Search

The development of outcome measures that can track the recovery of reinnervated muscle would benefit the clinical investigation of new therapies which hope to enhance peripheral nerve repair. The primary objective of this study was to assess the validity of volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as an outcome measure of muscle reinnervation by testing its reproducibility, responsiveness and relationship with clinical indices of muscular function. Over a 3-year period 25 patients who underwent nerve transfer to reinnervate elbow flexor muscles were assessed using intramuscular electromyography (EMG) and MRI (median post-operative assessment time of 258 days, ranging from 86 days pre-operatively to 1698 days post- operatively). Muscle power (Medical Research Council (MRC) grade) and Stanmore Percentage of Normal Elbow Assessment (SPONEA) assessment was also recorded for all patients. Sub-analysis of peak volitional force (PVF), muscular fatigue and co-contraction was performed in those patients with MRC > 3. The responsiveness of each parameter was compared using Pearson or Spearman correlation. A Hierarchical Gaussian Process (HGP) was implemented to determine the ability of volumetric MRI measurements to predict the recovery of muscular function. Reinnervated muscle volume per unit Body Mass Index (BMI) demonstrated good responsiveness (R 2  = 0.73, p < 0.001). Using the temporal and muscle volume per unit BMI data, a HGP model was able to predict MRC grade and SPONEA with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.73 and 1.7 respectively. Muscle volume per unit BMI demonstrated moderate to good positive correlations with patient reported impairments of reinnervated muscle; co- contraction (R 2  = 0.63, p = 0.02) and muscle fatigue (R 2  = 0.64, p = 0.04). In summary, volumetric MRI analysis of reinnervated muscle is highly reproducible, responsive to post-operative time and demonstrates correlation with clinical indices of muscle function. This encourages the view that volumetric MRI is a promising outcome measure for muscle reinnervation which will drive advancements in motor recovery therapy., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Mapping axon diameters within the central and peripheral nervous system could play an important role in our understanding of nerve pathways, and help diagnose and monitor an array of neurological disorders. Numerous diffusion MRI methods have been proposed for imaging axon diameters, most of which use conventional single diffusion encoding (SDE) spin echo sequences. However, a growing number of studies show that oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) sequences can provide additional advantages over conventional SDE sequences. Recent theoretical results suggest that this is especially the case in realistic scenarios, such as when fibres have unknown or dispersed orientation. In the present study, we adopt the ActiveAx approach to experimentally investigate the extent of these advantages by comparing the performances of SDE and trapezoidal OGSE in viable nerve tissue. We optimise SDE and OGSE ActiveAx protocols for a rat peripheral nerve tissue and test their performance using Monte Carlo simulations and a 800 mT/m gradient strength pre-clinical imaging experiment. The imaging experiment uses excised sciatic nerve from a rat's leg placed in a MRI compatible viable isolated tissue (VIT) maintenance chamber, which keeps the tissue in a viable physiological state that preserves the structural complexity of the nerve and enables lengthy scan times. We compare model estimates to histology, which we perform on the nerve post scanning. Optimisation produces a three-shell SDE and OGSE ActiveAx protocol, with the OGSE protocol consisting of one SDE sequence and two low-frequency oscillating gradient waveform sequences. Both simulation and imaging results show that the OGSE ActiveAx estimates of the axon diameter index have a higher accuracy and a higher precision compared to those from SDE. Histology estimates of the axon diameter index in our nerve tissue samples are 4-5.8 μm and these are excellently matched with the OGSE estimates 4.2-6.5 μm, while SDE overestimates at 5.2-8 μm for the same sample. We found OGSE estimates to be more precise with on average a 0.5 μm standard deviation compared to the SDE estimates which have a 2 μm standard deviation. When testing the robustness of the estimates when the number of the diffusion gradient directions reduces, we found that both OGSE and SDE estimates are affected, however OGSE is more robust to these changes than the SDE. Overall, these results suggest, quantitatively and in in vivo conditions, that low-frequency OGSE sequences may provide improved accuracy of axon diameter mapping compared to standard SDE sequences., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01342-y. Correction to: I Scientific Reports i https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01342-y, published online 17 November 2021 The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author James B. Phillips which was incorrectly given as James Benjamin Phillips. [Extracted from the article]