Search

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of cephalometric measurements made with digital tracing software (FACAD) with equivalent hand-traced measurements, and to evaluate the reproducibility of each method. Pre- and post-surgical lateral cephalographs of 30 adult patients (12 males and 18 females, median age = 25 years, standard deviation = 8.7) who had undergone orthognathic treatment were scanned into a computer. One operator identified 25 landmarks digitally on the computer display and manually on acetate paper. Measurements on the 60 radiographs were duplicated, and measurement error of each method was determined with interclass correlation. A paired t-test was used to detect differences between the manual and digital methods. Overall, greater variability in digital cephalometric measurements was found. Differences in Gn', Li, Si, and Ii-Li measurements between the two methods were statistically (P < 0.05), but not clinically significant. The findings indicate that the results of the two investigated tracing methods are similar and that digital tracing with FACAD is reliable and can be used routinely.

Occlusal indicators are widely used in dental treatment to measure tooth contacts that occur during occlusion. However, the presence of an indicator may affect the mechanics of occlusion and lead to invalid tooth contact data. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of four indicators (Parkell, silk, T-Scan(®) sensor and paper) on surface electromyography (SEMG) activity during occlusion. Twenty-three subjects performed strong bites and maximum clenches onto the four indicators and natural dentition. Surface electromyography recordings of anterior temporalis and superficial masseter activity and the subjects' perception of each indicator were measured. SEMG activity with the T-Scan(®) sensor and paper was significantly different (higher masseter activity; P0·05) compared to that for natural dentition. The Parkell and silk gave no significant differences to natural dentition. Similarly, subjects perceived that T-Scan(®) sensor and paper had the greatest effect on occlusion and were the least comfortable (P0·05). Thus, the very plastic T-Scan(®) sensor and very thick articulating paper both affected SEMG activity during occlusion and, therefore, may not provide valid tooth contact information for dental treatment. In conclusion, occlusal indicators can change SEMG activity during occlusion which may affect the validity of the measurements they provide.

The ductility of thin films is normally evaluated by conducting the bulge testing. However, the accuracy of the conventional type of mechanical bulge ductility testing unit is poor in determining the actual elongation. In this development, a photo-sensitive device is provided in the detecting portion to accurately measure the elongation. The sensitivity depends on the type of the materials tested. A Pyrex glass ball is utilized as a punching ball to provide equally distributed light. Pushing of the Pyrex glass is activated by a hydraulic media to control the punching velocity. Accuracy and reproducibility were primarily checked with copper thin foil deposited on polyimide substrates. Two types of dental articulating papers (paper-based and plastic-based) were tested. It was suggested that an appropriate selection of articulating paper to mark the occlusal interferences is essential for precise determination of occlusal harmony.