Search

Purpose: Although few studies have examined screening uptake among sexual minorities (lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer), almost none have examined it in the specific context of rural populations. Therefore, our objective was to assess how cancer screening utilization varies by residence and sexual orientation., Methods: Publicly available population-level data from the 2014 and 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were utilized. Study outcomes included recommended recent receipt of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Independent variables of interest were residence (rural/urban) and sexual orientation (heterosexual/gay or lesbian/bisexual). Weighted proportions and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the association between the independent variables and the outcomes, adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare utilization factors., Results: Rates for all three cancer screenings were lowest in rural areas and among sexual minority populations (cervical: rural lesbians at 64.8% vs. urban heterosexual at 84.6%; breast: rural lesbians at 66.8% vs. urban heterosexual at 80.0%; colorectal for males: rural bisexuals at 52.4% vs. urban bisexuals at 81.3%; and colorectal for females: rural heterosexuals at 67.2% vs. rural lesbians at 74.4%). In the multivariate analyses for colorectal screening, compared to urban heterosexual males, both rural gay and rural heterosexual males were less likely to receive screening (aOR = 0.45; 95% = 0.24-0.73 and aOR = 0.79; 95% = 0.72-0.87, respectively) as were rural heterosexual females (aOR = 0.87; 95% = 0.80-0.94) compared to urban heterosexual females. For cervical screening, lesbians were less likely to receive screening (aOR = 0.62; 95% = 0.41-0.94) than heterosexuals, and there were no differences for breast screening., Conclusion: We found that rural sexual minorities may experience disparities in cancer screening utilization associated with the compounding barriers of rural residence and sexual minority status, after adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare utilization factors. Further work is needed to identify factors influencing these disparities and how they might be addressed.

Background: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) are the most commonly reported notifiable diseases in the United States, with annual reported cases exceeding 1.2 million and estimated costs exceeding $1.2 billion. Reported Emergency Department (ED) prevalence rates for CT and GC for adolescents and young adults range from 0.9% to 8.1%., Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the burden of CT/GC infection in ED patients, assess the extent of associated under- and overtreatment, and investigate mechanisms whereby ED screening can be feasible., Methods: We performed a systematic review of the time period from 1995 to 2010., Discussion: Positivity rates for ED patients are comparable with other high-risk populations, and sufficient for selected screening to be cost-effective. Unfortunately, ED patient follow-up is notoriously difficult, and clinicians frequently must choose to either delay treatment until laboratory confirmation or presumptively treat based on presenting symptoms and clinical diagnosis. This results in high rates of both undertreatment (i.e., not treating those infected) and overtreatment (i.e., treating those who are infection-free). Incorrect on-the-spot treatment decisions can result in potentially infected future partners and lack of follow-up treatment, or unnecessary treatment and personal stress associated with improper diagnosis., Conclusions: ED clinician activities are frequently symptom-driven, and screening nonsymptomatic patients presents a major barrier. Educating ED clinicians on the topics of CT/GC epidemiology, sample collection, and analysis will enable them to address the risks in their presenting populations. Collaboration with health department partners for sample analysis, cost-sharing, and patient follow-up can make routine screening feasible and enable EDs to become more important partners in intervention programs., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Emergency department patients are at increased risk for infection with chlamydia and gonorrhea, but routine screening of asymptomatic patients is problematic. Limiting screening to patients answering the affirmative to 2 questions would reduce the number of tests administered by 51.9%, increase the tested population prevalence to 15.7%, and still identify 82.8% of those infected.

Objectives: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) rates and incidence continue to increase, and university students are known to engage in high-risk activities, but studies of CT prevalence in this population are limited by poor screening rates. Utilisation of self-obtained sample (SoS) kits in private student residencies may reduce screening barriers. The authors sought to determine the relative effectiveness, and comparative effectiveness, of two SoS kit distribution mechanisms: one which provided kits directly to students and another encouraging students to order kits from a website., Methods: During 2010-2011, residents of six university dormitories were provided training sessions describing CT, the project and SoS kit use. Students in three dormitories were provided kits, and the remaining students directed to the website (http://www.iwantthekit.org)., Results: Of 391 resident students, 163 were provided with kits and 175 were directed to the website. Of provided kits, 12 (8 women) were returned and 2 (16.7%; both women) were positive. Of only three internet-requested kits, all were returned (all women) and none were positive. In a post-project survey examining non-participation, 26.2% of students were unaware of the project (no difference by dormitory or gender) and 58.5% of women cited prior testing as part of a medical exam., Conclusions: Though direct kit distribution was more effective in student screening engagement, overall participation was poor despite widespread advertising. The methodology of online testing and SoS kits has been well validated elsewhere, but research is needed to successfully engage university students in screening and refine SoS target populations in light of changing healthcare policies.

Introduction: During 2002-2006, reported rates of Chlamydia (CT) increased 17.3% nationally, with 43.6% of guideline eligible females screened in 2006. Annual costs associated with CT exceed $1.88 billion. We sought to determine the importance of private medical doctors (PMDs) and hospitals as screening venues in Illinois, USA and if this varied by county Rural-Urban Continuum Code (RUCC)., Methods: A retrospective analysis of all CT cases reported in Illinois during 2002-2006. Counties were stratified by RUCC and eighteen provider types were condensed into nine venues. Venue positivity rates were derived from laboratory data., Results: PMDs and hospitals reported 247,725 CT cases (33.1% and 25.4%, respectively). Sample positivity rates were 6.2% and 6.1%, comparable to 5.7% for family planning clinics (FPC). Distribution of cases within these venues (and STD clinics) by RUCC was highly significant (p<0.001)., Discussion: Even though screening guideline compliance is low, PMDs identify the majority of cases in Illinois and are consistently important screening venues at all levels of urbanization. As PMDs (and/or hospitals) exist in every Illinois county, it may be more efficient to augment screening rates at these venues rather than create new venues of other types which may be cost-ineffective in rural or low-prevalence areas., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been acceptable to women, and can reach high-risk populations. No prior published data describe internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in men. We studied whether internet-based screening was acceptable and reached a high-risk population, and what risk factors were associated with STI positivity., Methods: The website, www.iwantthekit.org, encouraged men ≥14 years of age to request a home self-sampling kit and a questionnaire on risk factors and acceptability of internet-based screening. Penile swabs and urine samples were tested for C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis using a nucleic acid amplification test. Risk factors and acceptability were examined using chi squared tests and logistic regression., Results: Of 501 samples received for testing, 106 (21%) were positive for at least one STI, 64 (13%) for chlamydia, 4 (1%) for gonorrhea, and 49 (10%) for trichomonas. In multivariable analyses, age, race, household income, and frequency of condom use were independently associated with infection with at least one STI. Of the total respondents, 34% had a prior STI; 29% reported having a partner with an STI, but only 13% reported always using a condom. Among the men who participated in this study, 77% preferred a self-administered specimen versus attending a clinic, 89% reported that swab use was easy, and 89% reported that they would use internet-based screening again., Conclusions: Men who accessed internet-based screening had known risk factors for STIs and had a high prevalence of infection. Internet-based screening was acceptable and could reach these high-risk men who might not otherwise be reached through traditional means.