Search

The current research investigated mindfulness, savoring and temporal balance and how they are related to temporal perspective (TP) in materialistic individuals in a sample of 404 University students. Recent research on materialism and TP has found that highly materialistic individuals are more likely to have a past-negative or present fatalistic perspective rather than a balanced temporal perspective which is considered the most adaptive. Given these findings, it was hypothesized that materialism is negatively related to mindfulness and savoring, which involve having a clear focus on the present moment. It was also hypothesized that materialism is positively associated with the unbalanced types of TP, the "reminiscer", "futurist" and "time restrictive" and that materialism is associated with deviation from the balanced time perspective (DBTP). In addition, it was hypothesized that mindfulness and savoring mediate the relationship between DBTP and materialism. The results are consistent with these hypotheses as mindfulness was negatively related to materialism and savoring the moment was related to lower levels of materialism. Materialism was also associated with higher DBTP scores and the "reminiscer" and "futurist" unbalanced temporal styles. Mindfulness, savoring the moment and anticipation-savoring were found to be mediators in the DBTP and materialism relationship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psychological flexibility, or the ability to flexibly respond to psychological events, may be associated with peoples' preferences for material versus experiential purchases, their attachment to objects and experiences, and their motivation for non-material purchases. The present research tested predictions that greater psychological flexibility and lesser psychological inflexibility are associated with lower materialism and non-attachment (Study 1) and with a greater preference for, and internal motivation toward, experiential versus material purchases (Study 2). Study 1 (N = 298 undergraduates) revealed relationships between psychological inflexibility, high materialism, and attachment, and between psychological flexibility, low materialism, and non-attachment. Non-attachment was a meditator in the relationships between both flexibility and inflexibility and materialism. Study 2 (N = 299 undergraduates) revealed that psychological flexibility was correlated with both experiential buying and autonomous reasons for experiential buying, whereas inflexibility was related to controlled and amotivated reasons for experiential buying. We discuss the research and practice implications of the current findings. • Psychological flexibility/inflexibility & non-attachment correlate with materialism. • Non-attachment mediates the relationship between flexibility and materialism. • Psychological flexibility is related to experiential over material purchases. • Flexibility is related to autonomous motivation for experiential purchases. • Inflexibility is related to heteronomous motivation for experiential purchases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] Agreeableness, neuroticism and materialism were investigated. [•] High levels of materialism were found with high neuroticism and low agreeableness. [•] High neurotic and agreeable and low neurotic and agreeable were medium materialist. [•] Low levels of materialism were found with low neuroticism and high agreeableness. [•] Agreeableness did not moderate relationship between neuroticism and materialism. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]