1. A retrospective analysis of clinical efficacy of ribavirin in adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19
- Author
-
Sanlan Wu, Yong Han, Xue-Feng Cai, Fang Zeng, Yu-Yong Su, Yong-Ning Lv, Wei-Jing Gong, Jia-Long Ye, Tao Zhou, Yu Zhang, and Jia-Qiang Xu
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Microbiology (medical) ,China ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,viruses ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,030106 microbiology ,medicine.disease_cause ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Ribavirin ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Clinical efficacy ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Coronavirus ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,virus diseases ,Cancer ,Retrospective cohort study ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,COVID-19 Drug Treatment ,Treatment Outcome ,Infectious Diseases ,chemistry ,Original Article ,Female ,business - Abstract
Introduction Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) swept rapidly throughout the world. So far, no therapeutics have yet proven to be effective. Ribavirin was recommended for the treatment of COVID-19 in China because of its in vitro activity. However, evidence supporting its clinical use with good efficacy is still lacking. Methods A total of 208 confirmed severe COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized in Wuhan Union West Campus between 1 February 2020 and 10 March 2020 were enrolled in the retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of ribavirin. The primary endpoint was the time to clinical improvement. The secondary endpoints included mortality, survival time, time to throat swab SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negative conversion, and the length of hospital stay. Results 68 patients were treated with ribavirin while 140 not. There were no significant between-group differences in demographic characteristics, baseline laboratory test results, treatment, and distribution of ordinal scale scores at enrollment, except for coexisting diseases especially cancer (ribavirin group vs no ribavirin group, P = 0.01). Treatment with ribavirin was not associated with a difference in the time to clinical improvement (P = 0.48, HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.63–1.25). There were also no significant differences between-group in SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negative conversion, mortality, survival time, and the length of hospital stay. Conclusions In hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19, no significant benefit was observed with ribavirin treatment.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF