Search

Introduction: In everyday practice, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers are cornerstone treatments in patients with (cardio-)vascular disease. Clear data that evaluate the effects of the combination of these agents on morbidity and mortality are lacking. Methods: In this retrospective pooled analysis of three large perindopril outcome trials (ADVANCE, EUROPA, PROGRESS), clinical outcomes were evaluated in 29,463 patients with vascular disease. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed in patients randomized to a perindopril-based regimen or placebo (treatment effect), and data were stratified according to background beta-blocker treatment. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. Results: The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint over mean follow-up of 4.0 years (Sd 1.0) was significantly lower in the beta-blocker/perindopril group (9.6%; 545/5700 patients) as compared to beta-blocker/placebo (11.8%; 676/5718 patients) (p < 0.01). Adding perindopril to existing beta-blocker treatment reduced the relative risk of the primary endpoint by 20% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.90), non-fatal myocardial infarction by 23% (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65–0.91), and all-cause mortality by 22% (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.68–0.88) as compared to placebo. Significant treatment benefit was not observed for stroke (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.75–1.15). Significance was maintained for the primary endpoint and cardiovascular endpoints when data were further stratified by baseline hypertension. However, the mortality benefit was only observed in patients with hypertension with background beta-blocker use. Conclusions: These data suggest that the beneficial cardioprotective effects of perindopril treatment are additive to the background beta-blockers use.

Background beta-Blockers relieve angina/ischemia in stable coronary artery disease (CAD), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors prevent CAD outcomes. In EUROPA, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril reduced cardiovascular outcomes in low-risk stable CAD patients over 4.2 years. This post hoc analysis examined whether the addition of perindopril to beta-blocker in EUROPA had additional benefits on outcomes compared with standard therapy including beta-blocker. Methods EUROPA was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial in patients with documented stable CAD. Randomized EUROPA patients who received beta-blocker at baseline were identified, and the effect on cardiovascular outcomes of adding perindopril or placebo was analyzed. Endpoints were the same as those in EUROPA. Results At baseline, 62% (n = 7534 [3789 on perindopril and 3745 on placebo]) received beta-blocker. Treatment with perindopril/beta-blocker reduced the relative risk of the primary end point (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and resuscitated cardiac arrest) by 24% compared with placebo/beta-blocker (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.91; P = .002). Addition of perindopril also reduced fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction by 28% (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = .001) and hospitalization for heart failure by 45% (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.93; P = .025). Serious adverse drug reactions were rare in both groups, and cardiovascular death and hospitalizations occurred less often with perindopril/beta-blocker. Conclusions The addition of perindopril to beta-blocker in stable CAD patients was safe and resulted in reductions in cardiovascular outcomes and mortality compared with standard therapy including beta-blocker.

Background: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition reduces the risk of cardiovascular events at a group level. Presumably, the absolute effect of treatment varies between individuals. We sought to develop multivariable prediction scores to estimate individual treatment effect of perindopril in patients with stable coronary artery disease (sCAD). Methods: In EUROPA trial participants, we estimated the individual patient 5-year absolute risk reduction (ARR) of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE) by perindopril. Predictions were based on a new Coxproportional-hazards model with clinical characteristics and an external risk score in combination with the observed relative risk reduction. Second, a genetic profile modifying the relative efficacy of perindopril was added. The individual patient ARR was defined as the difference in MACE risk with and without treatment. The group level impact of selectively treating patients with the largest predicted treatment effect was evaluated using net benefit analysis. Results: The risk score combining clinical and genetic characteristics estimated the 5-year absolute treatment effect to be absent or adverse in 27% of patients. On the other hand, the risk score estimated a small 5-year ARR of = 50) in 20% of patients, a modest ARR of 2-4% (NNT5 25-50) in 26%, and a large ARR of >= 4% (NNT5

UNLABELLED: In the last decennia heart failure has become one of the most important diseases worldwide in terms of prevalence, morbidity, life expectancy, and in health care management and costs. Despite significant improvements in prevention and treatment, heart failure remains a frequently occurring disorder with increasing incidence and a high hospitalisation and death rate. As major health care problem it deserves full attention of health care authorities. Unfortunately, the seriousness of heart failure and the therapeutic possibilities are often not recognised by those directly involved, i.e. the doctor, the patient or his relatives, let alone that they are known to the general public and health care authorities. The SHAPE study aims at improving heart failure care by increasing awareness and perception of the disease in Europe. Firstly, awareness and perception of heart failure will be documented in the general public, primary care physicians and specialists (cardiologists, internists and geriatricians) in 9 European countries: France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden and the UK. Subsequently, the results will be used to design and carry out suitable awareness and educational programmes in these groups, aimed at improving heart failure care and research. Finally, the results of these programmes will be tested in a second documentation phase and adaptations made where needed. This manuscript describes the rationale and design of the first phase, the Documentation Phase.During the first documentation phase, 800 participants per country selected based on sex, two age groups and urban vs. rural location (100/cell) will be surveyed using a 32-question interview. Questions for the general public focus on recognition, incidence and prevalence, severity and prognosis of the disease in comparison to other disease areas, like cancer, on quality of life, therapeutic possibilities and availability of care. The primary care physician (PCP) survey aims at receiving a minimum of 300 responses. A questionnaire with 33 closed questions will be used covering the PCP's knowledge of heart failure, including prevalence, aetiology, new diagnostic and therapeutic developments and health care costs. Questions concerning diagnostic procedures and various treatments carried out by the PCP in his own practice, as well as referral patterns for diagnostic procedures and for specialist care. Questions relating to the type of practice and number of patients in each PCP's clinical practice. A minimum of 150 cardiologists and 150 internists + geriatricians will be surveyed per country. The specialist's questionnaire contains 31 questions focusing on identification of heart failure patients, patients at risk, use and availability of diagnostic tools, importance of therapies and order of treatment, perceived risks of treatment, relevance of counselling and advice, use of paramedical personnel, and questions concerning practice size, type of practice and number of patients with heart failure. CONCLUSION: This first part of the SHAPE study will provide important information about the level of knowledge and understanding of heart failure of the general public, as well as the perception of the relevance of heart failure and appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic approaches by both the primary care physician and the medical specialist. This knowledge will be extremely valuable when it comes to defining optimal educational programmes in the different target groups studied in SHAPE necessary to implement appropriate heart failure care in Europe and to obtain the means to do so.

Aims The efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) may be increased by targeting the therapy to those patients most likely to benefit. However, these patients cannot be identified by clinical characteristics. We developed a genetic profile to predict the treatment benefit of ACE-inhibitors exist and to optimize therapy with ACE-inhibitors. Methods and resultsIn 8907 stable CAD patients participating in the randomized placebo-controlled EUROPA-trial, we analysed 12 candidate genes within the pharmacodynamic pathway of ACE-inhibitors, using 52 haplotype-tagging-single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The primary outcome was the reduction in cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and resuscitated cardiac arrest during 4.2 years of follow-up. Multivariate Cox regression was performed with multiple testing corrections using permutation analysis. Three polymorphisms, located in the angiotensin-II type I receptor and bradykinin type I receptor genes, were significantly associated with the treatment benefit of perindopril after multivariate adjustment for confounders and correction for multiple testing. A pharmacogenetic score, combining these three SNPs, demonstrated a stepwise reduction of risk in the placebo group and a stepwise decrease in treatment benefit of perindopril with an increasing scores (interaction P < 0.0001). A pronounced treatment benefit was observed in a subgroup of 73.5 of the patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.67; 95 confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.79], whereas no benefit was apparent in the remaining 26.5 (HR 1.26; 95 CI 0.97-1.67) with a trend towards a harmful effect. In 1051 patients with cerebrovascular disease from the PROGRESS-trial, treated with perindopril or placebo, an interaction effect of similar direction and magnitude, although not statistically significant, was observed. Conclusion The current study is the first to identify genetic determinants of treatment benefit of ACE-inhibitor therapy. We developed a genetic profile which predicts the treatment benefit of ACE-inhibitors and which could be used to optimize therapy.

AimsAngiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiovascular risk in different groups of patients. Whether these effects can be generalized to the broad group of patients with vascular disease is unknown. Therefore, we undertook a combined analysis using individual data from ADVANCE, EUROPA, and PROGRESS to determine the consistency of the treatment effect of perindopril-based regimen in patients with vascular disease or at high risk of vascular disease.Methods and resultsWe studied all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular outcomes during a follow-up of about 4 years in the 29 463 patients randomly assigned a perindopril-based treatment regimen or placebo. The perindopril-based regimens were associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89; 95 confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.96; P = 0.006], cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.85; 95 CI 0.76-0.95; P = 0.004), non-fatal myocardial infarction (HR 0.80; 95 CI 0.71-0.90; P < 0.001), stroke (HR 0.82; 95 CI 0.74-0.92; P = 0.002), and heart failure (HR 0.84; 95 CI 0.72-0.96; P = 0.015). Results were consistent in subgroups with different clinical characteristics, concomitant medication use, and across all strata of baseline blood pressure.ConclusionThis study provides strong evidence for a consistent cardiovascular protection with an ACE-inhibitor treatment regimen (perindopril-indapamide) by improving survival and reducing the risk of major cardiovascular events across a broad spectrum of patients with vascular disease.

Background. - The European trial on Reduction Of cardiac events with perindopril. in patients with stable coronary Artery disease (EUROPA) demonstrated the benefits of perindopril with respect to secondary prevention of cardiovascular risk in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Aims. - To describe the clinical effects of perindopril in a subpopulation of patients from EUROPA with a history of myocardial infarction and/or revascularization. Patients and methods. - Of the 12,218 patients in the EUROPA study, 10,962 had a history of myocardial infarction and/or revascularization. In this EUROPA subpopulation, 7910 patients had a history of myocardial infarction and 6709 had a history of revascularization. Patients were randomized to treatment with perindopril 8 mg/day or placebo. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and resuscitated cardiac arrest. Results. - After a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, treatment with perindopril 8 mg/day was associated with a 22.4% reduction in the primary endpoint compared with placebo (p < 0.001) in patients with a history of myocardial infarction. Patients with a history of myocardial revascularization showed a 17.3% reduction in the primary endpoint with perindopril versus placebo (p < 0.05). In the combined population of patients with a history of myocardial infarction and/or revascularization, treatment with perindopril produced a 22.4% reduction in the primary endpoint compared with placebo (p < 0.001). Conclusions. - This study confirms the benefits of a high dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular risk among patients with a history of myocardial infarction and/or revascularization. (c) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Background: In the COMET study, carvedilol improved survival compared to metoprolol tartrate in 3029 patients with NYHA II-IV heart failure and EF

The multicenter EUROPA trial of 12,218 patients showed that perindopril decreased adverse clinical events in patients with established coronary heart disease. The PERSPECTIVE study, a substudy of the EUROPA trial, evaluated the effect of perindopril on coronary plaque progression as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). In total 244 patients (mean age 57 years, 81% men) were included. Evaluable paired quantitative coronary angiograms were obtained from 96 patients randomized to perindopril and from 98 patients to placebo. Concomitant treatment at baseline consisted of aspirin (90%), lipid-lowering agents (70%), and beta blockers (60%). The primary and secondary end point was the difference of minimum and mean lumen diameters (quantitative coronary angiography) or mean plaque cross-sectional area (IVUS) measured at baseline and 3-year follow-up between the perindopril and placebo groups. After a median follow-up of 3.0 years (range 1.9 to 4.1), no differences in change in quantitative coronary angiographic or IVUS measurements were detected between the perindopril and placebo groups (minimum and mean luminal diameters -0.07 +/- 0.4 vs -0.02 +/- 0.4 mm, p = 0.34; mean luminal diameter -0.05 +/- 0.2 vs -0.05 +/- 0.3 mm, p = 0.89; mean plaque cross-sectional area -0.18 +/- 1.2 vs -0.02 +/- 1.2 mm(2), p = 0.48). In conclusion, we found no progression in coronary artery disease by quantitative coronary angiography and IVUS with long-term administration of perindopril or placebo, possibly because most patients were on concomitant treatment with a statin.

Anaemia is a common comorbidity in chronic heart failure (CHF). The predictors of new onset anaemia (NOA) and its long-term prognostic value, particularly in patients treated with beta-blockers, are not known.In COMET, 3029 patients with CHF in NYHA II-IV and EF35% were randomized to carvedilol or metoprolol tartrate and were followed for an average of 58 months. Plasma haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations were measured at a central laboratory at randomization, at four monthly intervals for the first year and annually thereafter. According to WHO criteria, anaemia was defined when Hb measured13 g/dL for men and12 g/dL for women. We considered anaemia to be severe when Hb11.5 g/dL for men and10.5 g/dL for women. The baseline mean Hb was 14.2 +/- 1.5 g/dL (n = 2996) and 15.9% of patients had anaemia (males, 16.0%; females, 15.2%). At baseline, severe anaemia was found in 3.3% of patients (males, 3.6%; females, 2.0%). During the study, all-cause mortality (RR 1.47) death or hospitalization (RR 1.28), and heart failure hospitalization (RR 1.43, all P0.0001) were higher in anaemic when compared with non-anaemic patients. In patients without anaemia at baseline, at the end of the study, the cumulative frequency of NOA was 28.1% in males and 27.0% in females. NOA increased over time from 14.2% at year 1 to 27.5% at year 5. Predictors of NOA were: higher age, diuretic dose, creatinine (all P0.0001), higher serum potassium, lower serum sodium, body mass index, and use of aldosterone antagonists, carvedilol, and digitalis (all P0.03). Treatment with carvedilol (vs. metoprolol tartrate) was associated with a 24% increased risk to develop NOA (P = 0.0047), but not severe anaemia (P = 0.18). Patients with a Hb decrease of3 g/dL (RR 3.37, P0.0001) or of 2.0-3.0 g/dL (RR 1.47, P = 0.011) from baseline had an increased subsequent mortality when compared with patients having Hb increases of 0-1.0 g/dL.In stable ambulatory CHF patients, development of NOA is frequent and can be predicted by a set of clinical variables. Decreases in Hb over time relate to future increased morbidity and mortality.

Aims We studied the influence of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and beta-blocker dose on outcome in the 2599 out of 3029 patients in Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) who were alive and on study drug at 4 months after randomization (time of first visit on maintenance therapy). Methods and results By multivariable analysis, baseline HR, baseline SBP, and their change after 4 months were not independently related to subsequent outcome. In a multivariable analysis including clinical variables, HR above and SBP below the median value achieved at 4 months predicted subsequent increased mortality [relative risk (RR) for HR>68 b.p.m. 1.333; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.152-1.542; P120 mmHg 0.78; 95% CI 0.671-0.907; P

Background The Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) reported a significant survival benefit for carvedilol, a β1-, β2- and α1-blocker, vs. metoprolol tartrate, a β1-selective blocker, in patients with mild-to-severe chronic heart failure (CHF). Patients on treatment with metoprolol might benefit from switching to carvedilol. Aim To investigate the safety and tolerability of switching β-blockers in CHF. Methods At the end of COMET, the Steering Committee recommended that study medication was stopped without unblinding, and patients were commenced on open-label β-blockade at a dose equivalent to half the dose of blinded therapy, with subsequent titration to target or maximum tolerated dose. Patients were followed for 30 days. Results 1321 out of 1440 patients were transitioned to open-label treatment (76.8% to carvedilol). Serious adverse and CHF-related events were respectively 9.4% and 4.7% in those switching from carvedilol to metoprolol and 3.1% and 1.5% in patients switching from metoprolol to carvedilol. Patients who switched from carvedilol to metoprolol showed the highest mortality or hospitalisation rate (12.3%) in comparison with those who switched from metoprolol to carvedilol (3.1%, p

ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), Silvia G. Priori (Chairperson) (Italy), Jean-Jacques Blanc (France), Andrzej Budaj (Poland), John Camm (UK), Veronica Dean (France), Jaap Deckers (The Netherlands), Kenneth Dickstein (Norway), John Lekakis (Greece), Keith McGregor (France), Marco Metra (Italy), Joao Morais (Portugal), Ady Osterspey (Germany), Juan Tamargo (Spain), Jose Luis Zamorano (Spain) Document Reviewers, Marco Metra (CPG Review Coordinator) (Italy), Michael Bohm (Germany), Alain Cohen-Solal (France), Martin Cowie (UK), Ulf Dahlstrom (Sweden), Kenneth Dickstein (Norway), Gerasimos S. Filippatos (Greece), Edoardo Gronda (Italy), Richard Hobbs (UK), John K. Kjekshus (Norway), John McMurray (UK), Lars Ryden (Sweden), Gianfranco Sinagra (Italy), Juan Tamargo (Spain), Michal Tendera (Poland), Dirk van Veldhuisen (The Netherlands), Faiez Zannad (France) Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents aim to present all the relevant evidence on a particular issue in order to help physicians to weigh the benefits and risks of a particular diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. They should be helpful in everyday clinical decision-making. A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and by different organizations and other related societies. This profusion can put at stake the authority and validity of guidelines, which can only be guaranteed if they have been developed by an unquestionable decision-making process. This is one of the reasons why the ESC and others have issued recommendations for formulating and issuing Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents. In spite of the fact that standards for issuing good quality Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents are well defined, recent surveys of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents published in peer-reviewed journals between 1985 and 1998 have shown that methodological standards were not complied with in the vast majority of cases. It is therefore of great importance that guidelines and recommendations are presented in formats that are …

Background & Aims: The COMET trial was a prospective, double-blind, randomised trial comparing carvedilol, a comprehensive adrenergic receptor antagonist, with metoprolol, a beta-1-selective agent in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The trial showed a reduction in mortality with carvedilol that was consistent across subgroups. The purpose of this report is to describe in greater detail the heterogeneity of this population at baseline with particular reference to the impact of symptomatic severity, age and gender on patient characteristics. Methods: A descriptive report using data entered in the COMET study data-base. Results: The characteristics of the population studied were similar to those reported in previous trials of beta-blockers. Almost all patients were receiving diuretics and ACE inhibitors with few patients taking angiotensin receptor blockers. As expected, older patients had more co-morbidity. Older patients and women reported worse symptoms and poorer well-being despite similar ventricular dimensions and systolic dysfunction. NT-proBNP was higher in patients with more severe symptoms and older patients but not in women, although differences in NT-proBNP may have been confounded by differences in renal function. Conclusion: Age and gender, as well as the severity of cardiac dysfunction, appear to have an important effect on the severity of heart failure symptoms and patient 'well-being'. This could have important implications for the relationship between symptoms and prognosis and therefore the way in which patients are selected for clinical trials and the goals of treatment. This will be the subject of further analyses.

Heart failure (HF) treatment guidelines of the ESC recommend ACE-inhibitors (ACE-I) as first-line treatment and beta-blockers added if patients remain symptomatic. CARMEN explored the need for combined treatment for remodelling and order of introduction by comparing the ACE-I enalapril against carvedilol and their combination.In a parallel-group, 3-arm study of 18 months duration, 572 mild heart failure patients were randomly assigned to carvedilol (N = 191), enalapril (N = 190) or their combination (N = 191). In the latter, carvedilol was up-titrated before enalapril. Left ventricular (LV) remodelling was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (biplane, modified Simpson) at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months of maintenance therapy. Primary comparisons considered the change in LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) from baseline to month 18 between the combination and enalapril, and between carvedilol and enalapril.In the first primary comparison, LVESVI was reduced by 5.4 ml/m2 (p = 0.0015) in favour of combination therapy compared to enalapril. The second primary comparison tended to favour carvedilol to enalapril (NS). In the within treatment arm analyses, carvedilol significantly reduced LVESVI by 2.8 ml/m2 (p = 0.018) compared to baseline, whereas enalapril did not. LVESVI decreased by 6.3 ml/m2 (p = 0.0001) with combination therapy. All three arms showed similar safety profiles and withdrawal rates.CARMEN is the first study to demonstrate that early combination of ACE-I and carvedilol reverses LV remodelling in patients with mild to moderate HF and LV systolic dysfunction. The results of the CARMEN study support a therapeutic strategy in which the institution of beta-blockade should not be delayed.

Summary Backgroundblockers reduce mortality in patients who have chronic heart failure, systolic dysfunction, and are on background treatment with diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. We aimed to compare the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcome. Methods In a multicentre, double-blind, and randomised parallel group trial, we assigned 1511 patients with chronic heart failure to treatment with carvedilol (target dose 25 mg twice daily) and 1518 to metoprolol (metoprolol tartrate, target dose 50 mg twice daily). Patients were required to have chronic heart failure (NYHA II-IV), previous admission for a cardio- vascular reason, an ejection fraction of less than 0·35, and to have been treated optimally with diuretics and angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors unless not tolerated. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or all-cause admission. Analysis was done by intention to treat. Findings The mean study duration was 58 months (SD 6). The mean ejection fraction was 0·26 (0·07) and the mean age 62 years (11). The all-cause mortality was 34% (512 of 1511) for carvedilol and 40% (600 of 1518) for metoprolol (hazard ratio 0·83 (95% CI 0·74-0·93), p=0·0017). The reduction of all- cause mortality was consistent across predefined subgroups. The composite endpoint of mortality or all-cause admission occurred in 1116 (74%) of 1511 on carvedilol and in 1160 (76%) of 1518 on metoprolol (0·94 (0·86-1·02), p=0·122). Incidence of side-effects and drug withdrawals did not differ by much between the two study groups. Interpretation Our results suggest that carvedilol extends survival compared with metoprolol.

In large clinical trials both carvedilol and metoprolol have been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure. Carvedilol is an adrenoceptor antagonist, which inhibits beta(1)-, beta(2)-, and alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors. Carvedilol has additional metabolic and antioxidant properties. Metoprolol is a selective antagonist of beta(1)-adrenergic receptors. The carvedilol or metoprolol European trial (COMET) is the first study to investigate whether beta-blocking agents with differing pharmacological profiles exert different effects on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. 3029 patients from 15 different European countries were enrolled into COMET and will be followed until 1020 fatal events have been observed, unless the data and safety monitoring committee (DSMC) recommends early termination. The target dose for carvedilol is 25 mg bid and for metoprolol tartrate 50 mg bid. This manuscript outlines the rationale, design and possible outcomes of COMET.

OBJECTIVESWe sought to define the therapeutic dose range of levosimendan in patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure of ischemic origin.BACKGROUNDLevosimendan is a calcium sensitizer for treatment of acute decompensated heart failure.METHODSA double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study included 151 adult patients. Levosimendan was given as a 10-min intravenous bolus of 3, 6, 12, 24 or 36 μg/kg, followed by a 24-h infusion of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 0.6 μg/kg/min, respectively. Dobutamine, for comparative purposes, was given as an open-label infusion (6 μg/kg/min). The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients achieving in each treatment group at least one of the following: 1) a ≥15% increase in stroke volume (SV) at 23 h to 24 h; 2) a ≥25% decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (and ≥4 mm Hg) at 23 h to 24 h; 3) a ≥40% increase in cardiac output (CO) (with change in heart rate [HR]

Cardiac L-carnitine content, essential for mitochondrial fatty acid transport and ATP-ADP exchange, decreases during ischemia. In animal models, administration of the natural derivative, L-propionylcarnitine, may reduce ischemia and improve cardiac function. To evaluate possible antiischemic effects of L-propionylcarnitine was compared with placebo in a randomized, double-blind, parallel design, in addition to preexisting therapy. Patients with > or = 2 anginal attacks per week and objective signs of ischemia with angina during bicycle exercise testing were included. After an initial 2-week, single-blind placebo phase, 37 patients received 500 mg L-propionylcarnitine tid, and 37 patients received placebo for 6 weeks. Both groups were comparable at baseline. Three patients discontinued the study while on placebo (two because of noncompliance, one because of palpitations) and one while on L-propionylcarnitine (noncompliance). Although heart rate, blood pressure at rest, and maximal exercise were not affected, L-propionylcarnitine increased the time to 0.1 mV ST-segment depression [44 +/- 3 vs. 8 +/- 2 seconds (mean +/- SEM) in the placebo group; p = 0.05], and exercise duration improved by 5% compared with placebo. Anginal attacks and the consumption of nitroglycerin were not affected in either group. Thus, following a 6 week treatment period, L-propionylcarnitine induced additional, albeit marginal, antiischemic effects in anginal patients who were still symptomatic despite maximal conventional antianginal therapy. It is questionable whether in these patients this form of metabolic treatment will achieve great benefit, although in some improvement can be expected.

Appropriate risk stratification of patients with established, stable coronary artery disease could contribute to the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events. The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate risk prediction models for various cardiovascular end points in the EURopean trial On reduction of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery disease (EUROPA) database, consisting of 12,218 patients with established coronary artery disease, with a median follow-up of 4.1 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used for model development. The end points examined were cardiovascular mortality, noncardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and combinations of these end points. The performance measures included Nagelkerke's R 2 , time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration plots. Backward selection resulted in a prediction model for cardiovascular mortality (464 events) containing age, current smoking, diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, body mass index, previous myocardial infarction, history of congestive heart failure, peripheral vessel disease, previous revascularization, and previous stroke. The model performance was adequate for this end point, with a Nagelkerke R 2 of 12%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73. However, the performance of models constructed for nonfatal and combined end points was considerably worse, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of about 0.6. In conclusion, in patients with established coronary artery disease, the risk of cardiovascular mortality during longer term follow-up can be adequately predicted using the clinical characteristics available at baseline. However, the prediction of nonfatal outcomes, both separately and combined with fatal outcomes, poses major challenges for clinicians and model developers.

We evaluated a generic quality of life (QoL) Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ), in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The FSQ assesses the 3 main dimensions of QoL: physical functioning, mental health and social role. It also includes 6 single item questions about: work status, frequency of social interactions, satisfaction with sexual relationships, days in bed, days with restricted activity and overall satisfaction with health status. The FSQ was compared to the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLwHF). The FSQ was evaluated in a substudy (n = 340) of the second Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Survival study (CIBIS-II), a placebo-controlled mortality trial. 265 patients (75%) patients completed both questionnaires at 6 months of follow-up. Both questionnaires indicated substantially impaired QoL. The FSQ demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α > 0.7 for all items except “social activity” = 0.66) and construct and concurrent validity. After 6 months, the only item on either questionnaire to show a difference between the placebo- and bisoprolol-treatment groups was the single item FSQ question about “days in bed” (p = 0.018 in favour of bisoprolol). The FSQ performed well in this study, provided additional information to the MLwHF questionnaire and allowed interesting comparisons with other chronic medical conditions. The FSQ may be a useful general QoL instrument for studies in CHF.

Aims To investigate whether genetic variation in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and kallikrein-bradykinin pathways is related to hypertension and blood pressure (BP) response to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Methods and results In 8907 stable CAD patients from the EUROPA trial, 52 haplotype-tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 12 candidate genes within the RAAS and kallikrein-bradykinin pathways were investigated for association with hypertension (defined as BP >= 160/95 mmHg or use of antihypertensives) and BP response to ACE inhibitors, during a 4-week run-in period. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index and creatinine clearance and corrected for multiple testing. Results Hypertension was present in 28.3% of the patients (n = 2526); median BP reduction after perindopril was 10/4mmHg. Four polymorphisms, located in the ACE (rs4291), angiotensinogen (rs5049) and (pro) renin receptor (rs2968915; rs5981008) genes were significantly associated with hypertension in two vascular disease populations of CAD (EUROPA) and cerebrovascular disease (PROGRESS; n = 3571). A cumulative profile demonstrated a stepwise increase in the prevalence of hypertension, mounting to a 2-3-fold increase (P for trend < 0.001). Similar associations on hypertension were observed for angiotensinogen in a healthy population (n = 2197). In addition, genetic polymorphisms were identified that significantly modified the BP reduction by ACE inhibitor therapy; however, the observed BP differences were small and did not remain significant after permutation analysis. Conclusion This large genetic association study identified genetic determinants of hypertension in three cohorts of patients with vascular disease and healthy individuals. J Hypertens 29:509-519 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Acute systemic and, possibly, coronary vasoconstriction may limit the usefulness of i.v. beta-blockade for the management of hypertension in ischemic patients. The acute hemodynamic and neurohumoral profile of i.v. dilevalol (50 mg/5 min), a nonselective beta-antagonist and selective partial beta 2-agonist, was evaluated for 1 h in nine patients with stable angina, significant (> 50%) coronary artery disease, and mild hypertension. Immediately after administration, arterial pressures fell significantly by 13% and remained lowered for the entire study period. Concomitantly, heart rate slowed from 76 +/- 2 (mean +/- SEM; control) to 67 +/- 2 beats/min (60 min postadministration, p < 0.05), and cardiac index and stroke work decreased significantly by 15 and 21%, respectively. Isovolumetric contractility indices (measured at fixed heart rates) fell progressively by 9-12%, whereas relaxation (Tau1 and Tau2) slowed by 10% (all p < 0.05 vs. control). Consequently, left ventricular end-diastolic and right atrial pressures increased significantly from 17 +/- 3 and 9 +/- 1.2 mm Hg at baseline to 21 +/- 2.5 and 12 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, respectively. Dilevalol did not affect systemic or coronary resistance. However, coronary flow decreased by 24% (p < 0.05 vs. control), accompanied by significant reductions in myocardial oxygen demand and consumption of 23 and 14%, respectively. Levels of circulating norepinephrine and dopamine increased by 35 and 71%, whereas those of renin and angiotensin II decreased by 26 and 33%, respectively (all p < 0.05 vs. control). Adverse side effects did not occur. None of the patients became ischemic. Thus, at the dose level used, dilevalol has predominant beta-blocking effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aims Information on the effectiveness of beta-blockade in patients with heart failure (HF) and concomitant renal impairment is scarce and beta-blockers are underutilized in these patients. Methods and results The Cockcroft–Gault formula normalized for body surface-area was used to estimate renal function (eGFRBSA) in 2622 patients with HF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, New York Heart Association class III/IV and serum creatinine

The anti-ischemic efficacy of diltiazem may improve with increments in dosage and with additional beta-blocking therapy. However, the combined administration could lead to adverse effects through amplification of negative inotropic and chronotropic properties. To evaluate hemodynamic tolerability and safety of high-dose intravenous diltiazem in patients with coronary artery disease receiving long-term metoprolol treatment, 9 such patients were studied for 30 minutes after onset of intravenous diltiazem administration (0.5 mg/kg for 5 minutes, followed by 15 mg/hour). Diltiazem plasma levels peaked at 5 minutes (641 +/- 74 micrograms/liter), decreasing to 177 micrograms/liter at 30 minutes. Average metoprolol levels (43 +/- 12 micrograms/liter) did not change. Diltiazem immediately decreased systemic vascular resistance, left ventricular systolic and mean aortic pressures (29, 21 and 20%, respectively, at 5 minutes), and they remained significantly reduced at 30 minutes. Heart rate initially increased by 11% during the bolus infusion (p < 0.05). Concomitantly, contractility indexes Vmax and Vce40, measured at fixed heart rates, also increased significantly by 11%. Both heart rate and contractility indexes returned to baseline levels thereafter. Cardiac output increased by 10% (p = not significant), stroke index remained unchanged, but stroke work decreased significantly by 20%. Also, the tension-time index was significantly reduced (23%). Diltiazem induced moderate negative lusitropic effects, the first derivative of negative left ventricular pressure decline decreased by 12% and Tau 2 lengthened by 13%. Concomitantly, left ventricular filling pressure increased from 19 +/- 2 to 23 +/- 3 mm Hg, but only at 5 and 15 minutes. PQ, QRS and QTc intervals were not affected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We determined whether blood pressure (BP) lowering by perindopril was related to its benefit in the EUROPA study. Twelve thousand two hundred eighteen patients with documented coronary artery disease received perindopril 8 mg once daily or matching placebo after a 4-week run-in period in which all patients received perindopril. Patients were excluded if systolic (S) BP was > 180 or < 100 mmHg. Mean age was 60 years (range 26-89). 27% had a history of hypertension. After 4.2 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) was observed in 603 (9.9%) placebo versus 488 (8.0%) perindopril patients [20% relative risk reduction (RRR), CI 9-29%, P = 0.003]. There was no interaction between baseline SBP levels (using JNC-7 cutoff values) and treatment effect. If anything, the greatest RRR of the primary endpoint (32%) occurred in patients with the lowest SBP (< 120 mmHg) in whom perindopril did not reduce SBP. Also, RRR during blinded treatment was comparable, irrespective of whether BP decreased or not or of the extent of BP reduction during perindopril treatment. The treatment benefit in EUROPA cannot be fully explained by baseline BP or BP reduction with perindopril. Other mechanisms including direct anti-atherosclerotic effects of ACE inhibition may play a role.

The European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery Disease (EUROPA) investigated the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on the prevention of cardiac events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) without apparent heart failure. Perindopril 8 mg/day significantly reduced a composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or resuscitated cardiac arrest by 20% compared with placebo, in addition to standard preventive therapies. This review describes the substudies and subpopulation analyses carried out within the EUROPA population, concluding that the benefits of perindopril extend to all stable CAD patients, even revascularized patients or those with preserved left ventricular function. Data on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CAD indicate direct vascular protection with perindopril. This helps explain why perindopril is beneficial in preventing cardiac events in stable CAD patients.

This study sought to examine whether the cardioprotective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy by perindopril are modified by renal function in patients with stable coronary artery disease.A recent study reported that an impaired renal function identified a subgroup of patients with stable coronary artery disease more likely to benefit from ACE inhibition therapy. In light of the growing interest in tailored therapy for targeting medications to specific subgroups, remarks on the consistency of the treatment effect by ACE inhibitors are highly important.The present study involved 12,056 patients with stable coronary artery disease without heart failure randomized to perindopril or placebo. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios.The mean eGFR was 76.2 (+/-18.1) ml/min/1.73 m2. During follow-up, the primary end point (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) occurred in 454 of 5,761 patients (7.9%) with eGFRor =75 and in 631 of 6,295 patients (10.0%) with eGFR75. Treatment benefits of perindopril were apparent in both patient groups either with eGFRor =75 (hazard ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.93) or eGFR75 (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.98). We observed no significant interaction between renal function and treatment benefit (p = 0.47). Using different cutoff points of eGFR at the level of 60 or 90 resulted in similar trends.The treatment benefit of perindopril is consistent and not modified by mild to moderate renal insufficiency.

Background: β Blocker treatment may worsen glucose metabolism. Objective: To study the development of new onset diabetes in a large cohort of patients with heart failure treated with either metoprolol or carvedilol. Design: Prospective and retrospective analysis of a controlled clinical trial. Setting: Multinational multicentre study. Patients: 3029 patients with chronic heart failure. Interventions: Randomly assigned treatment with carvedilol (n = 1511, target dose 50 mg daily) or metoprolol tartrate (n = 1518, target dose 100 mg daily). Results: Diabetic events (diabetic coma, peripheral gangrene, diabetic foot, decreased glucose tolerance or hyperglycaemia) and new onset diabetes (clinical diagnosis, repeated high random glucose level or glucose lowering drugs) were assessed in 2298 patients without diabetes at baseline. Diabetic events occurred in 122/1151 (10.6%) patients in the carvedilol group and 149/1147 (13.0%) patients in the metoprolol group (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 0.99; p = 0.039). New onset diabetes was diagnosed in 119/1151 (10.3%) v 145/1147 (12.6%) cases in the carvedilol and metoprolol treatment groups (HR = 0.78, CI 0.61 to 0.997; p = 0.048), respectively. Patients with diabetes at baseline had an increased mortality compared with non-diabetic subjects (45.3% v 33.9%; HR = 1.45, CI 1.28 to 1.65). Both diabetic and non-diabetic subjects at baseline had a similar reduction in mortality with carvedilol compared with metoprolol (RR = 0.85; CI 0.69 to 1.06 and RR = 0.82; CI 0.71 to 0.94, respectively). Conclusion: A high prevalence and incidence of diabetes is found in patients with heart failure over a course of 5 years. New onset diabetes is more likely to occur during treatment with metoprolol than during treatment with carvedilol.

We explored whether vascular protection by carvedilol could contribute to its superior effects in the treatment of heart failure (HF) compared with metoprolol tartrate in the COMET (Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial) study.Full adrenergic blockade by carvedilol and additional (e.g., antioxidative) properties may lead to vascular protection relative to beta-1 blockade alone, and contribute to its efficacy in HF treatment.Three thousand twenty-nine patients with HF due to ischemic (51%) or idiopathic cardiomyopathy (44%) were randomized double-blind to carvedilol (n = 1,511) or metoprolol (n = 1,518) and followed for 58 months. Vascular end points were cardiovascular death, stroke, stroke death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unstable angina.The effect of carvedilol on cardiovascular death improved consistently in subgroups with prespecified baseline variables. Myocardial infarctions were reported in 69 carvedilol and 94 metoprolol patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 0.97, p = 0.03). Cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI combined were reduced by 19% in carvedilol (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92, p = 0.0009 vs. metoprolol). Unstable angina was reported as an adverse event in 56 carvedilol and in 77 metoprolol patients (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.501 to 0.998, p = 0.049). A stroke occurred in 65 carvedilol and 80 metoprolol patients (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.10). Stroke or MI combined occurred in 130 carvedilol and 168 metoprolol patients (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.95, p = 0.015), and fatal MI or fatal stroke occurred in 34 carvedilol and in 72 metoprolol patients (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.69, p = 0.0002). Death after a nonfatal MI or stroke occurred in 61 of 124 carvedilol and in 106 of 160 metoprolol patients (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.90, p = 0.0086).Carvedilol improves vascular outcomes better than metoprolol. These results suggest a ubiquitous protective effect of carvedilol against major vascular events.

