Search

Pavlovian conditioned approach paradigms are used to characterize the nature of motivational behaviors in response to stimuli as either directed toward the cue (i.e., sign-tracking) or the site of reward delivery (i.e., goal-tracking). Recent evidence has shown that activity of the endocannabinoid system increases dopaminergic activity in the mesocorticolimbic system, and other studies have shown that sign-tracking behaviors are dependent on dopamine. Therefore, we hypothesized that administration of a cannabinoid agonist would increase sign-tracking and decrease goal-tracking behaviors. Forty-seven adult male Sprague Dawley rats were given a low, medium, or high dose of the cannabinoid agonist CP-55,940 (N=12 per group) or saline (N=11) before Pavlovian conditioned approach training. A separate group of rats (N=32) were sacrificed after PCA training for measurement of cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) using in situ hybridization. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, CP-55,940 dose-dependently decreased sign-tracking and increased goal-tracking behavior. CB1 expression was higher in sign-trackers compared to goal-trackers in the prelimbic cortex, but there were no significant differences in CB1 or FAAH expression in the infralimbic cortex, dCA1, dCA3, dorsal dentate gyrus, or amygdala. These results demonstrate that cannabinoid signaling can specifically influence behavioral biases toward sign- or goal-tracking. Pre-existing differences in CB1 expression patterns, particularly in the prelimbic cortex, could contribute to individual differences in the tendency to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Previous work has shown that cannabinoids increase feeding, while cholecystokinin (CCK) has an anorexigenic effect on food intake. Receptors for these hormones are located on cell bodies of vagal afferent nerves in the nodose ganglia. An interaction between CCK and endocannabinoid receptors has been suggested. The purpose of these studies is to explore the effect of pretreatment with a cannabinoid agonist, CP 55,940, on nodose neuron activation by CCK. To determine the effect of CP 55,940 and CCK on neuron activation, rats were anesthetized and nodose ganglia were excised. The neurons were dissociated and placed in culture on coverslips. The cells were treated with media; CP 55,940; CCK; CP 55,940 followed by CCK; or AM 251, a CB1 receptor antagonist, and CP 55,940 followed by CCK. Immunohistochemistry was performed to stain the cells for cFos as a measure of cell activation. Neurons were identified using neurofilament immunoreactivity. The neurons on each slip were counted using fluorescence imaging, and the number of neurons that were cFos positive was counted in order to calculate the percentage of activated neurons per coverslip. Pretreatment with CP 55,940 decreased the percentage of neurons expressing cFos‐immunoreactivity in response to CCK. This observation suggests that cannabinoids inhibit CCK activation of nodose ganglion neurons.

Studies on cannabinoids have reported contradictory findings, showing both aversion and rewarding outcomes in conditioned place preference (CPP). Various possibilities have been suggested to explain the aversive properties of cannabinoids, including the pharmacokinetics profile and dose selection. In this study, we have established a CPP method to investigate the effects of modulating astroglial glutamate transporters in cannabinoid dependence using a cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) agonist, CP 55,940 (CP). Previous reports using CPP paradigm demonstrated the involvement of glutamatergic system in seeking behavior of several drugs of abuse such as cocaine, heroin and nicotine. Glutamate homeostasis is maintained by several astroglial glutamate transporters, such as glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1), cystine/glutamate transporter (xCT) and glutamate aspartate transporter (GLAST). In this study, we investigated the effects of Ampicillin/Sulbactam, β-lactam compounds known to upregulate GLT-1 and xCT, on cannabinoid seeking behavior using CP. We found first that one prime dose of CP induced CP reinstatement; this effect was associated, in part, with significant downregulation of xCT expression in the nucleus accumbens, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Moreover, GLT-1 expression was downregulated in the amygdala. Importantly, Ampicillin/Sulbactam treatment during the extinction phase attenuated CP-induced reinstatement and restored the expression of GLT-1 and xCT in mesocorticolimbic brain regions. These findings suggest that β-lactams may play a potential therapeutic role in attenuating dependence to cannabinoids, in part, through upregulation of GLT-1 and xCT.

In humans, impulsivity measured as false alarms in a Go/No-Go task is reportedly decreased by amphetamine and is not affected by oxycodone and delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol. To model these findings in animals, three rhesus monkeys were trained to perform a food-reinforced Go/No-Go task. In this task, amphetamine was found to decrease false alarms (i.e. responding during No-Go trials), but only at doses that also decreased hits (i.e. responding during Go trials). Morphine generally decreased hits but not false alarms. The cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55, 940 decreased both false alarms and hits, but only at doses that also decreased the number of trials completed. Additional studies in animals and humans are necessary to delineate the conditions under which amphetamine and other psychoactive drugs affect impulsivity in Go/No-Go tasks.

BACKGROUND: Cannabinoids have shown promise for the treatment of intractable pain states and may represent an alternative pharmacotherapy for pain management. A growing body of clinical evidence suggests a role for sex in pain perception and in cannabinoid response. We examined cannabinoid sensitivity and tolerance in male and female mice expressing a desensitization-resistant form (S426A/S430A) of the cannabinoid type 1 (CB(1)) receptor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice were assessed for acute and inflammatory nociceptive behaviors in the formalin test following pretreatment with either vehicle or mixed CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonists, Δ(9)-THC (1–6 mg/kg) or CP55,940 (0.06–0.2 mg/kg). Tolerance to the effects of 6 mg/kg Δ(9)-THC or 0.1 mg/kg CP55,940 was examined via the formalin test following chronic daily dosing. RESULTS: Female mice showed decreased sensitivity to the effects of Δ(9)-THC and CP55,940 compared to male controls. The S426A/S430A mutation increased the attenuation of nociceptive behaviors for both agonists in both sexes. Female mice displayed delayed tolerance to Δ(9)-THC compared to male mice while the S426A/S430A mutation conferred a delay in tolerance to Δ(9)-THC in both sexes. Male S426A/S430A mutant mice also display resistance to tolerance to CP55,940 compared to wild-type controls. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates sex and genotype differences in response for two different cannabinoid agonists. The results underscore the importance of including both male and female subjects in pre-clinical studies of pain and cannabinoid pharmacology.

Recent behavioral reports suggest that repeated exposure to cannabis and synthetic cannabinoid agonists is linked with mental disorders associated with dysfunction of serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor neurotransmission such as anxiety and depression. Here, we studied the effect of a nonselective cannabinoid agonist, CP55940, on the activity of 5-HT2A receptors in hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN). We detected that repeated exposure to CP55940 enhanced the prolactin and corticosterone neuroendocrine responses mediated by 5-HT2A receptors and increased the membrane-associated levels of 5-HT2A receptors in PVN. Importantly, we also detected increased anxiety-like behaviors in CP55940 treated rats compared to controls. The data presented here suggest that the mechanisms mediating the cannabinoid-induced upregulation of 5-HT2A receptors would be brain-region specific, as we were unable to detect a CP55940-induced upregulation of 5-HT2A mRNA. Our results might provide insight into the molecular mechanism by which repeated exposure to cannabinoids could be associated with the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders.

A novel alkynylthiophene series of cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists has been described to exhibit distinct intrinsic activities with minimal substructure modifications. The three representatives, BPR0432, BPR0568 and BPR0569, functioning as a neutral antagonist, an inverse agonist and a partial agonist, respectively, in GTP binding assay, were further characterized for their downstream signaling activities in relation to in vivo efficacy in appetite suppression to diets of different macronutrients. Interestingly, these three derivatives all behaved as inverse agonists with the potency of BPR0432 > BPR0568 > BPR0569 in cAMP assay. After administered to non-deprived rats, the potency in appetite suppression was positively related to their strength in intrinsic activity in the first hour of intake. The preferential suppression to high fat and high carbohydrate diets was revealed after 6 h and only appeared in the treatment of BPR0568, presumably due to its metabolic stability in addition to its intrinsic activity. These results indicated the suppression of appetite was controlled in a biphasic manner, and these three structurally close but functionally distinct compounds are invaluable tools in elucidating the mechanism of neuronal response to appetite and palatability.

We have analysed the long-term effects of adolescent (postnatal day 28–43) exposure of male and female rats to nicotine (NIC, 1.4 mg/kg/day) and/or the cannabinoid agonist CP 55,940 (CP, 0.4 mg/kg/day) on the following parameters measured in the adulthood: (1) the memory ability evaluated in the object location task (OL) and in the novel object test (NOT); (2) the anxiety-like behaviour in the elevated plus maze; and (3) nicotinic and CB1 cannabinoid receptors in cingulated cortex and hippocampus. In the OL, all pharmacological treatments induced significant decreases in the DI of females, whereas no significant effects were found among males. In the NOT, NIC-treated females showed a significantly reduced DI, whereas the effect of the cannabinoid agonist (a decrease in the DI) was only significant in males. The anxiety-related behaviour was not changed by any drug. Both, nicotine and cannabinoid treatments induced a long-lasting increase in CB1 receptor activity (CP-stimulated GTPγS binding) in male rats, and the nicotine treatment also induced a decrease in nicotinic receptor density in the prefrontal cortex of females. The results show gender-dependent harmful effects of both drugs and long-lasting changes in CB1 and nicotinic receptors.

The cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant (SR 141716) has been shown to block reinforcing and rewarding effects of nicotine. Research has not investigated whether the cannabinoid system is involved in the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine functioning as a conditional stimulus (CS).We examined the effects of rimonabant and the CB(1/2) receptor agonist, CP 55,940, on responding evoked by a nicotine CS in rats. Additionally, we determined whether CP 55,940 functioned as a CS or a Pavlovian positive drug featurePavlovian discrimination training involved intermixed nicotine (0.2 mg base/kg) and saline sessions with intermittent access to water only on nicotine. Antagonism tests with rimonabant (0.1-3 mg/kg) and substitution tests with CP 55,940 (0.003-0.1 mg/kg) followed. An effective dose of CP 55,940 was tested against the nicotine generalization curve. A separate group received CS training with CP 55,940 (0.01 mg/kg). Two other groups were trained using CP 55,940 (0.01 or 0.03 mg/kg) as a positive drug feature in which a brief light CS signaled access to water only on CP 55,940 sessions.Rimonabant blocked nicotine-evoked responding. CP 55,940 partially substituted for nicotine and enhanced responding to lower nicotine doses. Overall, CP 55,940 did not acquire control of conditioned responding in either Pavlovian drug discrimination task.The cannabinoid system was involved in the CS effects of nicotine. This finding is counter to the operant drug discrimination research with nicotine as a discriminative stimulus, warranting further research into this possible dissociation.

Patients with cancer frequently report pain that can be difficult to manage. This study examined the antihyperalgesic effects of a cannabinoid receptor agonist, CP 55,940, in a murine model of cancer pain. Implantation of fibrosarcoma cells into and around the calcaneous bone in mice produced mechanical hyperalgesia (decreased paw withdrawal thresholds and increased frequency of paw withdrawals). On day 13 after implantation, mechanical hyperalgesia, nociception, and catalepsy were assessed. Mice were randomly assigned to receive CP 55,940 (0.01-3 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle and behavioral measures were redetermined. CP 55,940 dose-dependently attenuated tumor-evoked mechanical hyperalgesia. To examine the effect of catalepsy on the antihyperalgesic effect of CP 55,940, mice with tumor-evoked hyperalgesia were pretreated with the dopamine agonist apomorphine prior to administration of CP 55,940. Apomorphine attenuated the cataleptic effect of CP 55,940 but did not attenuate its antihyperalgesic effect. In a separate group of mice with tumor-evoked hyperalgesia, administration of the dopamine antagonist spiperone produced catalepsy that was approximately 2.5 fold greater than that produced by CP 55,490. Whereas this dose of CP 55,940 completely reversed tumor-evoked mechanical hyperalgesia, spiperone only attenuated mechanical hyperalgesia by approximately 35%. Thus, the cataleptic effects of CP 55,940 did not fully account for its antihyperalgesic effect. The antihyperalgesic effect of CP 55,940 was mediated via the cannabinoid CB1 but not CB2 receptor. Finally, repeated administration of CP 55,940 produced a short-term and a longer-term attenuation of tumor-evoked hyperalgesia. These results suggest that cannabinoids may be a useful alternative or adjunct therapy for treating cancer pain.

Low doses of cannabinoids applied intrathecally attenuate capsaicin-evoked heat and mechanical hyperalgesia via CB1 receptors. Although cannabinoids produce antinociception, in part, by attenuating responses of nociceptive neurons in the spinal cord, few studies have examined the effect of cannabinoids on sensitization of spinal neurons. We therefore investigated whether a cannabinoid receptor agonist, CP 55,940, attenuated excitation and sensitization of spinal nociceptive neurons produced by intraplantar injection of 0.1% capsaicin (10 μl). In rats, wide-dynamic-range (WDR) and high-threshold (HT) neurons were classified according to responses evoked by mechanical stimuli of varying intensity. CP 55,940 (10 μg in 50 μl) or vehicle was applied directly to the spinal cord and responses to mechanical (von Frey monofilament) and heat stimuli were recorded 10 min after drug treatment. CP 55,940 alone did not alter responses to mechanical stimuli; however the enhanced responses to mechanical stimuli after injection of capsaicin into the receptive field were dose dependently attenuated in both HT and WDR neurons. Vehicle-treated neurons increased their response to 300.6 ± 52.1% of baseline after capsaicin, whereas CP 55,940-treated neurons responded at 153.0 ± 27.1% of baseline. The effects of CP 55,940 on sensitization to heat were less pronounced; however, CP 55,940 attenuated the capsaicin-evoked decrease in heat threshold in HT neurons. The attenuation by CP 55,940 of sensitization to mechanical stimuli was blocked by pretreatment of the spinal cord with the CB1 receptor antagonist, SR141716A. These studies demonstrate that cannabinoid application to the spinal cord prevents central sensitization.

Addictive drugs have a number of commonalities in animal behavioral models. They lower intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds, support self-administration, and produce conditioned place preference (CPP). However, cannabinoids appear atypical as drugs of abuse, since there are controversial data in the literature concerning their reinforcing properties.The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of cannabinoids on brain reward using the rate-frequency curve shift paradigm of ICSS.Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with electrodes into the medial forebrain bundle (MFB). Rate-frequency functions were determined by logarithmically decreasing the number of cathodal pulses in a stimulation train from a value that sustained maximal responding to one that did not sustain responding. After brain stimulation reward thresholds stabilized rats received intraperitoneal (IP) injections of the potent CB1 receptor agonists WIN 55,212-2 (graded doses 0.1, 0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg), CP 55,940 (graded doses 10, 30, 56 and 100 microg/kg), or HU-210 (graded doses 10, 30, 100 microg/kg).With the exception of the highest dose of all cannabinoid agonists tested, which significantly increased the threshold frequency required for MFB ICSS, all other doses of the tested drugs did not affect ICSS thresholds. The CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A reversed the actions of WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940, but not HU-210. However, the selective CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM 251 counteracted the effect of HU-210. Both CB1 receptor antagonists, at the doses used in the present study, did not affect reward thresholds by themselves.The present results indicate that cannabinoid agonists do not exhibit reinforcing properties in the ICSS paradigm, but rather have an inhibitory influence on reward mechanisms. The results suggest that the anhedonic effects of cannabinoids are probably mediated by cannabinoid CB1 receptors.

Animals trained to lick for a sucrose solution of a given incentive value that subsequently encounter an incentive downshift (i.e. 32-4% sucrose) display an exaggerated decrease in the amount consumed, relative to unshifted controls. This change has been classified as a successive negative contrast (SNC) effect. The emotional component to this robust behavioural change is dynamic and changes from post-shift day (PSD) 1 to 2. Anxiolytics block SNC, but the possible link between anxiety and SNC needs further exploration. Both nicotine and a cannabinoid receptor agonist have been reported to change anxiety and both have actions on the reward process, but their effects on SNC have not been investigated.To determine: (1) whether exposure to SNC evokes an anxiogenic response; (2) whether an anxiolytic dose of nicotine has the same effects on SNC as those of chlordiazepoxide; (3) the effects of a low (anxiolytic) and a high (anxiogenic) dose of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 on SNC.Two groups of animals were given access to high (32%) or low (4%) sucrose solutions for 5 min per day for 10 days. On PSD 1 and 2, the shifted group had access to a devalued incentive (from 32 to 4% sucrose) and the unshifted group remained at 4% sucrose. The volumes (ml) of sucrose solution consumed were measured pre-shift and on PSD 1 and 2. In experiment 1, immediately after SNC testing on PSD 1 and 2, the rats were tested in the social interaction and elevated plus-maze tests of anxiety. In experiment 2, the effects of chlordiazepoxide (5 and 7.5 mg/kg) and nicotine (0.1 mg/kg) were examined on PSD 1 and 2. In experiment 3, the effects of CP 55,940 (5 and 40 microg/kg) were examined on PSD 1 and 2.There were no anxiogenic effects of shift in either test of anxiety on either test day. However, on PSD 1, the shifted group had significantly higher locomotor activity and spent a higher percentage of time on the open arms, perhaps reflecting search strategies. Nicotine was without significant effect on SNC on either test day. On PSD 1, chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) and CP 55,940 (5 and 40 microg/kg, IP) blocked SNC. On PSD 2, both doses of chlordiazepoxide and the low, anxiolytic dose of CP 55,940 (5 microg/kg) blocked SNC, the high dose of CP 55,940 was without effect.The pattern of results allows for the separation between effects on anxiety and SNC. The block of contrast on PSD 1 was independent of changes in anxiety, since both anxiolytic and anxiogenic drug doses were effective. It is suggested that this may provide an animal model of disappointment in which the cannabinoid system plays an important role. An anxiolytic action would seem to be a necessary, but not a sufficient, action to block SNC on PSD 2.

Cannabinoids have been shown to influence food intake, and until recently, the neural pathways mediating these effects have remained obscure. It has been previously shown that intracerebroventricular injection of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) causes increased consumption of palatable foods in rats, and we postulated the involvement of the hindbrain in this cannabinoid-induced food intake. Cannulated rats (both female and male groups) trained to consume sweetened condensed milk received either lateral or fourth ventricle injections of CP 55,940 and were presented with sweetened condensed milk 15 min after injection. Rats were injected over a range of doses between 100 pg and 10 microg per rat. Milk intake was recorded for a total of 3 h. Lateral ventricle injection of CP 55,940 increased milk intake at doses in the microgram range. However, CP 55,940 was effective in increasing food intake at nanogram doses when injected into the fourth ventricle. Finally, male rats appeared to be more sensitive to CP 55,940 than female rats inasmuch as milk consumption was increased at the 1 ng dose in male rats, whereas only the 10 ng dose was effective in females. These results indicate that CP 55,940 may act in the hindbrain to influence feeding behavior in rats.

Rationale: Despite the increasing use of cannabis among adolescents, there is scarce information about the long-term effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists in appropriate animal models. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the behavioural features of adult male and female Wistar rats that had been exposed to a chronic treatment with the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 (CP) during the juvenile period. Methods: CP (0.4 mg/kg i.p.) or its corresponding vehicle was administered once daily, from day 35 to day 45. In adulthood, the animals were tested in the holeboard, the open field and the elevated plus-maze, under different stress (illumination) conditions. After a resting period, the serum corticosterone levels (radioimmunoassay) of the animals were measured. The effects of CP on food intake and somatic growth were monitored throughout the experimental period. Results: The CP treatment induced significant sex-dependent effects on holeboard activity, as well as a decrease in the level of emotionality/anxiety in the open field and in the plus-maze. The animals receiving CP also showed diminished food intake and body weights during the treatment period, but both parameters recovered normal values during the period after treatment. No significant effect of the CP treatment on corticosterone levels was found. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that chronic administration of CP during the peri-adolescent period resulted in marked behavioural effects in adulthood. The nature of these effects depended on the sex of the animals and on the specific behavioural test. The possible neurobiological substrates underlying the effects of CP are discussed.

Ligand binding to the cannabinoid receptor of brain membranes has been characterized using [ 3 H] CP 55,940 and the Multiscreen Filtration System. Binding of [ 3 H]CP 55,940 is saturable and reaches equilibrium by 45 min at room temperature. At a concentration of 10 pg of membrane protein/well, the K D for [ 3 H]CP 55,940 is 461 pM and the B max is 860 mfmol/mg of protein. The apparent K D of [ 3 H]CP 55,940 is dependent upon tissue protein concentration, increasing to 2,450 pM at 100 μg of membrane protein. Binding of [ 3 H]CP 55,940 is dependent upon the concentration of bovine serum albumin in the buffer; the highest ratio of specific to nonspecific binding occurs between 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml. The K i of anandamide, a putative endogenous ligand of the cannabinoid receptor, is 1.3 pM in buffer alone and 143 nM in the presence of 0.15 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. When [ 14 C] anandamide is incubated with rat forebrain membranes at room temperature, it is degraded to arachidonic acid; the hydrolysis is inhibited by 0.15 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. These results support the hypothesis that anandamide is a high-affinity ligand of the cannabinoid receptor and that it is rapidly degraded by membrane fractions

Recently, we have shown that cannabinoids of diverse structure block the ability of the selective 5-HT(2A/C) agonist DOI to produce the head-twitch response (HTR) and the ear-scratch response (ESR) in mice. The cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist/inverse agonist SR 141716A also induces these behaviors in mice. The purposes of the present study were: (1) to investigate whether Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and other cannabinoids HU-210 and WIN 55, 212-2 can prevent SR 141716A-induced HTR and ESR and (2) to evaluate any correlation between the ID(50) potency order of the cited cannabinoids in blocking SR 141716A-induced HTR and ESR and their ED(50) order of potency in reducing spontaneous locomotor activity and rearing behavior. For the SR 141716A reversal study, different groups of mice were injected intraperitoneally with either vehicle or varying doses of the following cannabinoids: Delta(9)-THC (2.5-20 mg/kg), Delta(8)-THC (5-20 mg/kg), HU-210 (0.05-0.5 mg/kg), CP 55, 940 (0.5-2.5 mg/kg) and WIN 55, 212-2 (2.5-10 mg/kg). Thirty minutes later, each mouse received SR 141716A (2.5 mg/kg ip) and the frequencies of the induced behaviors (mean +/- S.E.M.) were recorded for the next 30 min. The effects of the cited doses of cannabinoids were also examined on spontaneous locomotor activity and rearing frequency for a 20-min duration 10 min after cannabinoid injection. The tested cannabinoids reduced the frequencies of HTR and ESR in SR 141716A-injected mice. These agents also attenuated the cited naturally occurring repertoire of motor parameters in mice. Although large potency differences were observed among the cited cannabinoids, each tested cannabinoid was relatively equipotent in preventing locomotor parameters and SR 141716A-induced behaviors. The ID(50) potency order of cannabinoids in blocking SR 141716A-induced HTR and ESR were similar (HU-210CP 55, 940WIN 55, 212-2or = Delta 9)-THC=Delta(8)-THC), and are comparable with: (1) their ED(50) potency order in attenuating both spontaneous locomotor activity and rearing behavior (HU-210CP 55, 940WIN 55, 212-2Delta(9)-THC=Delta(8)-THC) and (2) their published ED(50) potency order for producing the tetrad of behaviors in mice as well as their rank order of binding affinities for cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. The present data show that cannabinoids of diverse structure prevent SR 141716A-induced HTR and ESR, and inhibition of these behaviors by cannabinoids could be used as a new index of cannabimimetic activity.

Several effects of the abused synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018 were compared to those of Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ 9 -THC) in rhesus monkeys. JWH-018 (0.1 mg/kg i.v.) was established as a discriminative stimulus and rimonabant was used to examine mechanisms responsible for discrimination as well as operant response rate-decreasing and hypothermic effects. JWH-018 dose-dependently increased drug-lever responding (ED 50 =0.01 mg/kg) and decreased response rate (ED 50 =0.064 mg/kg). Among various cannabinoids, the relative potency for producing discriminative stimulus and rate-decreasing effects was the same: CP-55940=JWH-018>Δ 9 -THC=WIN-55212-2=JWH-073. The benzodiazepine agonist midazolam and the NMDA antagonist ketamine did not exert JWH-018 like discriminative stimulus effects up to doses that disrupted responding. JWH-018 and Δ 9 -THC decreased rectal temperature by 2.2 and 2.8 °C, respectively; the doses decreasing temperature by 2 °C were 0.21 and 1.14 mg/kg, respectively. Antagonism did not differ between JWH-018 and Δ 9 -THC, but did differ among effects. The apparent affinities of rimonabant calculated in the presence of JWH-018 and Δ 9 -THC were not different from each other for antagonism of discriminative stimulus effects (6.58 and 6.59, respectively) or hypothermic effects (7.08 and 7.19, respectively). Apparent affinity estimates are consistent with the same receptors mediating the discriminative stimulus and hypothermic effects of both JWH-018 and Δ 9 -THC. However, there was more limited and less orderly antagonism of rate-decreasing effects, suggesting that an additional receptor mechanism is involved in mediating the effects of cannabinoids on response rate. Overall, these results strongly suggest that JWH-018 and Δ 9 -THC act at the same receptors to produce several of their shared psychopharmacological effects.

We have recently shown that the selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716A produces robust frequencies of head-twitch response (HTR) and ear-scratch response (ESR) in drug-naive mice. Both behaviors were potently blocked by the selective 5-HT(2A/C) receptor antagonist SR 46349B. Selective 5-HT(2A/C) agonists such as DOI also produce these behaviors in mice. The purpose of the present study was to: (1) investigate whether Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and its analogs [Delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(8)-THC), HU-210, CP 55,940, and WIN 55,212-2] can prevent the DOI-induced behaviors and (2) to see whether any correlation exists in the ID(50) potency order of these cannabinoids in inhibiting the DOI-induced HTR and ESR relative to their published ED(50) potency profiles in producing the tetrad of behaviors in mice. Thus, at 0 min, different groups of mice were injected intraperitoneally with either vehicle or varying doses of the following cannabinoids: Delta(9)-THC (0.25-20 mg/kg), Delta(8)-THC (2.5-20 mg/kg), HU-210 (0.02-0.5 mg/kg), CP 55,940 (0.004-0.5 mg/kg), and WIN 55,212-2 (0.5-10 mg/kg). Twenty minutes later, each mouse received an intraperitoneal injection of DOI (1 mg/kg) and the frequencies of DOI-induced behaviors (mean +/- S.E.M.) were recorded for the next 20 min. The tested cannabinoids reduced the frequencies of both DOI-induced HTR and ESR in a dose-dependent fashion. HU-210 was the most potent inhibitor of HTR, whereas CP 55,940 was most effective against ESR. The ID(50) potency order of cannabinoids in blocking the HTR is: HU-210 > CP 55,940 > WIN 55,212-2 > Delta(9)-THC > Delta(8)-THC, which is identical to their published order of potency in producing the tetrad of behaviors in mice. On the other hand, they had the following ID(50) potency order against the ESR: CP 55,940 > HU-210 > WIN 55,212-2 > Delta(9)-THC > Delta(8)-THC. The tested cannabinoids were 3-30 times more potent in preventing the ESR than the HTR. The data show that cannabinoids inhibit 5-HT(2A) receptor-mediated functions in a potent but differential manner.

There is substantial clinical evidence that Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and its synthetic analogs (nabilone and levonantradol) can prevent emesis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Limited available animal studies also support the antiemetic potential of these cannabinoids. The present study investigates the mechanism of antiemetic action of cannabinoids in an established animal model of emesis, the least shew (Cryptotis parva). Since cannabinoid agonists prevent emesis, it was hypothesized that blockade of either the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor or the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor would induce vomiting. Thus, the emetic potential of SR 141716A (CB(1) receptor antagonist) or SR 144528 (CB(2) receptor antagonist) was investigated. Both intraperitoneal (0, 1, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg, n = 7-15 per group) and subcutaneous (0, 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg, n = 6-9 per group) administration of SR 141716A caused emesis (ED(50) = 5.52 +/- 1.23 and 20.2 +/- 1.02 mg/kg, respectively) in the least shrew in a dose-dependent manner. Indeed, both the frequency of emesis and the percentage of animals vomiting increased with increasing doses of SR 141716A. Significant effects were seen at the 10- and 20-mg/kg doses for the IP route, while only the 40-mg/kg dose produced significant emesis via the SC route. The CB(2) antagonist failed to produce emesis via either route of administration. SR 141716A at an IP dose of 20 mg/kg was used to induce emesis for drug interaction studies. Thus, varying doses of three different classes of cannabinoid agonists [CP 55, 940 (0, 0.1, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg), WIN 55, 212-2 (0, 1, 5 and 10 mg/kg), and Delta(9)-THC (0, 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg)], were administered IP to different groups of shrews 10 min prior to SR 141716A injection. The frequency of emesis was recorded for 30 min following the administration of SR 141716A. The order of potency for redcing both the frequency of emesis and the percentage of shrews vomiting was CP 55, 940WIN 55, 212-2Delta(9)-THC which is consistent with an action on the CB(1) receptor. These results suggest that the antiemetic activity of Delta(9)-THC and its synthetic analogs reside in their ability to stimulate the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor. Furthermore, the antiemetic potency of CP 55, 940 is 45 times greater than Delta(9)-THC. On the other hand, blockade of CB(1) receptors can induce vomiting, which implicates an important role for endogenous cannabinoids in emetic circuits.

The effect of CP 55,940, on electroencephalographic (EEG) spectral power decrease and hyperlocomotion induced by transient global ischemia in gerbils, was investigated. Animals were treated with CP 55,940 (4 mg/kg intraperitoneal (i.p.)) 5 min after bilateral carotid occlusion or SR 141716A (3 mg/kg i.p.) 5 min before or with both. Mean total and relative spectral power was evaluated for 1 h before (basal) and 1 and 24 h, 3 and 7 days after ischemia. Spontaneous locomotor activity was evaluated at the same times. CP 55,940 antagonized the reduction in mean total spectral power and the hyperlocomotion induced by ischemia, in comparison with vehicle group, starting from 24 h and lasting 7 days (P

The role of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in sympathetic neurotransmission was characterised in nerve-mediated responses of isolated right atria, vasa deferentia and small mesenteric resistance arteries using the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, CP 55,940 and anandamide and the cannabinoid CB(1)-selective antagonist SR 141716A. In the mouse vas deferens, the twitch response was completely inhibited by each of the putative cannabinoid receptor agonists with pIC(50) values of CP 55,940, 9.2+/-0.1; Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, 8.4+/-0.1; anandamide, 7.1+/-0.1. SR 141716A 10-100 nM was a competitive antagonist of all three agonists with a pK(B) value of 8.4-8.6, consistent with an interaction at the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor. In the rat vas deferens CP 55,940 (0.01-10 microM) inhibited the contractions to a significant extent (88.5+/-0.5% at 10 microM; pIC(50) of 7.1+/-0.1) while Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and anandamide (both up to 10 microM) were inactive. CP 55,940 exhibited low potency in rat compared with mouse vas deferens and the rat concentration-response curve was not competitively antagonised by SR 141716A (100 nM) or SR 144528 (10 nM-10 microM), suggesting an interaction at a receptor(s) distinct from cannabinoid CB(1) or CB(2). Sympathetic nerve-induced tachycardia in rat and mouse atria, and rat mesenteric artery smooth muscle contractile responses to perivascular nerve stimulation, were not inhibited by Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, CP 55,940 or anandamide up to 1 microM. These data indicate that cannabinoid CB(1) receptor activation inhibits sympathetic neurotransmission only in the mouse vas deferens and thus point to species and regional differences in cannabinoid CB(1) receptor involvement in pre-synaptic inhibition of sympathetic neurotransmission and CP 55,940 may have inhibitory actions in rat vas deferens unrelated to cannabinoid receptor activity.

A series of experiments examined the effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist CP 55,940 ((-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hyd roxypropyl)cyclohexanol) on the motivation to consume beer, near-beer (a beer-like beverage containing

Rats given cocaine (15 mg/kg, i.p.) every second day over a 2-week period displayed a progressively greater locomotor response to the drug over days indicating behavioral sensitization. When the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 ((-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hyd roxypropyl)cyclohexanol) (10, 25 or 50 microg/kg) was administered under a similar regime, no such sensitization was observed. Rather, the two highest doses of CP 55,940 (25 and 50 microg/kg) caused locomotor suppression that lasted throughout administration. When rats pre-exposed 10 times to CP 55,940 were challenged with cocaine (15 mg/kg), no exaggerated locomotor response to cocaine was evident relative to non pre-exposed rats. When these rats were subsequently re-tested with CP 55,940, the cannabinoid continued to produce a dose-dependent suppression of locomotor activity. Finally, when CP 55,940 (50 microg/kg) was co-administered with cocaine, it significantly reduced the locomotor hyperactivity produced by the drug but did not block the development of behavioral sensitization. These results show that CP 55,940 does not sensitize locomotor activity with repeated administration in the same way as cocaine, and that pre-exposure or concurrent exposure to CP 55,940 does not enhance sensitivity to the subsequent behavioral effects of cocaine.

The present experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of four cannabimimetics on detailed temporal parameters of operant responding. In this study, the behavioral output during performance of a fixed ratio 5 schedule of reinforcement was recorded by a computer program that measured the response initiation time (IT; time interval between the offset of one lever press and the onset of the next) and the response duration (the amount of time that elapses from the onset to the offset of one lever press) of each lever press. ITs were further partitioned into fast responses (IT=0.0-1.0 s), short pauses (IT= 1.0-2.5 s), and long pauses (IT2.5 s). Four cannabimimetic agents were assessed in this study: (R)-methanandamide (AM 356), a hydrolytically stable analog of arachidonylethanolamide, an endogenous ligand for the CB1 receptor; CP-55,940, a potent non-classical synthetic ligand; (-)-delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta8-THC), an isomer of the naturally occurring delta9-THC; and WIN 55,212-2, a synthetic aminoalkylindole. All four of the cannabimimetic drugs tested significantly suppressed operant lever pressing in a dose dependent manner. The rank order of potencies observed in the present study was CP-55,940WIN-55,212-2delta8-THCAM 356, which is consistent with the rank order of affinities for the CB1 receptor shown by these drugs. All of the cannabimimetics substantially increased average IT, and also increased duration time. There was a substantial increase in average length of long pauses, and statistically significant but very small changes in the local rate of responding as measured by the average length of fast ITs. Cannabinoid-treated rats were largely immobile during pauses in responding, and these animals showed several signs of ataxia and catalepsy at the doses that suppressed lever pressing. Together with other data, the present results suggest that CB1 stimulation leads to motor effects that are associated with a suppression of lever pressing.

The binding of [123I]AM251 (a radioiodinated analog of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A) was compared to that of [3H]CP 55,940 in mouse and rat brain preparations. Scatchard analysis of the binding of [123I]AM251 and [3H]CP 55,940 to membranes prepared from mouse cerebellum, striatum and hippocampus yielded similar Bmax values (15-41 pmol/g wet wt tissue). Kd values were lower for [123I]AM251 (0.23-0.62 nM) than for [3H]CP 55,940 (1.3-4 nM). CP 55,940 and SR141716A increased dissociation of [123I]AM251 from binding sites in mouse cerebellar homogenates to a similar extent. The structurally dissimilar cannabinoid receptor ligands THC, methanandamide, WIN 55, 212-2, CP 55,940 and SR141716A were each able to fully compete with binding of both [123I]AM251 and [3H]CP 55,940 in mouse cerebellum. In vitro autoradiography demonstrated that the distribution of binding sites for [123I]AM251 in rat brain was very similar to published distributions of binding sites for [3H]CP 55,940. Together, these observations suggest that AM251 binds to the same site (the cannabinoid CB1 receptor) in rodent brains as CP 55,940. However, the binding site domains which interact with AM251 and CP 55,940 may not be identical, since IC50 values for cannabinoid receptor ligands depended on whether [123I]AM251 or [3H]CP 55,940 was used as radioligand.

The purported CB 1 cannabinoid antagonist SR 141716A has proven to be a useful tool in the investigation of cannabinoid pharmacology. This antagonist was employed in the present study to investigate the antinociceptive and cataleptic effects of cannabinoids after either systemic or intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration. The antinociceptive potency of systemically administered Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ 9 -THC) was decreased 18-fold by SR 141716A, from an ED 50 value of 0.3–5.1 mg/kg. Similarly, it completely blocked the antinociceptive effects of Δ 9 -THC and CP 55,940, a potent bicyclic cannabinoid, after ICV administration. In addition, it prevented cannabinoid-induced catalepsy when given by either route of administration. In contrast, SR 141716A failed to antagonize the antinociceptive effects of morphine, indicating its selectivity for cannabinoid receptors. These findings indicate that the antinociceptive and cataleptic effects of Δ 9 -THC and CP 55,940 are mediated through CB 1 cannabinoid receptors.

Cannabinoids are natural or synthetic compounds related chemically to (-)-(6aR,10aR)-6,6,9-trimethyl-3-pentyl-6a,7,8,10a-tetrahydro-6H-benzo[c]chromen-1-ol (Δ(9)-THC), the principle psychotropic constituent of the hemp plant, Cannabis sativa L. Here we examine the effects of the cannabinoids Δ(9)-THC, (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo [1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-napthalenylmethanone and 2-[(1R,2R,5R)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl) cyclohexyl]-5-(2-methyloctan-2-yl)phenol, and the cannabinoid antagonist (AM 251). Exposures were either acute (1-12-h exposure at 108 hours of postfertilization [hpf]) or chronic (96-h exposure starting at 24 hpf). Geometric range finding was used to determine the experimental concentrations. The concentration of the chemical that kills 50% of the test animals in a given time (LC50) was determined based on cumulative mortality at 5 days of postfertilization. At day 5, behavioral analysis (visual motor response test) was carried out in which movement of individual larvae was analysed using automated video-tracking. With acute exposure, embryos showed a biphasic response to the dark challenge with all three cannabinoids tested. This response consisted of stimulation of the locomotor activity at low concentrations, suppression at high doses. With chronic exposure, embryos habituated to the effects of all three cannabinoids when assayed with the dark challenge phase. Further, the excitation was ameliorated when the antagonist AM 251 was coadministered with the cannabinoid. When AM 251 was administered on its own (chronically or acutely), the locomotor activity was suppressed at high concentrations. We examined the embryos for a range of malformations after chronic exposure to cannabinoid. Only Δ(9)-THC was associated with a significant increase in malformations at 5d (yolk sac and pericardial edema, bent tail/body axis). We conclude that cannabinoids have behavioral effects in zebrafish that are comparable to some of those reported in the literature for mammals. In particular, the acute exposure response resembles behavioral effects reported for adult rodents. Our data are consistent with these behavioral effects being mediated, at least in part, by the CB1 receptor.

The possible occurrence of cannabinoid (CB) receptors was studied on superfused guinea-pig retinal discs preincubated with [3H]dopamine or [3H]noradrenaline. Tritium overflow was evoked either electrically (3 Hz) or by re-introduction of Ca2+ 1.3 mM after superfusion with Ca(2+)-free medium containing K+ 30 mM. The accumulation of [3H]dopamine ([3H]DA) and [3H]noradrenaline ([3H]NA) was inhibited by the selective inhibitor of the neuronal dopamine transporter GBR-12909 (pIC50% 7.29 and 7.41, respectively) but not by the selective inhibitor of the neuronal noradrenaline transporter desipramine (1 microM). The electrically or Ca(2+)-evoked tritium overflow in retinal discs preincubated with [3H]DA or [3H]NA was reduced by the CB receptor agonists CP-55,940 and WIN 55,212-2 (pIC50% in discs preincubated with [3H]NA, electrical stimulation: 7.03 and 6.70, respectively) but not affected by the inactive S(-)enantiomer of the latter, WIN 55,212-3 (up to 10 microM). The concentration-response curve of WIN 55,212-2 was shifted to the right by the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716 (apparent pA2: 8.29) which, by itself, increased the evoked overflow. The facilitatory effect of SR 141716 was not affected by GBR-12909 and the dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol. In conclusion, the dopaminergic neurones of the guinea-pig retina can be labelled by both [3H]DA and [3H]NA. Transmitter release from the dopaminergic neurones is inhibited by activation of cannabinoid receptors of the CB1 type, which appear to be tonically activated by an endogenous CB receptor ligand.

Background Like emotional symptoms such as anxiety, modulations in working memory are among the frequently-reported but controversial psychiatric symptoms associated with nicotine (NC) administration. In the present study, repeated NC-induced modulations in working memory, along with concurrently-observed anxiety-related behavioral alterations, were investigated in mice, and compared with the effects of a typical cognition-impairing stressor, immobilization stress (IM). Furthermore, considering the structural and functional contributions of brain cannabinoid (CB) receptors in NC-induced psychiatric symptoms including emotional symptoms, the interactive effects of brain CB receptor ligands (CB ligands) and NC and/or IM on the working memory- and anxiety-related behaviors were examined. Results Statistically significant working memory impairment-like behavioral alterations in the Y-maze test and anxiety-like behavioral alterations in the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test were observed in the groups of mice treated with 0.8 mg/kg NC (subcutaneous (s.c.) 0.8 mg/kg treatment, 4 days) and/or IM (10 min treatment, 4 days). In the group of mice treated with NC plus IM (NC-IM group), an enhancement of the behavioral alterations was observed. Among the CB type 1 (CB1) antagonist AM 251 (AM), the non-selective CB agonist CP 55,940 (CP), and the CB1 partial agonist/antagonist virodhamine (VD), significant recovering effects were provided by AM (0.2-2.5 mg/kg) and VD (5 mg/kg) against the working memory impairment-like behaviors, whereas significant anxiolytic-like effects (recoveries from both attenuated percentage of entries into open arms and attenuated percentage of time spent on open arms) were provided by VD (1–10 mg/kg) and CP (2 mg/kg) against the anxiety-like behaviors. Conclusions Although working memory impairment- and anxiety-like behavioral alterations were commonly induced in the NC, IM, and NC-IM groups and the therapeutic involvement of CB receptors was shown, there were discrepancies in the types of effective CB ligands between the working memory- and anxiety-related behaviors. The differential involvements of CB receptor subtypes and indirectly activated neurotransmitter systems may contribute to these discrepancies.

The effect of cannabinoid receptor stimulation on rotational behavior induced by a dopamine D1 and a D2 agonist was studied in rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesions of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway. The cannabinoid agonists WIN 55,212-2 (2.5 mg/kg) and CP 55,940 (0.1 mg/kg) both markedly attenuated contralateral rotation induced by the D1 agonist SKF 38393 (1.5 mg/kg). In contrast, WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 did not alter rotation elicited by the D2 agonist quinpirole (0.1 mg/kg). Doses of WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 that attenuated D1-mediated rotation did not produce catalepsy in intact rats or in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesions, indicating that the reduction in rotation produced by the cannabinoids was not due to a generalized motor impairment. In addition, the effective dose of WIN 55,212-2, but not CP 55,940, produced only a slight increase in ipsilateral rotation when administered alone, making it improbable that this ipsilateral tendency accounts for the reduction in D1-mediated contralateral rotation. These results suggest a preferential interaction between cannabinoid receptor stimulation and dopamine D1 receptor-mediated behavior.

Anandamide (arachidonylethanolamide), a putative endogenous ligand for the cannabinoid receptor, produces a tetrad of behavioral effects in mice characteristic of psychoactive cannabinoids including catalepsy, antinociception, hypothermia, and hypomobility. The present study examined the discriminative stimulus effects of anandamide in rats trained to discriminate delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol or the potent cannabinoid receptor ligand CP 55,940 [(-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-phenyl]-trans-4-(3- hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol)] from vehicle. Intraperitoneal injections of anandamide substituted for delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and for CP 55,940; however, unlike substitution dose-effect curves with the training drugs, anandamide substitution occurred at a single dose (30 or 45 mg/kg) and was accompanied by severe decreases in response rates. The results of the present study suggest that, although systemic anandamide administration may have cannabimimetic effects similar to those of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and CP 55,940, some differences in the behavioral effects of anandamide and other psychoactive cannabinoids also are apparent.

It is generally assumed that cannabinoids induce transient modulations of dopamine transmission through indirect regulation of its release. However, we previously described a direct cannabinoid-mediated control of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression, in vitro. We herein report on the influence of cannabinoid agonists on the expression of this key enzyme in catecholamine synthesis as well as on the modification of dopamine content in adult rats. As expected for cannabinoid agonists, the exposure to either Delta(9)-THC, HU 210 or CP 55,940 induced both catalepsy and hypolocomotion. Supporting a possible long-lasting control on dopaminergic activity, we noticed a significant HU 210-mediated increase in TH expression in the striatum that was concomitant with an increase in striatal dopamine content. Surprisingly, while a similar trend was reported with Delta(9)-THC, CP 55,940 completely failed to modulate TH expression or dopamine content. Nevertheless, the access of CP 55,940 to brain structures was validated by determinations of drug concentrations in the tissue and by ex vivo binding experiments. Furthermore, confirming the central activity of CP 55,940, the analysis of dopamine metabolites revealed a reduction in striatal DOPAC concentrations. Consistent with the involvement of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor in these different responses, both HU 210- and CP 55,940-mediated effects were prevented by SR 141716A. Therefore, the present data suggest that both HU 210 and CP 55,940 cause a delayed/persistent regulation of the dopamine neurotransmission system. Nevertheless, these commonly used cannabinoid agonists endowed with similar pharmacodynamic properties clearly triggered distinct biochemical responses highlighting the existence of functional selectivity in vivo. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Using in situ hybridization we found that chronic treatment with CP-55,940 (0.4 mg kg-1, i.p. daily for 11 days), a synthetic cannabinoid receptor ligand, changed cannabinoid receptor mRNA levels in rat brain. CP-55,940 produced the expected tolerance: the decrease in locomotor activity (75%) caused by an acute dose was diminished to 25% after the 11 days of treatment. Thirty minutes after the last injection the animals were killed and in situ hybridization indicated that the levels of cannabinoid receptor mRNA in the caudate-putamen were reduced by 33%, with no alteration in the other brain areas. We suggest that the altered cannabinoid receptor expression is part of the adaptive changes underlying cannabinoid tolerance.

Adolescence is a developmental period characterized by neuronal remodeling and the maturation of adult emotionality, reproductive behavior and social behavior. We examined whether chronic cannabinoid exposure in adolescent rats alters female sexual motivation, estrous cyclicity, sucrose preference, and CB(1)R expression in adulthood. Female rats were administered with the synthetic cannabinoid agonist, CP-55,940 (0.4 mg/kg, intraperitoneal), daily during adolescent development (PND 35-45). In a subset of subjects, socio-sexual motivation was investigated in adulthood (PND 75-86) using a runway apparatus. Estrous cyclicity was tracked in adulthood via vaginal cytology and a single-mount test. A two-bottle sucrose preference test was also conducted to determine whether predicted changes in socio-sexual motivation might be linked to alterations in hedonic processing. CB(1)R expression was examined in two separate subsets of subjects, one sacrificed following drug treatment (PND 46) and one before behavioral testing (PND 74). Drug treatment significantly decreased adult preference for a male conspecific (sexual motivation), as assessed by both Run Time and Proximity Time, but did not affect estrous cyclicity or sucrose preference. CP-55,940 treatment also induced immediate, but transient, decreases in CB(1)R expression in the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus and amygdala. Drug treatment did not affect CB(1)R expression in the nucleus accumbens (core or shell) or globus pallidus at either time point. We suggest that the endocannabinoid system may play a role in the maturation of neuroendocrine axes and adult female reproductive behavior, and that chronic exposure to cannabinoids during adolescence disrupts these neurodevelopmental processes.

Involvement of cannabinoid receptors in behavioral reinforcement is suggested by widespread human use of marihuana, although animal tests of cannabinoid reinforcement have produced mixed results. Cannabinoid receptors are found in high density in rat hippocampus and other brain areas. Using the hippocampal-slice preparation, we attempted to demonstrate in vitro reinforcement of CA1 bursting with local micropressure applications of the high-affinity synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist (−)-CP-55,940. Approximately 60% of the tested neurons showed increased burst activity after a series of brief, burst-contingent applications of (−)-CP-55,940 at pipette concentrations of 5 and 10 μM. Identical microinjections of (−)-CP-55,940 administered independently of cellular activity did not increase and usually suppressed hippocampal bursting. Since general stimulation of CA1 activity by (−)-CP-55,940 can thus be ruled out, we conclude that burst-contingent applications of a cannabinoid receptor agonist can reinforce hippocampal firing in vitro.

Numerous cannabinoids have been synthesized that are extremely potent in all of the behavioral assays conducted in our laboratory. An important feature in increasing potency has been the substitution of a dimethylheptyl (DMH) side chain for the pentyl side chain. Our previous studies have shown that (-)-11-OH-delta 8-THC-dimethylheptyl was 80-1150 times more potent than delta 9-THC. Stereospecificity was demonstrated by its (+)-enantiomer which was more than 1400-7500 times less potent. A related series of DMH cannabinoid analogs has recently been synthesized and preliminary evaluations reported here. (-)-11-OH-delta 9-THC-DMH was found to be equipotent with (-)-11-OH-delta 8-THC-DMH. The aldehyde (-)-11-oxo-delta 9-THC-DMH was 15-50 times more potent than delta 9-THC. Surprisingly, (-)-11-carboxy-delta 9-THC-DMH was also active, being slightly more potent than delta 9-THC. In the bicyclic cannabinoid series, the length and bulk of the side chain were found to be equally important. Aminoalkylindoles, which are structurally dissimilar from classical cannabinoids, have been found to exhibit a pharmacological profile similar to delta 9-THC. Though not extremely potent in vivo, they appear to represent an entirely new approach to studying the actions of the cannabinoids. The structural diversity and wide-ranging potencies of the analogs described herein provide the opportunity to develop a pharmacophore for the cannabinoids using molecular modeling techniques.

Early cannabinoid consumption may predispose individuals to the misuse of addictive drugs later in life. However, there is a lack of experimental evidence as to whether cannabinoid exposure during adolescence might differently affect opiate reinforcing efficacy and the opioid system in adults of both sexes. Our aim was to examine whether periadolescent chronic exposure to the cannabinoid agonist CP-55,940 could exert sex-dependent effects on morphine reinforcing and the opioid system in adulthood. Morphine reinforcing was studied under a progressive ratio (PR) reinforcement schedule in adult male and female rats that previously acquired morphine self-administration under a fixed ratio 1 (FR1) schedule. Binding levels and functionality of mu-opioid receptors were also evaluated. Periadolescent cannabinoid exposure altered morphine self-administration and the opioid system in adult rats in a sex-dependent manner. CP-55,940-exposed males exhibited higher self-administration rates under a FR1, but not under a PR schedule. In females, CP-55,940 did not modify morphine self-administration under either schedule. Moreover, CP-55,940 also increased mu-opioid receptor levels in the subcallosal streak of pre-treated animals and decreased mu-opioid receptor functionality in the nucleus accumbens shell but again, only in males. Our data indicate that adult male rats exposed to the cannabinoid in adolescence self-administer more morphine than females, but only when the demands required by the schedule of reinforcement are low, which might be related to the decrease in mu-opioid receptor functionality in the NAcc-shell observed in these animals.

Drugs metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) such as analgesics may induce acute attacks in patients with hepatic porphyrias. In recent years, preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that cannabinoid pharmaceutical preparations may be potentially useful in the treatment of pain. The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of CP-55,940, a cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist, on the hepatic heme metabolism in mice. To this end, hepatic activities of aminolevulinic acid synthase (ALAS), heme oxygenase (HO) and CYP levels were determined in mice treated with CP-55,940 (0.5 mg/kg/day; i.p.; 5 or 24 days). Results showed that treatment with CP-55,940 decreased CYP concentrations by 80% and increased HO activity by 158%. However, ALAS activity also decreased by 37%, suggesting that regulatory free heme pool was not modified. Our findings indicate that CP-55,940 and its metabolites do not behave as porphyrinogenic drugs and may potentially be safe for treating pain in patients with acute porphyrias.

Affinities and efficacies of several reference cannabinoid ligands were investigated at central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors in three different species (rat, mouse, and human). The tested compounds belong to different chemical classes such as classical and non-classical terpene derivatives (Delta(8)-THC, Delta(9)-THC, HU 210, CP 55,940, CP 55,244, CP 55,243 and CP 47,947), aminoalkylindole (WIN 55,212-2, WIN 55,212-3) and diarylpyrazole cannabinoids (SR 141716A, SR 144528). As cannabinoid receptors have been shown to be mainly coupled to Gi/o type G- proteins, and by using the [(35)S]-GTPgammaS nucleotide binding modulation, we characterized the functional activity of these ligands which can act as agonists (positive intrinsic activity), partial agonists (partial positive intrinsic activity), antagonists (no intrinsic activity), or inverse agonists (negative intrinsic activity). To our knowledge, some derivatives (Delta(8)-THC, WIN 55,212-3, CP 55,243 and CP 47,947) have never been characterized in [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding assays and up to now, this study represents the largest survey of reference cannabinoids performed in unique experimental conditions and in the same laboratory.

We have studied the possible interaction between the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 (1 and 50 μg/kg) and the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635 (1 mg/kg) in the modulation of plus-maze and holeboard activity in Wistar adult male rats. In the plus-maze, the higher dose of CP 55,940 induced an anxiogenic-like effect, whereas the lower dose induced anxiolytic-like responses. The 5-HT1A antagonist, which was silent in this test, attenuated the anxiogenic, but not the anxiolytic, effect of CP 55,940. In the holeboard, the higher dose of CP 55,940 significantly decreased head-dipping duration, and WAY 100635, which did not affect exploratory head-dipping when administered alone, antagonized this effect. The administration of WAY 100635 significantly increased grooming behaviour, and this effect was inhibited by the two doses of CP 55,940, which did not exert any effect, per se, on this parameter. We provide the first evidence implicating 5-HT1A receptors in anxiety-related behavioural responses to a cannabinoid agonist. © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

In spite of the addictive properties of cannabinoids, under certain circumstances, they can evoke strong anxiogenic and aversive responses in humans and in animal tests of anxiety. Effects of different doses of CP 55,940 (10, 20, and 40 microg/kg) were tested in the low-light, familiar (LF) apparatus test condition of the social interaction test. The 40-microg/kg dose of CP 55,940 significantly decreased the time spent in social interaction, indicating an anxiogenic effect. This dose also had an independent effect of reducing locomotor activity. In rats tested undrugged 24 h after testing with 40 microg/kg, there was a significant anxiogenic effect, indicating conditioned anxiety. The group of rats injected with 40 microg/kg immediately after the social interaction test showed an unexpected significant anxiolytic effect when tested undrugged 24 h later. In an additional experiment, rats were tested in the high-light, familiar (HF) apparatus test condition after 10 or 40 microg/kg, and only those that were tested after 40 microg/kg showed an anxiogenic effect on the test day and a conditioned anxiogenic effect when tested undrugged 24 h later. Once again, those injected with 40 microg/kg after the social interaction test displayed an anxiolytic effect when tested undrugged 24 h later. We provide the first evidence for unconditioned and conditioned anxiogenic-like responses to a cannabinoid agonist in the social interaction test.

Three experiments examined the influence of pre-exposure to the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55940 ((-)-cis-3-(2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl)-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol) on the sensitization of morphine-induced locomotor hyperactivity and self-administration in Lewis rats. In Experiment 1, rats received daily injections of vehicle or CP 55940 (0.1 mg/kg for 7 days then 0.2 mg/kg for a further 7 days). Four weeks later, the locomotor response to morphine (10 mg/kg s.c.) was tested once per day over a 3-h period for 14 consecutive days. Rats given morphine showed hypoactivity during the first hour following morphine but hyperactivity during the second and third hours. A progressive increase in hyperactivity to morphine was seen over the 14 days of administration, which was significantly greater in rats pre-treated with CP 55940. In Experiment 2, rats were given morphine (10 mg/kg) once a day for 14 days in combination with either vehicle, CP 55940 (0.1 mg/kg) or the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716 (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride) (3 mg/kg). Both CP 55940 and SR 141716 initially inhibited the hyperactive response to morphine, but these effects gradually wore off and by the end of 14 days, hyperactivity was similar in all morphine-treated groups. When tested 3 weeks later for their response to morphine (10 mg/kg) given alone, rats previously given the morphine/CP 55940 combination, but not the SR 141716/morphine combination, showed a greater locomotor stimulation than those previously exposed to morphine only. In Experiment 3, rats were pre-exposed to CP 55940 or vehicle for 14 days and were subsequently trained to self-administer morphine intravenously (1 mg/kg per lever press) for 14 days. Rats pre-exposed to CP 55940 self-administered a significantly greater number of morphine infusions than vehicle pre-exposed rats. However, both active and inactive ('dummy') lever presses were increased by cannabinoid pre-treatment. Overall, these results suggest that cannabinoid pre-exposure can lead to an exaggeration of morphine-induced hyperactivity and may alter the reinforcing effects of morphine in Lewis rats. The implications for 'gateway' theories of cannabinoid effects in humans are discussed.

We have studied the possible interaction between three selective opioid-receptor antagonists, nor-binaltorphimine (NB: κ) (5 mg/kg), cyprodime (CY: μ) (10 mg/kg) and naltrindole (NTI: δ) (1 mg/kg), and the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940, in the modulation of anxiety (plus-maze) and adrenocortical activity (serum corticosterone levels by radioimmunoassay) in male rats. The holeboard was used to evaluate motor activity and directed exploration. CP 55,940 (75 μg/kg, but not 10 μg/kg) induced an anxiogenic-like effect, which was antagonised by NB. The other effects of CP 55,940 (75 μg/kg), a decreased holeboard activity and stimulation of adrenocortical activity, were not antagonised by any of the three opioid receptor antagonists. CY and NTI, when administered alone, induced marked reductions in motor activity, anxiogenic-like effects and stimulation of adrenocortical activity. The selective κ-opioid receptor antagonist NB, on its own, did not modify the level of anxiety but stimulated adrenocortical activity. We provide the first pharmacological evidence about the involvement of the κ-opioid receptor in the anxiogenic-like effect of CP 55,940. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Dibenzopyran (Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol) and aminoalkylindole [R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrolol[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl) methanone mesylate; (WIN55,212-2)] cannabinoids suppress vomiting produced by cisplatin via cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. This study investigates the antiemetic potential of the "nonclassical" cannabinoid CP55,940 [1alpha,2beta-(R)-5alpha]-(-)-5-(1,1-dimethyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl) cyclohexyl-phenol] against cisplatin-induced vomiting and assesses the presence and functionality of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in the least shrew (Cryptotis parva) brain. CP55,940 (0.025-0.3 mg/kg) reduced both the frequency of cisplatin-induced emesis (ID(50)=0.025 mg/kg) and the percentage of shrews vomiting (ID(50)=0.09 mg/kg). CP55,940 also suppressed shrew motor behaviors (ID(50)=0.06- 0.21 mg/kg) at such doses. The antiemetic and motor-suppressant actions of CP55,940 were countered by SR141716A [N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methylpyrazole-3-carboxamide], indicating both effects are cannabinoid CB(1) receptor-mediated. Autoradiographic studies with [3H]-SR141716A and [35S]-GTPgammaS binding revealed that the distribution of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and its activation pattern are similar to rodent brain and significant levels are present in brain loci (e.g., nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS)) that control emesis. The affinity rank order of structurally diverse cannabinoid ligands for cannabinoid CB(1) receptor in shrew brain is similar to rodent brain: HU-210=CP55,940=SR141716A>/=WIN55,212-2>/=delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol>methanandamide=HU-211=cannabidiol=2-arachidonoylglycerol. This affinity order is also similar and is highly correlated to the cannabinoid EC(50) potency rank order for GTPgammaS stimulation except WIN55,212-2 and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol potency order were reversed. The affinity and the potency rank order of tested cannabinoids were significantly correlated with their antiemetic ID(50) potency order against cisplatin-induced vomiting (CP55,940>WIN55,212-2=delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) as well as emesis produced by 2-arachidonoylglycerol or SR141716A (CP55,940>WIN55,212-2>delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol).

It has been suggested that cannabinoid agonists increase dopamine (DA) transmission in the mesolimbic dopamine system. However, evidence for such an effect is inconsistent. Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex is a behavioural paradigm that is modulated by an increase of mesolimbic dopamine. This study sought to ascertain whether or not a cannabinoid agonist, CP 55,940, mimicked the effects of amphetamine (a drug which increases dopamine release) on PPI. The first experiment measured the PPI of 16 male Wistar rats injected (i.p.) with different doses of CP 55,940 in a Latin-square design. A second experiment replicated the effects of the first experiment in a between-subjects design, and also examined the effects of using a 5% alcohol solution as a solvent for cannabinoid agonists, in comparison to the more inert detergent, Tween 80. In both experiments, CP 55,940 in Tween 80 significantly reduced basal activity, increased startle onset latencies and increased PPI, effects opposite to those of amphetamine. These results suggest that the net behavioural effects of cannabinoids are opposite to those of amphetamine. In addition, it was found that 1 ml/kg of a 5% alcohol solution has significant behavioural effects on its own, and reverses the effects of CP 55,940 on PPI.

The peripubertal period appears to be critical in relation to the abuse of cannabinoids and opioids in humans. However there is little information about the acute effects of cannabinoids and their interactions with opioids in young experimental animals. We have studied the effects of the cannabinoid agonist CP 55,940 (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg) on the nociceptive responses (tail immersion test) and holeboard activity of 40-day-old rats, and the involvement of the CB1 receptor (antagonism by SR 141716A, 3 mg/kg). The implication of the opioid system was evaluated using the opioid antagonist naloxone (1 mg/kg) and a combined treatment with subeffective doses of CP 55,940 (0.1 mg/kg) and morphine (1 mg/kg). The effects of CP 55,940 on the serum corticosterone levels (radioimmunoassay) and on the dopamine and DOPAC contents of discrete brain regions (high-performance liquid chromatography) were also assessed. The antinociceptive effect of CP 55,940 was of a similar magnitude at all the doses used. The results show the involvement of the CB1 receptor. The cannabinoid agonist significantly depressed the holeboard activity in a dose-dependent manner. The results indicate that the CB1 receptor is involved in the effects on motor activity but not in the effects on the exploratory activity. The behavioural effects of CP 55,940 were modulated by morphine. The cannabinoid agonist (0.6 mg/kg) induced a CB1-mediated increase in the serum corticosterone levels, but no effect on the dopaminergic systems of either the striatum or the limbic forebrain was found. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Cannabinoids appear atypical as drugs of abuse since controversial data exist concerning the ability to lower the thresholds for electrical self-stimulation (Stark and Dews, 1980; Gardner et al., 1988; Gardner, 1992) and to support self-administration (Martellotta et al., 1998; Tanda et al., 2000) or conditioned place preference in animals (Lepore et al., 1995; Parker and Gillies, 1995; McGregor et al., 1996; Sanudo-Pena et al., 1997; Chaperon et al., 1998; Hutcheson et al., 1998; Mallet and Beninger, 1998; Cheer et al., 2000; Valjent and Maldonado, 2000). Opioids and cannabinoids share some pharmacological properties (Manzanares et al., 1999). The most interactions were found in antinociception (Welch and Stevens, 1992; Smith et al., 1994) and, to a lesser extent, in drug reinforcement (Chen et al., 1990; Vela et al., 1995; Tanda et al., 1997). In the present study we asked whether: (1) a potent synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist, [(-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptil)-phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxy propyl) cyclohexanol] (CP 55,940) (from 10 to 40 microg/kg), which binds to the brain cannabinoid receptors with high affinity (Herkenham et al., 1991), would induce conditioned place preference, in comparison with heroin (from 0.1 to 5 mg/kg); (2) what type of receptor was involved; (3) what kind of interaction there was between the two drugs, when given in combination, on reward. CP 55,940 elicited a conditioned place preference only at a dose of 20 microg/kg similar in intensity to that of heroin (2 mg/kg). The reinforcing properties of the cannabinoid agonist were fully antagonised by pretreatment with the brain cannabinoid receptor-1 (CB(1)) antagonist, [N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl) 1-(2,4-dichloro-phenyl)-4-methyl pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride] (SR 141716A) and naloxone. The combination of CP 55,940 and heroin, at the reinforcing doses, led to a reward which did not show any additive effect. Taken together these findings are important for understanding how the cannabinoids produce reward and the interconnection of the opioid and cannabinoid system in the motivation.

In the present work, we investigated in the rat the possibility of functional interaction between opiate and cannabinoid systems at immune level comparatively with the central nervous system (CNS). Moderate analgesic doses of the synthetic cannabinoid compound CP-55,940 (0.2 mg/kg, i.p.) and morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) significantly inhibited the ConA-induced splenocyte proliferation and natural killer (NK) cytolytic activity. The acute co-administration of the two drugs resulted in an enhancement of antinociception while they did not yield any additive inhibition of the immune parameters. The CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist N-(Piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A; 3 mg/kg, i.p.) and the CB2 receptor antagonist N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethhyl bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR144528; 3 mg/kg, i.p.) did not block the central nor the immune effects of morphine; similarly, the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone did not attenuate CP-55,940-induced effects. Animals tolerant to CP-55,940-induced (0.2 mg/kg, i.p.; twice a day for 4 days) or morphine-induced analgesia (5 mg/kg, s.c.; twice a day for 6 days) also developed tolerance to their acute immunosuppressive effects. Concomitantly, animals became cross-resistant to the immunosuppressive effects while an asymmetric cross-tolerance developed for analgesia. Our data demonstrated the existence of an interaction between cannabinoids and opiates at the immune level that differs from the interaction present in the CNS.

Differences in the distribution of cannabinoid receptor (studied by receptor binding radioautography using the synthetic psychoactive cannabinoid ligand [3H]CP55,940) and its mRNA (studied by in situ hybridization histochemistry using oligonucleotide probes complementary to rat cannabinoid receptor cDNA) have been investigated in the rat striatum during ageing. The striata of old rats (24 months) show a 50% reduction in expression of cannabinoid receptors and mRNA levels when compared with young (3 months) equivalents. Thus, changes in cannabinoid receptor gene expression appear to be partially responsible for age-related loss of these receptors.