Search

Objective: Our study aims to evaluate the impact of a stay-at-home order on stroke metrics during the 2019-novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Data on baseline characteristics, stroke subtype, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, the time between last known well (LKW) to emergency department (ED) arrival, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, the involvement of large vessel occlusion (LVO), and whether mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was pursued in patients with acute stroke were extracted from 24 March to 23 April 2020 (the time period of a stay-at-home order was placed due to the COVID-19 pandemic as the study group) at a tertiary care hospital in West Michigan, USA, compared with data from 24 March to 23 April 2019 (control group). Results: Our study demonstrated a reduction in cases of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), although this did not reach statistical significance. However, there was an increase in hemorrhagic stroke (7.5% controls vs. 19.2% study group). The age of stroke patients was significantly younger during the period of the stay-at-home order compared to the control group. We identified a significant overall delay of ED arrivals from LKW in the study group. Additionally, an increased number of AIS patients with LVO in the study group (34.8%) was found compared to the control group (17.5%). A significantly increased number of patients received MT in the study group. Additionally, 11 patients were COVID-19 PCR-positive in the study group, 10 with AIS and only 1 with hemorrhagic stroke. Patients with COVID-19 had a high incidence of atrial fibrillation and hyperlipidemia. One AIS patient with COVID-19 rapidly developed cytotoxic edema with corresponding elevated inflammatory biomarkers. No statistical significance was noted when stroke subtype, LVO, and MT groups were compared. Conclusions: There was a trend of decreasing AIS admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was also a significantly increased number of AIS patients with LVO who received MT, especially those with COVID-19. We conclude that cytokine storm resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection might play a role in AIS patients with COVID-19.

Background and Purpose: Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are abnormal shunts between dural arteries and dural venous sinus or cortical veins. We report our experience with endovascular therapy of primary complex DAVFs using modern embolic agents. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with DAVFs treated between 2015 and 2019. Patient demographics and technical aspects including the use of embolic agent, access to the fistula, number of treatments, occlusion rates, and complications were addressed. Angiographic treatment success was defined as complete occlusion (CO) of the DAVF. Results: Fifty patients were treated endovascularly. Median age was 61 years and 66% were men. The most common symptom was pulsatile tinnitus in 17 patients (34%). The most frequent location of the DAVF was the transverse-sigmoid sinus (40%). Thirty-six fistulas (72%) had cortical venous reflux. Nonadhesive and adhesive liquid agents were used in 92% as a single material or in combination. CO was achieved in 48 patients (96%). In 28 individuals (56%), only 1 procedure was necessary. Nonadhesive liquid agents were exclusively used in 14 patients (28%) with CO attained in every case. For CO of tentorial DAVFs, multiple sessions were more often required than at the other locations (55 vs. 14%, p = 0.0051). Among 93 procedures, the overall complication rate was 3%. The procedure-related mortality rate was 0%. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment of intracranial DAVFs is feasible, safe, and effective with high rates of CO. In more than half of the patients, the DAVF was completely occluded after a single procedure. However, in tentorial DAVFs, multiple sessions were more often required.

Background: Owing to the improvement in acute care, there has been an increase in the number of people surviving stroke and living with its impairments. Frailty is common in people with stroke and has a significant impact on the prognosis after stroke. To reduce frailty progression, potentially modifiable factors should be identified. Increasing levels of self-efficacy influence both behaviour and physical functioning, and therefore it could be a potential target to prevent frailty. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study that involved the secondary analysis of the RISE data to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and frailty. The RISE study is a longitudinal study that consists of 200 adults aged 18+ years after their first stroke event. Data were collected from the respondents at 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after their discharge from the hospital. Frailty was assessed using the multidimensional frailty index with scores ranging from 0 to 1, and self-efficacy was assessed using the SESx scale, which was dichotomized as low/moderate or high. Frailty trajectories were examined using the repeated linear model. The generalized estimating equation was used to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and frailty at baseline and in the future (6–24 months). The B coefficients were reported at 95% CI before and after adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, stroke severity, education, and social support). Results: A total of 200 responses were analysed, and the mean age of the respondents was 67.78 ± 11.53. Females made up 64% of the sample, and the mean frailty score at baseline was 0.17 ± 0.09. After adjusting for confounders, respondents with low self-efficacy had an approximately 5% increase in their frailty scores at baseline and in the 24-month follow-up period compared to those with high self-efficacy. Conclusion: The result from this study showed that self-efficacy was significantly associated with frailty after stroke. Our findings suggest that self-efficacy may play a role in frailty progression among stroke survivors.