1. Effect of assist-as-needed robotic gait training on the gait pattern post stroke: a randomized controlled trial
- Author
-
Vivian Weerdesteyn, Alexander C. H. Geurts, B.E. Groen, J.F. Alingh, Jaap H. Buurke, E.H.F. van Asseldonk, Johan S. Rietman, Bertine M. Fleerkotte, Biomechanical Engineering, TechMed Centre, and Biomedical Signals and Systems
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,030506 rehabilitation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Neurology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Health Informatics ,law.invention ,lcsh:RC321-571 ,03 medical and health sciences ,External work ,0302 clinical medicine ,Gait (human) ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center ,Gait training ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,medicine ,Humans ,Stroke ,Gait ,lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,Gait Disorders, Neurologic ,Aged ,Rehabilitation ,business.industry ,Research ,Stroke Rehabilitation ,Robotics ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Disorders of movement Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience [Radboudumc 3] ,Quality ,Biomechanical Phenomena ,Exercise Therapy ,Post stroke ,Female ,0305 other medical science ,Motor learning ,business ,human activities ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background Regaining gait capacity is an important rehabilitation goal post stroke. Compared to clinically available robotic gait trainers, robots with an assist-as-needed approach and multiple degrees of freedom (AANmDOF) are expected to support motor learning, and might improve the post-stroke gait pattern. However, their benefits compared to conventional gait training have not yet been shown in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The aim of this two-center, assessor-blinded, RCT was to compare the effect of AANmDOF robotic to conventional training on the gait pattern and functional gait tasks during post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Methods Thirty-four participants with unilateral, supratentorial stroke were enrolled (mDOF robotic (combination of training in LOPES-II and conventional gait training) or conventional gait training (30 min, 3–5 times a week), focused on pre-defined training goals. Randomization and allocation to training group were carried out by an independent researcher. External mechanical work (WEXT), spatiotemporal gait parameters, gait kinematics related to pre-defined training goals, and functional gait tasks were assessed before training (T0), after training (T1), and at 4-months follow-up (T2). Results Two participants, one in each group, were excluded from analysis because of discontinued participation after T0, leaving 32 participants (AANmDOF robotic n = 17; conventional n = 15) for intention-to-treat analysis. In both groups, WEXT had decreased at T1 and had become similar to baseline at T2, while gait speed had increased at both assessments. In both groups, most spatiotemporal gait parameters and functional gait tasks had improved at T1 and T2. Except for step width (T0–T1) and paretic step length (T0–T2), there were no significant group differences at T1 or T2 compared to T0. In participants with a pre-defined goal aimed at foot clearance, paretic knee flexion improved more in the AANmDOF robotic group compared to the conventional group (T0–T2). Conclusions Generally, AANmDOF robotic training was not superior to conventional training for improving gait pattern in subacute stroke survivors. Both groups improved their mechanical gait efficiency. Yet, AANmDOF robotic training might be more effective to improve specific post-stroke gait abnormalities such as reduced knee flexion during swing. Trial registration Registry number Netherlands Trial Register (www.trialregister.nl): NTR5060. Registered 13 February 2015.
- Published
- 2021