1. Naloxone eliminates passive avoidance retention deficits produced by pretest exposure to novelty in rats
- Author
-
A. Daniel Pinheiro and Dennis C. Wright
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Physiology ,Conditioning, Classical ,Interference theory ,Drinking ,(+)-Naloxone ,Engram ,Audiology ,Social Environment ,Developmental psychology ,Avoidance Learning ,medicine ,Animals ,Attention ,Fear conditioning ,Appetitive Behavior ,Naloxone ,Memoria ,beta-Endorphin ,Novelty ,Association Learning ,Brain ,Retention, Psychology ,Rats, Inbred Strains ,Rats ,Familiar environment ,Receptors, Opioid ,Passive avoidance ,Arousal ,Psychology - Abstract
Pretest exposure to novelty or injections of beta-endorphin can enhance passive avoidance (PA) retention (e.g., IzquierdoMcGaugh, 1985). Enhanced retention may result from a "state-dependent" match between the CNS state during test and the novelty-induced beta-endorphin state that is obtained during training in a novel apparatus. Our Experiment 1 suggests that, unlike PA, Pavlovian fear conditioning in a conditioned lick suppression (CLS) paradigm may be beta-endorphin "state-independent." Rats were given one tone-shock pairing in a novel environment. Baseline lick rates and CLS tested 48 h later in a familiar environment were not affected by pretest exposure to novelty and/or injections of 3.33 mg/kg naloxone HCl. In Experiment 2, the same rats were PA trained/tested in a new apparatus. Saline or naloxone injections and various exposure (novel, familiar, none) conditions preceded (1h) the 24-h retention test. Pretest exposure to novelty reduced retention and naloxone eliminated that deficit. In Experiment 3, naive rats given pretest exposure to novelty also showed a PA retention deficit. The results of Experiments 2 and 3 may complement rather than contradict previous findings. Pretest induction of a beta-endorphin state by novelty may either enhance state-dependent retrieval of a "weak" memory trace or make a "strong/well consolidated" training memory more vulnerable to retroactive interference from "new learning" during the pretest exposure period.
- Published
- 1991
- Full Text
- View/download PDF