1. Surgery of ascending aorta with complex procedures for aortic dissection through upper mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy
- Author
-
Dong Li, Cangsong Xiao, Weihua Ye, Wei Jiang, Chonglei Ren, Yang Wu, and Lei Chen
- Subjects
Aortic valve ,Male ,Time Factors ,Standard propensity score matching ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Aortic dissection ,law.invention ,law ,Hospital Mortality ,Aorta ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Intensive care unit ,Constriction ,Cardiac surgery ,Circulatory Arrest, Deep Hypothermia Induced ,Intensive Care Units ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Treatment Outcome ,Cardiothoracic surgery ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Research Article ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,lcsh:Surgery ,lcsh:RD78.3-87.3 ,medicine.artery ,Ascending aorta ,medicine ,Intubation, Intratracheal ,Humans ,Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ,Blood Transfusion ,Propensity Score ,Dialysis ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,lcsh:RD1-811 ,Length of Stay ,medicine.disease ,Sternotomy ,Surgery ,Median sternotomy ,lcsh:Anesthesiology ,Upper mini-sternotomy ,business - Abstract
Background Use of minimally invasive approaches for isolated aortic valve or ascending aorta surgery is increasing. However, total arch replacement or aortic root repair through a minimally invasive incision is rare. This study was performed to report our initial experience with surgery of the ascending aorta with complex procedures through an upper mini-sternotomy approach. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients who underwent ascending aorta replacement combined with complex procedures including hemi-arch, total arch, and aortic root surgeries from September 2010 to May 2018. Using standard propensity score-matching analysis, 36 patients were matched and divided into 2 groups: the upper mini-sternotomy group (n = 18) and the median sternotomy group (n = 18). The preoperative assessment revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Results Hospital mortality occurred in one patient (2.8%). The mini-sternotomy group showed a longer cross-clamping time (160 ± 38 vs. 135 ± 36 min, p = 0.048) due to higher rate of valve-sparing aortic root replacement and total arch repair. The cardiopulmonary bypass time in mini-sternotomy group was shorter than that of full sternotomy group (209 ± 47 min vs 218 ± 62 min, p = 0.595) but fell short of significance. There was no significant difference in lower body hypothermia circulatory arrest time between the two groups (40 ± 10 min vs 48 ± 20 min, p = 0.139). The upper mini-sternotomy group displayed a shorter ventilation time (22 vs. 45 h, p = 0.014), intensive care unit stay (4.6 ± 2.7 vs. 7.9 ± 3.7 days, p = 0.005), and hospital stay (8.2 ± 3.8 vs. 21.4 ± 11.9 days, p = 0.001). The upper mini-sternotomy group showed a lower postoperative red blood cell transfusion volume (4.6 ± 3.3 vs. 6.7 ± 5.7 units, p = 0.042) and postoperative drainage volume (764 ± 549 vs. 1255 ± 745 ml, p = 0.034). The rates of dialysis for newly occurring renal failure, neurological complications, and re-exploration were similar between the two groups (p = 1.000). Conclusion The upper mini-sternotomy approach is safe and beneficial in ascending aorta surgery with complex procedures for aortic dissection, including total arch replacement and aortic root repair.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF