1. Predictors of consent to cell line creation and immortalisation in a South African schizophrenia genomics study
- Author
-
Dan J. Stein, Stephanus Van Wyk, Megan M. Campbell, Odwa A. Ntola, Sibonile G. Mqulwana, Deborah Jonker, Adele Pretorius, Zukiswa Zingela, Ezra Susser, Megan Malan, Jantina de Vries, Michael M. Mndini, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Faculty of Health Sciences
- Subjects
Male ,Biomedical Research ,Health (social science) ,Logistic regression ,Consent ,South Africa ,0302 clinical medicine ,Community benefit ,Ethnicity ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Biological Specimen Banks ,media_common ,lcsh:R723-726 ,Informed Consent ,Health Policy ,Genomics ,06 humanities and the arts ,Middle Aged ,Biobank ,humanities ,language ,Female ,Psychology ,Research Article ,Adult ,Cell immortalisation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Neuropsychiatric genomics ,0603 philosophy, ethics and religion ,Cell Line ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,Perception ,medicine ,Humans ,Descriptive statistics ,Predictors ,Mental illness ,medicine.disease ,language.human_language ,Issues, ethics and legal aspects ,Xhosa ,Philosophy of medicine ,Case-Control Studies ,Family medicine ,Schizophrenia ,060301 applied ethics ,lcsh:Medical philosophy. Medical ethics - Abstract
Background Cell line immortalisation is a growing component of African genomics research and biobanking. However, little is known about the factors influencing consent to cell line creation and immortalisation in African research settings. We contribute to addressing this gap by exploring three questions in a sample of Xhosa participants recruited for a South African psychiatric genomics study: First, what proportion of participants consented to cell line storage? Second, what were predictors of this consent? Third, what questions were raised by participants during this consent process? Methods 760 Xhose people with schizophrenia and 760 controls were matched to sex, age, level of education and recruitment region. We used descriptive statistics to determine the proportion of participants who consented to cell line creation and immortalization. Logistic regression methods were used to examine the predictors of consent. Reflections from study recruiters were elicited and discussed to identify key questions raised by participants about consent. Results Approximately 40% of participants consented to cell line storage. The recruiter who sought consent was a strong predictor of participant’s consent. Participants recruited from the South African Eastern Cape (as opposed to the Western Cape), and older participants (aged between 40 and 59 years), were more likely to consent; both these groups were more likely to hold traditional Xhosa values. Neither illness (schizophrenia vs control) nor education (primary vs secondary school) were significant predictors of consent. Key questions raised by participants included two broad themes: clarification of what cell immortalisation means, and issues around individual and community benefit. Conclusions These findings provide guidance on the proportion of participants likely to consent to cell line immortalisation in genomics research in Africa, and reinforce the important and influential role that study recruiters play during seeking of this consent. Our results reinforce the cultural and contextual factors underpinning consent choices, particularly around sharing and reciprocity. Finally, these results provide support for the growing literature challenging the stigmatizing perception that people with severe mental illness are overly vulnerable as a target group for heath research and specifically genomics studies.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF