1. Reproducibility and Prognostic Performance of the 1973 and 2004 World Health Organization Classifications for Grade in Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter Study in 328 Bladder Tumors
- Author
-
C. Dilara Savci-Heijink, Jakko A. Nieuwenhuijzen, R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar, Lawrence Rozendaal, Elisabeth E. Fransen van de Putte, J. Patrick van der Voorn, André N. Vis, Anouk Hentschel, Judith Bosschieter, Birgit I. Lissenberg-Witte, Bas W.G. van Rhijn, Urology, Pathology, CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life, Epidemiology and Data Science, APH - Methodology, Other Research, Graduate School, and CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Urology ,030232 urology & nephrology ,World Health Organization ,World health ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Aged ,Observer Variation ,Reproducibility ,Neoplasm Grading ,Bladder cancer ,business.industry ,Proportional hazards model ,Reproducibility of Results ,Cystoscopy ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Urinary Bladder Neoplasms ,Oncology ,Multicenter study ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Disease Progression ,Female ,Radiology ,Non muscle invasive ,business - Abstract
Two classifications for bladder cancer grade are widely used; the World Health Organization (WHO) 1973 and the WHO 2004. We evaluated inter-observer variability of both classifications and investigated which histologic criteria cause this variability. We found that reproducibility of both classifications is poor, as well as scoring of the individual histologic criteria. This suggests that descriptions of these criteria for grade are not specific enough. Background: Histologic grade is an important prognosticator in patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Currently, 2 classifications for grade are widely used; the World Health Organization (WHO) 1973 and the WHO 2004. We compare inter-observer variability of both classifications and investigate which histologic criteria cause this variability. Furthermore, the prognostic value of both classifications was assessed. Patients and Methods: Three pathologists reviewed 328 bladder tissue samples of 232 patients with NMIBC in a blinded manner. WHO 1973 grade, WHO 2004 grade, histologic criteria of both classifications, and T-category were evaluated. Reproducibility was analyzed using the weighted Fleiss κ, association between criteria scores and grade with the χ2 test, and time-to-recurrence and time-to-progression with the log-rank test and Cox regression. Results: Reproducibility of both classifications was poor. The WHO 2004 showed better reproducibility (κ = 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.42) compared with the WHO 1973 as a 3-tiered (κ = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.19-0.28), but not as a 2-tiered (G1 + G2 vs. G3) classification (κ = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.29-0.42). Reproducibility of individual criteria was poor (κ range, −0.05 to 0.25). All criteria were associated with grade (P
- Published
- 2018