Search

Purpose: To evaluate the added value of ULTRAFAST-MR sequence to an abbreviated FAST protocol in comparison with FULL protocol to distinguish benign from malignant lesions in a population of women, regardless of breast MR imaging indication., Materials and Methods: From March 10th to September 22th, 2014, we retrospectively included a total of 70 consecutive patients with 106 histologically proven lesions (58 malignant and 48 benign) who underwent breast MR imaging for preoperative breast staging (n=38), high-risk screening (n=7), problem solving (n=18), and nipple discharge (n=4) with 12 time resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) acquisitions during contrast inflow interleaved in a regular high-resolution dynamic MRI protocol (FULL protocol). Two readers scored MR exams as either positive or negative and described significant lesions according to Bi-RADS lexicon with a TRICKS images (ULTRAFAST), an abbreviated protocol (FAST) and all images (FULL protocol). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated for each protocol and compared with McNemar's test., Results: For all readers, the combined FAST-ULTRAFAST protocol significantly improved the reading with a specificity of 83.3% and 70.8% in comparison with FAST protocol or FULL protocol, respectively, without change in sensitivity. By adding ULTRAFAST protocol to FAST protocol, readers 1 and 2 were able to correctly change the diagnosis in 22.9% (11/48) and 10.4% (5/48) of benign lesions, without missing any malignancy, respectively. Both interpretation and image acquisition times for combined FAST-ULTRAFAST protocol and FAST protocol were shorter compared to FULL protocol (p<0.001)., Conclusion: Compared to FULL protocol, adding ULTRAFAST to FAST protocol improves specificity, mainly in correctly reclassifying benign masses and reducing interpretation and acquisition time, without decreasing sensitivity., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the characterization of complex sonographic adnexal masses discovered in women during pregnancy.Study Design: The study population comprised 31 pregnant women (median age: 32 years (range: 19-42); mean gestation age of 16 weeks) referred to our institution for MR imaging for characterization of an adnexal mass discovered incidentally during routine ultrasound (US) for other indications. The population comprised of 31 women, with 36 adnexal lesions (mean size: 103mm [range: 20-290]), of which 27 were benign and 9 were malignant masses. Prospective US and MR reports were reviewed to determine the presence of a benign or malignant lesion. Two radiologists (R1 and R2) blinded to the final outcome, retrospectively evaluated the MR images using the criteria based on the ADNEXMR-SCORE and classified the lesion as benign or malignant. The reference standard was surgical pathology or at least a 1-year imaging follow-up.Results: Prospective US and MR imaging correctly identified the diagnosis in 27/36 (75%) (95% confidence interval (CI): 58.9%-86.2%) and in 32/36 (88.9%) (95% CI: 74.6%-95.6%) of lesions, respectively. MR imaging with ADNEXMR-SCORE allowed a correct diagnosis in 32/36 (88.9%) (95% CI: 74.6%-95.6%) of lesions for R1 and in 30/36 (83.3%) (95% CI: 68.1%-92.1%) of lesions for R2. The sensitivities and specificities of MR imaging using the MR ADNEXMR-SCORE were 100% (95% CI: 70.1%-1000%) for both readers and 85.1% (95% CI: 67.5%-94%) and 77.7% (95% CI: 59.2%-89.4%) for R1 and R2, respectively. No malignancy was classified as benign using MR criteria. The reproducibility between the two readers was almost perfect, with a kappa of 0.914.Conclusion: MR imaging is highly accurate for the characterization of complex adnexal masses incidentally discovered during pregnancy.Clinical Relevance: MR imaging can accurately characterize adnexal masses in pregnancy and could be useful in opting for expectant management until delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To study the long-term evolution of the bone marrow burden (BMB) score at MRI in patients with Gaucher disease (GD) under enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Material and methods: Forty patients treated for GD were retrospectively studied in a referral centre. BMB scores were assessed on spine and femur MR examinations performed between January 2003 and June 2014. The long-term evolution of the BMB scores was analyzed using a linear mixed model. Results: A total of 121 MRI examinations were performed during the study period with a mean follow-up of 7.1 years ± 5.6, an average rate of 3.1 MR examinations ± 1.7 per patient and an interval of 2.3 years ± 1.1 between examinations. Patients had received ERT during 12 years on average ± 6.7. The trend of BMB scores with time decreased significantly by 15 % (P = 0.008) during the total study period and 39 % (P = 0.01) during the first 5 years of treatment. No changes in BMB scores were observed after five years of treatment. Conclusion: In Gaucher patients, the trend of MRI BMB scores with time decreased significantly under ERT the first 5 years of treatment before a long-term stabilization. Key points: • Bone marrow infiltration of Gaucher patients responds to enzyme replacement therapy • MRI BMB score decreases mainly during the first five years of treatment • MRI BMB score tends to stabilize after five years of treatment • MR examinations could be limited after five years of treatment [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endometriosis is a complex gynecologic disorder characterized primarily by symptoms of pelvic pain, infertility, and altered quality of life. National and international guidelines highlight the diagnostic difficulties and lack of conclusive diagnostic tools for endometriosis. Furthermore, guidelines are becoming questionable at an increasingly rapid rate as new diagnostic techniques emerge. This work aims to provide a knowledge synthesis of the relevance of various diagnostic tools and to assess areas of improvement of conventional algorithms. MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 2021 to December 2023 using relevant key words. Articles evaluating the diagnostic relevance and performance of various tools were included and independently reviewed by the authors for eligibility. Included studies were assessed using the GRADE and QUADAS‐2 tools. Of the 4204 retrieved articles, 26 were included. While anamnesis and clinical examination do contribute to diagnostic accuracy, their level of evidence and impact on the diagnostic process remains limited. Although imaging techniques are recommended to investigate endometriosis, ultrasonography remains highly operator dependent. Magnetic resonance imaging appears to exhibit higher sensitivities than ultrasound. However, concerns persist with regards to the terminology, anatomical definition of lesions, and accuracies of both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Recently, several biological markers have been studied and cumulative evidence supports the contribution of noncoding RNAs to the diagnosis of endometriosis. Marginal improvements have been suggested for anamnesis, clinical examination, and imaging examinations. Conversely, some biomarkers, including the saliva microRNA signature for endometriosis, have emerged as diagnostic tools which inspire reflection on the revision of conventional diagnostic algorithms. Synopsis: Endometriosis diagnosis remains complex. In addition to anamnesis, clinical examination, and imaging techniques, biomarkers offer encouraging perspectives supporting their inclusion in diagnostic algorithms for endometriosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]