Search

Aim The purpose of this article was to report the orthodontic treatment of a growing patient with Angle Class II malocclusion, without teeth extraction and/or orthognathic surgery. Methods The Herbst mandibular protractor, associated with miniscrew implants (MSIs) installed in the mandible, was used for the correction of Class II malocclusion. The use of skeletal anchorage was aimed to reduce lower incisor proclination. Results Restriction of maxillary growth, distalization of maxillary molars, and control of the lower incisor proclination were observed. Conclusion The association of MSIs with mandibular protractor device allowed minimization of side effects as well as enhancement of skeletal and dental effects with excellent predictability and minimal patient collaboration.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the dental, dentoalveolar, and skeletal changes occurring right after the rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and slow maxillary expansion (SME) treatment using Haas-type expander. METHODS: All subjects performed cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) before installation of expanders (T1) and right after screw stabilization (T2). Patients who did not follow the research parameters were excluded. The final sample resulted in 21 patients in RME group (mean age of 8.43 years) and 16 patients in SME group (mean age of 8.70 years). Based on the skewness and kurtosis statistics, the variables were judged to be normally distributed and paired t-test and student t-test were performed at significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Intermolar angle changed significantly due to treatment and RME showed greater buccal tipping than SME. RME showed significant changes in other four measurements due to treatment: maxilla moved forward and mandible showed backward rotation and, at transversal level both skeletal and dentoalveolar showed significant changes due to maxillary expansion. SME showed significant dentoalveolar changes due to maxillary expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Only intermolar angle showed significant difference between the two modalities of maxillary expansion with greater buccal tipping for RME. Also, RME produced skeletal maxillary expansion and SME did not. Both maxillary expansion modalities were efficient to promote transversal gain at dentoalveolar level. Sagittal and vertical measurements did not show differences between groups, but RME promoted a forward movement of the maxilla and backward rotation of the mandible. RESUMO OBJETIVO: o objetivo do presente ensaio clínico randomizado foi avaliar as transformações dentárias, dentoalveolares e ósseas que ocorrem imediatamente após o tratamento com expansão rápida da maxila (ERM) e lenta (ELM) usando expansores do tipo Haas. MÉTODOS: todos os indivíduos foram submetidos a tomografias computadorizadas de feixe cônico (TCFC) antes da colocação dos expansores (T1) e imediatamente após a estabilização do parafuso (T2). Os pacientes que não seguiram os parâmetros da pesquisa foram excluídos. A amostra final constou de 21 pacientes no grupo ERM (idade média de 8,43 anos) e 16 no grupo ELM (idade média de 8,7 anos). Com base em estatística de assimetria e curtose, as variáveis foram consideradas de distribuição normal, e os testes t pareado e t de Student foram realizados, com nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: o ângulo intermolares mudou significativamente devido ao tratamento, e o grupo ERM apresentou maior inclinação vestibular do que o grupo ELM. O grupo ERM mostrou alterações significativas em outras quatro medidas devido ao tratamento: a maxila apresentou deslocamento anterior e a mandíbula, rotação posterior; no nível transversal, houve tanto alterações ósseas quanto dentoalveolares significativas, devido à expansão maxilar. O grupo ELM apresentou alterações significativas devido à expansão maxilar. CONCLUSÕES: apenas o ângulo intermolares apresentou diferença significativa entre as duas modalidades de expansão maxilar, com maior inclinação vestibular no grupo ERM. A ERM resultou, também, em expansão maxilar óssea, ao contrário da ELM. As duas modalidades de expansão maxilar promoveram, de forma eficiente, um ganho transversal em nível dentoalveolar. As medidas sagitais e verticais não apresentaram diferenças entre os grupos, mas a ERM promoveu o deslocamento anterior da maxila e a rotação posterior da mandíbula.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the canine retraction rate and anchorage loss during canine retraction using self-ligating (SL) brackets and conventional (CV) brackets. Differences between maxillary and mandibular rates were computed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five subjects requiring four first premolar extractions were enrolled in this split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. Each patient had one upper canine and one lower canine bonded randomly with SL brackets and the other canines with CV brackets but never on the same side. NiTi retraction springs were used to retract canines (100 g force). Maxillary and mandibular superimpositions, using cephalometric 45° oblique radiographs at the beginning and at the end of canine retraction, were used to calculate the changes and rates during canine retraction. Paired t-tests were used to compare side and jaw effects. RESULTS: The SL and CV brackets did not show differences related to monthly canine movement in the maxilla (0.71 mm and 0.72 mm, respectively) or in the mandible (0.54 mm and 0.60 mm, respectively). Rates of anchorage loss in the maxilla and in the mandible also did not show differences between the SL and CV brackets. Maxillary canines showed greater amount of tooth movement per month than mandibular canines (0.71 mm and 0.57 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SL brackets did not show faster canine retraction compared with CV brackets nor less anchorage loss. The maxillary canines showed a greater rate of tooth movement than the mandibular canines; however, no difference in anchorage loss between the maxillary and mandibular posterior segments during canine retraction was found.

Orthodontists have long been aware that mandibular rotation takes place during growth, but most have underestimated its importance. This is so because the distinction between the true rotation and the rotation of the mandibular plane is typically not made. Traditionally, orthodontists have focused on the mandibular plane, which changes little because modeling on the lower mandibular border largely hides the true rotation that occurs. Furthermore, orthodontists must understand that changes in tooth position—over which they have great control—play an important role in determining the true rotational changes that occur. Such an appreciation is of particular importance when evaluating Class II cases, for which true rotation is critically important, in terms of both the development and solution of the problem. Clinically, they must be aware of and able to use the various centers of rotation to prevent deleterious changes from occurring and to orthopedically correct the problems that have developed. Orthodontists must understand that true rotation is the primary determinant of chin position and a major determinant of condylar growth direction, mandibular modeling, and dentoalveolar compensations. They must learn how to take advantage of the mandible's capacity to adapt to rotational changes.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-08-06T16:14:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2014-01-01. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2015-08-06T16:44:26Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 S2176-94512014000100019.pdf: 212204 bytes, checksum: b284b5b63ba9f451049d7874185b5f28 (MD5) Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) INTRODUÇÃO:devido ao número reduzido de estudos que distinguem entre as mudanças dentoalveolares e ósseas produzidas pelo aparelho de Thurow, esse estudo clínico, conduzido pelo departamento de Ortodontia da Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, foi proposto para avaliar as mudanças dentárias e esqueléticas induzidas pelo aparelho de Thurow modificado.MÉTODOS:a amostra incluiu um grupo experimental de 13 indivíduos, entre 7 e 10 anos de idade, com má oclusão Classe II e mordida aberta anterior, e um grupo controle de 22 indivíduos, com idades, plano mandibular e má oclusão similares. Com base em 14 pontos cefalométricos, 8 ângulos (S-N-ANS, SNA, PPA, S-N-Pog, SNB, MPA, PP/MPA, ANB) e 3 medidas lineares (N-Me, ANS-Me, S-Go), foram avaliados movimentos maxilares e mandibulares horizontais e verticais dentários e esqueléticos (ANS, PNS, U1, U6, Co, Go, Pog, L1, L6).RESULTADOS:o tratamento produziu diminuição significativamente maior no ângulo entre o plano palatino e o plano mandibular do grupo controle, devido ao aumento do ângulo do plano palatino. Os ângulos A-N-B, S-N-A e S-N-ANS diminuíram significativamente mais no grupo tratado. A PNS sofreu remodelação superior. A altura facial inferior (ANS-Me) diminuiu no grupo tratado, ao passo que aumentou no grupo controle.CONCLUSÕES:o aparelho controlou deslocamento vertical e horizontal da maxila, rotacionou a maxila para melhorar a mordida aberta e diminuiu a altura facial inferior. INTRODUCTION:Due to the lack of studies that distinguish between dentoalveolar and basal changes caused by the Thurow appliance, this clinical study, carried out by the School of Dentistry - State University of São Paulo/Araraquara, aimed at assessing the dental and skeletal changes induced by modified Thurow appliance.METHODS:The sample included an experimental group comprising 13 subjects aged between 7 and 10 years old, with Class II malocclusion and anterior open bite, and a control group comprising 22 subjects similar in age, sex and mandibular plane angle. Maxillary/mandibular, horizontal/vertical, dental/skeletal movements (ANS, PNS, U1, U6, Co, Go, Pog, L1, L6) were assessed, based on 14 landmarks, 8 angles (S-N-ANS, SNA, PPA, S-N-Pog, SNB, MPA, PP/MPA, ANB) and 3 linear measures (N-Me, ANS-Me, S-Go).RESULTS:Treatment caused significantly greater angle decrease between the palatal and the mandibular plane of the experimental group, primarily due to an increase in the palatal plane angle. ANB, SNA and S-N-ANS angles significantly decreased more in patients from the experimental group. PNS was superiorly remodeled. Lower face height (ANS-Me) decreased in the experimental group and increased in the control group.CONCLUSIONS:The modified Thurow appliance controlled vertical and horizontal displacements of the maxilla, rotated the maxilla and improved open bite malocclusion, decreasing lower facial height. Texas A&M Baylor College of Dentistry State University of São Paulo School of Dentistry Texas A&M Baylor College of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics

Due to the skeletal complexity of the problem, hyperdivergent retrognathic patients are among the most difficult for orthodontists to treat. It is imperative to treat these patients for both esthetic and functional reasons. Hyperdivergent growth patterns are generally established early and most do not improve over time. The etiology appears to be environmental, due to postural adjustments related with compromised airways and weak masticatory musculature. If a lowered mandible posture is maintained in growing subjects, the dentition, dentoalveolar complex, and the mandible should be expected to compensate. Dentoalveolar heights should be expected to be excessive (i.e., supraeruption of the teeth), the ramus is shorter, the gonial angle is larger, the mandibular symphysis is taller and thinner, the mandibular plane is steeper, the mandible is retrognathic, and anterior lower face height is increased. Moreover, the jaws, especially the upper, are narrow. The most important factor underlying these developmental adaptations is true mandibular rotation. Rotation is important because it is the major determinant of the anteroposterior (AP) chin position. The detrimental skeletal changes that characterize hyperdivergent patients are ultimately due to backward or less than average true forward rotation. Theoretically, a therapeutic treatment that mimics normal growth (i.e., one that builds in true forward rotation) is desirable because it might be expected to correct not only the anteroposterior (AP) and vertical position of the chin, but also many of the other morphological maladaptations associated with the hyperdivergent retrognathic phenotype.

Introduction Because of limited available reference data, this study described the vertical growth changes that occur in untreated adolescents 10 to 15 years of age and evaluated the validity of measurements commonly used to classify patients’ vertical growth tendencies. Methods The sample consisted of 228 subjects (119 boys, 109 girls) between 10 and 15 years of age with normal occlusions or malocclusions who had lateral cephalograms (n = 1303) taken annually. Based on 6 landmarks, 3 angles (PPA, MPA, PP/MPA) and 2 proportions (PFH:AFH and UFH:LFH) were calculated. To reduce errors, each subject’s growth curve was estimated by using multilevel modeling procedures, and the estimated values were analyzed. Results Growth changes between 10 and 15 years for each of the 5 measurements followed relatively simple (linear or quadratic) polynomial models. On average, PPA and PFH:AFH increased, and MPA and PP/MPA decreased. The UFH:LFH ratio increased during the first few years and then decreased. MPA, PP/MPA, and PFH:AFH showed moderately high intercorrelations; PPA displayed moderate to moderately low correlations with UFH:LFH; UFH:LFH showed a moderate correlation with PP/MPA. Approximately 75% to 86% of the subjects classified as hyperdivergent or hypodivergent at 10 years maintained their classification. Subjects classified as hyperdivergent at 15 years of age showed significantly greater growth changes than did those classified within normal limits, who, in turn, showed greater changes than did the hypodivergent subjects. Conclusions Measurements typically used to classify vertical growth tendencies changed significantly during adolescence, with boys generally showing greater changes than girls. Although MPA, PFH:AFH, and PP/MPA measured the same phenotypic attribute, PPA and UFH:LFH were relatively independent of the other 3 measurements. Most subjects maintained their vertical facial types, but some worsened, and others improved.

OBJECTIVE: To determine class and sex differences in mandibular growth and modeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed-longitudinal sample of 130 untreated French-Canadian adolescents, 77 (45 boys and 32 girls) with Class I (normal or abnormal) occlusion and 53 (26 boys and 27 girls) with Class II division 1 malocclusion, was used. Based on eight landmarks, eight traditional measurements were used to compare the anteroposterior position of the maxilla and mandible, relationship between the jaws, and mandibular size. Mandibular superimpositions were used to compare the horizontal and vertical changes of condylion, gonion, and menton. RESULTS: While there were no differences in maxillary position based on the SNA angle, Class IIs had more retrognathic mandibles than did Class Is. Total mandibular length was greater in Class Is than in Class IIs at 15 years of age. Superior and total growth and modeling changes at condylion and gonion, respectively, were greater for Class Is than Class IIs. Boys were more prognathic than girls; they had larger mandibles and exhibited greater size increases and growth changes than girls did. CONCLUSIONS: There are both class and sex differences in mandibular growth and modeling.

