first two authors concerning epimorphisms in varieties of Brouwerian algebras, Heyting algebras and Sugihara monoids, but its scope also encompasses a range of interesting varieties of De Morgan monoids.

It is proved that every prevariety of algebras is categorically equivalent to a "prevariety of logic", i.e., to the equivalent algebraic semantics of some sentential deductive system. This allows us to show that no nontrivial equation in the language "meet, join, and relational product" holds in the congruence lattices of all members of every variety of logic, and that being a (pre)variety of logic is not a categorical property.

A quasivariety K of algebras has the joint embedding property (JEP) iff it is generated by a single algebra A. It is structurally complete iff the free countably generated algebra in K can serve as A. A consequence of this demand, called "passive structural completeness" (PSC), is that the nontrivial members of K all satisfy the same existential positive sentences. We prove that if K is PSC then it still has the JEP, and if it has the JEP and its nontrivial members lack trivial subalgebras, then its relatively simple members all belong to the universal class generated by one of them. Under these conditions, if K is relatively semisimple then it is generated by one K-simple algebra. It is a minimal quasivariety if, moreover, it is PSC but fails to unify some finite set of equations. We also prove that a quasivariety of finite type, with a finite nontrivial member, is PSC iff its nontrivial members have a common retract. The theory is then applied to the variety of De Morgan monoids, where we isolate the sub(quasi)varieties that are PSC and those that have the JEP, while throwing fresh light on those that are structurally complete. The results illuminate the extension lattices of intuitionistic and relevance logics.

The paper aims at studying, in full generality, logics defined by imposing a variable inclusion condition on a given logic $\vdash$. It turns out that the algebraic counterpart of the variable inclusion companion of a given logic $\vdash$ is obtained by constructing the Plonka sum of the matrix models of $\vdash$. This association allows to obtain a Hilbert-style axiomatization of the logics of variable inclusion and to describe the structure of their reduced models., Comment: to appear in Archive for Mathematical Logic

It is proved that every finitely subdirectly irreducible De Morgan monoid A (with neutral element e) is either (i) a Sugihara chain in which e covers not(e) or (ii) the union of an interval subalgebra [not(a), a] and two chains of idempotents, (not(a)] and [a), where a = (not(e))^2. In the latter case, the variety generated by [not(a), a] has no nontrivial idempotent member, and A/[not(a)) is a Sugihara chain in which not(e) = e. It is also proved that there are just four minimal varieties of De Morgan monoids. This theorem is then used to simplify the proof of a description (due to K. Swirydowicz) of the lower part of the subvariety lattice of relevant algebras. The results throw light on the models and the axiomatic extensions of fundamental relevance logics.

Generalizing a theorem of Campercholi, we characterize, in syntactic terms, the ranges of epimorphisms in an arbitrary class of similar first-order structures (as opposed to an elementary class). This allows us to strengthen a result of Isbell, as follows: in any prevariety having at most s non-logical symbols and an axiomatization requiring at most m variables, if the epimorphisms into structures with at most m + s + aleph0 elements are surjective, then so are all of the epimorphisms. Using these facts, we formulate and prove manageable "bridge theorems", matching the surjectivity of all epimorphisms in the algebraic counterpart of a logic L with suitable infinitary definability properties of L, while not making the standard but awkward assumption that L comes furnished with a proper class of variables.

The variety DMM of De Morgan monoids has just four minimal subvarieties. The join-irreducible covers of these atoms in the subvariety lattice of DMM are investigated. One of the two atoms consisting of idempotent algebras has no such cover; the other has just one. The remaining two atoms lack nontrivial idempotent members. They are generated, respectively, by 4-element De Morgan monoids C4 and D4, where C4 is the only nontrivial 0-generated algebra onto which finitely subdirectly irreducible De Morgan monoids may be mapped by non-injective homomorphisms. The homomorphic pre-images of C4 within DMM (together with the trivial De Morgan monoids) constitute a proper quasivariety, which is shown to have a largest subvariety U. The covers of the variety V(C4) within U are revealed here. There are just ten of them (all finitely generated). In exactly six of these ten varieties, all nontrivial members have C4 as a retract. In the varietal join of those six classes, every subquasivariety is a variety-in fact, every finite subdirectly irreducible algebra is projective. Beyond U, all covers of V(C4) [or of V(D4)] within DMM are discriminator varieties. Of these, we identify infinitely many that are finitely generated, and some that are not. We also prove that there are just 68 minimal quasivarieties of De Morgan monoids.

We generalise the Blok-J\'onsson account of structural consequence relations, later developed by Galatos, Tsinakis and other authors, in such a way as to naturally accommodate multiset consequence. While Blok and J\'onsson admit, in place of sheer formulas, a wider range of syntactic units to be manipulated in deductions (including sequents or equations), these objects are invariably aggregated via set-theoretical union. Our approach is more general in that non-idempotent forms of premiss and conclusion aggregation, including multiset sum and fuzzy set union, are considered. In their abstract form, thus, deductive relations are defined as additional compatible preorderings over certain partially ordered monoids. We investigate these relations using categorical methods, and provide analogues of the main results obtained in the general theory of consequence relations. Then we focus on the driving example of multiset deductive relations, providing variations of the methods of matrix semantics and Hilbert systems in Abstract Algebraic Logic.