Search

To describe a stepwise approach to evaluate the pH effect for a weakly basic drug by in vitro, in vivo and in silico techniques and identify a viable mitigation strategy that addresses the risk. Clinical studies included assessment of the pH effect with famotidine. In vitro dissolution was evaluated in various biorelevant media and in a pH-shift test. PK studies in dogs were conducted under pentagastrin or famotidine pre-treatment and GastroPlus was employed to model human and dog PK data and simulate the performance in human. Clinical data indicated considerable pH dependent absorption of the drug when dosed in the presence of H2-antagonists. In vitro dissolution and in vivo dog data confirmed that the observed pH effect was due to reduced dissolution rate and lower solubility at increased gastric and intestinal pH. A salt form was identified to overcome the effect by providing fast dissolution and prolonged supersaturation. GastroPlus simulations predicted a mitigation of the pH effect by the salt. The drug exhibited a strong pH-effect in humans. The in vitro, in vivo and modeling approach provides a systematic workflow to evaluate the risk of a new drug and identify a strategy able to mitigate the risk.

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of apremilast and its major metabolites on the placebo-corrected change-from-baseline QTc interval of an electrocardiogram (ECG). Materials and methods: Healthy male subjects received each of 4 treatments in a randomized, crossover manner. In the 2 active treatment periods, apremilast 30 mg (therapeutic exposure) or 50 mg (supratherapeutic exposure) was administered twice daily for 9 doses. A placebo control was used to ensure double-blind treatment of apremilast, and an open-label, single dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg was administered as a positive control. ECGs were measured using 24-hour digital Holter monitoring. Results: The two-sided 98% confidence intervals (CIs) for ΔΔQTcI of moxifloxacin completely exceeded 5 ms 2 – 4 hours postdose. For both apremilast dose studies, the least-squares mean ΔΔQTcI was 480 ms or a change from baseline > 60 ms. Exploratory evaluation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data showed no trend between the changes in QT/QTc interval and the concentration of apremilast or its major metabolites M12 and M14. Conclusions: Apremilast did not prolong the QT interval and appears to be safe and well tolerated up to doses of 50 mg twice daily.

BMS-663068 is an oral prodrug of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor BMS-626529, which prevents viral attachment to host CD4 + T cells by binding to HIV-1 gp120. To guide dose selection for the phase 3 program, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using data from two phase 2 studies with HIV-1-infected subjects ( n = 244). BMS-626529 population pharmacokinetics were described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination from the central compartment, zero-order release of prodrug from the extended-release formulation into a hypothetical absorption compartment, and first-order absorption into the central compartment. The covariates of BMS-663068 formulation type, lean body mass, baseline CD8 + T-cell percentage, and ritonavir coadministration were found to be significant contributors to intersubject variability. Exposure-response analyses showed a relationship between the log e -transformed concentration at the end of a dosing interval ( C tau ) normalized for the protein binding-adjusted BMS-626529 half-maximal (50%) inhibitory concentration (PBAIC 50 ) and the change in the HIV-1 RNA level from the baseline level after 7 days of BMS-663068 monotherapy. The probability of achieving a decline in HIV-1 RNA level of >0.5 or >1.0 log 10 copies/ml as a function of the log e -transformed PBAIC 50 -adjusted C tau after 7 days of monotherapy was 99 to 100% and 57 to 73%, respectively, for proposed BMS-663068 doses of 400 mg twice daily (BID), 600 mg BID (not studied in the phase 2b study), 800 mg BID, 600 mg once daily (QD), and 1,200 mg QD. On the basis of a slight advantage in efficacy of BID dosing over QD dosing, similar responses for the 600- and 800-mg BID doses, and prior clinical observations, BMS-663068 at 600 mg BID was predicted to have the optimal benefit-risk profile and selected for further clinical investigation. (The phase 2a proof-of-concept study AI438006 and the phase 2b study AI438011 are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under numbers NCT01009814 and NCT01384734, respectively.)

Efavirenz (EFV) is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor approved worldwide for the treatment of HIV in adults and children over 3 years of age or weighing over 10 kg. Only recently EFV was approved in children over 3 months and weighing at least 3.5 kg in the United States and the European Union. The objective of this analysis was to support the selection of an appropriate dose for this younger pediatric population and to explore the impact of CYP2B6 genetic polymorphisms on EFV systemic exposures. A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model was developed using data from three studies in HIV-1-infected pediatric subjects ( n = 168) and one study in healthy adults ( n = 24). The EFV concentration-time profile was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Body weight was identified as a significant predictor of efavirenz apparent clearance (CL), oral central volume of distribution ( V C ), and absorption rate constant ( K a ). The typical values of efavirenz apparent CL, V C , oral peripheral volume of distribution ( V P ), and K a for a reference pediatric patient were 4.8 liters/h (4.5 to 5.1 liters/h), 84.9 liters (76.8 to 93.0 liters), 287 liters (252.6 to 321.4 liters), and 0.414 h −1 (0.375 to 0.453 h −1 ), respectively. The final model was used to simulate steady-state efavirenz concentrations in pediatric patients weighing

BMS-663068 is a prodrug of BMS-626529, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds directly to HIV-1 gp120, preventing initial viral attachment and entry into host CD4+T cells. This open-label, multiple-dose, four-sequence, crossover study addressed potential two-way drug-drug interactions following coadministration of BMS-663068 (BMS-626529 is a CYP3A4 substrate), atazanavir (ATV), and ritonavir (RTV) (ATV and RTV are CYP3A4 inhibitors). Thirty-six healthy subjects were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive one of four treatment sequences with three consecutive treatments: BMS-663068 at 600 mg twice daily (BID), BMS-663068 at 600 mg BID plus RTV at 100 mg once daily (QD), ATV at 300 mg QD plus RTV at 100 mg QD (RTV-boosted ATV [ATV/r]), or BMS-663068 at 600 mg BID plus ATV at 300 mg QD plus RTV at 100 mg QD. Compared with the results obtained by administration of BMS-663068 alone, coadministration of BMS-663068 with ATV/r increased the BMS-626529 maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve in one dosing interval (AUCtau) by 68% and 54%, respectively. Similarly, coadministration of BMS-663068 with RTV increased the BMS-626529Cmaxand AUCtauby 53% and 45%, respectively. Compared with the results obtained by administration of ATV/r alone, ATV and RTV systemic exposures remained similar following coadministration of BMS-663068 with ATV/r. BMS-663068 was generally well tolerated, and there were no adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation, serious AEs, or deaths. Moderate increases in BMS-626529 systemic exposure were observed following coadministration of BMS-663068 with ATV/r or RTV. However, the addition of ATV to BMS-663068 plus RTV did not further increase BMS-626529 systemic exposure. ATV and RTV exposures remained similar following coadministration of BMS-663068 with either ATV/r or RTV. BMS-663068 was generally well tolerated alone or in combination with either RTV or ATV/r.

Background: Like itraconazole and ketoconazole, posaconazole, a broad-spectrum oral triazole antifungal, inhibits the activity of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozyme 3A4. Midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, is metabolized by CYP3A4. Potential drug interactions can be expected in patients who are concurrently receiving inhibitors and substrates of CYP3A4 (eg, ketoconazole, posaconazole) and benzodiazepines (eg, midazolam). Because of the potential for drug interactions, it is important to determine the effects of posaconazole on the pharmacokinetic properties of midazolam. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of oral administration of posaconazole versus ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetic properties of orally and intravenously administered midazolam. Methods: This Phase I, randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted at Swiss Pharma Contract Ltd., Allschwil, Switzerland. Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Arm 1 received posaconazole 200 mg BID for 7 days, posaconazole 400 mg BID for 7 days, no drugs during a 28-day washout, and ketoconazole 400 mg once daily for 7 days. Arm 2 received posaconazole and ketoconazole in the reverse order, with a 28-day washout between treatments. An oral/IV midazolam sequence (oral midazolam 2 mg and IV midazolam 0.4 mg) was administered on days -2/-1, 6/7, 13/14 (arm 1), 36/17 (arm 2), 43/44, and 50/51 in both treatment arms. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after midazolam administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including C max , C min (before azole administration), terminal-phase t 1/2 (t 1/2z ), and AUC to final measurable sampling time (AUC tf ), were calculated using noncompartmental methods, and drug interactions were evaluated using analysis of variance. Adverse events were collected using physical examination, including vital sign measurements; clinical laboratory analysis; electrocardiography; and direct questioning at predefined time points throughout the study to assess tolerability. Results: A total of 12 subjects were enrolled (11 men, 1 woman; all white; mean age, 42.8 years [range, 28-53 years]; mean weight, 80.6 kg; and mean body mass index, 25.6 kg/m 2 ). All of the subjects completed the study. Based on point estimates of logarithm-transformed data, posaconazole 200 and 400 mg BID were associated with significant increases in midazolam C max (up to 1.3- and 2.4-fold) and AUC tf values (up to 4.6- and 6.2-fold), respectively. Ketoconazole 400 mg once daily was associated with significantly increased midazolam C max and AUC tf (up to 2.8- and 8.2-fold, respectively). When midazolam was concurrently administered with either azole, t 1/2z was prolonged. Seven of 12 (58%) subjects reported ≥1 adverse event during the study (5 with posaconazole alone and 4 with posaconazole + midazolam). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (3 subjects [25%] with posaconazole alone, 2 [17%] with ketoconazole alone, and 1 [8%] with posaconazole + midazolam) and flatulence (1 [8%] with posaconazole alone and 1 [8%] with midazolam alone). Conclusions: The results from this study in a small, all-white population of healthy volunteers suggest that posaconazole was a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, but to a lesser extent than was ketoconazole. Monitoring patients for adverse events, the need for dose adjustments, or both during coadministration with posaconazole may be warranted in patients being treated with benzodiazepines that are predominantly metabolized through CYP3A4 (eg, midazolam).