1. Can leucocyte esterase replace frozen sections in the intraoperative diagnosis of prosthetic hip infection?
- Author
-
Enrico Gallazzi, G. Materazzi, Laura Cappelletti, Luigi Zagra, F. Villa, and E. De Vecchi
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Prosthesis-Related Infections ,Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ,Intraoperative Period ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Synovial Fluid ,medicine ,Frozen Sections ,Humans ,Synovial fluid ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,030222 orthopedics ,Frozen section procedure ,business.industry ,Leucocyte esterase ,Prosthetic joint infection ,Histology ,Middle Aged ,Surgery ,ROC Curve ,Female ,Hip Prosthesis ,business ,Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases ,Biomarkers ,Follow-Up Studies ,Total hip arthroplasty - Abstract
Aims Leucocyte esterase (LE) has been shown to be an accurate marker of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and has been proposed as an alternative to frozen section (FS) histology for intraoperative diagnosis. In this study, the intraoperative assessment of LE was compared with FS histology for the diagnosis of prosthetic hip infection. Patients and Methods A total of 119 patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) between June 2015 and December 2017 were included in the study. There were 56 men and 63 women with a mean age of 66.2 years (27 to 88). Synovial fluid was collected before arthrotomy for the assessment of LE using enzymatic colourimetric strips. Between five and six samples were stained with haematoxylin and eosin for FS histology, and considered suggestive of infection when at least five polymorphonuclear leucocytes were found in five high-power fields. Results The sensitivity and specificity of the LE assay were 100% and 93.8%, respectively; the positive (PPV) and the negative (NPV) predictive values were 79.3% and 100%, respectively. The mean time between the collection of the sample and the result being known was 20.1 minutes (sd 4.4). The sensitivity and specificity of FS histology were 78.3% and 96.9%, respectively; the PPV and the NPV were 85.7% and 94.9%, respectively. The mean time between the collection of the sample and the result being known was 27.2 minutes (sd 6.9). Conclusion The sensitivity of LE assay was higher, with similar specificity and diagnostic accuracy, compared with FS histology. The faster turnaround time, its ease of use, and low costs make LE assay a valuable alternative to FS histology. We now use it routinely for the intraoperative diagnosis of PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:372–377.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF