Search

This is the second part of the paper with the same title published inCommunications in Algebrain 2011. It contains applications of the Latticial Osofsky–Smith Theorem to Grothendieck categories and module categories equipped with a torsion theory. Various many different meanings spread in the literature of the relative concepts with respect to a hereditary torsion theory τ on Mod-Rlike τ-essential submodule, τ-complement submodule, τ-CS module, etc. are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

We consider the concept of prime submodule defined by Raggi et al. [7]. We find equivalent conditions for a module M progenerator in σ[M], with τ M -Gabriel dimension, to have a one-to-one correspondence between the set of isomorphism classes of indecomposable τ-torsion free injective modules in σ[M] and the set of τ-pure submodules prime in M, where τ is a hereditary torsion theory in σ[M]. Also we give a relation between the concept of prime M-ideal given by Beachy and the concept of prime submodule in M. We obtain that if M is progenerator in σ[M], then these concepts are equivalent. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Let R be a right perfect ring, and let (ℱ, 𝒞) be a cotorsion theory in the category of right R-modules ℳ R . In this article, it is shown that every right R-module has a superfluous ℱ-cover if and only if there exists a torsion theory (𝒜, ℬ) such that (ℱ, 𝒞) is cogenerated by ℬ. It is also proved that if (𝒜, ℬ) is a cosplitting torsion theory, then (⊥ℬ, (⊥ℬ)⊥) is a hereditary and complete cotorsion theory, and if (𝒜, ℬ) is a centrally splitting torsion theory, then (⊥ℬ, (⊥ℬ)⊥) is a hereditary and perfect cotorsion theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Let R be a ring. A collection of R-modules containing the zero module and closed under isomorphisms will be denoted by X. An R-module M is said to be X -lifting if for every X-submodule N of M there exists A ≤ N such that M = A ⊕ B and N ∩ B is small in B [11]. In the present paper, we consider the question: Can we characterize X-lifting modules via objects of the class X ? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Let A be a pseudocompact (or profinite) algebra, so where C is a coalgebra. We show that the if the semiartinian part (the “Dickson” part) of every A-module M splits off in M, then A is semiartinian, giving thus a positive answer in the case of algebras arising as dual of coalgebras (pseudocompact algebras), to a well known conjecture of Faith. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Many known results on finite von Neumann algebras are generalized, by purely algebraic proofs, to a certain class of finite Baer *-rings. The results in this paper can also be viewed as a study of the properties of Baer *-rings in the class . First, we show that a finitely generated module over a ring from the class splits as a direct sum of a finitely generated projective module and a certain torsion module. Then, we define the dimension of any module over a ring from and prove that this dimension has all the nice properties of the dimension studied in [W. Lück, J. Reine Angew. Math. 495 (1998) 135–162] for finite von Neumann algebras. This dimension defines a torsion theory that we prove to be equal to the Goldie and Lambek torsion theories. Moreover, every finitely generated module splits in this torsion theory. If R is a ring in , we can embed it in a canonical way into a regular ring Q also in . We show that is isomorphic to by producing an explicit isomorphism and its inverse of monoids that extends to the isomorphism of and . [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Let R be a ring, M a right R-module and a hereditary torsion theory in Mod-R with associated torsion functor τ for the ring R. Then M is called τ-supplemented when for every submodule N of M there exists a direct summand K of M such that K ≤ N and N/K is τ-torsion module. In [4], M is called almost τ-torsion if every proper submodule of M is τ-torsion. We present here some properties of these classes of modules and look for answers to the following questions posed by the referee of the paper [4]: (1) Let a module M = M′ ⊕ M″ be a direct sum of a semisimple module M′ and τ-supplemented module M″. Is M τ-supplemented? (2) Can one find a non-stable hereditary torsion theory τ and τ-supplemented modules M′ and M″ such that M′ ⊕ M″ is not τ-supplemented? (3) Can one find a stable hereditary torsion theory τ and a τ-supplemented module M such that M/N is not τ-supplemented for some submodule N of M? (4) Let τ be a non-stable hereditary torsion theory and the module M be a finite direct sum of almost τ-torsion submodules. Is M τ-supplemented? (5) Do you know an example of a torsion theory τ and a τ-supplemented module M with τ-torsion submodule τ(M) such that M/τ(M) is not semisimple? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]