Search

Objective: To review the imaging features of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) seen on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and to evaluate whether DBT could improve conspicuity and tumour size assessment of ILC in comparison with digital mammography (DM)., Methods: Institutional review board with waiver of informed consent was obtained for this retrospective study. Patients with ILC or IDC who underwent DBT and DM at the time of diagnosis were included. DM and DBT images were reviewed in consensus by two breast radiologists in order to assess imaging features, conspicuity and maximum tumour diameter of ILC and IDC. Pathology on the surgical specimen was considered the standard of reference for assessment of tumour size., Results: 43 patients (20 patients with ILC and 23 patients with IDC) were included. On DBT, compared with IDC, ILC presented less frequently as masses (40% vs 78%) (p = 0.01) and more frequently as isolated distortion (20% vs 0%) (p = 0.03). ILC presented more often as asymmetries (60%) than masses (20%) on DM (p = 0.02) but not on DBT (35% vs 40%; p = 1.00). Conspicuity of ILC was significantly higher on DBT than on DM (p = 0.002), while the difference between the two techniques was not significant for IDC (p = 0.2). Regarding ILC, concordance in tumour size measurement between DBT and pathology was fair (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.24)., Conclusion: ILC rarely presented as dense masses but frequently demonstrated architectural distortion on DBT. DBT increased lesion conspicuity but failed to accurately assess tumour size of ILC. Advances in knowledge: (1) This study describes specific features of ILC on DBT. (2) It shows that DBT can improve conspicuity of ILC.

Imaging of breast cancer is the backbone of breast cancer screening, diagnosis, preoperative/treatment assessment and follow-up. The main modalities are mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. New emerging technologies have also enabled each modality to improve on their weaknesses. Imaging-guided biopsies have allowed for accurate diagnosis of breast cancer, with low complication rates. The purpose of this article is to review the common modalities for breast cancer imaging in current practice with emphasis on the strengths and potential weaknesses, discuss the selection of the best imaging modality for the specific clinical question or patient population, and explore new technologies / future directions of breast cancer imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To review breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of radial scar (RS) with and without associated atypia/malignancy. Methods: Twenty-eight (mean age 56.8) patients diagnosed with 30 biopsy-proven RS (n = 25, ultrasound-guided 14-gauge, n = 5, stereotactically guided 9-gauge) subsequently underwent breast MRI followed by surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging protocol included axial T1, axial fat sat T2, and postgadolinium in axial and sagittal planes. Two radiologists reviewed the mammographic and MRI findings in consensus according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. Results: Of the 30 RSs excised surgically, 14 (14/30, 47.7%) were not associated with atypia/malignancy while atypia/malignancy was found in 16 (16/30, 53.3%) RSs. Three (3/30, 10%) RS lesions did not enhance on dynamic MR. Mean lesion size on MRI was 1.4 cm (range, 0.5-5 cm). Seventeen (17/30, 56.7%) lesions presented as nonmass enhancement and 9 (9/30, 30%) as masses. Nonmass lesions showed focal distribution (13/17, 76.5%) and heterogeneous enhancement (15/17, 88.2%). Masses showed irregular shape and margins (6/9, 67%) and heterogeneous enhancement (8/9, 89%). Multivariate analysis did not show any significant difference in MRI presentation between RS only and RS associated with atypia/malignancy. Conclusion: Breast MRI does not help differentiate between RS with or without associated atypia/malignancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]