Search

Chlamydia trachomatis infections during pregnancy may have serious consequences for women and their offspring. Chlamydial infections are largely asymptomatic. Hence, prevention is based on screening. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of C. trachomatis screening during pregnancy. We used a health-economic decision analysis model, which included potential health outcomes of C. trachomatis infection for women, partners and infants, and premature delivery. We estimated the cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective using recent prevalence data from a population-based prospective cohort study among pregnant women in the Netherlands. We calculated the averted costs by linking health outcomes with health care costs and productivity losses. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as net costs per major outcome prevented and was estimated in base-case analysis, sensitivity, and scenario analysis. In the base-case analysis, the costs to detect 1000 pregnant women with C. trachomatis were estimated at €527,900. Prevention of adverse health outcomes averted €626,800 in medical costs, resulting in net cost savings. Sensitivity analysis showed that net cost savings remained with test costs up to €22 (test price €19) for a broad range of variation in underlying assumptions. Scenario analysis showed even more cost savings with targeted screening for women less than 30 years of age or with first pregnancies only. Antenatal screening for C. trachomatis is a cost-saving intervention when testing all pregnant women in the Netherlands. Savings increase even further when testing women younger than 30 years of age or with pregnancies only.

Objective: To inform development of guidelines for hypertension management in Vietnam, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of different strategies on screening for hypertension in preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD)., Methods: A decision tree was combined with a Markov model to measure incremental cost-effectiveness of different approaches to hypertension screening. Values used as input parameters for the model were taken from different sources. Various screening intervals (one-off, annually, biannually) and starting ages to screen (35, 45 or 55 years) and coverage of treatment were analysed. We ran both a ten-year and a lifetime horizon. Input parameters for the models were extracted from local and regional data. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate parameter uncertainty. A threshold of three times GDP per capita was applied., Results: Cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained varied in different screening scenarios. In a ten-year horizon, the cost-effectiveness of screening for hypertension ranged from cost saving to Int$ 758,695 per QALY gained. For screening of men starting at 55 years, all screening scenarios gave a high probability of being cost-effective. For screening of females starting at 55 years, the probability of favourable cost-effectiveness was 90% with one-off screening. In a lifetime horizon, cost per QALY gained was lower than the threshold of Int$ 15,883 in all screening scenarios among males. Similar results were found in females when starting screening at 55 years. Starting screening in females at 45 years had a high probability of being cost-effective if screening biannually was combined with increasing coverage of treatment by 20% or even if sole biannual screening was considered., Conclusion: From a health economic perspective, integrating screening for hypertension into routine medical examination and related coverage by health insurance could be recommended. Screening for hypertension has a high probability of being cost-effective in preventing CVD. An adequate screening strategy can best be selected based on age, sex and screening interval.

This paper provides an estimation of the lifetime health-care cost of HIV-infected children and an update of the cost-effectiveness of universal HIV-screening of pregnant women in Amsterdam (The Netherlands). During 2003-2005, we collected data concerning the prevalence of newly diagnosed HIV-infected pregnant women in Amsterdam. Also, data on resource utilization and HAART regimen for HIV-infected children was gathered from a national registry. Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, we estimated the life-expectancy of a vertically HIV-infected child at 19 years, with the corresponding lifetime health-care costs of 179,974 Euros. HIV-screening of pregnant women could prevent 2.4 HIV transmissions annually in Amsterdam, based on an estimated prevalence of nine yet undiagnosed HIV-positive pregnant women per 10,000 pregnancies. We show that universal HIV screening during pregnancy generates significant net cost savings and health benefits in most situations. Universal antenatal HIV screening is justified in Amsterdam from a health-economic point of view.

The health economic concepts of dominance were reviewed on the basis of two recently published cost-effectiveness analyses on screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis, one in this journal. On the basis of dominance, some strategies may be deleted from the set options from which to choose. The two investigated studies were from the United Kingdom and The Netherlands. Both studies nicely illustrate situations of so-called extended dominance in practical decision making. Extended dominance is a theoretical topic in many health-economic text books but is only scarcely encountered in daily practice. Although the concept of extended dominance is theoretical in nature, a formal analysis and explanation may help show which options under consideration are not optimal from a strictly health-economic perspective; however, these options might still be attractive policy options for other reasons.

Early treatment of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections reflects a new clinical paradigm and a significant option to reduce the socioeconomic burden of HCV. Therefore, this approach seems suitable as a new strategy to face HCV and prevent end stage liver diseases and premature deaths due to progressed chronic HCV-infections. The main limitation of this approach is that the majority of acute infections show an asymptomatic course and do thus not present to the health-care settings. Screening for HCV has already been extensively studied in the literature. This paper offers further insights in screening for HCV using cost effectiveness analysis for the impact of screening in two cohorts: Injecting Drug Users (IDUs) and Individuals With Surgery (IWSs). The setting of the cost effectiveness simulation is the Veneto Region in the North-east of Italy. Using a Markov model of the natural history of HCV infection we derive costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness related to screening vs. no-screening strategies. In the IDUs cohort, the screening strategy can result in a substantial difference in premature deaths and dominates (less costs better outcomes) the no-screening one. The overall outcomes of the screening strategy are mostly affected by the prevalence of HCV and of genotypes that are more relatively more difficult to treat (above 10% of prevalence for its cost effectiveness). The number of premature deaths prevented in the IWSs cohort is lower and there seems to be an unacceptable incremental cost per QALY gained, which may be unsustainable for society.

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of universal HIV screening of patients attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases (STD) in Amsterdam., Design: Cost effectiveness analysis., Methods: A Bernoulli model for the secondary transmission of HIV was linked with epidemiological data on infection with HIV and other STD in patients attending a STD clinic in Amsterdam from 1991 to 1997. This gave estimates of the number of secondary HIV infections caused by attenders of the STD clinic. Combined with data on the health and monetary benefits of averting HIV infection and costs of HIV screening, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of HIV-screening of attenders of the STD clinic., Results: Increased risk for HIV infection was found in STD clinic attendees infected with other STD. (odds ratio, 2.07). The risk differed for specific STD: the highest odds ratios were found for syphilis and gonorrhoea. Screening of all attendees was estimated at net costs of 82,552 Euro per secondary infection averted. The cost-effectiveness ranges between 680 Euro and 9335 Euro per life-year gained, depending on the value of key parameters used in the model., Conclusion: Compared to other interventions in infectious diseases control in the Netherlands, screening of STD clinic attendees for HIV has an acceptable cost-effectiveness.

Objectives: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of a systematic screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a female inner city population. To determine the sensitivity of the cost effectiveness analysis to variation in the probability of developing sequelae., Methods: A decision tree was constructed to evaluate health effects of the programme, such as averted sequelae of chlamydial infection. Cost effectiveness from a societal perspective was estimated for screening by means of a ligase chain reaction on mailed, home obtained urine specimens, in a population with a C trachomatis test prevalence of 2.9%. An extensive sensitivity analysis was performed for the probability of sequelae, the percentage of preventable pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and the discount rate., Results: The estimated net cost of curing one woman, aged 15-40 years, of a C trachomatis infection is US$1210. To prevent one major outcome (PID, tubal factor infertility, ectopic pregnancy, chronic pelvic pain, or neonatal pneumonia), 479 women would have to be screened. The net cost of preventing one major outcome is $15 800. Changing the probability of PID after chlamydial infection from 5% to 25% decreases the net cost per major outcome averted from $28 300 to $6380, a reduction of 78%. Results were less sensitive to variations in estimates for other sequelae. The breakeven prevalence of the programme ranges from 6.4% for the scenario with all probabilities for complications set at the maximum value to a prevalence of 100% for probabilities set at the minimum value., Conclusions: Systematic screening of all women aged 15-40 years for asymptomatic C trachomatis infections is not cost effective. Although the results of the analyses are sensitive to variation in the assumptions, the costs exceed the benefits, even in the most optimistic scenario.

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for male partners in screening women for asymptomatic infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT)., Methods and Data: A pharmacoeconomic decision analysis model was constructed for the health outcomes of a CT screening program, such as averted cases of pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility (major outcomes). Reinfection in the absence of partner pharmacotherapy was included in the model. Cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective was estimated for prevalence data from a selective opportunistic screening program in Amsterdam. For diagnosis of asymptomatic CT infection a Ligase Chain Reaction (LCR) test on urine was used; for pharmacotherapy of women and partners azithromycin was used. By linking health outcomes with health care costs and productivity losses, averted costs were estimated. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as net costs per major outcome averted., Results: Partner pharmacotherapy reduces net costs per major outcome averted of the screening program by approximately 50%. Sensitivity analysis indicates significant improvements in cost-effectiveness of the screening program, even when relevant assumptions are varied. Within the broader framework of the screening program, partner pharmacotherapy is a cost-saving activity., Conclusions: Inclusion of partner pharmacotherpy provides significant improvements in overall cost-effectiveness of the CT screening program among women aged 15 to 29. Partner pharmacotherapy lowers net costs per major outcome averted to the realm where implementation of the screening program should be considered. Considering the cost-saving potential, male partner pharmacotherapy should be pursued within the broader framework of a CT screening program for women. Reinfection should be included in any future pharmacoeconomic model of CT screening. Further work on this type of model should also be directed to linking cost-effectiveness to epidemiological models for the long-term spread of infectious diseases in populations.

The design of a screening program for asymptomatic genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis, requires decisions about which sex or age group should be targeted and whether partner referral should be included in the program. To investigate the effects of various screening programs on the prevalence and incidence of asymptomatic C. trachomatis infections in women, in May 1996 to April 1997 in Bilthoven, the Netherlands, the authors used a stochastic simulation model for C. trachomatis transmission in an age-structured, heterosexual population with a sexually highly active core group. Different screening scenarios were implemented over a time period of 10 years. Prevalence, incidence, and the fraction of infected persons found by partner referral were computed. Through screening of men and women between ages 15 and 24 years (baseline scenario), the prevalence of asymptomatic infections in women could be reduced from 4.2% to 1.4% in 10 years. Increasing the age range of screening up to ages 29 or 34 years led to prevalences of 0.4% and 0.06%, respectively, after 10 years. About 28% of all infected persons were found via partner referral. There are considerable indirect positive effects of screening on those population groups that are not included in the screening because of the reduced risk of becoming infected. Partner referral contributes substantially to prevalence reduction.

Screening for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in early pregnancy is included in routine antenatal care for several infectious agents in many western European countries. Pharmaco-economics of these interventions have been evaluated. Currently, reconsideration of antenatal screening is ongoing, with explicit attention given to extending the STD testing to some other infectious agents, such as HIV and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT). This paper examines the socio-economics of such extensions for the Netherlands and the UK. Based on pharmaco-economic investigations in the UK and the Netherlands, we argue that serious consideration should be given to expanding antenatal STD screening to include universal testing for HIV and CT. Further research should be directed to the economic aspects of paediatric HIV infection and the epidemiology of CT in pregnancy.

Background: Models commonly used for the economic assessment of chlamydial screening programs do not consider population effects., Goal: To develop a novel dynamic approach for the economic evaluation of chlamydial prevention measures and to determine the cost-effectiveness of a general practitioner-based screening program., Study Design: The dynamic approach was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a screening program for the first 10 years of screening in The Netherlands. Screening involved a ligase chain reaction test on urine followed by standardized therapies and partner referral. Eligible persons were sexually active, 15 to 24 years, visited a general practitioner, and had no symptoms of sexually transmitted diseases. The heterosexual model population, which consisted of persons 15 to 64 years, had a total chlamydial prevalence of 4.1% before screening. Screening effects on chlamydial incidence were computed by using a population-based stochastic simulation model. Incidence data were connected with a decision analysis model to determine the health effects of the program. The net costs of the program were calculated (investment costs minus averted costs, in 1997 US$) from a societal perspective and expressed per major outcome averted (symptomatic pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, infertility, neonatal pneumonia)., Results: Unlike the standard static approach, our model adequately addresses dynamic processes such as chlamydial transmission and the impact of screening programs on chlamydial incidence in the population. During the first 10 years of screening, the investigated program yields savings of US $492 or US $1,086 per major outcome averted, excluding or including indirect costs, respectively. These results depend on chlamydial prevalence and partner referral., Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of chlamydial screening programs seems best to be determined by using dynamic modeling on a population basis. In addition to preventing negative health outcomes, the investigated screening program may save costs.

Objective: To estimate the cost effectiveness of universal screening for HIV of pregnant women in Amsterdam., Design: Pharmaco-economic model calculation., Method: An estimate was made of the minimal and maximal prevalences of undiagnosed HIV infection during pregnancy for the whole of Amsterdam, based on epidemiological data from observation among pregnant women in two Amsterdam hospitals and one obstetrical practice. The calculation was based on universal screening with an ELISA test. The interventions after screening comprised pharmacotherapy during pregnancy, delivery by caesarean section and breast-milk substitution. The issues of pharmaco-economic analysis were whether or not costs were reduced and net costs per year of life gained; the question was also studied at what lifetime costs of care for HIV infected children the net costs would be nil (costs equal benefits)., Results: Universal HIV screening in Amsterdam required a total investment of about Dfl 300,000.-per annum. In many of the analysed options for HIV screening the financial profits exceeded the investment. Variation of assumptions showed that the net costs of HIV screening under all conditions investigated would remain below Dfl 1,200.-per life year gained., Conclusion: Universal HIV screening of pregnant women in Amsterdam showed a favourable cost effectiveness. The calculations indicated a possibility of reducing costs.

The role of reinfection and the importance of partner treatment were added to a pharmacoeconomic model for the analysis of a GP-based opportunistic screening programme for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in sexually active women in Amsterdam. A favourable cost-effectiveness was found for partner treatment. Partner treatment was cost saving and overall net costs per major outcome averted by the screening programme were reduced by 40% or more due to partner treatment. From a pharmacoeconomic point of view partner treatment should be routinely provided in the framework of a CT screening programme for Amsterdam women.

Objective: To estimate the cost effectiveness of universal, voluntary HIV screening of pregnant women in England., Design: Cost effectiveness analysis. Cost estimates of caring for HIV positive children were based on the stage of HIV infection and calculated using data obtained from a London hospital between 1986 and 1996. These were combined with estimates of the health benefits and costs of antenatal screening so that the cost effectiveness of universal, voluntary antenatal screening for HIV infection in England could be estimated., Main Outcome Measures: Lifetime, direct costs of medical care of childhood HIV infection; life years gained as a result of the screening programme; net cost per life year gained for different pretest counselling costs; and different prevalence rates of pregnant women who were unaware that they were HIV positive., Results: Estimated direct lifetime medical and social care costs of childhood HIV infection were pound178 300 using a 5% discount rate for time preference (1995-6 prices). In high prevalence areas screening pregnant women for HIV is estimated to be a cost effective intervention with a net cost of less than pound4000 for each life year gained. For areas with comparatively low prevalence rates, cost effectiveness could be less than pound20 000 per life year gained, depending on the number of pregnant women who are unaware that they are infected and local screening costs., Conclusions: Our results confirm recent recommendations that universal, voluntary antenatal HIV screening should be implemented in the London area. Serious consideration of the policy should be given for other areas in England depending on local prevalence and screening costs.

Objective: To estimate the cost effectiveness of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) screening of young women visiting general practitioners., Design: Economic model analysis., Methods: Data on the health care needs for CT complications were derived from various sources; costing was done using estimated cost prices, charges and the friction cost method; epidemiological data were derived from a pilot study among 22 general practices in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The analyses were carried out assuming screening with ligase chain reaction test of a urine sample and treatment of identified cases of infection with single-dose azitromycin. The model intervention consisted of screening all heterosexually active women aged 15-19, 15-24, 15-29, or 15-34 years (strategies 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively). Cost effectiveness was presented in net direct and indirect costs per woman cured and per major outcome averted (pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, infertility and pneumonia of newborns)., Results: The first two strategies were cost saving. For the third strategy net costs per woman cured and per major outcome averted were almost 110.- Dutch guilders (DFL) and over DFL 300, respectively. The last strategy costs over DFL 320 per woman cured and over DFL 910 per major outcome averted. The cost effectiveness was sensitive to the assumed probability of progression of CT infection to PID., Conclusion: Universal implementation of the screening programme investigated in Amsterdam for women aged 15-24 years would result in approximately equal savings and costs. Screening of all 15-29-year-old women would require a net investment of DFL 350,000.

The results of the serological syphilis screening programme for pregnant women in the region of Amsterdam in the period 1985-1989 are described. In addition, a cost-benefit analysis was done to determine useful effects of the programme. Every GP and obstetrician routinely takes blood samples from pregnant women to determine the blood group, rhesus factor and syphilis serology. In the period 1985-1989, a total of 37,520 serum samples were screened for syphilis in the Amsterdam region by the Central Laboratory of the Blood Transfusion Service (until mid-1986) and by the Regional Public Health Laboratory of the Municipal Health Service (from mid-1986). In 55 women (0.15%) both the Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) and the venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) tests were positive. Further evaluation of these 55 women ultimately brought to light 10 women with positive syphilis serology who had not been treated and consequently might infect their child with Treponema pallidum. Considering the various transmission percentages of the bacterium from mother to foetus, which depend on the stage of the maternal infection, the screening programme has prevented two cases of congenital syphilis. This brings the cost-benefit ratio of the syphilis screening programme for the region of Amsterdam to 1:6.2. In view of these findings there is no reason to reconsider the current screening practice in Amsterdam.