1. Construction and feasibility study of the SOFMER Activity Score (SAS), a new assessment of physical and cognitive activity
- Author
-
Pierre-Alain Joseph, F. Caillet, Jean-Pierre Luauté, M.D. Morard, Carole Vuillerot, M. Royet, P. Calmels, Sylvain Roche, René Ecochard, S. Otmani, S. Gonzalez-Monge, F. Ghelfi, J.C. Bernard, D. Lagauche, Sophie Jacquin-Courtois, Gilles Rode, J. Di Marco, C. Delvert, P. Rippert, Service de réadaptation pédiatrique [Hospices Civils de Lyon], Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche (IMER), Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive - UMR 5558 (LBBE), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Hôpital Henry Gabrielle [CHU - HCL], Biostatistiques santé, Département biostatistiques et modélisation pour la santé et l'environnement [LBBE], Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive - UMR 5558 (LBBE), Université de Lyon, Pôle rééeducation - réadaptation, and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand (CHU Dijon)
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,030506 rehabilitation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Activities of daily living ,Adolescent ,Delphi Technique ,medicine.medical_treatment ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Nursing assessment ,Rehabilitation Centers ,Disability Evaluation ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cognition ,0302 clinical medicine ,Floor effect ,medicine ,Criterion validity ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Medical physics ,Prospective Studies ,Exercise ,Reliability (statistics) ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Aged ,Inpatients ,Rehabilitation ,business.industry ,Construct validity ,Middle Aged ,3. Good health ,Scale (social sciences) ,Feasibility Studies ,Female ,France ,0305 other medical science ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Objectives For hospitalizations in rehabilitation centers (RCs) in France, the quantification of healthcare givers’ activity is based on the dependency of the patients, defined as a total or partial inability to perform activities required for daily living without help. The tools currently used to quantify dependency are not sufficiently precise. Here we describe the construction of a new tool, the SOFMER Activity Score (SAS scoring), which allows for a good description of the level of activity of patients hospitalized in RCs, and a feasibility study of the tool. Methods After a study group proposed the first version of the SAS, the validity of its content was studied by the Delphi consensus method: 26 physicians or healthcare professionals known for their expertise in PMR responded to the first round. The feasibility study was prospective and involved multi-site professionals. Data related to the SAS determined by a multidisciplinary team were collected and compared to the Activite de la Vie Quotidienne (AVQ) scale, which is administered to all patients and included in medical and administrative data. Results We included 81 patients in the feasibility study. The mean (SD) time to obtain the SAS was 4.5 (3.3) min. For 97.5% of scorings, the participating professionals judged that the SAS was compatible or fairly compatible with clinical practice. The internal structure of the SAS scale seemed better than that of the AVQ scale, for which the present study confirmed a floor effect for all items. Conclusions The SAS allows for measuring the level of physical and cognitive activity of a patient hospitalized in an RC. If validation studies for the SAS, exploring its reliability, construct validity or criterion validity, confirm the tool's good metrological qualities, the SAS will allow for a good quantification of the burden of care.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF