Search

Since 2013, selective dry cow treatment (SDCT) has been the standard approach in the Netherlands where farmers select cows for the use of antimicrobials at drying-off. Shortly after its introduction, antimicrobial usage decreased significantly, and no significant association was found between the level of SDCT and clinical mastitis (CM). Obviously, at that time long-term associations could not be evaluated. This study aimed to provide insight into the methods and level of implementation of SDCT on Dutch dairy farms with a conventional milking system (CMS) or an automatic milking system (AMS) in 2016 and 2017, several years after the implementation of SDCT. Udder health and antimicrobial use were also assessed. For this study, 262 farmers recorded dry cow treatments as well as all CM cases in the period from May 1, 2016, until April 30, 2017. Additionally, somatic cell count (SCC) data on cow and herd level, treatment data on herd level and questionnaire results on udder health management were collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with differences between milking systems being evaluated using nonparametric univariable statistics. In the study period, SDCT was applied on almost all (98.8%) of the participating dairy farms. The main reason for applying antimicrobials at drying-off was either the SCC history during the complete previous lactation or the SCC at the last milk recording before drying-off. The median percentage of cows treated with antimicrobials was 48.5%. The average incidence rate of CM was 27.3 cases per 100 cows per year. From all CM cases that were registered per herd, on average 32.8% were scored as mild, 42.2% as moderate, and 25.0% as severe CM. The mean bulk tank SCC of the herds was 168,989 cells/mL. A cow was considered to have subclinical mastitis (SCM) if individual SCC was ≥150,000 cells/mL for primiparous and ≥250,000 cells/mL for multiparous cows. Passing these threshold values after 2 earlier low SCC values was considered a new case of SCM. The mean incidence rate of SCM in these herds was 62.5 cases per 100 cows per year. Bulk tank SCC and the incidence rate of SCM on farms with a CMS were statistically lower than on farms with an AMS, whereas the incidence rate of CM did not significantly differ between both groups of farms. The AMS farms had more cows per herd treated with antimicrobials at drying-off and a larger proportion of severe CM cases than did CMS farms. It is unknown whether the differences are due to the milking system or to other differences between both types of farms. This study showed the level of adoption of SDCT, udder health, and antimicrobial usage parameters several years after the ban on the preventive use of antimicrobials in animal husbandry. It found that udder health parameters did not differ from those found in Dutch studies before and around the time of implementing SDCT, whereas SDCT was widely applied on Dutch dairy farms during the study period. Therefore, it was concluded that Dutch dairy farmers were able to handle the changed policy of antimicrobial use at drying-off while maintaining indicators of a good udder health., (© 2022, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)

In 2013, the preventive use of antimicrobials in Dutch livestock was prohibited, including a ban on the blanket application of antimicrobial dry cow treatment (BDCT). Since then, selective dry cow treatment (SDCT) has become the standard approach. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of the ban on BDCT and the extent of the subsequent adoption of SDCT on antimicrobial usage (AMU) and udder health on Dutch dairy farms. In the Dutch cattle health surveillance system, AMU for dry cow treatment (AMU DCT ), AMU for intramammary treatment at any point in time (AMU IMM ), and udder health indicators are routinely and continuously monitored. This provided the opportunity to study associations among SDCT, udder health, and AMU on census data of approximately 17,000 dairy herds, with about 1.67 million cows in total (>2 yr old) at one moment in time in the period from 2013 until 2017. Six udder health parameters were evaluated using multivariable population-averaged generalized estimating equation models. The year in which the ban on BDCT was introduced (2013) was compared with the period thereafter (2014-2017). Additionally, AMU IMM and AMU DCT were included as independent variables to evaluate whether the extent to which SDCT was implemented on the herd level was associated with udder health. Demographic parameters were included as potential confounders. Since the ban on BDCT, overall declines of 63% in AMU DCT and 15% in AMU IMM were observed. The raw data show an improvement in 5 out of 6 evaluated udder health parameters between 2013 and 2017. Nevertheless, the multivariable model results showed that the period since the ban on BDCT was associated with a small but significant increase in the percentage of cows with high somatic cell count (HSCC) and new HSCC (+0.41% and +0.06%, respectively). Additionally, the probability of belonging to the group of herds with more than 25% of primiparous cows having HSCC during the start of lactation increased slightly, associated with the period after which BDCT was banned (odds ratio = 1.08). The probability of belonging to the group of herds with more than 25% cows having a persistent HSCC during the dry period was not affected and bulk milk somatic cell count showed a slight but significant reduction. The only udder health parameter that notably worsened during the study period was the probability of belonging to the group of herds with more than 25% of multiparous cows with a new HSCC after the dry period, during the start of lactation (odds ratio = 1.23). In herds where the farmer decided not to apply any dry cow therapy (≈20% of all herds), all udder health parameters were poorer compared with herds in which dry cow therapy was applied to some extent. The ban on BDCT and implementation of SDCT in the Netherlands was associated with a considerable reduction in AMU without a major impairment in udder health at the national level. Although negative effects of changed dry cow management were observed in some herds, we conclude that SDCT can be introduced without substantial negative effects on udder health., (Copyright © 2021 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the Netherlands, regulations have been in place since 2008 to reduce the overall use of antimicrobials to mitigate antimicrobial resistance. As part of these regulations, a ban on the preventive use of antimicrobials, such as applying blanket dry cow treatment, was introduced and alternative measures such as selective dry cow treatment (SDCT) were implemented. Both farmers and veterinarians play an important role in implementing these measures and have a shared responsibility with respect to prudent antimicrobial use (AMU). The attitude of Dutch dairy veterinarians toward restricted AMU and toward SDCT is unknown, but a favorable attitude toward this approach seems crucial for successful implementation. In 2015, an online questionnaire was collected from 181 veterinarians that contained questions with regard to their attitude and behavior toward reduction of AMU and toward SDCT. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data, and multivariable logistic regression models with a logit link function were applied to evaluate potential associations between veterinarians' attitudes toward AMU and SDCT and the rationale behind their mindset, based on positive and negative aspects of reduction in AMU. The veterinarians were divided into 3 groups based on their opinion on 4 statements with regard to AMU and SDCT: veterinarians with an unfavorable, a neutral, and a favorable attitude toward reduction of AMU and toward SDCT. For the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the first 2 groups were combined and compared with the veterinarians with a favorable attitude. The general attitude of Dutch dairy veterinarians toward reduction of AMU was positive, and most expressed the belief that they can still be a good veterinarian when they prescribe less antimicrobials. Veterinarians indicated they progressively promoted SDCT beginning in 2013. Most veterinarians see the advice they provide to farmers on SDCT as the best possible approach and are convinced that their farmers apply this SDCT approach. The results of the multivariable analyses showed that veterinarians with a favorable attitude mentioned positive aspects of SDCT, such as an increased consciousness of AMU among farmers, improving animal health, reducing antimicrobial resistance, and a chance to add value for the farmer, more often than other veterinarians. The latter group significantly more often indicated negative aspects of SDCT, such as a higher risk of sick cows and feeling pushed to follow the rules. In conclusion, the general attitude of Dutch dairy veterinarians toward reduction of AMU and SDCT was found to be positive. However, given the influence veterinarians potentially have on the attitude of farmers and the variability found in their attitude and behavior, veterinarians need specific attention if regional or national programs are organized trying to change behavior of farmers and encourage prudent AMU and SDCT., (Copyright © 2018 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The attitude of Dutch dairy farmers toward selective dry cow treatment (SDCT) is unknown, although a favorable mindset toward application of SDCT seems crucial for successful implementation. Given the fact that blanket dry cow treatment has been strongly promoted until recently, the implementation of SDCT was expected to be quite a challenge. This study aimed to provide insight into the level of implementation of SDCT in 2013 in the Netherlands, the methods used by farmers for selection of cows for dry cow treatment (DCT), the relation between SDCT and udder health and antimicrobial usage (AMU) in 2013, and the mindset of farmers toward SDCT. In 2014, a questionnaire was conducted in a group of 177 herds included in a large-scale udder health study in 2013 and for which all clinical mastitis cases during this year were recorded. In addition, data on somatic cell count (SCC) parameters and AMU was available for these herds. The questionnaire included questions with regard to DCT with a special emphasis on farmers' attitude and mindset with regard to applying DCT in 2013. The data that were obtained from the questionnaire were combined with the data on clinical mastitis, SCC, and AMU. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data and to study the association between DCT, udder health, and AMU. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models with a logit link function were applied to evaluate potential associations between DCT and farmers' mindset. Selective DCT was taken up progressively by the farmers in our study, with 75% of them implementing SDCT in 2013. The main criterion used to select cows for DCT was the SCC history during the complete previous lactation. The herds were divided into 3 groups based on the percentage of cows dried off with antibiotics in 2013 as indicated by the farmers during interviews. The first group applied BDCT, and the herds for which SDCT was applied were split in 2 equally sized groups based on the median percentage of cows dried off with antibiotics (67%). The incidence rate of subclinical and clinical mastitis were comparable between the groups. Results of the multivariable model showed that 4 factors related to farmers' mindset were associated with the probability to apply SDCT: "financial consequences of SDCT," "uncertainty whether a cow will recover without antimicrobials," the statement "I do not have a problem with the (potential) negative consequences of SDCT," and the usage of internal teat sealants. Application of SDCT appeared to be associated with farmers' attitude. The mindset of farmers with respect to reduction of AMU and the implementation of SDCT was generally positive., (Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recently, many changes have been implemented in Dutch dairy herds. Herd sizes have increased and antimicrobial use has been reduced. Certain types of antimicrobials can only be used in specific circumstances, and the preventive use of antimicrobials in dry cows is prohibited. The aim of this study was to quantify clinical mastitis (CM), subclinical mastitis (SCM), and risk factors associated with CM in Dutch dairy herds in 2013, in the context of these changes. For this study, 240 dairy herds were randomly selected from farms that participated in test-day milk recording, used a conventional milking system, and agreed to participate in the study. Eventually, 233 Dutch dairy farmers had complete records of CM in their herds in 2013 and 224 of these farmers completed a questionnaire on management factors potentially associated with CM. All participating farmers gave consent to use their routinely collected herd data such as test-day records and cow identification and registration data. Clinical and subclinical mastitis incidence rate (CMI and SCMI, respectively) per 100 cows per year, subclinical mastitis prevalence, and average bulk tank milk somatic cell count were obtained for 2013. The risk factor analysis was conducted using a generalized linear model with a log link function and a negative binomial distribution on herd level in Stata 13.1. A median CMI of 28.6 per 100 cows at risk per year, SCMI of 70.1 per 100 cows at risk per year, SCM prevalence of 15.8%, and bulk tank milk somatic cell count of 171 × 10(3) cells/mL were observed in 2013. Factors that were significantly associated with a higher CMI were cleaning slatted floors only once per day compared with more than 4 times a day (i.e., mechanical), a higher percentage of Holstein Friesian cows present in the herd, treating less than 50% of the cows with CM with antimicrobials, postmilking teat disinfection, and treatment of cows with elevated somatic cell count with antimicrobials. The results of this study indicated that udder health had not deteriorated compared with udder health in previous Dutch studies where herd sizes were somewhat smaller and before the restrictions in antimicrobial use. Several of the risk factors that were found can be influenced by the farmer and can prevent the occurrence of CMI. Still, when cases of CM occur, treatment with antimicrobials might be necessary to cure the CM case and is beneficial for the overall udder health in the herd., (Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether it was possible to (1) estimate the clinical mastitis incidence rate (CMI) for all Dutch dairy herds and (2) to detect farms with a high CMI based on routinely collected herd data. For this study, 240 dairy farms with a conventional milking system that participated in the milk recording program every 4 to 6 wk were randomly selected and agreed to participate. From the initial 240 herds, data of clinical mastitis (CM) registrations and routinely collected herd data of 227 herds were complete and could be used for analysis. Routinely collected herd data consisted of identification and registration records, antimicrobial usage, test-day records from the milk recording program, bulk tank milk (BTM) somatic cell count data and results of diagnostic tests on BTM samples. For each of the 227 herds, the CMI per 100 cows per year was calculated per quarter of the year and was combined with the available herd data. Two models were developed to predict the CMI for all dairy herds and to detect individual herds that belonged to the 25% herds with the highest CMI. Records of 156 (67%) herds were used for development of the models and the remaining 71 (33%) were used for validation. The model that estimated the CMI in all herds consisted of 11 explanatory variables. The observed and predicted averages of the validation herds were not significantly different. The model estimated a CMI per 100 cows per year of 32.5 cases (95% confidence interval=30.2-34.8), whereas the farmers registered 33.4 cases (95% confidence interval=29.5-37.4). The model that aimed at detecting individual herds with a high CMI contained 6 explanatory variables and could correctly classify 77% of all validation herds at the quarter-year level. The most important variables in the model were antibiotic usage for treating CM and BTM somatic cell count. In conclusion, models based on routinely collected herd data gave an accurate prediction of CMI for all Dutch dairy herds and could detect individual dairy herds with a high CMI. With these models it is possible to periodically monitor CMI both at the herd and at the national level, which is valuable for monitoring purposes and can motivate farmers to continuously improve udder health in their herds., (Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Heifer mastitis is a problem and risk factors may differ between heifers and older cows. The aim of this study was to estimate the heifer subclinical mastitis (HSCLM) incidence based on elevated somatic cell count (SCC) in the first 100 d in lactation and the associated risk factors in Dutch dairy herds. In 2008, 173 farmers filled in a questionnaire regarding housing and herd management factors potentially related to udder health. In addition, monthly milk production and SCC data from all cattle were provided by the Dutch Royal Cattle Syndicate (CRV, Arnhem, the Netherlands). Heifer subclinical mastitis incidence was calculated at the herd level as the number of heifer cases divided by the number of heifers at risk in the first 100 d in milk. Linear regression models were used for the analyses. On average, 25.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 23.9 to 27.0%] of the heifers had subclinical mastitis. Heifers with a high SCC (>150,000 cells/mL) on the first test day after calving that returned to SCC levels below the cut-off continued to have a higher SCC throughout the study period compared with heifers with a low SCC (≤150,000 cells/mL) at the first test day after calving. Housing heifers together with lactating cows close to calving was protective from HSCLM incidence compared with separate housing (-4.5%; 95% CI: -8.7 to -0.2%). In addition, herds in which the farmer removed supernumerary teats of calves had a 7.0% (95% CI: 2.8 to 11.3%) lower HSCLM incidence and day and night grazing was also protective (-5.9%; 95% CI: -10.6 to -1.3%). Herds that were milked with an automatic milking system had, on average, a 6.9% (95% CI: 2.2 to 11.5%) higher HSCLM incidence and submitting milk samples for bacteriological culturing in the previous year was also associated with a higher HSCLM incidence (4.1%; 95% CI: 1.1 to 7.1%). Heifer subclinical mastitis is prevalent in all dairy herds, with a large variation in incidence. A high SCC in heifers at the first test day after calving appears to indicate a prolonged effect on udder health. Several management factors were found to be associated with HSCLM incidence that may help in reducing HSCLM., (Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The effect was quantified of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) intramammary infections on quarter- and cow-level somatic cell count (SCC) and on bulk milk somatic cell count (BMSCC) in different BMSCC cohorts in Dutch dairy herds. Two datasets were used for this purpose. In the first dataset, on 49 randomly selected dairy farms a total of 4220 quarter milk samples of 1072 cows were collected of all cows and heifers with a test-day SCC 250 000 and 150 000 cells/ml, respectively, and of 25% of cows and heifers below these thresholds. In the second dataset, on 39 selected dairy farms a total of 8329 quarter milk samples of 2115 cows were collected of all cows with a test-day SCC 250 000 cells/ml following two consecutive SCC <250 000 cells/ml, and of heifers using the same SCC criteria but with a threshold of 150 000 cells/ml. These cows and heifers were defined as new high SCC. In both datasets, CNS was the most frequently isolated pathogen, 11% in the first dataset and 12% in the second dataset. In both datasets, quarters with CNS IMI had a lower SCC than quarters infected with major pathogens, and a higher SCC than culture-negative quarters. The same was found for SCC at cow level. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were more often found in quarters with SCC 200 000 cells/ml in dairy farms with a BMSCC <150 000 cells/ml compared with dairy farms with a higher BMSCC. Prevalence of CNS in cows and heifers with a high SCC was higher in dairy farms with a BMSCC <150 000 cells/ml compared with dairy farms with a medium or high BMSCC: 30, 19 and 18%, respectively. This indicates that CNS IMI as a cause of subclinical mastitis is relatively more important in dairy farms with a low BMSCC and may become a point of attention in udder health management on that type of farm.