1. Is delayed ischemic preconditioning as effective on running performance during a 5 km time trial as acute IPC?
- Author
-
Joost P. H. Seeger, Silvie Timmers, Danique J.M. Ploegmakers, Maria T. E. Hopman, Dick H. J. Thijssen, and Nigel Timothy Cable
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Warm-Up Exercise ,Preconditioning ,Blood Pressure ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Ischaemic preconditioning ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Running ,RC1200 ,Athletic performance ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Time trial ,Heart Rate ,Hardware_GENERAL ,Internal medicine ,parasitic diseases ,Exercise performance ,Heart rate ,medicine ,Blood lactate ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Lactic Acid ,cardiovascular diseases ,Treadmill ,Ischemic Preconditioning ,Exercise ,Analysis of Variance ,Cross-Over Studies ,Hardware_MEMORYSTRUCTURES ,business.industry ,Metabolic Disorders Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 6] ,030229 sport sciences ,ComputerSystemsOrganization_PROCESSORARCHITECTURES ,Stepwise regression ,Running time ,Cardiology ,Physical therapy ,Regression Analysis ,Ischemic preconditioning ,Female ,Hardware_CONTROLSTRUCTURESANDMICROPROGRAMMING ,business - Abstract
Item does not contain fulltext Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) may enhance exercise performance. Cardioprotective effects of IPC are known to re-occur 24h after the stimulus. Whether the delayed effect of IPC has similar effects as IPC on exercise performance is unknown. OBJECTIVES: Examine whether IPC applied 24h (24-IPC) before exercise is equally effective as IPC in improving exercise performance. DESIGN: Randomized, cross-over study METHODS: 12 healthy participants were randomly exposed to SHAM-session, IPC or 24-IPC before a self-paced 5km running trial on a treadmill. Subjects were blinded for time, speed and heart rate. Furthermore, heart rate, BORG, and the local tissue saturation index were measured during exercise, while lactate levels were determined after running. Using a regression model, we explored whether these parameters predicted the change in running time after IPC and 24-IPC. RESULTS: We found no differences in finish time after IPC (SHAM: 1400+/-105s, IPC: 1381+/-112s, 24-IPC: 1385+/-113s; p=0.30). However, we observed a significant positive relation between the change in finish time after IPC and 24-IPC (p=0.016; r=0.677). Using stepwise linear regression, a lower post-exercise blood lactate level after IPC or 24-IPC was significantly related to an improvement in finish time (R2=0.47, beta=-0.687, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Although no significant effect of IPC or 24-IPC on exercise performance was found, individual finish time after IPC and 24-IPC were strongly correlated. Therefore, our data suggest that, at the individual level, the effects of 24-IPC are closely related to the effects of IPC. 01 februari 2017
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF