1. Assessing Hearing Conservation Program Effectiveness
- Author
-
Linda F. Cantley, Deron Galusha, Vickie Ramirez, Peter M. Rabinowitz, Richard L. Neitzel, Sally Trufan, Arthur J. Swersey, and Christine Dixon-Ernst
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Program evaluation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Hearing loss ,MEDLINE ,Article ,Occupational safety and health ,Interviews as Topic ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Occupational Exposure ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Manufacturing Industry ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Hearing conservation program ,Health Education ,Occupational Health ,business.industry ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Focus Groups ,Middle Aged ,030210 environmental & occupational health ,Focus group ,Occupational Diseases ,Leadership ,Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced ,Family medicine ,Female ,Health education ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Program Evaluation - Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) remains one of the most prevalent occupational diseases. Occupational hearing conservation programs (HCPs) can reduce the risk of NIHL, but there remains no consensus on assessing HCP effectiveness. We conducted a multi-site, mixed-method assessment of HCP programs. METHODS: At thirteen manufacturing plants, we performed assessments, including interviews with program staff and worker focus groups and surveys. We analyzed the association between these assessments and age-corrected NIHL rates. RESULTS: Only a few items from the HCP staff interviews correlated with NIHL rates. For the employee survey, management commitment to NIHL prevention and being counseled about NIHL were strongly associated with NIHL rates. CONCLUSION: Management commitment and counseling of workers about NIHL may be key factors in program effectiveness. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods appears to be useful for assessing HCPs.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF