Search

Mandibular movement is complex and individual due to variations in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Consequently, patient-centered dentistry should incorporate patients' specific anatomy and condylar function in treatment planning. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rt-MRI) visualizes relevant structures and tracks mandibular movement. However, current assessments rely on qualitative observations or time-consuming manual tracking, lacking reliability. This study developed an automatic tracking algorithm for mandibular movement in rt-MRI using least mean square registration (LMS) and compared it to manual tracking (MT) during mouth opening. Ten participants with skeletal class I underwent rt-MRI (10 frames/s). The same operator tracked the condylar pathway for the two methods, setting 2000 landmarks (2 landmarks x100 frames x10 participants) for MT and 210 landmarks (3 landmarks x7 frames x10 participants) for LMS. Time required, superimposition error, and the distance between tracked condylar pathways were compared between methods. LMS tracking was 76% faster and showed significantly better superimposition (0.0289 ± 0.0058) than MT (0.059 ± 0.0145) (p = 0.002). During one-third of the movement, the pathways tracked by both methods were more than 1 mm and 1° apart. These findings highlight the benefits of automatic condylar movement tracking in rt-MRI, laying the groundwork for more objective and quantitative observation of TMJ function., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) is essential for diagnosing and comprehending temporomandibular joint (TMJ) movements. Current methods for tracking and analysis require manual landmark placement on each acquisition frame. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability of placing cephalometric landmarks in frames from a dynamic real-time TMJ MRI., Material and Methods: Four real-time MRIs of the right TMJ were taken during mandibular movement at ten frames per second. Seven dentists identified ten landmarks on two frames (intercuspal position-ICP-and maximum mouth opening-MMO) twice at a two-week interval, yielding 112 tracings. Six typical cephalometric measurements (angles and distances) were derived from these landmarks. The reliabilities of landmarks and measurements were evaluated using distance-based (dbICC), linear mixed effect model intraclass correlation (lmeICC), and standard ICC., Results: The average inter-rater reliability for the landmarks stood at 0.92 (dbICC) and 0.93 (lmeICC). The intra-rater reliability scores were 0.97 and 0.98. Over 80% of the landmarks showed an ICC greater than 0.98 (inter-rater) and over 0.99 (intra-rater). The lowest landmark ICC was observed for the orbitale and the oblique ridge of the mandibular ramus. However, the cephalometric angle and distance measurements derived from these landmarks showed only moderate to good reliability, whereas the reliability in the frames with ICP was better than those with MMO. Measurements performed in the ICP frame were more reliable than measurements in the MMO frame., Conclusion: While dentists reliably localize isolated landmarks in real-time MRIs, the cephalometric measurements derived from them remain inconsistent. The better results in ICP than MMO are probably due to a more familiar jaw position. The higher error rate of the TMJ measurements in MMO could be associated with a lack of training in real-time MRI analysis in dentistry., (© 2024. The Author(s).)