Search

Background Few studies have compared abbreviated breast MRI with full-protocol MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC), and they have not adjusted for confounding variables. Purpose To compare abbreviated breast MRI with full-protocol MRI in women with PHBC by using propensity score matching to adjust for confounding variables. Materials and Methods In this single-center retrospective study, women with PHBC who underwent full-protocol MRI (January 2008-August 2017) or abbreviated MRI (September 2017-April 2019) were identified. With use of a propensity score-matched cohort, screening performances were compared between the two MRI groups with the McNemar test or a propensity score-adjusted generalized estimating equation. The coprimary analyses were sensitivity and specificity. The secondary analyses were the cancer detection rate, interval cancer rate, positive predictive value for biopsies performed (PPV3), and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 short-term follow-up rate. Results There were 726 women allocated to each MRI group (mean age ± SD, 50 years ± 8 for both groups). Abbreviated MRI and full-protocol MRI showed comparable sensitivity (15 of 15 cancers [100%; 95% CI: 78, 100] vs nine of 13 cancers [69%; 95% CI: 39, 91], respectively; P = .17). Abbreviated MRI showed higher specificity than full-protocol MRI (660 of 711 examinations [93%; 95% CI: 91, 95] vs 612 of 713 examinations [86%; 95% CI: 83, 88], respectively; P < .001). The cancer detection rate (21 vs 12 per 1000 examinations), interval cancer rate (0 vs five per 1000 examinations), and PPV3 (61% [14 of 23 examinations] vs 41% [nine of 22 examinations]) were comparable (all P < .05). The BI-RADS category 3 short-term follow-up rate of abbreviated MRI was less than half that of full-protocol MRI (5% [36 of 726 examinations] vs 12% [84 of 726 examinations], respectively; P < .001). Ninety-three percent (14 of 15) of cancers detected at abbreviated MRI were node-negative T1-invasive cancers ( n = 6) or ductal carcinoma in situ ( n = 8). Conclusion Abbreviated breast MRI showed comparable sensitivity and superior specificity to full-protocol MRI in breast cancer detection in women with a personal history of breast cancer. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article .

Objective: To compare the performance of simulated abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) and full diagnostic (FD)-MRI in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions detected by MRI and investigate the features of discrepant lesions of the two protocols., Materials and Methods: An AB-MRI set with single first postcontrast images was retrospectively obtained from an FD-MRI cohort of 111 lesions (34 malignant, 77 benign) detected by contralateral breast MRI in 111 women (mean age, 49.8. ± 9.8; range, 28-75 years) with recently diagnosed breast cancer. Five blinded readers independently classified the likelihood of malignancy using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System assessments. McNemar tests and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses were performed. The imaging and pathologic features of the discrepant lesions of the two protocols were analyzed., Results: The sensitivity of AB-MRI for lesion characterization tended to be lower than that of FD-MRI for all readers (58.8-82.4% vs. 79.4-100%), although the findings of only two readers were significantly different ( p < 0.05). The specificity of AB-MRI for lesion characterization was higher than that of FD-MRI for 80% of readers (39.0-74.0% vs. 19.5-45.5%, p ≤ 0.001). The AUC of AB-MRI was comparable to that of FD-MRI for all readers ( p > 0.05). Fifteen percent (5/34) of the cancers were false-negatives on AB-MRI. More suspicious margins or internal enhancement on the delayed phase images were related to the discrepancies., Conclusion: The overall performance of AB-MRI was similar to that of FD-MRI in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. AB-MRI showed lower sensitivity and higher specificity than FD-MRI, as 15% of the cancers were misclassified compared to FD-MRI., Competing Interests: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology.)

We combined the abbreviated and ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique with the standard MRI protocol and compared lesion characterization quantitatively and qualitatively to the standard MRI protocol.Fifty-six patients with breast cancer who underwent MRI from June 2017 to May 2018 and fulfilled our inclusion criteria were included. Three radiologists measured the lesion sizes, described the MRI findings using BI-RADS lexicon, and demarcated the regions of interest to extract the volumetric quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters. We used Pearson's correlation analysis comparing the quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters. To evaluate the inter-observer variability, we calculated the intra-correlation coefficient (ICC). We also analysed the correlation in BI-RADS lexicon.There were 45 (80.4%) luminal and 11 (19.6%) non-luminal breast cancers, and the most common tumour subtype was invasive carcinoma (n = 48, 85.7%), followed by ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 8, 14.3%). Regarding correlation between the quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters, K significantly correlated with the wash-in factor (r, 0.862; P < .001) and AUC value (r, 0.951; P < .001). The lesion size measured by standard and combined abbreviated-ultrafast phases and that from the surgical pathological specimens showed moderate agreement (ICC range, 0.516-0.578). The ICCs among the 3 readers were excellent for lesion size measurement, BI-RADS lexicon regarding lesion type, mass shape, margin, internal enhancement, non-mass enhancement distribution, and internal enhancement by the standard and combined abbreviated-ultrafast protocols.The use of the modified and combined abbreviated-ultrafast MRI protocol provides a reliable measurement of the quantitative parameters and may aid in the screening of breast cancer.

Background: Breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging does not usually assess axillary lymph nodes -using dedicated axillary sequence. The additional utility of dedicated axillary sequence is poorly understood. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of dedicated axillary imaging sequence for evaluation of axillary lymph node., Methods: In this retrospective study from January 2018 to March 2018, 750 consecutive women underwent breast MR imaging. 263 patients were excluded, due to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 235), incomplete histopathological information (n = 14) and follow-up loss (n = 14), 487 women were included. Two radiologists scored lymph node on confidence level scale from 0 (definitely benign) to 4 (definitely malignant), -using standard MR and dedicated axillary imaging sequences. Diagnostic performance parameters were compared and calculated correlation coefficient of quantitative features (largest dimension, cortical thickness, and the ratio of cortical thickness to largest dimension of lymph node)., Results: 68 (14.0%) were node-positive and 419 (86.0%) were node-negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, negative predictive values and accuracy were respectively, 66.2, 93.3, 61.6, 94.4, and 89.5% for dedicated axillary sequence and 64.7, 94.0, 63.8, 94.3, 89.9% for standard MR sequence The dedicated axillary and standard sequences s did not exhibit significant differences in detection of positive lymph nodes (AUC, 0.794 for standard and 0.798 for dedicated axillary sequence, P = 0.825). The cortical thickness appeared to be the most discriminative quantitative measurement using both axillary (AUC, 0.846) and standard sequences (AUC, 0.823), with high correlation coefficient (0.947)., Conclusion: Evaluation of axillary nodal status using standard breast MR imaging is comparable to dedicated axillary MR imaging.

Background An extensive intraductal component (EIC) in breast cancer is an independent risk factor for local recurrence after surgery, especially in young, premenopausal women. Few studies have analyzed long-term outcomes or imaging features of EIC-positive breast cancer. Purpose To assess the prognostic value of EIC on recurrence-free and overall survival in breast cancer and evaluate imaging features of EIC-positive breast cancer by using mammography, US, and MRI. Materials and Methods A retrospective study of 6816 consecutive women with surgically diagnosed invasive breast cancer between January 2007 and December 2012 was performed. After individual matching, women were allocated into either an EIC-positive or an EIC-negative group. Imaging factors associated with prognosis were investigated. The recurrence-free and overall survival rates were compared. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze the effect of EIC. Results Among 6136 included women (mean age, 48.9 years ± 9.8), 1800 EIC-positive and 4336 EIC-negative breast cancers were identified. After matching according to EIC presence was performed, 1551 women were allocated into each group. The mean follow-up period was 79.9 months. The local-regional recurrence rate in the EIC-positive group was higher than that in the EIC-negative group (39.4% [63 of 160] vs 25.5% [37 of 145]; P = .001). However, there were no significant differences in total recurrence rate (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9, 1.4; P = .21) or death (HR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.8, 1.5; P = .45). EIC was not a significant independent factor for recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.9, 1.4; P = .45) or death (HR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.8, 1.6; P = .44) in multivariable analyses. Calcification and non-mass lesions were more commonly seen at US and MRI in the EIC-positive group than in the EIC-negative group ( P < .001). Conclusion The presence of an extensive intraductal component in women with invasive breast cancer did not affect overall survival or recurrence-free survival. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Eby in this issue.

Objective: To investigate and compare the effect of preoperative breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes among patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC)., Methods: A total of 287 ILC patients between January 2005 and December 2012 were included. One hundred twenty (41.8%) had undergone preoperative breast MR imaging (MR group) and 167 (58.2%) had not (no MR group). Two groups were matched for 21 covariates in terms of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical features. We compared unmatched variables between the patients with and without breast MR imaging using the chi-square or Student's t test. Comparisons of matched data were performed with McNemar's test or test of symmetry for categorical variables and paired t test for continuous variables. The RFS and OS outcomes were compared using the Kaplan-Meier estimates. MR effects were estimated after adjusting for significant potential confounders of specific outcomes in the multivariable modeling., Results: In the matched cohort, no statistically significant association was observed between MR imaging and total recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.096; p = 0.821), loco-regional recurrence (HR, 1.204; p = 0.796), contralateral breast recurrence (HR, 0.945; p = 0.952), or distant recurrence (HR, 1.020; p = 0.973). MR imaging was associated with improved OS with 51% reduction, but not significantly (HR, 0.485; p = 0.231). Analysis with multivariable Cox regression model indicated that MR imaging was not significant independent factor for better RFS (HR, 0.823; p = 0.586) or improved OS (HR, 0.478; p = 0.168)., Conclusion: Preoperative MR imaging is not significant prognostic factor and produces no apparent recurrence or survival outcome benefits in ILC patients., Key Points: • Preoperative breast MR imaging in invasive lobular carcinoma was associated with a better overall survival with 51% reduction, but not statistically significant. • Preoperative breast MR imaging does not show significant prognostic value in invasive lobular carcinoma as there is no apparent benefit in terms of recurrence or survival outcomes.

Purpose To investigate the association between preoperative breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and surgical outcomes in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) by using propensity score matching to decide whether MR examination is beneficial in the ILC subtype of breast cancer. Materials and Methods The authors identified 603 patients with ILC who underwent surgery between January 2005 and December 2016. Of the 603 patients, 369 (61.2%) underwent MR imaging. The authors calculated the MR detection rate of additional lesions that were occult at mammography and ultrasonography and analyzed any alterations in surgical management. After propensity score matching, 196 pairs of patients were allocated to the groups, and the 17 possible confounding variables regarding patient and tumor characteristics and various clinical features were well balanced between the patients who underwent MR imaging and those who did not. Surgical outcomes were compared. Results Of the 369 patients who underwent MR imaging, additional lesions were detected in 145 (39.3%); 95 of the 145 patients (65.5%) had malignant lesions. A change in surgical management occurred because of MR findings in 94 of the 369 patients (25.5%). According to pathologic findings, this change was appropriate for 84 of the 94 patients (89.4%). In the propensity score-matched analysis, breast MR imaging was associated with lower odds of repeat surgery (odds ratio, 0.140; P < .001) and similar likelihood of initial mastectomy (odds ratio, 0.876; P = .528) and final mastectomy (odds ratio, 0.744; P = .151) compared with patients without breast MR imaging. Conclusion Preoperative MR imaging is useful for detecting additional synchronous malignancy and significantly reducing the likelihood of repeat surgery without increasing the rate of mastectomy in patients with ILC. © RSNA, 2018.

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used to treat breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has replaced axillary lymph node dissection in patients who convert to node-negative status after NAC. However, few studies have evaluated the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in determining axillary lymph node status after NAC. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of breast ultrasonography and MRI in determining residual metastatic axillary lymph node status after NAC for breast cancer and to identify histopathological factors affecting radiological performance. Material and Methods This study included 157 patients who underwent initial and follow-up preoperative breast ultrasonography and MRI before NAC between January and December 2010. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and accuracy of ultrasonography, MRI, and their combinations were evaluated. Results The sensitivity of ultrasonography, MRI, and their combination in post-NAC axillary imaging was 60.00%, 57.33%, and 65.33%, respectively; the specificity was 60.47%, 72.09%, and 60.47%, respectively. The positive predictive value was highest with MRI (78.18%). On univariate analysis, positive estrogen receptor status was associated with misdiagnosis by ultrasonography ( P = 0.002), MRI ( P = 0.002), and their combination ( P = 0.001). When residual metastatic lymph nodes were present, lymph nodes with macrometastasis (>2.0 mm) were associated with correct ultrasonography-based diagnosis ( P = 0.0027). Conclusion Imaging assists in predicting axillary lymph node status in patients undergoing NAC; however, is imprudent to omit sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection for staging in women determined to be node-positive.

Introduction: Most enterovirus (EV) 71 infections manifest as mild cases of hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD)/herpangina with seasonal variations, having peak incidence during the summer. Meanwhile, EV 71 may involve the central nervous system (CNS), causing severe neurologic disease. In many cases, enteroviral encephalomyelitis involves the central midbrain, posterior portion of the medulla oblongata and pons, bilateral dentate nuclei of the cerebellum, and the ventral roots of the cervical spinal cord, and the lesions show hyperintensity on T2-weighted and fluid-attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. Our goal was to review usual and unusual magnetic resonance (MR) findings in CNS involvement of enteroviral infection., Methods: Among consecutive patients who had HFMD and clinically suspected encephalitis or myelitis and who underwent brain or spinal MR imaging, five patients revealed abnormal MR findings. Diffusion-weighted and conventional MR and follow-up MR images were obtained. From cerebrospinal fluid, stool, or nasopharyngeal swabs, EV 71 was confirmed in all patients., Results: MR imaging studies of two patients showed hyperintensity in the posterior portion of the brainstem on T2-weighted and FLAIR images, which is the well-known MR finding of EV 71 encephalitis. The remaining three cases revealed unusual manifestations: leptomeningeal enhancement, abnormal enhancement along the ventral roots at the conus medullaris level without brain involvement, and hyperintensity in the left hippocampus on T2/FLAIR images., Conclusion: EV 71 encephalomyelitis shows relatively characteristic MR findings; therefore, imaging can be helpful in radiologic diagnosis. However, physicians should also be aware of unusual radiologic manifestations of EV 71.

Purpose: To evaluate the added value of ultrafast MRI in abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC).Method: Between September 2017 and November 2019, consecutive postoperative surveillance AB-MRIs with ultrafast MRIs (20 images with a 4.0-second temporal resolution using 4D time-resolved angiography with keyhole technique) were retrospectively collected. Four blinded radiologists independently classified the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category for AB-MRI alone versus the combined protocol (AB-MRI + ultrafast MRI). Readers were recommended to change BI-RADS category according to the time to enhancement cut-off of 12 s in ultrafast MRI. McNemar test and generalized estimation equation model were used to compare the diagnostic performances.Results: A total of 867 MRI examinations in 867 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 51 years ± 8) were evaluated. The sensitivity of both protocols among all readers was the same, at 90% (9/10). Addition of ultrafast MRI improved the specificity (a mean of 95.3% vs. 88.6 %, p < 0.001 for all readers) and positive predictive value 1 (PPV1) (a mean of 21% vs. 10%, p < 0.001 for all readers) compared to AB-MRI alone. Downgrading BI-RADS category 3 to 2 in four readers in a mean of 6.7% (57 of 857) of negative or benign findings was the main reason for the improved specificity and PPV1.Conclusion: Addition of ultrafast MRI to AB-MRI improved the specificity and PPV1 by reducing unnecessary short-term follow-ups without compromising sensitivity in postoperative surveillance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]