Search

Background: The treatment of posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs) is debated, including the need for surgery and method of fixation. Recent literature has suggested that fracture pattern, rather than fragment size, may be an important predictor for ankle biomechanics and functional outcome. Biomechanical studies have been conducted to provide evidence-based treatment on the effects of fracture and fixation on contact pressure and stability. The objective of this scoping review is to summarize the methodologies used in biomechanical studies on PMFs and assess whether they are sufficient to test the need for surgery and method of fixation. Methods: A scoping review of publications before January 2022 was performed. PubMed/Medline and Embase Ovid were searched for cadaver or finite element analysis (FEA) studies that created and tested the effects of PMFs in ankle fractures. Both cadaver and FEA studies were included. Data about fragment characteristics, mode of testing, and outcomes were charted by 2 persons from the study group. The data were synthesized when possible and compared. Results: We included 25 biomechanical studies, including 19 cadaver studies, 5 FEA studies, and 1 cadaver and FEA study. Aside from the fragment size, few other fragment characteristics were reported. Mode of testing varied with different loads and foot positions. Strong conclusions on the effects of fracture and fixation on contact pressure and stability could not be made. Conclusion: Biomechanical studies on PMFs demonstrate wide variability in fragment characteristics and mode of testing, which makes it difficult to compare studies and draw conclusions on the need for surgery and method of fixation. Additionally, limited reporting of fragment measurements questions the applicability to clinical practice. The biomechanical literature on PMFs would benefit from the use of a standard classification and universal fragment measurements to match clinical injuries in future biomechanical studies. Based on this review, we recommend the Mason classification, which addresses the pathomechanism, and use of the following fragment measurements in all 3 anatomic planes when creating and describing PMFs: fragment length ratio, axial angle, sagittal angle or fragment height, and interfragmentary angle. The testing protocol needs to reflect the purpose of the study. Clinical Relevance: This scoping review demonstrates wide methodological diversity of biomechanical studies. Consistency in methodology should enable comparison of study results, leading to stronger evidence-based recommendations to guide surgeons in decision making and offer PMF patients the best treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Historically, treatment of partial articular radial head fractures has hinged on radiographic assessment and application of the Mason classification. The inter- and intra-rater reliability of radiographic assessment and classification of radial head fractures may be lower than previously reported. We hypothesized that radiographic assessment leads to an underestimation of the number of fragments, percentage of articular surface involved, and displacement in millimeters. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all Mason II radial head fractures treated at our institution. Four independent observers performed radiographic assessment of the cohort. An independent observer performed these measurements on high-resolution computed tomography (CT) imaging, the reference standard. Radiographic assessments were then correlated with the CT findings using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Kappa statistic, where indicated. Results: Fifty-nine Mason II radial head fractures were reviewed. These results were not impressive, with all comparisons showing a Kappa statistic less than 0.5 (ie, weak agreement). Intra-rater reliability was similar: displacement (measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient) was 0.58, percent articular involvement was 0.74, and the number of fragments (measured by the Kappa statistic) was 0.28. Fracture displacement was generally underestimated on radiographic measurements when compared to CT scan. Nearly half (45%) of all cases demonstrated inaccurate fragment number assessment when compared to the reference standard. Conclusion: Radiographs show poor inter- and intra-observer reliability for determining radial head fracture morphology. Assessment of the number of fragments was particularly inaccurate. High-resolution CT should be considered for patients with Mason II radial head fractures, especially in cases of poorly visualized fracture characteristics or borderline amounts of displacement, in an effort to appropriately indicate patients for the variety of treatment options available today.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of bipolar and monopolar radial head arthroplasty in treatment of radial head fracture at a mean follow-up of 6 years. Methods: A retrospective multicentre cohort study of 30 patients treated for unreconstructable radial head fractures. Patients were treated either with a cemented bipolar or an uncemented monopolar radial head arthroplasty. All patients included were evaluated with patient-rated outcome questionnaire, physical examination, and radiographic evaluation at a mean of 6 years (range, 2–12 years) postoperatively. Results: There was no statistical difference in QuickDASH between the bipolar or monopolar groups. The majority of patients had no to little pain during rest. Neither flexion nor extension of the injured arm was significantly affected by the type of prosthesis. None of the patients in the bipolar group had any secondary surgery at the time of follow-up. In the monopolar group, four patients required removal of the arthroplasty. Signs of ulnohumeral degenerative changes were seen in the majority of patients in both groups (55% in the monopolar group, 92% in the bipolar group). Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort study comparing a bipolar and a monopolar radial head arthroplasty for treatment of radial head fractures, we found comparable functional outcome but more revision procedures in the monopolar group at a mean follow-up of 6 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The management of displaced and comminuted radial head fractures has been a matter of debate amongst surgeons for many years. Radial head excision formed the mainstay of surgical management of these injuries. Over the years, there have been improvements in the surgical techniques and availability of better implants and instrumentation techniques, hence, open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures is gaining popularity. Aim: To compare the outcome of elbow function between radial head excision and open reduction and internal fixation of the radial head with mini screws of Mason Type II and Type III radial head fractures and to assess the complications that occur in both techniques. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery of Justice K.S.Hegde Charitable hospital. A total of 40 patients between the age group of 30-50 years with Mason Type II and Type III fresh closed radial head fractures were included in the study. Group I consisted of 20 patients who underwent radial head excision and Group II consisted of 20 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with mini screws. Patients were reviewed at postoperative week 3, 6 and 24. Radiographs were taken and functional outcome assessment of the elbow was done during all the follow ups. Elbow physiotherapy was started on postoperative week three. Scoring of elbow function was done as per the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring system. Results were tabulated, compared and analysed statistically using the ‘chi-square test’. Results: At the end of six months, the patients of the open reduction and internal fixation group had lower DASH scores (4.82±2.73 points) than the radial head excision group (14.23±5.60 points). This inferred that patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation had better functional outcomes than the excision group. Complications of proximal radial migration was noted in three patients, elbow osteoarthritis was noted in two and periarticular ossification was noted in six patients who underwent radial head excision. Conclusion: Open reduction and internal fixation of Mason Type II and Type III radial head fractures is a better management technique as compared to radial head excision for management of Mason Type II and III radial head fractures.

Purpose: The treatment of Mason type II fractures is controversial, and the aim of our study is to define the outcome of surgical treatment with screw fixation in the Mason type II radial head fracture. Methods: The study was carried out between 2011 and 2015, and included 14 men and 9 women, with isolated Mason type II radial head fractures which were treated operatively with screw fixation. Cases involving the additional ligament injury or fractures in other areas, or having a follow-up period which is greater than 11 months were excluded. The clinical and radiological results of our patients were assessed, using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Results: The average MEPS was 95.86 points. 100 degree arcs of motion were attained by a total of 21 patients (91 %) for both flexion-extension and pronation-supination. Nevertheless, 2 patients (9 %) did not recover the 100 degree arcs for the flexion-extension. Conclusion: Anatomical reduction of type II radial head fractures through open surgery and fixation with screws can have favorable results. Level of evidence: Level IV, Retrospective design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The management of displaced and comminuted radial head fractures has been a matter of debate amongst surgeons for many years. Radial head excision formed the mainstay of surgical management of these injuries. Over the years, there have been improvements in the surgical techniques and availability of better implants and instrumentation techniques, hence, open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures is gaining popularity. Aim: To compare the outcome of elbow function between radial head excision and open reduction and internal fixation of the radial head with mini screws of Mason Type II and Type III radial head fractures and to assess the complications that occur in both techniques. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the department of orthopaedic surgery of Justice K.S.Hegde Charitable hospital. A total of 40 patients between the age group of 30-50 years with Mason Type II and Type III fresh closed radial head fractures were included in the study. Group I consisted of 20 patients who underwent radial head excision and Group II consisted of 20 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with mini screws. Patients were reviewed at postoperative week 3, 6 and 24. Radiographs were taken and functional outcome assessment of the elbow was done during all the follow ups. Elbow physiotherapy was started on postoperative week three. Scoring of elbow function was done as per the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring system. Results were tabulated, compared and analysed statistically using the 'chi-square test'. Results: At the end of six months, the patients of the open reduction and internal fixation group had lower DASH scores (4.82±2.73 points) than the radial head excision group (14.23± 5.60 points). This inferred that patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation had better functional outcomes than the excision group. Complications of proximal radial migration was noted in three patients, elbow osteoarthritis was noted in two and periarticular ossification was noted in six patients were noted in the cases who underwent radial head excision. Conclusion: Open reduction and internal fixation of Mason Type II and Type III radial head fractures is a better management technique as compared to radial head excision for management of Mason Type II and III radial head fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Unfallchirurg is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: This study aims to evaluate the incidence of forearm soft tissue abnormalities associated with radial head fracture severity based on the Mason classification system. Methods: Eighteen patients (age 18-45 years) were prospectively evaluated with elbow radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following longitudinal forearm trauma. MRI was performed within 10 days of the initial injury. Radiographs and MR images were evaluated in a blinded fashion by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Results: Thirteen of 18 patients presented with Mason type I radial head fractures. In all patients with Mason type I fractures, the interosseous membrane (IOM) was intact. Two patients had Mason type II fractures with associated partial and compete tearing of the IOM and three patients had Mason type III fractures with complete tearing of the IOM. Edema was noted in the pronator quadratus in six of 13 type I injuries and seen in all type II and III injuries. No structural forearm soft tissue abnormalities were present in patients with Mason type I injuries. The presence of edema within the pronator quadratus correlated with distal forearm pain. Conclusions: The severity of radial head fracture correlates with longitudinal forearm injury evidenced by the presence of IOM tearing. The findings suggest patients with Mason type II or III fractures of the radial head should undergo further evaluation of the forearm for associated soft tissue injuries. Edema within the pronator quadratus was present following forearm trauma regardless of the severity of fracture and was related to symptomatic forearm pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Introduction: There is no consensus on optimal treatment strategy for Mason type II–IV fractures. Most recommendations are based upon experts’ opinion. Methods: An OVID-based literature search were performed to identify studies on surgical treatment of radial head and neck fracture. Specific focus was placed on extracting data describing clinical efficacy and outcome by using the Mason classification and including elbow function scores. A total of 841 clinical studies were identified describing in total the clinical follow-up of 1264 patients. Results: For type II radial head and neck fractures the significant best treatment option seems to be ORIF with an overall success rate of 98% by using screws or biodegradable (polylactide) pins. ORIF with a success rate of 92% shows the best results in the treatment of type III fractures and seem to be better than resection and implantation of a prosthesis. For this fracture type the ORIF with screws (96%), biodegradable (polylactide) pins (88%) and plates (83%) showed the best results. In the treatment of type IV fractures similar results could be found with a tendency of the best results after ORIF followed by resection and implantation of a prosthesis. If a prosthesis was implanted, the primary implantation seems to be associated with a better outcome after type III (87%) and IV (82%) fractures compared to the results after a secondary implantation. Discussion: Recommendations for surgical treatment of radial head and neck fractures according to the Mason classification can now be given with the best available evidence. Level of evidence: IV [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Hypothesis: Many investigators agree that 2 mm of articular displacement is a reasonable indication for open reduction and internal fixation of Mason type II fractures of the radial head. However, there is no evidence to support that this degree of articular displacement is predictive of poor outcomes in conservatively treated fractures. We hypothesized there would be no difference between conservatively treated radial head fractures with greater 2 mm of displacement and those with less than 2 mm of displacement in terms of patient-reported or clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: We reviewed databases of all radial head fractures in our region. The primary outcomes were the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaires. Secondary outcomes included radiologic radiocapitellar arthritis and range of motion (ROM) at follow-up. Postinjury treatment protocols, as well as patient factors, were examined for their effects on outcome. Results: The results showed no significant difference in any outcome for conservatively treated radial head fractures with 2 mm (P = .8) or even 3 mm (P = .6) of articular displacement over a mean follow-up of 4.4 years. Early ROM and physiotherapy showed no significant differences in any outcome measure. Dominant hand injury showed no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes; however, ROM was significantly decreased on examination. Conclusions: This retrospective review suggests that fracture displacement of 2 to 3 mm is not necessarily an indication for surgical fixation in isolated fractures of the radial head. In addition, it appears that postinjury ROM/physiotherapy does not play a large role in improving patient outcome. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Complex radial head fractures treated by early resection arthroplasty yield good clinical results at long-term follow-up. Methods: Fifty-one radial head excisions were performed for the treatment of radial head fractures. Twenty-seven patients (20 men, 7 women) were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age was 37 (range, 18-61) and their fracture types according to the Mason classification were 5 type II, 16 type III, and 6 type IV. The mean follow-up period was 17 years (range, 10-24). Patients were clinically evaluated: Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain scores, and strength. Degenerative changes, proximal migration of the radius, and carrying angle were measured. Results: The overall outcome of the MEPS was 96.4 (range, 70-100), 22 patients (81%) achieving an excellent result, 4 patients a good (15%), and 1 patient a fair result (4%). The mean DASH score was 4.89, with slightly better results in the Mason II group than the Mason III and IV patients (P = .15). VAS averaged 0.48 (range, 0-10). Twenty-three patients (85%) reported no pain. The mean range of motion was from 5° to 135°. Pronation averaged 83° and supination averaged 79°. Strength was maintained in 24 cases (88%). In 24 patients, osteoarthritic changes were present without clinical relevance. Proximal migration of the radius was recorded in 7 cases. Carrying angle increased significantly by 7° (15° compared with 8°). Conclusion: Radial head fractures treated by early resection arthroplasty offer satisfactory functional results in 96% of patients at long-term follow-up, in spite of the radiographic degenerative changes present in the great majority of cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Obere Extremitat is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Summary: The radial head is involved in both elbow flexion and extension as well as forearm rotation and is an important stabiliser of the elbow. Fractures account for one-third of elbow fractures in adults and can lead to marked disability. Radial head fractures can be part of a spectrum of injuries to the elbow leading to complex instability. Management of comminuted fractures is controversial, but the present trend is towards stabilisation to allow early mobilization. The majority of radial head fractures are undisplaced and do not require operative treatment. Associated injuries to the elbow potentially leading to instability should be sought. In comminuted fractures with an intact MCL where fixation is not possible excision gives satisfactory long-term results. If instability is present radial length should be restored either by ORIF or replacement and any associated bony or ligamentous injuries repaired to allow early mobilisation to prevent stiffness. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Copyright of Der Unfallchirurg is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Chirurg is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Trauma und Berufskrankheit is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)