AIMS: Appropriate heart failure (HF) care and adequate resourcing require recognition of its clinical, social, and economic importance by the general public besides healthcare authorities and providers. The extent of public awareness in Europe is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 7958 subjects were randomly selected from nine European countries (minimum 100/group per country). Each completed a 32-question survey on HF covering recognition, impact on health, comparative prevalence and severity, treatment, and costs. Although 86% of respondents had heard of HF, only 3% could correctly identify HF from a description of typical symptoms and signs, 31% correctly identified angina, and 51% identified transient ischaemic attack/stroke. Only 29% thought that HF signs and symptoms indicate a 'severe' condition. Most thought that HF patients should reduce all physical activity and 34% believed HF a normal consequence of ageing. Sixty-seven per cent thought that HF patients live longer than cancer patients. Only 9% believed that HF leads to greater healthcare expenditure than cancer, HIV, or diabetes. Overall, responses were comparable between countries. CONCLUSION: In Europe, community awareness of HF is low. Therefore, the general public is unlikely to demand appropriate measures by healthcare authorities and providers. A better understanding of HF could improve its prevention and management. Strategies to educate the public about HF are needed.

This study was designed to investigate the loss of well-being, in terms of life-years, overall and in patients randomized to metoprolol versus carvedilol in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET).The ultimate objectives of treating patients with heart failure are to relieve suffering and prolong life. Although the effect of treatment on mortality is usually described in trials, the effects on patient well-being throughout the trials' courses are rarely reported.A total of 3,029 patients randomized in the COMET study were included in the analysis. "Patient journey" was calculated by adjusting days alive and out of hospital over four years using a five-point score completed by the patient every four months, adjusted according to the need for intensification of diuretic therapy. Scores ranged from 0% (dead or hospitalized) to 100% (feeling very well).Over 48 months, 17% of all days were lost through death, 1% through hospitalization, 23% through impaired well-being, and 2% through the need for intensified therapy. Compared with metoprolol, carvedilol was associated with fewer days lost to death, with no increase in days lost due to impaired well-being or days in hospital. The "patient journey" score improved from a mean of 54.8% (SD 26.0) to 57.4% (SD 26.3%) (p0.0068).Despite treatment with beta-blockers, heart failure remains associated with a marked reduction in well-being and survival. Loss of quality-adjusted life-years through death and poor well-being seemed of similar magnitude over four years, and both were much larger than the loss that could be attributed to hospitalization.

Background: Management guidelines for heart failure recommend ACE-I and β-blockers. The perception of difficult up-titration might have added to the slow uptake of β-blockers despite their mortality and morbidity benefits. Aims: CARMEN offered a possibility to study safety and tolerability of enalapril against carvedilol and their combination. Methods: Five hundred and seventy-two patients were blindly up-titrated on carvedilol (target 25 mg bid) and/or enalapril (target 10 mg bid), and continued for 18 months. In the combination arm, carvedilol was up-titrated before enalapril. Results: There was no group related difference in adverse events during up-titration. Withdrawal rates were 31, 30 and 30%, and serious adverse events 28, 29 and 34% in the combination, carvedilol and enalapril arms. Mortality was similar in all groups (all-cause N=14, 14 and 14; cardiovascular N=9, 13 and 14). All-cause and cardiovascular hospitalizations occurred in 26, 27 and 32%, and in 12, 16 and 22% in the combination, carvedilol and enalapril arms, respectively. Conclusion: The safety profile was similar in all treatment arms. In contrast to common perception, there was no difference in tolerability between the ACE-I and carvedilol. This result is even more remarkable as the high prestudy use of ACE-I (65%) might have introduced a bias by selecting ACE-I tolerant patients, who were only switched from their former ACE-I to enalapril.

background Aldosterone blockade reduces mortality and morbidity among patients with severe heart failure. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, on morbidity and mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. methods Patients were randomly assigned to eplerenone (25 mg per day initially, titrated to a maximum of 50 mg per day; 3313 patients) or placebo (3319 patients) in addition to optimal medical therapy. The study continued until 1012 deaths occurred. The primary end points were death from any cause and death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or ventricular arrhythmia. results During a mean follow-up of 16 months, there were 478 deaths in the eplerenone group and 554 deaths in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.85; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.75 to 0.96; P=0.008). Of these deaths, 407 in the eplerenone group and 483 in the placebo group were attributed to cardiovascular causes (relative risk, 0.83; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.94; P = 0.005). The rate of the other primary end point, death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for cardiovascular events, was reduced by eplerenone (relative risk, 0.87; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.79 to 0.95; P=0.002), as was the secondary end point of death from any cause or any hospitalization (relative risk, 0.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.98; P=0.02). There was also a reduction in the rate of sudden death from cardiac causes (relative risk, 0.79; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.97; P=0.03). The rate of serious hyperkalemia was 5.5 percent in the eplerenone group and 3.9 percent in the placebo group (P = 0.002), whereas the rate of hypokalemia was 8.4 percent in the eplerenone group and 13.1 percent in the placebo group (P

The aim of this report is to provide practical guidelines for the diagnosis, assessment and treatment of heart failure for use in clinical practice and in addition for epidemiological surveys and for clinical trials. The recommendations in these guidelines should always be considered in the light of local regulatory requirements for the administration of any chosen drug or device. This report is a comprehensive summary of the full report 1 . The full report should be used when in doubt or when further information is required.

Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition may reduce ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease, but whether it protects against acute ischemia or the effects of preexisting left ventricular (LV) dysfunction on potential anti-ischemic properties is unknown. We performed a double-blind trial in 25 patients with exercise-induced ischemia. The effects of perindoprilat on pacing-induced myocardial ischemia were examined. Fourteen patients received perindoprilat and 11 patients received placebo. Based on LV function, 2 subgroups were formed in the perindoprilat group: 7 patients with LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction

Background: Currently evaluated positive inotropic agents that act predominantly through phosphodiesterase III-inhibiting properties, have been disappointing in the treatment of heart failure. Lack of efficacy as a result of diminished cellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate and vasodilating tolerance and side effects are prevalent. In contrast, calcium sensitization is preserved in heart failure and agents that combine phosphodiesterase-inhibiting and calcium-sensitizing properties may be more efficacious. Isomazole is such a novel agent with combined properties. This study investigated the acute hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of intravenous isomazole (3 μ g/kg/min for 30 minutes). Methods and Results: The effects of preexisting preload were evaluated in 18 patients with heart failure, New York Heart Association class II/III, and elevated (>15 mmHg, n = 11, group I) and normal (n = 7, group II) pulmonary wedge pressure at baseline. In the overall group, isomazole increased myocardial contractility and relaxation and decreased systemic resistance by 20%. Left and right filling pressures fell by 35–45%, accompanied by a 69% reduction in cardiac atrial natriuretic peptide release. In contrast, levels of arterial norepinephrine and renin both increased by 27%. Cardiac output increased in group I (23%), but fell in group II (18%), accompanied by a 51% increase in arterial norepinephrine. Cardiac atrial natriuretic peptide decreased in group I, but not in group II. Conclusions: Isomazole induced positive inotropic and lusitropic effects and arterial vasodilation in all patients. Cardiac pump function improved only in group I, accompanied by a reduction in sympathetic activity and renin-angiotensin and aldosterone levels and a more pronounced decrease in cardiac atrial natriuretic peptide release. In contrast, in patients with normal to low preload, the further reduction in preload led to a deterioration of pump function and increased sympathetic tone.

Analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) provides a non-invasive index of autonomic nervous system activity. HRV has been shown to be reduced in heart failure. Preliminary data indicate that beta blockers improve clinical status in patients with heart failure, but HRV improvement remains to be demonstrated. Fifty-four patients from the randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study were included in the HRV study. The bisoprolol daily dose was 5 mg once daily. We assessed HRV during 24-hour Holter recordings before randomization and after 2 months of treatment. HRV as measured in the time domain by root-mean-square successive differences (rMSSD), the percentage of adjacent RR differences >50 ms (pNN50), and the SD of RR intervals (SDNN), and in the frequency domain by high-frequency (0.16 to 0.40 Hz) and low-frequency (0.04 to 0.15 Hz) power. Most patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 27 +/- 7%, and heart failure was idiopathic or ischemic. After 2 months, the patients receiving bisoprolol had a reduced mean heart rate compared with that in placebo patients (p=0.0004). Bisoprolol increased 24-hour rMSSD (p=0.04) and 24-hour pNN50 (p=0.04), daytime SDNN (p=0.05), and daytime high-frequency power (p=0.03) power. Bisoprolol induced a significant increase in HRV parameters related to parasympathetic activity in heart failure. Increased vagal tone may contribute to the protective effect of beta blockers and may have prognostic implications.

Flosequinan is a balanced-type vasodilator with a prolonged mode of action due to an approximate 38-hour half-life of its active first metabolite, BTS 53554. As this may lead to tolerance and neurohormonal activation, the acute and long-term pharmacokinetic, hemodynamic, and neurohormonal profile of flosequinan was evaluated. On three consecutive days, 23 patients with heart failure (New York Heart Association classes II-IV), despite digitalis and diuretics, underwent invasive hemodynamic studies after receiving 100 mg oral flosequinan (day 1), placebo (day 2), and 100 mg flosequinan (day 3), followed by repeat invasive evaluation after long-term flosequinan (100 mg daily) for 17 +/- 2 weeks. On each study day, plasma flosequinan levels increased to 1.9 +/- 0.2 mg/L after 1 hour, but returned to baseline levels at 24 hours. In contrast, BTS 53554 increased progressively, reaching relatively high plateau levels (6 mg/L) during chronic therapy. First-dose flosequinan decreased the pulmonary wedge, right atrial pressure, and systemic resistance by 50, 60, and 22%, respectively, whereas the cardiac index was increased by 40%; these effects lasted for 48 hours. During long-term treatment, baseline values of the pulmonary wedge and right atrial pressure were comparable to prestudy values, whereas systemic resistance had decreased by 22%, and the cardiac index and heart rate had increased by 22 and 14%, respectively. Readministration of flosequinan did not further affect hemodynamics, apart from a moderate reduction in the pulmonary wedge and right atrial pressure. Neurohumoral activation did not occur during acute or long-term therapy. Thus, although changes in left and right heart filling pressures are attenuated during long-term treatment, flosequinan induces sustained arterial dilatation and improves cardiac pump function without activation of circulating neurohormones.

To identify the effect of L-propionylcarnitine (LPC) on ischemia, 31 fasting, untreated male patients with left coronary artery disease were studied during 2 identical pacing stress tests 45 minutes before (atrial pacing test I [APST I]) and 15 minutes after (APST II) administration of 15 mg/kg of LPC or placebo. Hemodynamic, metabolic, and nuclear angiographic variables were studied before, during, and for 10 minutes after pacing. After LPC administration, arterial total carnitine levels increased from 47 +/- 1.7 mumol/liter (control) to 730 +/- 30 mumol/liter. Hemodynamic and metabolic variables were comparable in LPC and placebo during APSI I, and reproducible in placebo during both tests. Although LPC did not affect myocardial oxygen demand and supply, it diminished myocardial ischemia, indicated by a significant 12% and 50% reduction in ST-segment depression and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, respectively, during APST II. Moreover, during APST II, left ventricular ejection fraction increased by 18% (p0.05 vs APST I). Furthermore, LPC improved recovery of myocardial function after pacing, with a reduction in the time to peak filling and a 21% increase in both peak ejection and filling rates 10 minutes after pacing (all p0.05). Thus, LPC prevents ischemia-induced ventricular dysfunction, not by affecting the myocardial oxygen supply-demand ratio but as a result of its intrinsic metabolic actions, increasing pyruvate dehydrogenase activity and flux through the citric acid cycle. Because it is well tolerated, it may be a valuable alternative or addition to available antiischemic therapy.

Antiischemic effects of beta 1-blocking agents are based on intrinsic negative inotropic and chronotropic properties. Partial beta 1-agonistic activity, although useful in preserving cardiac function, may counteract such antiischemic properties by modulating the intrinsic negative cardiac effects of beta-blockade. To investigate the acute hemodynamic and antiischemic profile of epanolol, a cardioselective beta 1-antagonist and partial agonist, 20 patients with left coronary artery disease underwent two incremental atrial pacing tests, 45 minutes before (APST I) and 15 minutes after (APST II) 4 mg intravenous epanolol, administered over 5 minutes. Additional measurements were carried out at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes after epanolol, at basal and fixed heart rates. Epanolol immediately reduced heart rate with a maximum of 10% at 15 minutes and decreased contractility (Vmax) by 7% (both p.05), whereas cardiac output fell temporarily by 9% (p.05). Other hemodynamic parameters did not change, except for a significant 11% reduction in myocardial oxygen demand. Despite comparable pacing conditions, both the double product and contractility decreased significantly less during APST II, resulting in a 17% lower myocardial oxygen consumption (p.05). Myocardial ischemia was markedly reduced, indicated by normalization of lactate metabolism [lactate extraction 16 +/- 7% vs. -7 +/- 8% (APST I)], less ST depression (21%), and modulation of LV end-diastolic pressure postpacing (all p.05 vs. APST I), whereas angina was absent or less in 14 patients. None of the patients reported an adverse effect. Thus, under resting conditions intravenous epanolol induces moderate, short-lasting negative chronotropic and inotropic effects, but does not alter cardiac pump function or vascular resistance, reflecting its additional beta 1-agonistic properties. Alternatively, during pacing it still reduces ischemia through negative inotropic effects and diminishes myocardial oxygen demand, reflecting its beta 1-antagonistic profile.

Objectives. This study was designed to compare the acute systemic and coronary hemodynamic effects of high doses of intravenous diltiazem in patients with normal versus impaired left ventricular function, investigate the safety of this drug and compare its anti-ischemic potential in these two patient groups during pacing-induced stress. Background. Because coronary hemodynamic effects and negative inotropic properties of diltiazem are dose related, high dose intravenous diltiazem may improve anti-ischemic efficacy but may not be tolerated in patients with impaired cardiac function. Methods. High dose intravenous diltiazem, 0.4 mg/kg for 5 min followed by 0.4 mg/kg for 10 min, was administered to 23 normotensive patient's with coronary artery disease, 11 (group A) with normal and 12 (group B) with impaired ventricular function (ejection fraction

To identify the effect of myocardial ischemia on systemic neurohormones and vascular resistance, 32 untreated, normotensive patients with coronary artery disease underwent incremental atrial pacing until angina. Arterial and coronary venous lactate and arterial values of catecholamines and angiotensin II were determined at control, at maximal pacing rates, and at 1, 2, 5 and 30 minutes after pacing. Based on pacing-induced ST-segment depression (≥0.1 mV) or myocardial lactate production, or both, patients were selected as ischemic (n = 25) or nonischemic (n = 7). Baseline clinical and hemodynamic data were comparable. During pacing, chest pain was similar (20 ischemic vs 7 nonischemic patients). Also, hemodynamic measurements were comparable, except for contractility, which did not improve, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, which significantly increased in ischemic patients. Moreover, during ischemia arterial pressures increased significantly (13%) and systemic resistance increased from 1,470 ± 60 (control) to 1,632 ± 76 dynes · s · cm−5 5 minutes after pacing (p < 0.05) in ischemic but not in nonischemic patients. Pacing did not affect neurohormones in nonischemic patients. In contrast, norepinephrine in ischemic patients increased significantly from 1.7 ± 0.2 (control) to 2.6 ± 0.3 (maximal pacing) and to 3.0 ± 0.4 nmol/liter (1 minute after pacing), whereas angiotensin II levels increased from 6.2 ± 1.4 (control) to 9.3 ± 2.1 pmol/liter (1 minute after pacing, p < 0.05). Epinephrine only increased during maximal rates (0.9 ± 0.1 vs 0.6 ± 0.1 nmol/liter at control, p < 0.05). Thus, myocardial ischemia activates circulating catecholamines and angiotensin II, accompanied by systemic vasoconstriction. Because the latter may amplify ischemia, modulation of this neuroendocrine stimulation may be of therapeutic value.

The duration and reproducibility of hemodynamic effects of flosequian, a direct-acting, balanced-type vasodilator, were studied in 19 heart failure patients (NYHA class 3.0 +/- 0.7) receiving 100 mg orally (day 1), placebo (day 2), and again 100 mg (day 3). Flosequinan immediately reduced systemic and pulmonary resistance (23% and 35%, respectively, at 60-90 minutes postdrug) and decreased pulmonary wedge, right atrial, mean pulmonary artery, and mean arterial pressure by 38%, 50%, 25%, and 7%, respectively. Concomitantly, cardiac output, and stroke volume and work increased by 26%, 20%, and 22%, respectively. Most hemodynamic effects persisted for 48 hours. In contrast, changes in pulmonary wedge and arterial pressures, stroke volume, and stroke work only lasted for 2-12 hours. Maximum absolute changes on day 3 were generally comparable with first-dose effects with, again, long-lasting effects on systemic resistance and cardiac output. However, changes in pulmonary artery, wedge, and resistance were significantly shorter than after first dose administration. These data indicate sustained and reproducible arterial dilating effects of flosequinan, but less pronounced and shorter lasting pulmonary arterial and venodilator properties.

Pacing-induced changes in regional coronary flow were studied continuously with krypton-81m by intracoronary infusion in 25 patients: 21 with 50% or greater diameter narrowing of 1 or more left coronary arteries (group I) and 4 with less than 50% diameter reduction of a left coronary artery (group II). No changes occurred in group II. In group I, krypton-81m perfusion decreased progressively in all areas with more than 70% diameter narrowing, with a simultaneous increase in normal regions. At the end of pacing during angina, krypton-81m perfusion was reduced to 81 ± 4% of control in areas with 71 to 90% diameter reduction (n = 8) and to 69 ± 6% in areas with more than 90% diameter narrowing (n = 15). In contrast, in regions with 50 to 70% diameter reduction changes were variable (decrease in 4 regions, increase in 2 and an unchanged distribution in 1 region). Krypton-81m perfusion decreased early, before general signs of ischemia in areas with more than 90% diameter reduction, whereas this decrease occurred later in regions with 71 to 90% diameter narrowing, concurrently with ST-segment changes but before anginal pain. Although all signs of ischemia had dis-appeared between 2 and 5 minutes after pacing, changes in krypton-81m distribution persisted in most areas for 5 to 15 minutes after pacing. It is concluded that the functional significance of coronary arterial narrowing can be assessed with a continuous intracoronary infusion of krypton-81m. Changes in regional distribution persisted after cessation of pacing-induced ischemia, indicating an ongoing decrease in regional myocardial blood flow.

The acute hemodynamic and antiischemic properties of amiodarone were investigated in 16 patients with more than 70% diameter reduction of a left coronary artery. Two successive atrial pacing stress tests (APST I and II) were performed, with an interval of 40 minutes in between, and amiodarone, 5 mg/kg/5 min, was infused 30 minutes after APST I. Hemodynamic changes during amiodarone administration consisted of a 20% decrease in left ventricular (LV) systolic pressure, a 13% decrease in systemic vascular resistance and an 18% decrease in stroke work. Coronary vascular resistance was reduced 19% and coronary sinus flow increased 23%. Despite a secondary 14% increase in heart rate, contractility decreased 21%, accompanied by a 45% increase in LV end-diastolic pressure, which persisted until APST II. Although most hemodynamic changes were observed only during the infusion, contractility and LV systolic pressure were still diminished at the beginning of APST II and remained so during pacing, resulting in a reduction in myocardial oxygen demand compared to APST I. Although overall myocardial oxygen consumption and coronary flow were equal during both pacing tests, amiodarone significantly reduced pacing-induced myocardial ischemia. Lactate metabolism remained normal during APST II (lactate extraction 12 +/- 3% vs -28 +/- 8% (APST I) at maximal pacing rates [p less than 0.05]), while ST-segment depression, LV end-diastolic pressure postpacing and angina were also significantly reduced during APST II. Thus, in humans, intravenous amiodarone reduces vascular resistance and contractility and inhibits pacing-induced myocardial ischemia, presumably by reducing myocardial oxygen demand.

The temporal relation between myocardial lactate and hypoxanthine metabolism and regional changes in krypton-81m perfusion during pacing-induced ischemia was studied in 17 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). During incremental atrial pacing, lactate production and hypoxanthine release occurred early and simultaneously, accompanied by ST-segment changes, but before angina and only few minutes after a significant (17%) reduction in krypton-81m perfusion in areas with more than 90% luminal diameter reduction. During maximal pacing heart rates, krypton-81m distribution decreased to 68 ± 7% of control in areas with more than 90% diameter reduction and to 80 ± 4% in 70 to 90% reduction (both p < 0.05 vs control). Maximal lactate production occurred 15 seconds after pacing (extraction −15 ± 7% vs 16 ± 2% during control, p < 0.05) and peak hypoxanthine release 1 minute after pacing (Δ arteriovenous −2.64 ± 0.8 μM vs 0.08 ± 0.21 μM during control, p < 0.05). Krypton-81m perfusion decreased in 20 of the 21 CAD areas. Angina, ST-segment changes, hemodynamic alterations and lactate production occurred in 15, 14, 9 and 15 patients, respectively. In contrast, hypoxanthine release was found in all cases. After pacing, lactate production and all general indexes of ischemia persisted for only 2 to 3 minutes. In contrast, krypton-81m perfusion was still significantly reduced 5 minutes after pacing and was only accompanied by hypoxanthine release (Δ arteriovenous −1.41 ± 0.6 μM, p < 0.05 vs control). Therefore, although lactate production and hypoxanthine release occur early and simultaneously during pacing-induced ischemia, closely following coronary flow changes in high-stenotic areas, hypoxanthine appears to be more sensitive and consistent as indicator of ischemia. Persistant reductions in krypton-81m perfusion and hypoxanthine release strongly suggest prolonged ischemia after cessation of pacing.