INTRODUCTION: Although lip bumpers (LBs) provide significant clinical gain of mandibular arch perimeter in mixed-dentition patients, orthodontists are reluctant to use them due to the possibility of permanent second molar eruptive disturbances.OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to assess second molar impaction associated with the use of LBs, and to investigate how they can be solved.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral and panoramic radiographs of 67 patients (34 females and 33 males) were assessed prior (T1) and post-LB treatment (T2). LB therapy lasted for approximately 1.8 ± 0.9 years. Concomitant rapid palatal expansion (RPE) was performed in the maxilla at LB treatment onset. Impaction of mandibular second molars was assessed by means of panoramic radiographs in relation to the position of first mandibular molars. Horizontal and vertical movements of first and second molars were assessed cephalometrically on lateral cephalometric radiographs based on mandibular superimpositions.RESULTS: Eight (11.9%) patients had impacted second molars at the end of LB therapy. Two patients required surgical correction, whereas five required spacers and one patient was self-corrected. Mandibular first molar tip and apex migrated forward 1.3 mm and 2.3 mm, respectively. Second molar tip showed no statistically significant horizontal movement.CONCLUSION: Although LB therapy increased the risk of second molar impaction, impactions were, in most instances, easily solved. INTRODUÇÃO: embora placas labioativas (PLAs) promovam um ganho clínico significativo no perímetro da arcada inferior em pacientes com dentição mista, ortodontistas são relutantes em usá-las devido a possibilidade de problemas eruptivos dos segundos molares.OBJETIVO: o presente estudo avaliou a impacção dos segundos molares associada ao uso das PLAs e como a impacção pôde ser resolvida.MÉTODOS: radiografias cefalométricas lateral e panorâmica de 67 pacientes (34 do sexo feminino e 33 do masculino) foram avaliadas antes (T1) e após (T2) o tratamento com PLAs, que durou aproximadamente 1,8 ± 0,9 anos. Expansão rápida do palato (ERP) foi usada na maxila no início do uso da PLA. Usando as radiografias panorâmicas, a impacção dos segundos molares inferiores foi avaliada relativamente à posição dos primeiros molares mandibulares. Os movimentos horizontais e verticais dos primeiros e segundos molares inferiores foram avaliados com base em sobreposições de estruturas estáveis da arcada inferior por meio das radiografias laterais.RESULTADOS: oito (11,9%) pacientes apresentaram impacção dos segundos molares mandibulares ao final do tratamento com PLA; dois pacientes tiveram de recorrer à intervenção cirúrgica para a correção da impacção, cinco tiveram a correção da impacção usando apenas espaçadores e um apresentou autocorreção da impacção. A coroa e o ápice do primeiro molar inferior migraram 1.3mm e 2,.3mm, respectivamente, para mesial. O segundo molar não mostrou movimento horizontal significativo.CONCLUSÃO:embora o tratamento com PLA aumente o risco de impacção do segundo molar mandibular, as impacções, na maioria das vezes, podem ser facilmente corrigidas.

SUMMARY The purpose of the study is to determine whether the various aspects of the craniofacial complex exhibit female adolescent growth spur ts. Multilevel polynomial models were used to estimate the growth curves of a mixed-longitudinal sample of 111 untreated females 10–15 years of age. To evaluate the horizontal and vertical movements of the individual landmarks relative to stable structures, the tracings were superimposed on the natural reference structures in the anterior cranial base. The horizontal and vertical growth changes of four landmarks and the changes of three traditional linear measurements were evaluated. Posterior nasal spine (PNS) moved posteriorly at a constant rate of approximately 0.12 mm/ year. Fi ve measures showed changes in growth velocity (i.e. quadratic growth curves) but not adolescent growth spurts, including the anterior movements of anterior nasal spine (ANS) and pogonion (Pg), the inferior movements of gonion (Go), and the increases in ANS–PNS and condylion to pogonion (Co–Pg). Five measurements, including the inferior movements of ANS, PNS and Pg, the posterior movements of Go, and the increases of Go–Pg exhibited adolescent growth spurts. Peak growth velocities were attained between 11.4 and 12.8 years of age, approximately 0.7–1.4 years earlier in the maxilla than mandible. While the vertical aspects of craniofacial growth exhibit distinct female adolescent growth spurts, with peak rates occurring earlier in the maxilla than mandible, most horizontal aspects of craniofacial growth do not exhibit an adolescent spurt.