1. Secondary cytogenetic abnormalities in core-binding factor AML harboring inv(16) vs t(8;21)
- Author
-
Hans-Peter Horny, Cecilia Arana Yi, Celalettin Ustun, Cecilia C. S. Yeung, Jason Gotlib, Christina Cho, Tracy I. George, David R. Czuchlewski, Jessica Kohlschmidt, Amandeep Salhotra, Ryotaro Nakamura, Sheeja T. Pullarkat, Gerwin Huls, Linda B. Baughn, Robert S. Ohgami, Jenna M. Voutsinas, Cem Akin, Wolfgang R. Sperr, Guido Marcucci, Jason L. Hornick, Young L. Kim, Hanne Vestergaard, Qian Wu, Gautam Borthakur, Gregor Hoermann, Mark R. Litzow, Michael Boe Møller, Peter Valent, Dong Chen, Jacobien R. Hilberink, Miguel-Angel Perales, Melissa L. Larson, Thomas Kielsgaard Kristensen, Michael A. Linden, Ana Iris Schiefer, Philip M. Kluin, Daniel J. Weisdorf, Clara D. Bloomfield, Vinod Pullarkat, Michelle M Dolan, Se young Han, Nam K. Ku, H. Joachim Deeg, Krzysztof Mrózek, Sigurd Broesby-Olsen, Elizabeth A. Morgan, Lori Soma, Stem Cell Aging Leukemia and Lymphoma (SALL), and Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS)
- Subjects
Male ,EXPRESSION ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Myeloid ,C-KIT MUTATIONS ,PROGNOSTIC IMPACT ,MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE ,ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA ,Trisomy 8 ,RELAPSE ,Gastroenterology ,Translocation, Genetic ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Retrospective Studies ,Chromosome Aberrations ,Univariate analysis ,Myeloid Neoplasia ,business.industry ,Core Binding Factors ,Hematology ,medicine.disease ,GENE ,CANCER ,Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ,Leukemia ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Chromosome abnormality ,SURVIVAL ,Hypodiploidy ,Female ,Hyperdiploidy ,Trisomy ,business - Abstract
Patients with core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), caused by either t(8;21)(q22;q22) or inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22), have higher complete remission rates and longer survival than patients with other subtypes of AML. However, ∼40% of patients relapse, and the literature suggests that patients with inv(16) fare differently from those with t(8;21). We retrospectively analyzed 537 patients with CBF-AML, focusing on additional cytogenetic aberrations to examine their impact on clinical outcomes. Trisomies of chromosomes 8, 21, or 22 were significantly more common in patients with inv(16)/t(16;16): 16% vs 7%, 6% vs 0%, and 17% vs 0%, respectively. In contrast, del(9q) and loss of a sex chromosome were more frequent in patients with t(8;21): 15% vs 0.4% for del(9q), 37% vs 0% for loss of X in females, and 44% vs 5% for loss of Y in males. Hyperdiploidy was more frequent in patients with inv(16) (25% vs 9%, whereas hypodiploidy was more frequent in patients with t(8;21) (37% vs 3%. In multivariable analyses (adjusted for age, white blood counts at diagnosis, and KIT mutation status), trisomy 8 was associated with improved overall survival (OS) in inv(16), whereas the presence of other chromosomal abnormalities (not trisomy 8) was associated with decreased OS. In patients with t(8;21), hypodiploidy was associated with improved disease-free survival; hyperdiploidy and del(9q) were associated with improved OS. KIT mutation (either positive or not tested, compared with negative) conferred poor prognoses in univariate analysis only in patients with t(8;21).
- Published
- 2021