Search

Imaging with bone scans plays an important role in the diagnostic path of patients with unilateral condylar hyperactivity or unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH). The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the diagnostic performance of the bone SPECT and SPECT/CT scan for the diagnosis of UCH. PubMed, SCOPUS and EMBASE were searched electronically to identify diagnostic accuracy studies that assessed the diagnostic value of bone SPECT and SPECT/CT for the diagnosis of UCH, Meta-analyses were performed with Metadisc 1.4 and 2.0. A total of 14 studies, with a total number of 887 patients, were included in the qualitative analysis and 11 studies qualified for meta-analyses. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for the SPECT scan were 0.814 (95 % CI: 0.639-0.915) and 0.774 (95 % CI: 0.655-0.861), for the SPECT/CT scan these were 0.818 (95 % CI: 0.749-0.874) and 0.901 (95 % CI: 0.840-0.945). The summary receiver operating characteristics of the SPECT scan showed an area under the curve of 0.847 (95 % CI: 0.722-0.972) and that of the SPECT/CT scan was 0.928 (95 % CI: 0.876-0.980). CONCLUSION: Both bone SPECT scan and SPECT/CT scan provide a high diagnostic accuracy for UCH. The added value of the SPECT/CT scan is questionable and given the potential disadvantages of the SPECT/CT scan, including the increased radiation dose and costs, the diagnostic modality of first choice in patients with UCH should be a SPECT scan., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Nuclear imaging plays an important role in the diagnostic path of patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH). The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) in a large group of patients with suspected UCH. This study prospectively included 156 patients with a clinical presentation of progressive mandibular asymmetry. All patients underwent 99 m Tc-HDP SPECT-CT and extensive baseline and follow-up documentation. The relative activity of the ipsilateral condyle in relation to the contralateral condyle was calculated for both the mean and maximum count, and the diagnostic accuracy of different cut-off values was determined. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the SPECT-CT scan was 0.892 for the mean count and 0.873 for the maximum count. The optimal cut-off of> 8% (SPECT-CT mean count) resulted in a sensitivity of 87.0% and a specificity of 88.6%. SPECT-CT showed good diagnostic performance in UCH; however the benefit of the CT scan is questionable and the potential disadvantages have to be weighed against the benefits when compared to standard SPECT scanning. When using SPECT-CT in the diagnostic path in UCH, a mean value cut-off of>8% for the relative activity between the condyles is most accurate., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) causes progressive asymmetry of the mandible. The aetiology of this growth disorder is unknown. A two-centre prospective study was established, and 10 consecutive adult UCH patients scheduled for high condylectomy were included. The resected condylar tissue was divided into two parts, one for regular histopathology and one for DNA extraction. A panel of eight selected overgrowth genes (AKT1, AKT3, MTOR, PIK3CA, PIK3R2, PTEN, TSC1, TSC2) were sequenced using next-generation sequencing, with coverage of a minimum 500 times in order to be able to detect low-grade mosaicisms. Subsequently, untargeted whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed to detect variants in other genes present in three or more patients. No mutation was detected in any of the overgrowth genes, and untargeted exome sequencing failed to detect any definitively causative variant in any other gene. Ten genes had a rare variant in three or more patients, but these cannot be designated as causative without additional functional studies. The hypothesis that the cause in at least some patients with UCH is a somatic mutation in a gene that controls cell growth could not be confirmed in this study., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: Unilateral condylar hyperplasia or hyperactivity (UCH) is a bone overgrowth disorder affecting the mandible. The purpose of this study was to determine the relations among age, condylar bone structure, condylar bone volume, and condylar bone activity on single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) scans in patients with UCH., Materials and Methods: This study included 20 patients with a clinical presentation of progressive mandibular asymmetry and a positive bone SPECT scan. A bone SPECT-derived standardized uptake value (bSUV) for the condylar region was determined. All patients underwent condylectomy to arrest further progression of the disease. The resected condyles were scanned with a micro-computed tomographic scanner (18-μm resolution). Bone architectural parameters were calculated with routine morphometric software., Results: The mean bSUV of the condyle on the affected side was 15.32 (standard deviation [SD], 8.98) compared with 9.85 (SD, 4.40) on the nonaffected side (P = .0007). For trabecular bone structure, there was a nonsignificant correlation between the SUV of the affected condyle and the measured bone volume fraction (r = 0.13; P = .58) and trabecular thickness (r = 0.03; P = .90)., Conclusion: No meaningful relation was found between condylar bone volume fraction and condylar activity on bone scan; therefore, the impact of bone volume fraction on the results of bone scans is limited. The measured condylar activity on SPECT scan seems to be primarily a reflection of the remodeling rate of bone., (Copyright © 2018 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia (UCH) is an acquired deformity of the mandible, which can highly influence the symmetry of the face due to its progressive nature. It is caused by growth resembling pathology in one of the mandibular condyles. Definition as well as classification is subject to discussion. The aim of this study is to evaluate a large cohort of alleged UCH patients, and to describe the clinical characteristics, demographic features, classification and follow up. Secondly an algorithm is presented, in order to achieve uniformity in diagnosis and treatment., Patients and Methods: From 1994 to 2014 a database of consecutive patients from 3 maxillofacial departments (Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; VU Medical Center, Amsterdam and Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem) with suspected UCH was set up. Patients were referred by orthodontists, dentists, general practitioners or maxillofacial surgeons. Demographic features, bonescan outcomes, laterality, classification and follow-up were noted. Secondarily, all patients were retrospectively diagnosed by one surgeon (JWN), using available documentation. Missing data and follow-up were additionally retrieved from orthodontic offices., Results: 394 asymmetric patients were evaluated. In 309 (78%) patients, the diagnosis UCH was justified and SPECT data were available. The mean age at presentation was 20.3 years (SD ± 7.7, range 9.0-54.5 years). In 48% of the patients, the bonescan was positive. 80% of these patients received surgical treatment, of which 62% were treated with a condylectomy only, 33% were treated with condylectomy plus additive corrective surgery, and 5% underwent corrective surgery only. Of the patient group without positive bonescan 42% of the patients received surgical treatment: 34% condylectomy only, 15% condylectomy plus additive corrective surgery, and 51% corrective surgery only. In total (N = 309) 96 (31%) patients underwent condylectomy as only surgical treatment and 124 (40%) patients received no surgical treatment at all. Treatment could be finalized with orthodontic treatment without further surgery in 64% and 41% respectively. 96 patients were subject to comparison of the classification as noted by the clinician and the author (JWN). In only 72% of the cases, the secondary screening was in agreement with the initial classification., Conclusion: Based on this study not all (active) UCH patients require corrective (orthognathic) surgery. A (transoral) partial condylectomy for active patients is recommended, with a postoperative remodeling period of 6 months with or without orthodontic treatment. Second stage correcting surgery may be necessary upon evaluation, using general orthognathic diagnostic and planning procedures. It appears difficult to classify patients reliably using the available clinical and radiological documentation. Objectivity and quantification in the diagnostic process is necessary: uniformity in documentation and parameters. The attached documentation form and UCH treatment algorithm is recommended., (Copyright © 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Three-dimensional quantification of asymmetry in UCH has not been reported yet, but would be useful for diagnosing and evaluating the degree of deformity in this disease. It enables profound decision-making and timing of surgery. Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) can subjectively be classified in hemimandibular elongation (HE), hemimandibular hyperplasia (HH) and a combination of these two (hybrid form). The main purpose of this study was to quantify mandibular asymmetry in UCH patients with a reliable and reproducible method. Secondly, it was evaluated whether the existing classification can be confirmed., Materials and Methods: 37 UCH-patients with progressive mandibular asymmetry, supported by a positive bone scan and/or such clinical progression that condylectomy was performed, were included in this retrospective study. A group of healthy subjects, matched for age and gender, was used as the control group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were imported in Maxilim ® software. Each mandibular half was divided into three skeletal segments (condyle, ramus, and body). Linear and volumetric measurements were calculated for these skeletal units on the affected and unaffected side, for both patients and controls., Results: Significant differences between affected and unaffected sides in the patient group were found in condylar, ramus, and body segments for linear (p < 0.01) as well as for volumetric quantitative measurements (p < 0.0040). A mean linear difference between affected and unaffected sides in the condylar region of the UCH patient group was found of 3.6 mm (sd 2.9) versus 0.2 mm (sd 1.5) in controls. For volumetric measurements there was a mean difference between the left and right condyle of 718 mm 3 (sd 638) in the patient group versus 8 mm 3 (sd 225) difference in the control group. The condyle was the most affected segment. Differences between sides were significantly larger in the patient group than in the control group (p < 0.001). It was not possible to objectify differences between HE and HH., Conclusion: CBCT is a useful and accurate modality for quantification and evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in UCH. It enables objective monitoring. The existing classification in HE and HH could not be confirmed., (Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with suspected unilateral condylar hyperplasia are often screened radiologically with a panoramic radiograph, but this is not sufficient for routine diagnosis and follow up. We have therefore made a quantitative analysis and evaluation of panoramic radiographs in a large group of patients with the condition. During the period 1994-2011, 132 patients with 113 panoramic radiographs were analysed using a validated method. There was good reproducibility between observers, but the condylar neck and head were the regions reported with least reliability. Although in most patients asymmetry of the condylar head, neck, and ramus was confirmed, the kappa coefficient as an indicator of agreement between two observers was poor (-0.040 to 0.504). Hardly any difference between sides was measured at the gonion angle, and the body appeared to be higher on the affected side in 80% of patients. Panoramic radiographs might be suitable for screening, but are not suitable for the quantitative evaluation, classification, and follow up of patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia., (Copyright © 2015 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Unilateral condylar hyperplasia or hyperactivity is a disorder of growth that affects the mandible, and our aim was to visualise the 3-dimensional bony microstructure of resected mandibular condyles of affected patients. We prospectively studied 17 patients with a clinical presentation of progressive mandibular asymmetry and an abnormal single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) scan. All patients were treated by condylectomy to arrest progression. The resected condyles were scanned with micro-CT (18 μm resolution). Rectangular volumes of interest were selected in 4 quadrants (lateromedial and superoinferior) of the trabecular bone of each condyle. Variables of bone architecture (volume fraction, trabecular number, thickness, and separation, degree of mineralisation, and degree of structural anisotrophy) were calculated with routine morphometric software. Eight of the 17 resected condyles showed clear destruction of the subchondral layer of cortical bone. There was a significant superoinferior gradient for all trabecular variables. Mean (SD) bone volume fraction (25.1 (6) %), trabecular number (1.69 (0.26) mm(-1)), trabecular thickness (0.17 (0.03) mm), and degree of mineralisation (695.39 (39.83) mg HA/cm(3)) were higher in the superior region. Trabecular separation (0.6 (0.16) mm) and structural anisotropy (1.84 (0.28)) were higher in the inferior region. The micro-CT analysis showed increased cortical porosity in many of the condyles studied. It also showed a higher bone volume fraction, greater trabecular thickness and trabecular separation, greater trabecular number, and less mineralisation in the condyles of the 17 patients compared with the known architecture of unaffected mandibular condyles., (Copyright © 2014 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study assessed the quantitative evaluation of the region of interest (ROI) by mean and maximum pixel counts of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans in patients with clinical suspicion of unilateral condylar hyperactivity (UCH); the interobserver reliability and the correlation of condylar activity with patient age was determined., Methods: Two independent observers analyzed 67 bone SPECT scans. Maximum and mean activity values within an ROI on the mandibular condyle were analyzed; a cutoff value of 55% was used to determine the qualitative outcome., Results: Excellent interobserver agreement was seen for both maximum (kappa 1.0) and mean activity analysis (kappa 0.94). Maximum and mean condylar activities were strongly correlated (r > 0.98). Maximum and mean condylar activity of the normal condyle decreased significantly with increasing age., Conclusions: Maximum and mean condylar activity levels were highly correlated in patients with mandibular asymmetry. An excellent interobserver agreement was found with either maximum or mean condylar activity., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Objective quantifications of facial asymmetry in patients with Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia (UCH) have not yet been described in literature. The aim of this study was to objectively quantify soft-tissue asymmetry in patients with UCH and to compare the findings with a control group using a new method., Material and Methods: Thirty 3D photographs of patients diagnosed with UCH were compared with 30 3D photographs of healthy controls. As UCH presents particularly in the mandible, a new method was used to isolate the lower part of the face to evaluate asymmetry of this part separately. The new method was validated by two observers using 3D photographs of five patients and five controls., Results: A significant difference (0.79 mm) between patients and controls whole face asymmetry was found. Intra- and inter-observer differences of 0.011 mm (-0.034-0.011) and 0.017 mm (-0.007-0.042) respectively were found. These differences are irrelevant in clinical practice., Conclusion: After objective quantification, a significant difference was identified in soft-tissue asymmetry between patients with UCH and controls. The method used to isolate mandibular asymmetry was found to be valid and a suitable tool to evaluate facial asymmetry.

Unilateral condylar hyperactivity is a growth disorder which is characterised by a progressive asymmetry in the mandibula and in some cases also secondarily in the maxilla. Various forms are hemimandibular hyperplasia, hemimandibular elongation and a hybridform. In deciding on a plan of treatment, it is important to determine whether there is a question of continuous and/or excessive condylar activity, possibly with the help of a skeletal scintigraphy.

Bone scan analyses and clinical assessment are used to diagnose unilateral condylar hyperactivity (UCH). This review compares the diagnostic accuracy of planar and SPECT bone scans. Studies diagnosing patients with possible UCH using bone scans, published between 1968 and 2008, were included in this review. Of 15 articles that met the inclusion criteria, 7 presented results in sufficient detail to calculate index test characteristics. Three control studies show that the difference in uptake values of the left and right condylar regions in the normal population does not exceed 10%. The pooled sensitivity of the planar bone scan (n=130) was 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.82), which was significantly lower (p=0.04) than that of the bone SPECT technique (n=88), which was 0.90 (0.79-0.97). The pooled specificity of the SPECT scan was 0.95 (0.82-0.99), which did not significantly differ (p=0.58) from that of the planar scan (0.92 (0.83-0.97)). Future studies should include a diagnostic analysis of the data, including two-by-two contingency tables, so the accuracy of the diagnostic test may be evaluated. Bone scans are best performed using SPECT, conducting a quantitative analysis by calculating the percentile differences between the left and right condylar regions., (Copyright © 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess temporomandibular function after condylectomy because of unilateral condylar hyperactivity (UCH) by means of standardized diagnostic criteria. The results were compared with those obtained in a control group., Patients and Methods: In this study, 33 patients with UCH who underwent condylectomy and 31 controls matched for age and gender filled out a history questionnaire and underwent a clinical examination as part of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Data analysis was performed by use of the Fisher exact test for 2-by-2 tables., Results: Patients and controls did not differ significantly regarding myofacial pain (P = .131), disc displacement (P = .516), and depression (P = .34). The groups differed significantly concerning arthralgia, osteoarthritis, and osteoarthrosis (P = .003), as well as pain with low disability (P = .022)., Conclusions: In patients with UCH who underwent condylectomy because of progressive mandibular asymmetry, more joint-related temporomandibular problems as well as more postoperative pain developed when compared with age- and gender-matched controls. However, these problems did not lead to more severe disabilities in daily life., (Copyright 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To perform a histopathologic analysis of condyles that were resected because of unilateral condylar hyperactivity and compare the results of the bone scan with the histopathologic findings., Patients and Methods: A total of 47 resected condyles were histopathologically examined. In 29 cases, a single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) bone scan was available. For all condylar specimens, a standardized histologic scoring system was used to assess the number of cartilage islands and the thickness of the cartilage layer. The SPECT scans were analyzed by calculating the difference in bone activity between the hyperactive and contralateral condyles., Results: The number of cartilage islands was highly variable, ranging from almost absent in 37% of the patients to abundant in 35%. Furthermore, the relative thickness of the cartilage layer exhibited considerable variation, from less than one quarter of the total thickness of the condylar articular layer in 22% of the patients to one half of the total thickness in 35%. We found no significant relationship between the number of cartilage islands and bone activity using SPECT (P = .11) or between the relative thickness of the cartilage layer and bone activity using SPECT (P = .82)., Conclusions: Unilateral condylar bone growth can occur without large numbers of cartilage islands and without abundant cartilage formation. The bone activity measured by bone scintigraphy was not related to the histologic results. The histopathologic findings of resected condyles in unilateral condylar hyperactivity cannot, therefore, be used as a reference standard. Nevertheless, histopathologic examination should always be performed to rule out other diseases.

This study aimed to compare different analytical methods and identify the optimal analysis method to distinguish patients with unilateral condylar hyperactivity (UCH) from those with inactive condyles. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans of patients with progressive and nonprogressive mandibular asymmetry (each group, n=26), were analyzed using the region of interest technique. Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for the different analytic methods. The ROC curve illustrates that UCH can be diagnosed significantly better by determining the percentile bone activity in both condyles. The area under the curve (AUC) of the percentile comparison between the affected and contralateral condyles was 0.93+/-0.04, that for the condyle/clivus ratio was 0.75+/-0.07 and for the condyle/cervical spine (CS) ratio 0.57+/-0.08. Sensitivity for the condyle/clivus ratio was 65% and specificity 61%. Sensitivity for the condyle/CS ratio was 85% and specificity 31%. For the percentile difference of the condyles, sensitivity and specificity were 88%. For UCH patients, direct comparison of bone activity between the affected and contralateral condyle in SPECT scans is the analysis method of choice. Comparison of condylar bone activity to reference bone activity does not have additional value in the diagnosis of UCH.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess bone growth and blood flow in the condylar region in patients with unilateral condylar hyperactivity (UCH) by use of positron emission tomography (PET)., Patients and Methods: This prospective study included 7 patients with UCH and a control group of 6 volunteers. In addition to normal clinical investigations, labeled fluoride ((18)F(-)) and oxygen 15-labeled water (H(2)(15)O) PET scans were performed., Results: In control subjects the net rate of fluoride influx, representing bone metabolism, was similar for left and right condylar sides. Interestingly, this was not significantly different from the affected condyles in UCH patients. Rather, the net rate of fluoride influx on the contralateral side of UCH patients was reduced significantly compared with the affected side (P= .02) and control subjects (P= .004). The mean blood flow on the left and right condylar sides in control subjects was not significantly different. The same was true for the hyperactive and contralateral condyles of UCH patients. Blood flow in the condylar region in UCH patients was similar to that in the control group., Conclusions: There was no evidence of an abnormally high rate of bone growth in the affected condylar region in UCH patients. Instead, the rate of bone growth appeared to be reduced in the contralateral condylar region. These PET results are in contrast to the characteristic clinical picture of UCH patients and suggest the possibility of subgroups in patients with a mandibular asymmetry caused by UCH. Furthermore, no evidence of hypervascularization of the condylar region in UCH patients was found.

Objective: A comparison is made of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and planar bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of patients with suspected unilateral condylar hyperactivity (UCH)., Study Design: The subjects comprised 56 patients with suspected UCH who underwent SPECT and regular planar bone scans. Accuracy of SPECT and planar scintigraphy were compared using left-right condylar activity., Results: Of the 56 patients, 29 were diagnosed with active UCH and 27 without UCH. The mean relative activity of the hyperactive condylar region in the planar scans was 53.5% (SD +/- 2.3%), which was significantly higher in the SPECT scan with a mean value of 60.5% (SD +/- 5.4%), P < .005 (t = 8.951). Receiver operating curves (ROC) were clearly in favor of SPECT over the planar bone scan. The area under the curve (AUC) of the planar ROC was 0.87 +/- 0.049 while that of the SPECT ROC was 0.97 +/- 0.024. The optimal cut-off value for planar scanning was 52%, yielding a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 85%. For SPECT scanning, the optimal cut-off was 56%, resulting in a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 96%., Conclusions: It can be concluded that in patients with a clinically suspected active UCH, SPECT scanning is the preferred diagnostic tool rather than planar bone scanning. However, treatment planning should be done in combination with clinical assessment of progressive mandibular asymmetry as well as taking into account the patient history.

Objective: This study compares quantitative analysis of planar bone scintigrams with visual interpretation in patients having unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) and normal control subjects. The possibility of using a bony structure in a region near the condyle as an objective measurement of bone activity is assessed., Study Design: Planar bone scintigrams from 20 subjects suspected of having active UCH were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Bone activity was assessed in both condyles as well as in reference sites in the cervical spine and the skull. Percentile activities for both condyle regions and ratios using condyle activity versus reference regions were assessed., Results: All UCH patients had unilateral increased activity on qualitative visual interpretation of the bone scan. The mean percentile activities of the affected and unaffected condyles in the UCH group were significantly different at 55.3% and 44.7%, respectively (P < .001). No significant difference was found in the control group, with the ratios between left and right condyle being 49.5% and 50.5%, respectively (P = .46). In the ratios between the region of interest (ROI) in the condyles versus the ROIs selected for the cervical spine and the skull, a significant difference was noticed in the UCH group; however, there was a considerable overlap between condyle and reference ROI ratios. Symmetrical uptake of diphosphonate reliably excluded continued asymmetrical growth of the condyles., Conclusions: Quantitative analysis of planar scintigrams in unilateral condylar hyperplasia patients was not found to be superior to qualitative visual interpretation of the scans. Because of a considerable overlap in condyle/reference ROI ratios, quantified ratios did not seem to be clinically helpful in the differentiation of a hyperplastic condyle from a normal condyle. In the case of unilateral increased condylar uptake of diphosphonate, clinical assessment is mandatory.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of orthognathic surgery in cases with posttraumatic malocclusion as a long-term complication of condylar process fractures., Patients and Methods: A retrospective study on 21 patients with posttraumatic malocclusions attributable to condylar process fractures was performed. In group I, 15 patients were treated for asymmetric malocclusion with unilateral or bilateral mandibular ramus osteotomies. In group II, six patients were treated for anterior open bit with either a Le Fort I osteotomy (n=5) or a bilateral ramus osteotomy (n=1). All patients had clinical and radiographic follow-up for at least 1 year., Results: Stable dental and cephalometric results were obtained in all patients except the one in group II who was treated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomies. In two cases, both in the asymmetric group, minor occlusal interferences had to be treated by equilibration in the early postoperative period., Conclusions: Orthognathic surgery is a predictable and stable method for the treatment of posttraumatic malocclusion due to condylar process fractures. Maxillary orthognathic surgery is successful in correcting symmetric anterior open bites due to bilateral condylar process fractures. Because posttraumatic malocclusion is a rare complication after closed treatment of condylar process fractures, and it can be treated satisfactorily using orthognathic surgery, routine open reduction and fixation of condylar process fractures is not indicated to prevent posttraumatic malocclusion.