1. Differentiation of Predominantly Osteoblastic and Osteolytic Spine Metastases by Using Susceptibility-weighted MRI
- Author
-
Moritz Wagner, Yvonne Y. Bender, Bernd Hamm, Ute Lina Fahlenkamp, Sarah M. Böker, Lisa C. Adams, and Marcus R. Makowski
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Bone Neoplasms ,Osteolysis ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Imaging phantom ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Diagnosis, Differential ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,X ray computed ,Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Reference standards ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Spinal Neoplasms ,Phantoms, Imaging ,business.industry ,Mean age ,Middle Aged ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Tomography ,Signal intensity ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business ,Nuclear medicine - Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the use of susceptibility-weighted MRI for the differentiation of predominantly osteoblastic and osteolytic spine metastases. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, 53 study participants (mean age, 54.5 years ± 14.3 [range, 22-88 years]; 27 men with a mean age of 55.3 years ± 12.7 [range, 22-72 years] and 26 women with a mean age of 53.8 years ± 15.7 [range, 23-88 years]) with clinically suspected spine metastases underwent imaging with standard MRI sequences, susceptibility-weighted MRI, and CT. Sensitivities and specificities of MRI sequences for the detection of predominantly osteoblastic and osteolytic metastases were determined by using CT as the reference standard. The metastases-to-vertebral body signal intensity ratio (MVR) was calculated to compare modalities. Phantom measurements were obtained to correlate bone densities between MRI sequences and CT. Results A total of 64 metastases (38 predominantly osteoblastic, 26 predominantly osteolytic) were detected. Susceptibility-weighted MRI achieved a sensitivity of 100% (38 of 38) and specificity of 96% (25 of 26) for predominantly osteoblastic metastases and a sensitivity of 96% (25 of 26) and specificity of 100% (38 of 38) for predominantly osteolytic metastases. Standard MRI sequences achieved a sensitivity of 89% (34 of 38) and specificity of 73% (19 of 26) for predominantly osteoblastic metastases and a sensitivity of 73% (19 of 26) and specificity of 92% (35 of 38) for predominantly osteolytic metastases. MVR measurements obtained with susceptibility-weighted MRI demonstrated a strong correlation with those obtained with CT (R2 = 0.75), whereas those obtained with T1-weighted MRI, T2-weighted MRI, and turbo inversion-recovery magnitude MRI showed a weak to moderate correlation (R2 = 0.00, R2 = 0.35, and R2 = 0.39, respectively). Susceptibility-weighted MRI showed a strong correlation with CT with regard to metastases size (R2 = 0.91). In phantom measurements, susceptibility-weighted MRI enabled the reliable differentiation of different degrees of mineralization (R2 = 0.92 compared with CT). Conclusion Susceptibility-weighted MRI enables the reliable differentiation between predominantly osteoblastic and osteolytic spine metastases with a higher accuracy than standard MRI sequences. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Schweitzer in this issue.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF