1. fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains
- Author
-
Angela Hein Ciccia, Abraham Z. Snyder, Anthony I. Jack, Abigail J. Dawson, Kevin P. Barry, Katelyn L. Begany, and Regina L. Leckie
- Subjects
Male ,Elementary cognitive task ,Cognitive Neuroscience ,Chronesthesia ,Rest ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,Article ,Task (project management) ,Developmental psychology ,Young Adult ,Cognition ,Social cognition ,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ,Humans ,Attention ,Set (psychology) ,Default mode network ,Brain Mapping ,Resting state fMRI ,Brain ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Neurology ,Female ,Psychology ,psychological phenomena and processes ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
Two lines of evidence indicate that there exists a reciprocal inhibitory relationship between opposed brain networks. First, most attention-demanding cognitive tasks activate a stereotypical set of brain areas, known as the task-positive network and simultaneously deactivate a different set of brain regions, commonly referred to as the task negative or default mode network. Second, functional connectivity analyses show that these same opposed networks are anti-correlated in the resting state. We hypothesize that these reciprocally inhibitory effects reflect two incompatible cognitive modes, each of which may be directed towards understanding the external world. Thus, engaging one mode activates one set of regions and suppresses activity in the other. We test this hypothesis by identifying two types of problem-solving task which, on the basis of prior work, have been consistently associated with the task positive and task negative regions: tasks requiring social cognition, i.e., reasoning about the mental states of other persons, and tasks requiring physical cognition, i.e., reasoning about the causal/mechanical properties of inanimate objects. Social and mechanical reasoning tasks were presented to neurologically normal participants during fMRI. Each task type was presented using both text and video clips. Regardless of presentation modality, we observed clear evidence of reciprocal suppression: social tasks deactivated regions associated with mechanical reasoning and mechanical tasks deactivated regions associated with social reasoning. These findings are not explained by self-referential processes, task engagement, mental simulation, mental time travel or external vs. internal attention, all factors previously hypothesized to explain default mode network activity. Analyses of resting state data revealed a close match between the regions our tasks identified as reciprocally inhibitory and regions of maximal anti-correlation in the resting state. These results indicate the reciprocal inhibition is not attributable to constraints inherent in the tasks, but is neural in origin. Hence, there is a physiological constraint on our ability to simultaneously engage two distinct cognitive modes. Further work is needed to more precisely characterize these opposing cognitive domains.
- Published
- 2012