1. A comparison of liver fat fraction measurement on MRI at 3T and 1.5T.
- Author
-
Athithan L, Gulsin GS, House MJ, Pang W, Brady EM, Wormleighton J, Parke KS, Graham-Brown M, St Pierre TG, Levelt E, and McCann GP
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Female, Adult, Reproducibility of Results, Fatty Liver diagnostic imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Liver diagnostic imaging, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Purpose: Volumetric liver fat fraction (VLFF) measurements were made using the HepaFat-Scan® technique at 1.5T and 3T to determine the agreement between the measurements obtained at the two fields., Methods: Sixty patients with type 2 diabetes (67% male, mean age 50.92 ± 6.56yrs) and thirty healthy volunteers (50% male, mean age 48.63 ± 6.32yrs) were scanned on 1.5T Aera and 3T Skyra (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) MRI scanners on the same day using the HepaFat-Scan® gradient echo protocol with modification of echo times for 3T (TEs 2.38, 4.76, 7.14 ms at 1.5T and 1.2, 2.4, 3.6 ms at 3T). The 3T analyses were performed independently of the 1.5T analyses by a different analyst, blinded from the 1.5T results. Data were analysed for agreement and bias using Bland-Altman methods and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). A second cohort of 17 participants underwent interstudy repeatability assessment of VLFF measured by HepaFat-Scan® at 3T., Results: A small, but statistically significant mean bias of 0.48% was observed between 3T and 1.5T with 95% limits of agreement -2.2% to 3.2% VLFF. The ICC for agreement between field strengths was 0.983 (95% CI 0.972-0.989). In the repeatability cohort studied at 3T the repeatability coefficient was 4.2%. The ICC for agreement was 0.971 (95% CI 0.921-0.989)., Conclusion: There is minimal bias and excellent agreement between the measures of VLFF using the HepaFat-Scan® at 1.5 and 3T. The test retest repeatability coefficient at 3T is comparable to the 95% limits of agreement between 1.5T and 3T suggesting that measurements can be made interchangeably between field strengths., Competing Interests: MH is employed part time by Resonance Health Ltd; WP is employed by Resonance Health Ltd. MH holds shares in Resonance Health Ltd. TSP was a former consultant for Resonance Health Ltd. The authors would like to declare the following patents/patent applications associated with this research: TSP and MH are inventors on a patent (No. 2012350165) for measuring liver fat. HepaFat-Scan® is owned and marketed by Resonance Health Ltd. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF