1. Decompressive hemicraniectomy without clot evacuation in supratentorial deep-seated intracerebral hemorrhage
- Author
-
Hosein Safari, Masoud Zeinali, M. Jahangiri, and Saleh Rasras
- Subjects
Male ,Decompressive Craniectomy ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Randomization ,medicine.medical_treatment ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,cardiovascular diseases ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Craniotomy ,Aged ,Cerebral Hemorrhage ,Intracranial pressure ,Intracerebral hemorrhage ,Decompressive hemicraniectomy ,business.industry ,Glasgow Outcome Scale ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Survival Rate ,Clinical trial ,Treatment Outcome ,Female ,Decompressive craniectomy ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Objective Decompressive craniectomy (DC) lowers intracranial pressure and improves outcomes in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery stroke; yet, its usefulness in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unclear. The authors sought to assess the preliminary utility of decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) without clot evacuation in patients with deep-seated supratentorial ICH. Patients and methods Patients with deep seated spontaneous ICH who were admitted to the Golestan Hospital, of Ahvaz, from November 2014 to February 2016, were prospectively enrolled in this study. A prospective clinical trial where 30 patients diagnosed having large hypertensive ICH was randomly allocated to either group A or B using permuted-block randomization. These patients (n = 30), who all had large deep seated supratentorial ICH with surgery indications, were randomly divided to two groups. ultimately, in one group (n = 13), large DHC was performed without clot evacuation, while in the other (n = 17), craniotomy with clot evacuation was done. Data pertaining to the patients' characteristics and treatment outcomes were prospectively collected. Results There was no statistically significant difference between two treatment groups (P > 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of mortality and GOS at 6 months (P > 0.05); nevertheless, the good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale = 4–5) for patients with hematoma evacuation was slightly higher (35.3%) as compared to the DHC patients without clot evacuation (30.7%). Conclusion Decompresive craniectomy without clot evacuation in deep seated ICH can be accomplished with identical mortality and outcome in comparison to patient that undergone clot evacuation.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF