Search

Using seabirds as bioindicators of marine plastic pollution requires an understanding of how the plastic retained in each species compares with that found in their environment. We show that brown skua Catharacta antarctica regurgitated pellets can be used to characterise plastics in four seabird taxa breeding in the central South Atlantic, even though skua pellets might underrepresent the smallest plastic items in their prey. Fregetta storm petrels ingested more thread-like plastics and white-faced storm petrels Pelagodroma marina more industrial pellets than broad-billed prions Pachyptila vittata and great shearwaters Ardenna gravis. Ingested plastic composition (type, colour and polymer) was similar to floating plastics in the region sampled with a 200 μm net, but storm petrels were better indicators of the size of plastics than prions and shearwaters. Given this information, plastics in skua pellets containing the remains of seabirds can be used to track long-term changes in floating marine plastics. • Seabird species differ in the types and colours of plastics they ingest at sea. • As a community, seabirds ingest plastics similar to those sampled at sea with surface nets. • Storm petrels are better indicators of the size of environmental plastics than prions and shearwaters. • Skua pellets containing the remains of seabirds can be used as biomonitors of marine plastics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Floating anthropogenic litter occurs in all ocean basins, yet little is known about their distribution and abundance in the coastal waters off east Africa. Neuston net and bulk water sampling shows that meso- and micro-litter (8567 ± 19,684 items∙km−2, 44 ± 195 g∙km−2) and microfibres (2.4 ± 2.6 fibres∙L−1) are pervasive pollutants off the coasts of Tanzania and northern Mozambique, with higher litter loads off Tanzania. Densities of meso- and micro-litter at the start of the rainy season were greater close to the coast and to major river mouths, suggesting that much litter likely originates on land. However, the mass of litter increased with distance from the six major coastal cities. By number, 95% of meso- and micro-litter was plastic, but only 6% of microfibres. Our results highlight the need to reduce plastic use and improve solid waste management in the region. • Higher litter and fibre densities off Tanzania than Mozambique. • Higher litter densities close to river mouths and coast. • Most (95 %) of meso- and micro-litter items were plastic. • Only 6 % of microfibres were synthetic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rivers are a major source of litter entering the sea but our understanding of the transport and fate of plastics in estuarine environments is poor. Marked blocks of varying buoyancy were released at three river mouths in South Africa. Of the 1400 blocks released, 80% were recovered on nearby beaches, with a higher recovery rate for more buoyant blocks. Dispersal distances increased with decreasing buoyancy at all sites; median dispersal distance of stranded items ranged from 20 to 90 m for expanded polystyrene (EPS) to 70–90 m for wood and 60–1042 m for high density polyethylene (HDPE) blocks. Floating litter in estuaries is subject to bidirectional flow and export is largely controlled by hydrodynamic conditions such as tides, winds, and wave action, as well as coastal structure and vegetation. Cleaning beaches around river mouths will help to reduce leakage of plastic and other litter into the sea. • Most floating litter washes ashore rather than dispersing out to sea. • Tides, winds and currents all affect stranding rates and dispersal distances. • The structure of the coast and associated waves are crucial. • Some litter items move from the sea into estuaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Beaches are key attractions for tourism and recreation, and considerable effort is made to keep beaches clean, yet many beaches still have substantial litter loads. Lasting solutions to reduce the amounts of marine litter require an understanding of litter sources. We collected bottles and other single-use containers at 32 sites around the South African coast to infer their sources based on their age and country of manufacture. Bottle densities varied greatly among beaches (8–450 bottles·km−1), depending on proximity to local urban centres and beach cleaning frequency. Most bottles were plastic, despite well-developed recycling initiatives for PET and HDPE bottles in South Africa. Street litter was dominated by bottles made in South Africa (99%), but foreign-manufactured bottles comprised up to 74% of bottles at some beaches, with an increase from urban (4%) through semi-urban (24%) to remote beaches (45%). Most foreign bottles were PET drink bottles from China and other Asian countries, followed by South America and Europe, with little regional variation in the contribution from these sources. This fact, coupled with their recent manufacture dates (mainly <2 years old), indicates that most foreign PET drink bottles are dumped illegally from ships. By comparison, foreign HDPE bottles were more common along the southeast coast of South Africa than along the west coast, consistent with many of these bottles arriving by long-distance drift across the Indian Ocean from southeast Asia. The most common country of origin for these bottles was Indonesia, and most newly-arrived HDPE bottles were 4–6 years old. To tackle beach litter in South Africa we need to greatly reduce plastic leakage from land-based sources, both locally and in southeast Asia, as well as improve measures to prevent the illegal dumping of plastics and other persistent wastes from ships. [Display omitted] • Bottles from 78 countries were found on South African beaches. • Proportions of foreign bottles increase from urban (4%) to remote beaches (45%). • Most foreign PET bottles are dumped illegally from ships and come from Asia (China). • Many foreign HDPE bottles have drifted from southeast Asia, mainly Indonesia. • By knowing litter sources, we can better target mitigation measures. Bottles indicate that South African beach litter comes from diverse sources, including local, land-based sources, long-distance drift and illegal dumping from ships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ingestion of anthropogenic litter has been well documented in marine vertebrates, but comparatively little is known about marine invertebrates. We report macrolitter ingestion by the sandy anemone Bunodactis reynaudi at Muizenberg beach in False Bay, South Africa. Monthly surveys from May 2015 to August 2019 collected 491 ingested litter items (9.4 ± 14.9 items·month-1, 39.8 ± 71.5 g·month-1), of which >99% were plastic. The number of ingested items was correlated with the abundance of stranded items and ingestion peaked in autumn when seasonal rains washed more litter into the bay. Most ingested litter was clear (39%), white (16%) and black/purple (15%). Comparison with environmental litter showed selection for flexible plastics, particularly bags/packets and food packaging. Experimental feeding trials found that B. reynaudi selected for pieces of HDPE bag suspended in seawater for 2–20 days, suggesting that biofilms enhance the palatability of flexible plastics. Studies are needed to assess the possible impacts of plastic ingestion on B. reynaudi. While only a small proportion of the population currently ingest litter, ingestion might become more common if environmental litter loads increase. This might negatively affect the anemone's ability to respond to other environmental changes such as increasing levels of heavy metal pollution. Image 1 • We report the first record of macroplastic ingestion by a sessile anemone. • Approximately 1% of Bunodactis reynaudi ingested litter items each month. • B. reynaudi preferred flexible plastics (bags/packets and food packaging). • The incidence of ingestion was linked to litter abundance in the environment. • Feeding trials suggest that biofilms enhance the palatability of HDPE bags. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most monitoring studies of marine anthropogenic debris have focused on sandy beaches, so little is known about litter on rocky shorelines. We surveyed litter trapped on a rocky intertidal shore in False Bay, South Africa, between May 2015 and March 2018. An exceptional upwelling of seabed litter occurred in November 2017 (70 items∙m−1). Excluding this event, monthly clean-ups at spring low tide collected 2 (1.3–3.1) items∙m−1∙month−1 and 31 (19.4–49.4) g∙m−1∙month−1 of which 74% was plastic (31% by mass). Litter loads peaked in autumn when seasonal rains washed litter into False Bay, suggesting that most litter comes from local land-based sources. Litter composition differed from that on a nearby sandy beach, with more glass and other dense items on the rocky shore, but 60% of plastic items floated in water. Sand inundation and biotic interactions helped to trap buoyant plastics in the intertidal zone. • One of few studies to monitor litter trapped on a rocky intertidal shore • Plastics made up 74% of litter by count but only 31% by mass. • Most plastic was disposable flexible packaging (bags and food packaging). • Litter loads 1–2 orders of magnitude higher than average during an upwelling event. • Rocky shore trapped more bags/packets, but less rigid plastics, than nearby sandy beach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Demersal trawls provide an index of seafloor macrolitter abundance, but there are no published data from sub-Saharan Africa. We collected litter items from 235 trawls conducted to assess fish abundance off South Africa. Only 17% of trawls contained litter (3.4 items·km−2, 2.1 kg·km−2 but only 0.2 kg·km−2 excluding four megalitter items). Plastic items predominated (88%), of which 77% floated once cleaned of epibionts. One LDPE bag manufactured three months before being caught carried pelagic goose barnacles Lepas anserifera , confirming that biofouling leads to rapid sinking of floating plastics. Fishery/shipping wastes comprised 22% of litter items (98% by mass; 73% excluding megalitter items); the remainder was general waste – mostly packaging or other single-use items – that could come from land- or ship-based sources. Litter was more abundant in deep water close to Cape Town. The annual demersal trawl survey is a useful way to monitor seafloor litter off South Africa. • We report the first estimates of seabed litter from trawl surveys off sub-Saharan Africa. • Only 17% of trawls contained litter, and densities were low (3.4 items·km−2). • Most litter was packaging, but marine wastes accounted for most of the mass of litter. • Proximity to Cape Town, a major urban litter source, best explained litter distribution • Most plastic items floated, and biofouling probably caused these plastic items to sink. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]