Search

Purpose: To compare three-dimensional (3D) mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography with conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography for depiction and definition of intrahepatic biliary anatomy in liver transplant donor candidates., Materials and Methods: One hundred eight healthy liver transplant donor candidates were examined with two MR cholangiographic methods. All candidates gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by the institutional review board. First, breath-hold transverse and coronal half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo and breath-hold oblique coronal heavily T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences were performed. Second, mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced breath-hold fat-suppressed 3D gradient-echo sequences were performed through the ducts (oblique coronal plane) and through the entire liver (transverse plane). Interpretation of biliary anatomy findings, particularly variants affecting right liver lobe biliary drainage, and degree of interpretation confidence at both 3D mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography and T2-weighted MR cholangiography were recorded and compared by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Then, consensus interpretations of both MR image sets together were performed. Intraoperative cholangiography was the reference-standard examination for 51 subjects who underwent right lobe hepatectomy. The McNemar test was used to compare the accuracies of the individual MR techniques with that of the consensus interpretation of both image sets together and to compare each technique with intraoperative cholangiography., Results: Biliary anatomy was visualized with mangafodipir trisodium enhancement in all patients. Mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced image findings agreed with findings seen at combined interpretations significantly more often than did T2-weighted image findings (in 107 [99%] vs 88 [82%] of 108 donor candidates, P < .001). Confidence was significantly higher with the mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced images than with the T2-weighted images (mean confidence score, 4.5 vs 3.4; P < .001). In the 51 candidates who underwent intraoperative cholangiography, mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced imaging correctly depicted the biliary anatomy more often than did T2-weighted imaging (in 47 [92%] vs 43 [84%] donor candidates, P = .14), whereas the two MR imaging techniques combined correctly depicted the anatomy in 48 (94%) candidates., Conclusion: Mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced 3D MR cholangiography depicts intrahepatic biliary anatomy, especially right duct variants, more accurately than does conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography., ((c) RSNA, 2004.)

The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients who undergo transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis is not known. We prospectively evaluated 24 patients with known HCC who underwent MRI and subsequent transplantation within 60 days (mean, 20 days). Using a phased-array coil at 1.5T, breath-hold turbo STIR and T2-weighted MR images were performed. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI was performed using a two- or three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequence with images obtained in the hepatic arterial, portal venous, and equilibrium phases. The prospective interpretation of the MR study was directly compared with thin-section pathology evaluation of the explanted livers. All 24 patients had at least one HCC, and MR diagnosed tumor in 21 (88%) of these patients. On a lesion-by-lesion basis, MRI depicted 39 of 118 HCC for an overall sensitivity of 33%. MRI detected five (100%) of five lesions >5 cm, 20 (100%) of 20 lesions >2 cm but not exceeding 5 cm, 11 (52%) of 21 lesions between 1 and 2 cm, and three (4%) of 72 lesions <1 cm. Of the nine patients with carcinomatosis (innumerable lesions less than 1 cm), MR detected three lesions in one patient. Of the 15 dysplastic nodules found at pathology, MRI depicted a single 1.8-cm high-grade lesion, for a sensitivity of 7%. In conclusion, MRI is sensitive for the detection of HCC measuring at least 2 cm in diameter but is insensitive for the diagnosis of small HCC (<2 cm) and carcinomatosis.

Objective: Our purpose was to evaluate a comprehensive MR imaging strategy for recipients of liver transplants that relies on dynamic interpolated three-dimensional (3D) MR imaging for simultaneous vascular, parenchymal, and extrahepatic imaging., Materials and Methods: Twenty-three consecutive adult patients underwent 30 MR imaging examinations between 2 days and 99 months (mean, 15 months) after transplantation using a breath-hold 3D gradient-echo sequence (TR range/TE range, 3.7-4.7/1.8-1.9; flip angle, 12-30 degrees ) with an intermittent fat-saturation pulse and interpolation in the section-select direction to enable pixel size 3 mm or less in all dimensions. Unenhanced and triphasic contrast-enhanced 3D imaging (average dose, 0.13 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine) was performed. A subset of patients (n = 13) also underwent MR cholangiopancreatography using half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo imaging. MR imaging examinations were correlated with digital subtraction angiography (n = 8), contrast-enhanced cholangiography (n = 9), sonography (n = 13), and histopathology (n = 14)., Results: MR imaging revealed abnormal findings in 27 (90%) of 30 examinations, including vascular disease in nine, biliary complications in four, and evidence of intra- or extra-hepatic hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in six. Digital subtraction angiography confirmed seven MR angiography examinations but suggested disease overestimation in one. Contrast-enhanced cholangiography confirmed findings of MR cholangiopancreatography in seven cases but suggested disease underestimation in two., Conclusion: Dynamic interpolated 3D MR imaging combined with dedicated MR cholangiopancreatography can provide a comprehensive assessment of vascular, biliary, parenchymal, and extrahepatic complications in most recipients of liver transplants.

Objective: Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of MR imaging as a comprehensive preoperative imaging test for examination of liver donor candidates for adult-to-adult right lobe transplantation., Subjects and Methods: Twenty-five consecutive donor candidates were examined at 1.5 T using a torso phased array coil with breath-hold T1- and T2-weighted imaging of the abdomen, MR cholangiography using T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging, and MR angiography and venography of the liver using two interpolated three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo sequences (average dose of gadolinium contrast material, 0.17 mmol/kg). Images were interpreted for liver parenchymal and extrahepatic abnormalities; measurements of right and left lobe liver volumes; definition of hepatic arterial, portal venous, and hepatic venous anatomy; and definition of the biliary branching pattern. Findings were compared with those of conventional angiography in 13 patients, 11 of whom also had surgical findings for comparison., Results: Nine patients were excluded as candidates for donation on the basis of MR imaging findings that included parenchymal or extrahepatic abnormalities in five patients, vascular anomalies in two, and biliary anomalies in three. Two patients who did not undergo surgery underwent conventional angiography that confirmed MR angiographic findings except for a small (<2 mm) accessory left hepatic artery missed on MR imaging. Of the nine patients who underwent successful right hepatectomy, all MR imaging findings were corroborated intraoperatively. In two patients, right hepatectomy was aborted at laparotomy because of intraoperative cholangiography findings; in one of them, the biliary finding was unsuspected on MR imaging., Conclusion: A comprehensive MR imaging examination has the potential to serve as the sole preoperative imaging modality for living adult-to-adult liver donor candidates provided improvements in definition of intrahepatic biliary anatomy can be achieved.

Purpose: To determine the sensitivity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for detection of siderotic nodules in patients with cirrhosis and whether the frequency of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and dysplastic nodules is greater if siderotic nodules are present., Materials and Methods: MR imaging (1.5 T) was performed within 0-117 days (mean, 30 days) before liver transplantation in 77 patients. Two readers retrospectively evaluated gradient-echo (GRE) (echo time [TE], > or = 9 and 4-5 msec) and turbo short inversion time inversion-recovery or T2-weighted images for low-signal-intensity nodules. Whole-explant pathologic correlation was available in every case., Results: At explantation, 28 (36%) of 77 patients had HCC, 25 (32%) had dysplastic nodules, and nine (12%) had both; 35 (45%) patients had siderotic nodules. The sensitivity of GRE imaging with 9-msec or longer TE for the detection of siderotic nodules was 80% (28 of 35) but decreased to 31% (11 of 35) with 4-5-msec TE. Frequency of HCC was not significantly higher (P =.27) in patients with (43% [15 of 35]) than in patients without (31% [13 of 42]) siderotic nodules. Frequency of dysplastic nodules also was not significantly higher (P =.42) in patients with (37% [13 of 35]) than in patients without (29% [12 of 42]) siderotic nodules., Conclusion: Sensitivity of MR imaging for the detection of siderotic nodules was improved with use of GRE pulse sequences with longer TEs of 9 msec or greater (80%) versus 4-5 msec (31%); however, there was no significant increased frequency of HCC or dysplastic nodules in patients with pathologically proved siderotic nodules.

Objective: To determine if iron containing "siderotic" nodules detected at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are regenerative (RN) or dysplastic (DN) and to attempt to identify features that may distinguish them., Material and Methods: MR imaging (1.5 T) was performed on 77 cirrhotic patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation within 0-117 days (mean 30 days) of MR imaging. Two readers retrospectively evaluated breath-hold gradient-echo pulse sequences (echo time > or =9.0 ms, flip angle < or =45 degrees) for the presence of hypointense nodules, which were classified as micronodular (< or =3 mm), macronodular (>3 mm), or mixed. Nodule distribution was classified as focal (<5), scattered (5-20), or diffuse (>20) per slice. Thin section pathologic correlation was available in all cases, and Prussian blue iron stains were performed., Results: Of 35 patients with pathologically proven siderotic nodules, 10 (29%) had at least 2 siderotic DN. MR detected siderotic nodules in 10 of 10 (100%) patients with siderotic DN and RN, and in 18 of 25 patients (72%) with siderotic RN only., Conclusion: Siderotic RN cannot be reliably distinguished from siderotic DN with MR imaging, and therefore the widely used term "siderotic regenerative nodule" should be avoided and replaced by "siderotic nodule."