1. Comparison of four high-throughput, automated immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies
- Author
-
Shonagh Haslam, Brittany Houghton, Dawn Singleton, Janet Eglin, Jane Oakey, and Andrew Peter Brown
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,2019-20 coronavirus outbreak ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Health Personnel ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,General Practice ,030106 microbiology ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Antibodies, Viral ,COVID-19 Serological Testing ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Seroepidemiologic Studies ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Pandemics ,Throughput (business) ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Immunoassay ,biology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Virology ,United Kingdom ,High-Throughput Screening Assays ,Hospitalization ,biology.protein ,Female ,Antibody ,business - Abstract
Background A number of immunoassays have been developed to measure antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2. More data is required on their comparability, particularly among those with milder infections and in the general practice population. The aim of this study was to compare four high-throughput automated anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays using samples collected from hospitalized patients and healthcare workers with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, we collected general practice samples to compare antibody results and determine seroprevalence. Methods Samples were collected from 57 hospitalized patients and nine healthcare workers at 14 days and at 28 days following confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Samples were also collected from 225 patients presenting to general practice. Four assays were used: Abbott Architect IgG, Beckman Coulter DxI 800 IgG, Roche Cobas e801 total antibody and Siemens Advia Centaur XPT total antibody. Results All four assays showed concordance at 14 days in 83.9% of hospitalized patients and in 66.7% of healthcare workers. All four assays showed concordance at 28 days in 88.4% of hospitalized patients and 77.8% of healthcare workers. The sensitivity to detect recent infection was higher for the IgG assays than the total assays. All four assays showed concordance of 95.1% in the general practice population. Seroprevalence ranged from 4.9 to 5.8% depending on the assay used. Conclusions All four assays showed excellent comparability, but it may be possible to obtain a negative result for any of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays in patients with confirmed previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. An equivocal range would be useful for all anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF