1. Can an online battery match in-person cognitive testing in providing information about age-related cortical morphology?
- Author
-
Thienel R, Borne L, Faucher C, Behler A, Robinson GA, Fripp J, Giorgio J, Ceslis A, McAloney K, Adsett J, Galligan D, Martin NG, Breakspear M, and Lupton MK
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Internet, Brain diagnostic imaging, Brain anatomy & histology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Neuropsychological Tests, Cerebral Cortex diagnostic imaging, Cerebral Cortex physiology, Cerebral Cortex anatomy & histology, Aging physiology, Cognition physiology
- Abstract
Clinical identification of early neurodegenerative changes requires an accurate and accessible characterization of brain and cognition in healthy aging. We assessed whether a brief online cognitive assessment can provide insights into brain morphology comparable to a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. In 141 healthy mid-life and older adults, we compared Creyos, a relatively brief online cognitive battery, to a comprehensive in person cognitive assessment. We used a multivariate technique to study the ability of each test to inform brain morphology as indexed by cortical sulcal width extracted from structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI).We found that the online test demonstrated comparable strength of association with cortical sulcal width compared to the comprehensive in-person assessment.These findings suggest that in our at-risk sample online assessments are comparable to the in-person assay in their association with brain morphology. With their cost effectiveness, online cognitive testing could lead to more equitable early detection and intervention for neurodegenerative diseases., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: Data acquisition followed approval from the Human Research Ethics committees of QIMR Berghofer (P2193 and P2210), the University of Queensland (2016/HE001261), The University of Newcastle (H-2020-0439) and the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Written informed consent to participate and publish was obtained from all participants following local institutional ethics approval. Disclosure statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF