1. Impact of Preoperative Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Long-Term Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis
- Author
-
Stephen D. Surgenor, Louis Russo, Cathy S. Ross, Robert E. Helm, Elaine M. Olmstead, Robert S. Kramer, Bruce J. Leavitt, Meredith J. Sorensen, David J. Malenka, Todd A. MacKenzie, Anthony W. DiScipio, Yvon R. Baribeau, Lawrence J. Dacey, Gerald L. Sardella, Joseph P. DeSimone, Robert A. Clough, Donald S. Likosky, and Joshua B. Goldberg
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Population ,Severity of Illness Index ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Aortic valve replacement ,New England ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,Long term survival ,medicine ,Humans ,Longitudinal Studies ,Prospective Studies ,Registries ,Coronary Artery Bypass ,education ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,education.field_of_study ,Ejection fraction ,business.industry ,Stroke Volume ,Aortic Valve Stenosis ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Survival Rate ,Stenosis ,Treatment Outcome ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Aortic Valve ,Concomitant ,Preoperative Period ,Cohort ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Artery - Abstract
Background— The survival of patients who undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis with reduced preoperative ejection fractions (EFs) is not well described in the literature. Methods and Results— Patients undergoing AVR for severe aortic stenosis were analyzed using the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group surgical registry. Patients were stratified by preoperative EF (≥50%, 40%–49%, and P =0.003). Patients with preserved EF had significantly improved 6-month and 8-year survival compared with their reduced EF counterparts. Conclusions— Survival after AVR or AVR+coronary artery bypass grafting was most favorable among patients with preoperative preserved EF. However, patients with mild to moderately depressed EF experienced a substantial survival benefit compared with the natural history of medically treated patients. Furthermore, minor reductions of EF carried equivalent increased risk to those with more compromised function suggesting patients are best served when an AVR is performed before even minor reductions in myocardial function.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF